Camden Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 124.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with the Pharmacist and Pharmacy Services Nurse from the dispensing pharmacy and facility staff, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored consistent with manufacturer recommendations for temperature control in 1 of 3 medication refrigerators (located in the 1100/1200 hall medication room) and in 3 of 3 medication rooms (400/500 hall, 1100/1200 hall, and 700/800 hall) observed for storage and labeling of medications. The facility also failed to label medications in 1 of 4 medication carts (400/500 hall medication cart) observed for proper storage and labeling of medications. Findings included: 1. Review of the 1100/1200 hall refrigerator temperature log form for the month of June 2026 revealed that the expected temperature range was 36-46 Fahrenheit ( F) and if the temperature was not in range, one must document corrective action under the comments section of the form and recheck the temperature in one hour and record the recheck temperature on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to: label and date foods in the walk-in and reach-in refrigerators; date opened nutritional supplements and food brought in by resident's family member in 3 of 4 Nourishment refrigerator (Nourishment refrigerator #1, Nourishment refrigerator #2 and Nourishment refrigerator #3); and maintain the ice scoop holder clean in 1 of 4 nourishment rooms (Dogwood Nourishment room). These practices had the potential to affect food served to 122 of 124 residents. Findings included: 1 a. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 3/24/24 at 9:50 AM, revealed a plastic bag with 4 boiled eggs with no label, a white plastic bag with sliced meat with no label, a blue plastic bag with diced meat with no label, two individual plastic bags - one with 1/4 tomato and another with ½ tomato that was cut and had no label, and one plastic bag with half cut onion with no label. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 9:51 AM, the Dietary cook stated the sliced meat in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, physician, Rehab Consultant Physician Assistant (PA), resident, resident family, and staff interviews the facility failed to notify the physician that Resident #114 reported he had a scheduled outpatient dental appointment. The outpatient dental appointment was for teeth extractions and the facility physician was not given the opportunity prior to the appointment to review medications or consider holding the anticoagulant medication prior to the procedure. This was for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for anticoagulant use. (Resident #114). Findings included: Resident #114 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and unspecified atrial flutter. A review of physician order dated 4/7/23 revealed an order for Eliquis 2.5 milligrams to be administered by mouth twice a day. This order was discontinued on 1/31/24. A review of the January 2024 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of dental care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental care. (Resident #89). The findings included: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with dysphagia and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A review of dental consultation note dated 8/29/23 revealed resident #89 had root tips present for teeth #1,7,8,9,12, 18, and 20. A review of Resident #89's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment and to have no broken natural teeth. A telephone interview was conducted on 3/26/24 at 3:20 PM with the dental provider. She confirmed that Resident #89 has had root tips present since 8/29/23 for teeth #1,7,8,9,12, 18, and 20 which indicated these natural teeth had been broken. An interview was conducted with MDS nurse #1 on 03/26/24 at 3:53 PM. She revealed that she completed the dental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility's Quality's Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that were put in place following the complaint survey conducted on 8/23/23. This was for a repeat deficiency in the area of Notification of Change (F580). This deficiency was recited during the annual recertification survey conducted on 3/27/24. The repeated citations during the two surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assessment Assurance program (QAA). Findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F 580 Based on observations, record review, physician, Rehab Consultant Physician Assistant (PA), resident, resident family, and staff interviews the facility failed to notify the physician that Resident #114 reported he had a scheduled outpatient dental appointment. The outpatient dental appointment was for teeth extractions and the facility physician was not given the opportunity prior to the appointment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Regional Nurse Consultant interviews, the facility failed to notify the medical provider and resident representative after a resident, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes or an order to receive insulin, was mistakenly administered 50/50 insulin (combination of intermediate and fast acting insulin) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's admission physician orders dated 3/21/23 indicated no orders for the resident to receive insulin. A review of Progress Notes by Nurse #1 for Resident #1 dated 3/23/23 at 6:20 PM (Recorded as Late Entry on 03/24/2023 12:24 AM) revealed Nurse #1 gave 4 units of 50/50 insulin to Resident #1. Patient has remained stable with no adverse effects noted. There was no documentation in Nurse #1's progress of notification to inform the medical provider or resident representative of the medication error. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Regional Nurse Consultant interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when a nurse administered 50/50 insulin (combination of intermediate and fast acting insulin) subcutaneously (into the fat layer under the skin through an injection) to a resident who had no diagnosis of diabetes and no physician's order for the administration of insulin for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that did not include diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 3/21/23 revealed no care area for diabetes. Review of Resident #1's admission physician orders dated 3/21/23 indicated no orders for the resident to receive insulin. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired, and Resident #1 did not receive insulin injections. A review of Progress Notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC