The Carrolton of Lumberton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with resident, staff, Pharmacy Director and Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of narcotic pain medications (Tramadol, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone, and Oxycodone-Acetaminophen) for 9 of 9 residents reviewed for misappropriation of controlled medications (Residents #21, #2, #16, #34, #43, #52, #69, #79, and #87). Findings included: a.) Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and debility. A physician's order with a start date of 10/16/23 which remained as an active order for Resident #21 revealed Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) tablets, one tablet by mouth two times a day for pain. A packing slip and proof of delivery receipt from the dispensing pharmacy revealed on 10/27/25 at 7:09 PM a total of 30 Tramadol 50 mg tablets for Resident #21 were delivered to the facility. The delivery receipt was signed off as received by Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to obtain orders to access and manage a port-a-cath (an implantable device placed under the skin, usually in the chest, to provide long-term, easy access to veins for chemotherapy, medications, blood draws, or intravenous fluids) for 1 of 1 sampled resident with a port-a-cath (Resident #1). The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include personal history of traumatic brain injury with persistent vegetative state. The hospital discharge summary completed on 12/20/2024 for Resident #1 revealed a left chest port-a-cath was placed by vascular surgery on 12/18/2024 for future access, but it was not yet mature (approximately 7 to 14 days for the site to heal to allow for use).A progress note written by the NP on 12/4/2025 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for pneumonia and sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, Consultant Pharmacist, Pharmacy Nurse Consultant, and Pharmacy Director, the facility failed to have effective safeguards and systems in place for the accounting of controlled medications and the return of discontinued controlled medications to the pharmacy to prevent drug diversion for 9 of 9 residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications (Resident #69, #43, #2, #21, #16, #34, #52, #79, and #87). Findings included: a. A physician's order for Resident #69 with a start date of 8/8/25 revealed Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) tablets, one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days. A packing slip and proof of delivery receipt from the dispensing pharmacy revealed on 8/8/25 at 7:13 PM a total of 14 Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets were delivered to the facility for Resident #69. The delivery receipt was signed by Nurse #1 on 8/8/25. There was no signature on the delivery sheet from a second nurseThere was no declining count sheet (an inventory log…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Consultant Pharmacist's interviews, the facility failed to a.) act on the Consultant Pharmacist's recommendation to address a residents (Resident #12) diuretic medication Metolazone (used to treat high blood pressure and fluid retention caused by heart failure or kidney disease) that was prescribed for increased edema. The Consultant Pharmacist reported during the monthly medication regimen review in October 2025 and November 2025 that Resident #12 was receiving Metolazone outside of the physician ordered parameters which were to hold the medication if the residents systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or the diastolic blood pressure was less than 60. b.) the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify and address during the December 2025 and January 2026 monthly medication regimen reviews that Metolazone continued to be administered to Resident #12 outside of the ordered blood pressure parameters. This resulted in Resident #12 continuing to receive the medication when it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff, resident, Nurse Practitioner and the Consultant Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to hold the medication Metolazone (a diuretic medication used to treat high blood pressure and fluid retention caused by heart failure or kidney disease) when a resident's blood pressure was less than 110 systolic or less than 60 diastolic according to the parameters ordered by the physician. This resulted in a significant medication error as Resident #12 received 57 doses when the medication should have been held. Resident #12 experienced no significant outcome from receiving the medication. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #12). Findings included. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, and kidney disease. A physician's order dated 9/5/25 for Resident #12 revealed Metolazone 5 milligram (mg) tablets. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Monday,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and Registered Dietician (RD) and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor residents' choices to have food items stored in the refrigerator and reheated for later consumption for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for self-determination (Resident #28, Resident #48, Resident #71).The findings included:a. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute unspecified protein calorie malnutrition.Review of Resident #28's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was moderately cognitively impaired and was coded independent for eating.The care plan dated 12/8/2025 for Resident #28 revealed a plan of care for risk for malnutrition related to weight loss, acute on chronic illness, and impaired mobility. The goal of care was for her intake of nutrients to meet her metabolic needs. Interventions included she was to receive her diet and supplements as prescribed.An interview with Resident #28 was completed on 2/10/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide effective supervision of a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #91) who was known to exhibit wandering behavior and rummaging. This failure resulted in Resident #91 obtaining and ingesting one gel capsule of an over-the-counter cold and flu medication containing acetaminophen, dextromethorphan (cough suppressant) and phenylephrine (nasal decongestant) that was in an unlocked drawer in the receptionist's desk located in the lobby area of the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #91).Findings included:Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Lewy body dementia, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, thyroid disease and kidney disease.Resident #91's care plan dated 3/10/24 and currently active indicated that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired medications and record an opened date on ophthalmic drops that had shortened expiration dates on 2 of 6 medication carts that were reviewed for medication storage (200 hall medication cart #1 and medication cart #2). Findings included. a.) An observation of the 200-hall medication cart #1 on 2/10/26 at 2:50 PM along with Nurse #1 revealed the following medications: One bottle of Latanoprost .005% ophthalmic drops that was opened with no opened date labeled on the bottle. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Latanoprost ophthalmic solution instructed that once a bottle was opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature for 6 weeks then discarded. One bottle of Rocklatan ophthalmic drops that was opened with no opened date labeled on the bottle. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Rocklatan ophthalmic solution (a combination of two medications) instructed that once a bottle was opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature for 6 weeks then discarded. b.) An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment identified and addressed the care required for the population of residents with a port-a-cath (a small implanted device placed under the skin in the chest to provide easy, long-term access to a vein for chemotherapy, medication, intravenous (IV) fluids, or blood sampling), and to address the staff training necessary to competently provide port-a-cath care for residents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1).Findings included:Review of the facility assessment revealed the assessment was last updated on 9/8/2025. The document indicated the facility had completed education, training and competencies with staff specific to resident care needs; however, the document lacked training and competency to care for residents who required a port-a-cath.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #1's port-a-cath was placed 12/18/2024 during a hospitalization for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage a day, 7 days a week for 13 of 139 days reviewed. Findings included: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report Fiscal Year - Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1-March 31, 2024) documented the facility had no RN coverage on 01/13/24, 01/20/24, 01/21/24, 02/03/24, 02/18/24, 02/24/24, 03/02/24, 03/24/24, and 03/30/24; and for Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1-June 30, 2024) on 04/06/24, 04/28/24, 05/04/24, 05/11/24, 05/12/24, and 05/26/24. Review of the facility daily staffing documentation revealed the DON (Director of Nursing) had worked 8 consecutive hours as a staff nurse on 01/21/24 and 04/06/24 after he had fulfilled his full time DON obligation (40 hours) as the DON for both weeks. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/19/24 at 12:44 PM he stated the facility had hired an RN Weekend Supervisor and there had been no recent issues with RN coverage. He noted that on some of the days that there was no weekend RN coverage the DON had worked as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARROLTON NURSING HOMES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $921K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC