No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Carrolton of Williamston

119 Gatling Street, Williamston, NC 27892 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (252) 792-1616 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (252) 792-1616 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)2 actual-harm citations$45,102 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $45,102 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1227 Brentway Ave · (252) 792-6611 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens7.5 mi
1560 US Highway 17 · (252) 792-2269 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion3.8 mi
607 E Boulevard · (252) 792-1019 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1073 Tyner Rd · (252) 792-7042 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1490 Sweet Home Rd · (252) 792-3693

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%15.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.0%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.2%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.0%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.5%5.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.5%14.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.9%78.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.5%22.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.8%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.551.781.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.461.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.4%CMS range 28.1–52.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 8.5–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified57.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened14.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 119.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.70 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-03-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, resident interview, staff interviews and a Physician interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure a resident was administered morning scheduled medications in the allotted time frame for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medications (Resident #211). Resident #211 not receiving her scheduled morning medications in the allotted time frame caused Resident #211 to remain in bed for fear of falling due to feeling dizzy. Findings included: This tag is cross reference to: F760: Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interviews and a Physician interview, the facility failed to administer significant medications of a resident's medication regimen in the scheduled time frame that caused the resident to remain in bed for fear of falling due to feeling dizzy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for administration of significant medications (Resident #211). In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/13/2024 at 11:15 a.m., she explained on 3/13/2024 due to the call out of a scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interviews and a Physician interview, the facility failed to administer significant medications of a resident's medication regimen in the scheduled time frame that caused the resident to remain in bed for fear of falling due to feeling dizzy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for administration of significant medications (Resident #211). Findings included: Resident #211 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, atrial fibrillation, epilepsy (seizures), anxiety and pain. Resident #211's care plan dated 2/29/2024 included a focus for hypertension and atrial fibrillation, and interventions included giving antihypertensive medications as physician ordered and monitoring for side effects. Resident #211's care plan also included the use of anti-anxiety and seizure medications. Interventions included administering the medications as ordered by the physician, monitoring for side effects and effectiveness of the medications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) for dialysis services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #2).The findings included: Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis.Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had end-stage renal disease but did not reflect that dialysis services were being provided. During an interview with the MDS nurse on 1/7/26 at 9:14 am, she stated the former MDS nurse should have indicated Resident #2 was receiving dialysis services and acknowledged the error. She confirmed that the MDS assessment was inaccurate and that the MDS should have been coded correctly by the former MDS nurse. An attempt was made to interview the former MDS nurse by telephone on 1/7/26 at 11:57 am with no return call. During an interview with the Administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis had a physician's order for dialysis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #2).The findings included: A review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #2 was hospitalized on [DATE] due to shortness of breath and progressive renal failure. A permacath (a soft flexible tube used for long-term dialysis access) was placed for the initiation of dialysis, and dialysis was initiated on 8/19/25. Subsequent treatments were scheduled on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday outpatient dialysis schedule.Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis.Upon readmission to the facility on 8/26/25, the physician's orders did not include dialysis services.The resident's care plan, updated on 8/27/25, documented the need for dialysis related to renal failure with interventions which included checking and changing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to place a resident's call light device within reach to allow for the resident to request assistance as needed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #90). Findings included: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and aphasia (difficulty speaking). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #90 was severely cognitively impaired with no range of motion impairments to upper and lower extremities and was dependent on staff to provide assistance with all activities of daily living and mobility. The pain assessment in the MDS assessment indicated Resident #92 was not receiving a pain medication regimen or as needed pain medications and was not experiencing pain. On 6/30/2025 at 3:30pm, the beige colored string exiting from the call light wall device on the left side of the bed was observed lying on top of the light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN) form 10555 prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review (Resident #38 and Resident #54). The findings included: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was readmitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 3/11/25. Resident #38's Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 3/28/25. He remained in the facility. Record review revealed there was no documentation Resident #38 or his responsible party were issued a SNF-ABN. During an interview with the facility social worker on 7/2/25 at 3:40 PM she stated it was her job to issue the SNF-ABN. She further stated there was an error in processing and Resident #38 did not receive the correct notification. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 7/2/25 at 6:01 PM who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance services to a resident room that was observed with damaged sheetrock on the wall to the left side of the bed, a dresser with visible damage and a broken track for the bottom drawer and a bathroom cabinet with doors that did not latch and the pressboard in the bottom of the cabinet was observed sunken inward and covered with a dirty white thin board with dry white paper towel lying flat to the surface observed in the right back corner with dry black material covering over half of the paper towel for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for homelike environment on 1 of 6 halls in the facility (Resident #92). The findings included: A review of the census revealed Resident #92 was moved into room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/1/2025. Resident #92's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #92 was cognitively intact. A review of undated maintenance logs recorded a work order #2554 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of behaviors for 1 of 26 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed (Resident #167). Findings included: Resident #167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia. A progress note dated 9/13/24 revealed Resident #167 had behaviors including spitting and urinating on the floor. These behaviors were not directed towards others. A progress note dated 9/15/24 revealed Resident #167 refused to have a nursing assessment completed including blood pressure taken. He placed his sheet over his head and refused to answer any questions. A progress note dated 9/17/24 indicated Resident #167 adjusted his brief and voided on the floor. Resident #167's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was coded for having verbal behaviors directed toward others for 1-3 days during the 7-day lookback period. There were no other behavioral symptoms or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on manufacturer directions, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove 3 multi-dose insulin injector pens that were expired in 2 of 5 medication carts ([NAME] medication cart and Split medication cart), remove expired medication in 1 of 5 medication carts (Split medication cart), and remove 1 opened and expired vial of Pneumococcal vaccine in 1 of 1 medication storage room refrigerator reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The findings included: a. The manufacturer's directions for lispro insulin injector pen stated it should be discarded 28 days after opening. An observation of the [NAME] medication cart on 7/3/25 at 9:23 am revealed one Lispro insulin injector pen that was open and dated 5/20/25. Interview with Nurse # 5 during the medication cart observation on 7/3/25 at 9:23 am and stated the insulin pen should have been removed after 28 days. b. An observation of the Split medication cart on 7/3/25 at 9:30 am revealed two Lispro insulin injector pens that were opened and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedures for enhanced barrier precautions for one (Nurse #5) of three nursing staff members observed for infection control procedures. Findings included: Review of the facility policy on enhanced barrier precautions, dated as implemented on 11/1/2024, revealed the following information. The facility will have the discretion on how to communicate to staff which residents require to use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), as long as staff are aware of which residents require to use of EBP prior to providing high-contact care activities. Personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities and may not need to be donned prior to entering the resident's room. 1. Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Stage 4 pressure ulcer and presence of a tracheostomy tube. Observation on initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner for one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included: Resident #4 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and resided on a locked dementia unit in the facility. Documentation on the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #4 as severely cognitively impaired with no moods or behaviors. An interview was conducted with Medication Aide (Med Aide) #3 on 11/7/2024 at 9:56 AM. Med Aide #3 stated on 9/28/2024 he was in the hallway after the evening meal with a view visible into the day room of the dementia unit. Med Aide #3 stated Resident #4 was standing up and he witnessed Nurse Aide (NA) #1 grab the shirt of Resident #4 and push Resident #4 into the chair telling her to sit down. Med Aide #3 stated NA #1 pushed Resident #4 harder than necessary making the chair hit the wall. Med Aide #3 revealed he heard Resident #4 state, I'm telling and NA #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and wound care physician interview the facility failed to accurately document a resident's admission skin assessment, initiate treatment for a pressure ulcer, complete a weekly assessment, and administer treatments as ordered according to the care plan for one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for pressure sore care. Findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged back to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #6 had multiple diagnoses some of which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, severe quadriparesis/neuropathy, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, tracheostomy status, percutaneous gastrostomy tube, cerebral vascular accident, dysphagia, and pressure sore injury to sacrum and left buttock. Documentation on the hospital discharge summary for Resident #6 dated 9/24/2024 included physician orders for a sacral pressure injury, left medial buttock tissue loss as well as left knee pressure injury. The wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, to designate a director of nursing (DON) who worked on a full-time basis, and to have the DON only serve as a charge nurse when the average daily census was 60 residents or less for 23 of 39 days reviewed for staffing. Findings included: The nursing staff schedule and staff posting was reviewed from 2/1/24 through 3/10/24. The daily staff sheet indicated a Registered Nurse (RN) was not scheduled for at least eight consecutive hours a day on 2/3/24. Review of staff timecard dated 2/3/24 showed there was not an RN on duty at the facility that day. Review of the staffs' timecards dated 2/10/24 showed one RN worked. The RN was scheduled for the day shift 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. The timecard showed the RN worked from 7:49 A.M. to 3:29 P.M. for a total of 7 hours and 40 minutes. Review of the DON time punches for the week of 2/15/24 through 2/21/24 showed the DON worked 29.36 hours in the DON role. - 2/15/24, Thursday: DON hours logged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, North Carolina Board of Nursing Registry, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and a Physician interview, the facility failed to provide effective leadership and oversight to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) implemented her responsiblities in these areas: sufficiently staffing the facility to administer medications in a timely manner, having a registered nurse work eight consecutive hours daily and a DON who worked full time and only serves as a charge nurse when census was less than 60 residents, monitoring and tracking expiration of nursing licenses (Nurse #3) and nurse aide certifications (NA #9, NA # 4, NA #1, and NA #8), completing yearly performance evaluations for nurse aides (NA #4, NA #7, NA #6 and NA #5) and providing and monitoring 12 hours of annual training for nurse aides ( NA #4, NA #7, NA #6 and NA #5). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 105 of 105 facility residents. Findings included: This tag is cross reference to: F725: Based on observations, record review, resident interview, staff interviews and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure bathrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #60, #61, #65, #67/69, #70) on the locked unit were free of fecal matter or black/brown matter on various surfaces for 6 of 10 bathrooms reviewed for clean and homelike living environment. The findings included: On 3/10/24, a Sunday, at 1:02 PM, an observation of the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], rooms on the locked unit, revealed the inner and outer parts of the toilet had multiple areas of dried black matter. room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by 2 residents, and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by 1 resident. The residents of these rooms were able to use the bathroom on their own or with supervision assistance by staff. On 3/10/24 at 1:03 PM, an observation of the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER], a room on the locked unit, revealed brown matter on multiple areas of the toilet. room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by 1 resident. The resident of this room was able to use the bathroom on her own. On 3/10/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and interviews with Wound Care Physician Assistant (PA), the facility failed to (1) perform wound care to a pressure ulcer per physician's order (Resident #19), (2) set the alternating pressure air mattress at the correct setting based on the resident's weight (Resident #104), and (3) change the treatment for a pressure ulcer when ordered by the Wound Care PA (Resident #77) for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings included: 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and diagnoses included dementia and right hip fracture. Resident #19's care plan dated 1/14/2024 included a focus for a right heel suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI). Interventions included administration of treatments as ordered by the physician and monitor effectiveness of treatments. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #19 was moderately cognitively impaired and was receiving treatments for a pressure ulcer. Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to obtain post dialysis vital signs, record post dialysis weights, and maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #58). Findings included: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included renal insufficiency and dependence on renal dialysis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #58 was cognitive intact. He was also coded for dialysis. Review of Resident #58's care plan last reviewed 2/6/24 indicated a focus for dialysis related to renal failure with an intervention check and change dressing daily at access site and monitor for signs/symptoms of bleeding, hemorrhage, and septic shock. Review of Resident #58's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 2/29/24 record post dialysis weight and vitals upon return every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of Resident #58's February Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor the North Carolina (NC) Nurse Aide (NA) Registry to ensure 5 of 47 nurse aides employed at the facility remained listed on the NC Nurse Aide Registry with an active Nurse Aide I certification (NA #6, NA #9, NA #4, NA #1,and NA #8). Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 8:12 a.m., NA #6, who was a Medication Aide, was observed passing medications to Resident #59. A review of NA #6's employment record reported a hired date as [DATE], and NA #6's verification report listed the NA I expiration date as [DATE] for the NC Nurse Aide Registry, and the NC Medication Aide Registry listed an expiration date of [DATE]. A review of daily nursing assignment schedules since [DATE] listed NA #6 assigned as a medication aide on the following dates: * [DATE] 7am-3pm; 8pm and 5am on the Skills and Sparks Unit. * [DATE] 7am-3 pm and 3 pm- 11pm on the Skills and Sparks Unit. * [DATE] 7am-3 pm and 3 pm- 11pm on the Skills and Sparks Unit. * [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review every 12 months for 4 of 5 nursing assistants (NAs) reviewed to ensure in-service education was designed to address the outcome of the performance reviews (NA #4, NA #7, NA #6, and NA #5). Findings included: 1. NA (Nurse Aide) #4's personnel file was reviewed and revealed a date of hire of 10/1/20. The personnel file for NA #4 did not include evidence a performance review had been completed since the NA's date of hire. Attempts were made to reach NA #4 for an interview were unsuccessful. An interview was conducted on 3/13/24 at 3:40 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview, the DON stated she was unaware she was required to complete NA performance review until this past Monday 3/11/24. She shared the performance reviews had not been completed due to turnover in the position of the DON. The DON explained she had not provided individual training to NA #4 based on the outcome of her performance evaluation. An interview was conducted on 3/13/24 at 5:10 P.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a lunch meal tray line observation, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to provide a pureed food item with a smooth consistency. This failure had the potential to affect 9 of 105 residents with diet orders for a pureed diet texture. The findings included: A review of the Diet Order Report dated 3/12/24 revealed 9 residents with diet orders for a pureed diet texture. Review of the menus revealed the facility followed the National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) for residents with diet orders for a pureed diet texture. The NDD recorded a dysphagia pureed diet required all foods pureed and thickened, if necessary, to a pudding-like consistency, lump free, requiring little to no chewing. A continuous observation of the lunch meal tray line on 3/12/24 from 11:43 AM - 11:56 AM revealed [NAME] #1 recorded the internal temperature of the food items stored on the tray line intended for the lunch meal service, including pureed egg noodles. The pureed egg noodles were observed with a lumpy consistency smaller than pea-sized when the food was stirred. [NAME] #1 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, North Carolina Board of Nursing (NCBON) verification registry and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #3, who was observed providing resident care at the facility, maintained a current and active professional nursing licenses with the NCBON for 1 of 12 nurses reviewed. Finding included: A review of the nursing licensure audit conducted by the facility on [DATE] reported Nurse #3's license expired on [DATE]. The electric NCBON Registry listed Nurse #3's license with an expiration date of [DATE]. A review of the employee time sheet for Nurse #3 indicated she had worked at the facility since [DATE] on the following dates: * [DATE] from 7:22 a.m. to 3:25 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:02 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:12 a.m. to 7:34 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:19 a.m. to 3:33 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:25 a.m. to 3:08 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:36 a.m. to 3:24 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:15 a.m. to 3:23 p.m. * [DATE] from 7:00 a.m. to 3:25 p.m. On [DATE] at 10:30 a.m., Nurse #3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, Wound Care Physician Assistant interview, staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions put into place by the Committee following the recertification and complaint investigation surveys of 6/10/21 and 11/18/22 and the complaint investigation surveys of 2/27/23 and 9/7/23. This was for 6 deficiencies that were recited on the current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 3/13/24 in the areas of Resident Rights (F550), Environment (F584),Treatment and Services for Pressure Sores (F686), Supervision to Prevent Accidents (F689), Medication Storage (F761), and Complete/Accurate Medical Records (F842). The continued failure of the facility during four federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F550: Based on record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure at least 12 hours of annual training to include dementia and areas of weakness as determined in the nursing aides' performance reviews were completed for 4 Nursing Assistants (NA #4, NA #7, NA #6, and NA #5) of 5 reviewed for staffing. Findings included: a) NA (Nursing Aide) #4's date of hire was 10/1/20. Review of NA #4's Education/In-service records did not include evidence of training for areas of weakness as determined in the NA's performance review. b) NA # 7's date of hire was 10/1/20. Review of NA #4's Education/In-service records did not include evidence of training for areas of weakness as determined in the NA's performance review. c) NA #6's date of hire was 9/7/22. Review of NA #4's Education/In-service records did not include evidence of training for areas of weakness as determined in the NA's performance review. d) NA #5's date of hire was 10/4/22. Review of NA #4's Education/In-service records did not include evidence of training for areas of weakness as determined in the NA's performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff communicated to a resident in a respectful and dignified manner for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for dignity (Resident #93). The reasonable person concept was applied to this deficiency as individuals have the expectation to be addressed by staff using language and tone that portrays respect and dignity. Findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and her diagnoses included intellectual disabilities. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #93 was cognitively intact and exhibited no behaviors in the seven-day look back period. The MDS assessment also indicated Resident #93 was incontinent of urine and stool and required assistance with activities of daily living including toileting and mobility in bed and transfers. A psychiatric physician note dated 1/18/2024 reported Resident #93 had an intellectual disability. The psychiatric physician recorded Resident #93's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #46) from hitting another resident (Resident #31) in the face two days after he initially exhibited physically aggressive behaviors directed toward another resident (Resident #55). Resident #31 sustained a scratch to the face as a result of the incident. This was for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #46). Findings included: 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and schizoaffective disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision of 1 person for locomotion on the unit. Resident #46 was coded with no physical behaviors directed towards others. As of 7/24/23 Resident #46's comprehensive care plan revealed no evidence the resident had any physical behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed secure the keys for a medication cart when Medication Aide #7 left the medication cart keys for the skilled-hall medication cart in Resident #211's room. This deficient practice was for 1 of 5 medication carts in the facility. Findings included: On 3/12/2024 at 11:05 a.m., Medication Aide #7 was observed locking the skilled-hall medication cart and positioning the medication cart against the wall outside Resident #211's door before walking down the hall away from Resident #211's door. On 3/12/2024 at 11:08 a.m., during an interview with Resident #211, she picked up a double ring key chain and stated the Medication Aide #7 had left the keys in her room after administering her medications. Three keys were observed on one ring and four keys were observed on the other ring. On 3/12/2024 at 11:11a.m., when Medication Aide #7 returned to Resident #211's room, Resident #211 was observed holding up the double ring key chain and stating, You forgot these. Medication Aide #7 with a surprise facial gesture stated, Oh and gathered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete an accurate medical record related to documentation of the treatment for pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #19). Findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Physician orders dated 2/29/2024 included an order to cleanse the right heel with wound cleaner, to apply collagen particles before applying calcium silver alginate and a foam heel dressing and to secure the dressing with kerlix (a wrap to hold primary and secondary dressings in place) every other day for wound healing. A review of the March 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #19 indicated Nurse #3 recorded providing treatment of the right heel pressure ulcer on 3/11/2024. During observation of wound care to Resident #19's right heel pressure ulcer on 3/12/2024 at 10:05 a.m., the old foam dressing to the right heel was observed dated 3/9/2024 with Nurse Aide #6 initials. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-18 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with the Resident Council members and facility staff, the facility failed to post information and contact information about the State Survey Agency and the local ombudsman program. This occurred for 6 of 6 cognitively intact residents who regularly attended the Resident Council meetings (Residents #35, 55, 22, 41, 390, and 25). The findings included: A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes from 10/21 through 11/22 revealed the resident rights section did not contain information on the contact information for the state survey agency or the local ombudsman. During a group meeting on 11/16/22 at 2:00 PM with Residents # 35, 55, 22, 41, 390, and 25, they stated they regularly attended the Resident Council meeting. The Residents stated they did not know the number to contact the state survey agency. The residents stated they did not know who the Ombudsman was or how to contact the Ombudsman. The residents further revealed that they did not know who their current Ombudsman was, and the information had not been posted for almost a year. An observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff and residents, the facility failed to ensure residents who had perishable food items brought into the facility had a location to store their food. This deficient practice affected 5 members of the Resident Council (Residents #22, #25, #35, #41, #55) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #56). The findings included: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 10/25/22 indicated this was an emergency meeting for the purpose of reviewing the memo titled Food Safety and Resident Room Refrigerators. The minutes revealed that residents were informed that personal refrigerators would be removed. The memo read in part; Perishable food could not be left with the resident as they had nowhere to store perishable food. The memo also stated that food could not be placed in one of the facility ' s refrigerators because all opened food must have an expiration date and the facility could not place food in their refrigerators that had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide residents with access to the use of a telephone in a place where calls could be made without being overheard for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for privacy. (Resident #2). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #2 was cognitively intact. An observation was conducted on 11/15/22 at 1:06 PM of Resident #2 on the telephone at the nurse's station. Resident #2 could be heard talking on the phone. An observation was conducted on 11/17/22 at 2:22 PM of Resident #2 on the telephone at the nurse's station. Resident #2 could be heard talking on the telephone. There were multiple staff and residents present around the nurse's station. An interview was conducted with Resident #2 on 11/18/22 at 2:40 PM. Resident #2 stated that he hated having to talk on the phone at the nurse's station. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain resident walls and lighting fixtures in good repair. This occurred on 3 of 4 halls ([NAME], Skilled and Sparks halls) reviewed for environment. Findings included: 1. Observation of [NAME] Hall revealed the following. a. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 11-15-22 at 10:30am. The room was observed to have rust on the over the bed light fixture, the ceiling light had a missing cover exposing the florescent light bulbs and there was paint scrapped off the wall exposing the plaster at the head of the resident's bed. A second observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] was completed on 11-18-22 at 10:15am with the Maintenance Director and the Environmental Manager. The second observation revealed rust on the over the bed light fixture, the ceiling light had a missing cover exposing the florescent light bulbs and there was paint scrapped off the wall exposing the plaster at the head of the resident's bed. The Environmental Manager was interviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and Physician interview, the facility failed to initiate new treatment orders for pressure ulcer treatment and perform pressure ulcer treatment as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 4 resident (Resident #25) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of buttock and hip unstageable. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact and was documented for her pressure ulcers. Resident #25's care plan dated 10-21-22 revealed a goal that her pressure ulcer would show signs of healing and remain free from infection. The interventions for the goal were administer medications as ordered, administer treatments as ordered. Physician order from the wound care clinic dated 10-28-22 revealed an order for Resident #25 to have her right hip wound cleaned with soap and water, then apply Prisma (wound treatment) to wound bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff and Physician interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when 4 of 4 staff members (Medication Aide #2, Medication Aide #4, Treatment Nurse, and Housekeeper #2) failed to perform hand hygiene between tasks and don a gown when entering a resident's room (Resident #79) who was on contact precautions. Findings included: Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy dated 10-1-22 revealed in part; perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves. 1. An observation of Medication pass occurred on 11-16-22 at 8:10am with Medication Aide #2. The Medication Aide was observed to don a pair of gloves, pick up the resident's medication from the medication cart, walk into the resident's room, place the medication on the resident's table touching the top of the table, providing the resident with his medication in pill form with a glass of water touching the rim of the cup after the resident had drank the water, then provided the resident his inhaler medication touching the mouth piece of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 4 halls reviewed for pests ([NAME] Hall). The findings included: Pest control summary of services from the pest control service were reviewed for the following dates of 1/24/22, 2/24/22, 3/18/22, 4/19/22, 5/19/22, 6/27/22. 7/25/22, 8/22/22, 9/29/22, 11/1/22. There were no recommendations on the materials summaries. Observation of the [NAME] unit on 11/15/22 at 12:52 PM flies were visible in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #27 was observed to fan by his head to remove the fly. Observation of the [NAME] unit on 11/15/22 at 1:38 PM flies were visible in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #44 was observed to swat a fly with a fly swatter he had in his hand. An interview was conducted with Resident #44 on 11/17/22 at 2:12 PM. Resident #44 was cognitively intact. Resident #44 stated that he always kept a fly swatter in his room. He stated that flies were an issue, and something needed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner by scolding a resident after the resident overturned a mop bucket for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #71). Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included aphasia, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominate side, difficulty in walking, occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, and major depressive disorder. Resident #71's minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and had no behaviors. His hearing was assessed as adequate with unclear speech. Resident #71 was sometimes understood and usually understood others. Resident #71's care plan dated 11/15/22 revealed he was care planned for a communication problem related to expressive aphasia. The interventions included to allow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to invite 1 of 1 resident (Resident #389) reviewed for care plan meetings. Findings included: Resident #389 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #389 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #389's medical record revealed a progress note dated 11-16-22 written by the facility's Social Worker (SW) stating an interdisciplinary care plan meeting was held that included activities, SW and a nursing assistant. The note indicated Resident #389's legal representative did not attend, and the care plan was reviewed and updated. During an interview with the SW on 11-17-22 at 11:25am, the SW stated she had not invited Resident #389 to her care plan meeting on 11-16-22. The SW explained She did not invite the resident because the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, and she does not invite a resident to care plan meeting unless the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident, staff and Physician interview the facility failed to assess 1 of 4 resident (Resident #45) to determine if self-administration of medication through a feeding tube was clinically appropriate. Findings included: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status. Review of the Resident #45's Physician orders since admission revealed no Physician order for Resident #45 to self-administer medication. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed no documentation of a Medication Self-Administration Form, or documentation of education had been completed with Resident #45 to self-administer her own medication. Physician order dated 12-21-17 revealed an order for Resident #45 to have nothing by mouth (NPO). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with one person for eating. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan in the areas of pressure ulcers (Resident #67) and antianxiety medication (Resident #50). This was for 2 of 23 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings included: 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. He was at risk for pressure ulcers. He had no unhealed pressure ulcers. A review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #67 revealed a focus area initiated on 7/29/22 of suspected deep tissue injury to bilateral heels. The goal last revised on 11/16/22 was for Resident #67 to show signs of healing. An intervention was pressure relieving boots bilaterally. On 11/15/22 at 3:05 PM Resident #67 was observed in bed. He was not observed to be wearing pressure relieving boots. On 11/17/22 at 11:21 AM Resident #67 was observed in bed. He was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a hazard free environment by leaving an electrical outlet uncovered with exposed wires for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #4). Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4's minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as cognitively intact. During observation of Resident #4's room on 11/15/22 at 2:43 PM an electrical outlet cover was observed ajar, and electrical wires were observed uncovered in Resident #4's room under the room's air-conditioning unit. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 2:45 PM Resident #4 stated it did not bother her that the outlet was uncovered but understood it could be a safety issue for someone else. During observation on 11/16/22 at 2:50 PM the electrical outlet was observed to still have exposed electrical wiring and the cover was still ajar. During an interview on 11/16/22 at 2:54 PM Medication Aide #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to keep medications locked while unattended for 1 of 1 treatment carts observed and failed to refrigerate insulin for 1 of 3 medications carts observed (Treatment Cart #1, Medication Cart #1). Findings included: During observation on [DATE] at 10:49 AM Treatment Cart #1 was observed unattended in the main entry hallway with a housekeeper next to the unlocked cart. At 11:50 AM a therapist was observed passing the unlocked treatment cart. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:51 AM the Treatment Nurse stated treatment carts were to be locked when left unattended due to the medications in the cart. She further stated she remembered something she forgot and left the cart in the entrance hallway unlocked and forgot to lock it and should have locked it. During observation with the Treatment Nurse on [DATE] at 10:52 AM the treatment cart was observed to contain items including barrier film normal saline, vitamin A&D ointment barrier spray, Minerin cream,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to have a barrier between a nurse aide's (Nurse Aide #1) bare hands and ready to eat food for 1 of 4 dining observations. This practice had the potential to affect food served to a resident. Findings included: During observation on 11/16/22 at 7:34 AM Nurse Aide #1 was observed providing a meal tray to a resident in their room. She was observed to move the tray over the bed, adjust the height of the tray, and then remove the heat top off the tray. She then held the resident's piece of toast with her bare hand as she spread jelly on the toast. During an interview on 11/16/22 at 7:41 AM Nurse Aide #1 stated she knew not to touch resident food and to hand sanitize following touching resident items, but she was moving fast and did not realize it. During an interview on 11/16/22 at 7:45 AM the Director of Nursing stated staff were not to touch resident food with bare hands and the nurse aide should not have touched the toast. She concluded staff had been educated on this.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) process failed to implement, monitor, and revise as needed the action plan developed for the survey 11/22/19 and 6/10/21 in order to achieve and sustain compliance. This was for 5 recited deficiencies on a recertification survey on 11/18/22. The deficiencies were in the areas of dignity, the right to forms of communication in private, care plan timing and revision, storage of drugs and biologicals, and sanitary food service. The continued failure during these federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QA program. The findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F550 - Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner by scolding a resident after the resident overturned a mop bucket for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #71). During the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 6/10/21 the facility was cited for failing to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine which can prevent a type of bacterial lung infection) in accordance with the signed informed consent. This was for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: A review of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) recommendations titled Use of 15-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) and 20-Valent PCV Among U.S. Adults: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices dated 1/28/2022 revealed in part, Recommendations for use of 15-valent PCV in series with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV) or 20-valent PCV in PCV-naïve adults aged greater than or equal to19 years; Adults aged greater than or equal to 65 years who have not previously received PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown should receive 1 dose of PCV (either PCV20 or PCV15). When PCV15 is used, it should be followed by a dose of PPSV23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to display accurate daily nursing staffing information, the resident census on each shift, and/or maintain the daily nurse staff posting on file for 39 out of 39 days from February 2024 and March 2024 reviewed for staffing. Findings included: A review of the nursing staff posting (report of nursing staff directly responsible for resident care) for February 1, 2024, through March 10, 2024, was conducted. The staffing posting included the day shift 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM, the evening shift 3:00 PM - 11:00PM and the night shift 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM. Each shift listed the category for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Nursing Assistance (NAs) and Medication Assistant, the census (number of residents in the facility), a column for actual hours worked and a column for staffing total. The number of unlicensed and licensed staff and actual hours worked during the evening shift, the night shift, and the facility census were not documented during the evening shift and night shift for the following days: 2/1/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-03-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the 14-day required timeframe for 3 of 41 residents reviewed for quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (Resident #29, Resident #16, and Resident #75). Findings included: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the assessment was signed as completed on 9/11/23. An interview was conducted with the MDS Nurse on 3/13/24 at 8:25 A.M. The MDS nurse indicated she was aware of the timeline requirements for completion of the MDS assessments and unsure why Resident #29's quarterly assessment was completed late. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 3/13/24 at 1:01 P.M. The Administrator stated she had identified late MDS assessments during a spot check and worked to get them caught up. She stated she was aware of the required completion date had been missed and stated the deadline shouldn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for physician ordered wound treatments for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for wound care. Findings included: 1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's physician orders dated 7/4/23 indicated the following wound care treatment orders: full strength 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution apply to the following areas: left top of foot, right top of foot, right ankle and left hip. Cleanse all areas with sodium hypochlorite solution. Cover areas to right and left foot and ankle with Hydrofera blue (an antibacterial foam) dressing cut to size, extra absorbent pads and wrap with gauze. Apply Hydrofera blue dressing to the left hip, cover with extra absorbent pads and foam dressing. Review of Resident # 1's August Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed no documentation of the physician ordered wound care treatment to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-18 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with the Resident Council members and facility staff, the facility failed to inform residents of the location of the state inspection results. This occurred for 6 of 6 cognitively intact residents who regularly attended the Resident Council meetings. (Residents #35, 55, 22, 41, 390, and 25). The findings included: During a group meeting on 11/16/22 at 2:00 PM with Residents # 35, 55, 22, 41, 390, and 25, they stated the state inspection results were not made available for residents to read. The Residents stated they did not know the location of the state inspection results. An observation was conducted of the facility with the Administrator on 11/16/22 at 3:13 PM. The Administrator was unable to locate the state inspection results. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 11/16/22 at 3:15 PM, she stated that she was used to the survey inspection results being in a binder in the front lobby. The Administrator stated she was not aware that the state inspection results were not available to the residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-11-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to provide access to resident funds during the weekend for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident #4, Resident #12) Findings included: a. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 2:39 PM Resident #4 stated there was no way to get to her money on the weekends. She stated she would have to ask for her money on Friday or wait until Monday. b. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. During an interview on 11/15/22 at 2:08 PM Resident #12's visitor stated she did not think money was available on the weekend for resident accounts. She stated she had seen most residents needed to get money on Friday or wait until Monday and believed it was the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$45,102 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $45,102 — penalty dated 2024-03-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARROLTON NURSING HOMES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
C. SAUNDERS ROBERSON, JR., AS TRUSTEE OF THE JUDITH ROBERSON DIXON IRROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST38%since 04/27/2020
C. SAUNDERS ROBERSON, JR., TRUSTEE OF THE CAROL SAUNDERS ROBERSON FAMIOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 04/27/2020
FIGLEWSKI, DEBORAHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 04/27/2020
POWELL, EARLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 04/27/2020
POWELL, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 04/27/2020
RUSSELL, DENISEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 04/27/2020
ROBERSON, CARROLIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
CARROLTON FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2026
ROZIER, SONYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 5%Other / private 8%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,483per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345145. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next