Linden Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 106.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(I) Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when residents have been identified at risk for elopement. This affected 10 (Residents 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13) of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 105. The facility Administrator (ADM) was notified on 04/30/2025 at 6:00 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 04/20/2025. The IJ was removed on 04/30/2025, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings are: A record review of a policy titled Elopement Prevention and Management dated 3/2024 revealed: Key elements: -Every building must have a current Elopement Risk Manual, located at the nurse's station. It includes the Missing Resident Identification Form for those at risk for elopement. -Every facility should be doing elopement drills quarterly and as needed. -Elopement Prevention Audit per the QAPI Audit schedule Resident Risk Assessment: -All residents will be evaluated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdated food items were not available for use, opened items were dated, and failed to do to complete hand hygiene and change gloves while preparing food to prevent potential cross contamination and food-borne illness. The facility identified a census of 113. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate out of the kitchen.Findings are: A. During the initial tour on 4/13/2026 from 11:21 AM until 12:00 PM, the following concerns were identified: -Walk-in refrigerated was found to have a half gallon bottle of buttermilk dated best by 4/11/2026. A tray of hamburger on the top shelf with a pan of cheesecake below it that had saran wrap loosely on top of it, not sealed.-Walk-in freezer was found to have box of hamburger patties opened in package and not sealed.-In dry storage, a bottle Coffee Mate hazelnut liquid creamer found with the lid caved in and available for use.-Opened package of penne and rotini pasta opened, resealed, but no date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.06(E&F), 12-006.18(B), and 1-005.06(D) Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to change their personal protective equipment when transitioning from infectious rooms to non-infectious rooms, failed to perform hand hygiene, and failed to ensure housekeeping services were provided to non-infectious rooms prior to infectious rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 113. Findings Are: A. A record review of the Nebraska Infection Control Assessment and Promotion Program (ICAP) Nebraska Medicine 2026 website revealed a hyperlink in the COVID-19 Resources for Healthcare Settings section. The hyperlink was https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/infection-control/. A record review of the CDC Infection Control Guidance: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) document found at https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/infection-control/ and dated 6/24/2024 revealed the guidance applied to all United States settings where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of 2 (Residents 116 and 118) of 3 sampled residents' discharge from the facility. The facility census was 113.Findings Are: A. A record review of Resident 116's admission Record dated 4/15/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The document revealed the resident was discharged from the facility on 3/17/2026. A record review of a fax sent to the ombudsman by the Social Services Supervisor (SSS) on 4/1/2026 revealed no evidence of the ombudsman being notified of Resident 116's discharge from the facility. An interview on 04/14/2026 at 2:22 PM with the Administrator confirmed the ombudsman had not been notified of Resident 116's discharge from the facility. B.A record review of Resident 118's admission Record dated 4/15/2026 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The document revealed the resident was discharged from the facility 3/13/2026. A record review of a fax sent to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) was coded accurately for Resident 3's medication and Resident 5's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a process which requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability). The sample size was 23 and the facility census was 113.Findings Are: A.A record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities) dated October 2025 revealed in Chapter 3,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-009.02(F)Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards related to chemicals in the resident bathrooms for 3 residents (Resident 18, 92, 113) of 8 residents sampled. The facility census was 113. Findings are:An observation on 4/13/26 at 3:08 PM in the bathroom for Resident 92 revealed a cylindrical container titled, Micro-Kill D1 Germicidal Wipes sitting on the toilet tank. The container had a wipe hanging out of the lid of the container at the time.An interview with Resident 92 on 4/13/26 at 3:08 PM about the Micro-Kill D1 Germicidal Wipes in the bathroom revealed the resident smiling stating not knowing anything about it.An interview on 4/13/26 at 3:10 PM with Registered Nurse (RN)-V revealed the Micro-Kill D1 Germicidal Wipes are used for residents that occupy bathrooms with transmissible bacteria. RN-V further revealed Resident 92 has Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL; an enzyme produced by certain bacteria, that make them resistant to many common antibiotics with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.06(C)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a stop date for the use of antibiotics medication. This affected 1 (Residents 15) ) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 113. Findings are: Record review of Resident 15's undated care plan revealed an admission date of 4/12/2021 with the following diagnoses: -FREQUENCY OF MICTURITION-AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS-UNSPECIFIED URINARY INCONTINENCE -COGNITIVE COMMUNICATION DEFICIT-LONG TERM (CURRENT) USE OF ANTIBIOTICS -UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, SEVERE, WITH OTHER BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE-UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITH OTHER BEHAVIORAL -DISTURBANCEA record review of Resident 15's orders revealed an order dated 1/24/2025 with an order summary stating Bactrim Tablet 400-80 Milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to long term use of antibiotics, continue this order. Leave as prescribed. There was no stop date identified for the use of the antibiotic medication. A record review of a document The core elements of Antibiotic Stewardship…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a thorough investigation of misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 104. Findings are:A record review of the facility's policy, Abuse and Neglect Prevention Standard dated 3/2017, under Section V. Investigation, revealed all allegations of abuse or neglect would be investigated and interview investigations would be completed and documented. All investigation results would be maintained in a confidential file by the Administrator. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 3 on 7/12/2022. A record review of Resident 3's Inventory of Personal Effects (dated 9/10/2022), under Items of Specific Value revealed a wedding ring, a mother's ring, and a [NAME] ring. A record review of an Investigation Report (dated 10/8/2025) revealed on 10/3/2025, the facility received an email…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately code comprehensive assessments for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #7 and Resident #14) and failed to accurately complete care area assessment summaries for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #14). The facility census was 105. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident #7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment used to develop resident care plans) dated 04/23/2025 revealed an anticoagulant medication (medication used to prevent blood clots) and antidepressant medication (medication used to treat symptoms of depression) was used during the last 7 days. Record review of Resident #7's MAR (medication administration record) showed no anticoagulant or antidepressant medication in use during the MDS observation period. An interview on 05/01/2025 at 1:45 PM with MDS Coordinator RN-A and MDS Coordinator LPN-B revealed that medications anticoagulant and antidepressant should not have been on the MDS because Resident #7 is no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update resident care plans to reflect resident care needs for 1 resident (Resident #7). The facility census was 105. Findings are: A record review of Resident #7's Care Plan (CP - an individual plan for caring for each resident that can be updated daily, and as needed between quarterly care plan assessments) last updated on 04/30/2025 revealed Resident #7 is taking an anticoagulant medication (medication used to prevent blood clots) and psychoactive medications; an antianxiety (medication used to treat symptoms of anxiety) and an antidepressant (medication used to treat symptoms of depression). Record review of Resident #7's MAR (medication administration record) showed no anticoagulant or antidepressant medication in use during the MDS observation period. Record review of Resident #7's last Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment used to develop resident care plans) was dated 04/23/2025. A record review of a Comprehensive Care Plan Policy dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.11E Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene as required after handling uncooked meat and failed to wear hair restraints in the kitchen as required to prevent the potential for food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents who resided within the facility and were served out of the kitchen. Findings are: A. Record review of an undated facility policy titled, Hand Washing Importance and Technique, revealed that hand washing was indicated after handling uncooked foods including raw meat, fish, poultry, and produce. An observation on 1/28/25 at 7:37 AM revealed Culinary Lead-B (CL-B) was preparing the ingredients for meat loaf. The observation revealed CL-B performed the following: -CL-B completed hand hygiene prior to food preparation using soap and water. -CL-B opened a 10-pound tube of uncooked ground beef while wearing gloves and emptied it into a bowl. -CL-B removed their gloves, then discarded their gloves and packaging at the same time. -CL-B entered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,017 — penalty dated 2025-05-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VETTER SENIOR LIVING — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $691K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE