Alaris Health At Cedar Grove
110 Grove Ave, Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 230 certified beds · (973) 571-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.4% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.6% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.3% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.4% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.8% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.5% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.3% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.07 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.11 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 225 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.1%CMS range 50.6–66.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.5–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.5–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 230 beds and averages 157.3 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-01-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident #182) from abuse by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) by failing to ensure: a.) the facility policy was followed to identify an allegation of abuse, b.) that upon receiving an allegation of abuse on 01/17/23 during the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift, the facility immediately protected Resident #182, and other residents from potential abuse, and c.) a thorough investigation was immediately initiated. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, and on 1 of 4 resident units. The facility's failure to ensure the abuse policy was followed to protect a resident from abuse, and ensure a process was in place to protect all residents from potential abuse resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation that began on 01/17/23 when a family member of Resident #182 informed the facility that CNA #1 was not nice to Resident #182, and had and attitude, and the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation and CNA #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide adequate supervision, b.) follow the facility accident policy and initiate new fall prevention interventions in response to falls, and c.) implement existing interventions to prevent falls (5 of 6 falls reviewed were determined that the resident was left unsupervised). These failures resulted in Resident #92 sustaining multiple falls including a fall on 11/08/21 that required an emergency room transfer on 11/08/21, when Resident #92 fell out of a wheelchair, hit a tray table, sustained a laceration to the right frontal scalp, and was admitted to the hospital with a mechanical fall with head trauma and laceration without obvious intracranial bleed. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #92) with injury and was evidenced by the following: On 01/06/23 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor entered the room and observed Resident #92 in bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
COMPLAINT #2734880Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 4/7/26 and 4/8/26, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently auscultate (listen for sounds) for Resident #5's bowel sounds prior to the administration of the resident's medications and tube feeding (a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system through a tube). The deficient practice was identified for 1of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #5) and was evidenced by the following: Resident #5 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia, chronic kidney disease, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #5's comprehensive Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 11/9/25, indicated that Resident #5 was rarely/never understood and was severely cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 4/7/26, and 4/8/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff failed to consistently bladder and bowel continence in the Documentation Survey Report v2 (DSR). This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, Resident #2, & Resident #5) and was evidenced by the following:a). A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: traumatic subdural hematoma, gastrotomy status, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (a noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland). Review of Resident #1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/21/26, indicated that Resident #1 was rarely/never understood. Further review of the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and provide readily accessible medical documents for 1 (one) of 32 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for medical records. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/11/25 at 11:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in bed, awake, and able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 9/16/25 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Health Record (eHR)/ hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #4, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus (increased blood sugar level) due to underlying conditions. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS) (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) on 7/19/25, indicated that the facility assessed the residents' cognitive status using a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's call device was readily accessible. The deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of the 32 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs/preferences. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/10/2025 10:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed, awake, unable to answer the surveyor's inquiry. The surveyor observed that the call device was located between the siderails and away from the resident's reach. On 9/11/2025 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor observed that the resident's call device was hanging on the side of the resident's bed and not within the reach of the resident. On 9/11/2025 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Health Record (eHR)/ hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #13, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #13 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ 2594265 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident/accident on 6/14/25 and 6/15/25, related to an allegation of being dropped by transport for Resident #182. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following:A review of the reportable event record/report (FRE; Facility Reported Event) was called in on 6/16/25 at 11:37 AM, with an event date of 6/14/25 and 6/15/25 at 12:24 PM. The incident was reported as an allegation of being dropped by ambulance transport and involved two (2) personnel on 6/14/25 and 6/15/25. The event was described as follows: On 6/14/25 the resident reported to the nurse while reaching for their urinal, the resident heard a pop and immediately experienced pain on their elbow and shoulder. The notified physician ordered to transfer the resident to the hospital. The transport [name redacted transport #1] arrived at the facility at 8:49 PM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (CP) for a resident on long-term use of insulin medication. This deficient practice was identified in 1 (one) of the 32 residents (Resident#11) reviewed for CP.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/10/2025 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 out of bed to the wheelchair, able to propel themselves, and able to answer questions appropriately. On 9/15/25 at 1:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Health Record (eHR)/ hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #11, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hemiplegia (weakness of one body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (a blood vessel in the brain was blocked) affecting the right dominant side and type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar). A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ 404793 Based on observations, interviews, records review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident #178's care plan was individualized, reflective of the resident's assessment, consistently provided full assistance to a resident who was dependent when eating, and the nutritional status was monitored by following the weekly weights intervention. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident #178) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #178 The resident's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), diabetes (high blood sugar), congestive heart failure (a condition of weakened, stiffened heart muscle causing the heart to ineffectively pump blood leading to fluid buildup in the lungs and other parts of the body) and pulmonary embolism (clot travels from one part of the body and blocks an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed ensure consistent provision of care/services in accordance with professional standards, consistently assess residents' vital signs and dialysis access site before dialysis treatments and provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center regarding a medication that was held. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: Reference: According to the manufacturer's specifications for Midodrine under Mechanism of Action; Standing systolic blood pressure is elevated by approximately 15 to 30 mmHg at 1 hour after a 10-mg dose of midodrine, with some effect persisting for 2 to 3 hours. On 9/10/25 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) informed the surveyor that Resident #12 was at the hemodialysis (HD) center and picked up on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:15 AM. On 9/15/25 at 9:13 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in their room with their eyes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCYBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's primary physician accurately dated their Physician Progress Notes (PPN) during their visit to ensure the resident's current medical regimen was up to date. This deficient practice was observed for 1 (one) of 32 residents (Resident #13). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/10/2025 10:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed, awake, unable to answer the surveyor's inquiry. The surveyor observed that the call device was located between the siderails and away from the resident's reach. On 9/11/2025 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor observed that the resident's call device was hanging on the side of the resident's bed and not within the reach of the resident. On 9/11/2025 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Health Record (eHR)/ hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #13, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #13 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards and ensure consistent accountability and reconciliation of narcotic medication for Resident #95's and 151's narcotic medications. These deficient practices were identified for one (1) of five (5) medication carts inspected and was evidenced was as follows:On 9/16/25 at 11:57 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) the surveyor began the narcotic medication inspection, stored in a mounted, double locked portion of the medication cart (narcotic box) located on the high side of the pink unit. A review of the facility's Controlled Medication Accountability Sheet (a shift-to-shift count/sign in sheet, used to account for the narcotics and syringes within the medication cart) for September 2025, reflected that the inventory counts were performed on three shifts (7:00 AM, 3:00 PM and 11:00 PM), daily from 9/1/25 at 7:00 AM, to at 9/15/25 at 7:00 AM by the two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire. This deficient practice was identified for three (3) of five (5) newly hired licensed staff reviewed, (Staff #5, #8 and #10). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On On 6/27/24 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed five of ten randomly selected new employee files. The review for license verification for one of the new licensed employees revealed the following: Staff #5, a Social Worker, hired 8/21/23, had a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs license verification printout was dated 10/02/23. The verification was completed after the staff member was hired. There was no documented evidence that Staff #5's license was verified prior to the date of hire (doh). On 6/28/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) regarding license verification. The BOM stated that she would check the license and print a copy and that it had to be done before orientation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible physician supervising the care of residents conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least once every sixty days from January 2024 through June 2024 according to the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 28 residents, Resident #134 was reviewed for physician visits and was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 seated in a wheelchair in the Therapy room (also known as the dining area) with other five residents for early lunch. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #134. Resident #134's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hypotension unspecified (low blood pressure), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (caused by a traumatic head injury) without loss of consciousness, cerebral infarction (also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified in behavioral unit for four (4) of six (6) residents rooms, one (1) of one (1) shower room, and one (1) of two (2) unit rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/25/24 at 10:08 AM through 10:49 AM, the surveyor conducted a Behavioral Unit (BU) tour with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Registered Nurse/Unit Coordinator (RN/UC) in the presence of a second surveyor. The following was observed during the tour: 1. At 10:08 AM, the surveyor entered into room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed a gray-black colored substance on the air vent cover on the ceiling of the room. The LNHA stated, the gray/black substance was an accumulation of dust. The LNHA was unable to state when the air vent was last cleaned. The surveyor observed one ceiling tile near the window area with a large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide full visual privacy when providing wound care treatment, for one (1) of 28 residents, Resident #103. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/27/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) perform a treatment to the sacral wound of Resident #103. The Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) was assisting the LPN with the positioning of Resident #103 during the wound treatment. On 6/27/24 at 10:31 AM, during the wound treatment, Resident #103 with the assistance of the CNA was lying on their left side on the bed facing away from the door. The back of the resident's body was exposed. The privacy curtain was partially pulled, around the foot of the resident's bed. The resident's bed was visible to the door of the room, which was closed. The LPN after cleansing the resident's wound, removed her gloves and went to the door of the room. LPN #1 fully opened the door, went to the treatment cart positioned in front of the door to get gloves from the box…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident's representative written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital and also send a copy to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for two (2) of three (3) resident's (Resident #195 and #41) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of Resident #195's electronic medical record included the following: Resident #195's discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set's (DRAMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for the three DRAMDS, reflected that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A review of Resident #195's hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical record did not include a written notification of the reason for transfer to the resident or resident representative (RR) and a copy to the LTCO for each transfer to the hospital. 2. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for one (1) of three (3) residents, Resident #142 reviewed for closed records. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/26/24 at 12:58 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical chart for Resident #142 whose discharge MDS was coded for discharge (dc) to an acute hospital. Review of Resident #142's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), anxiety disorder, unspecified, and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of A section of the 4/27/24 Discharge MDS for Resident #142 revealed that section A2105 DC Status documented, 04. Short-Term General Hospital. The Order Summary Report (OSR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for medications with parameters for two (2) of 28 residents, Residents #44 and #134, reviewed for physician orders according to standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary was completed for two (2) of two (2) residents, Residents #13 and #142 reviewed for discharge to home, according to the facility policy and procedure . This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/26/24 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) closed record of Resident #13 and revealed the following: The admission Record (AR, or face sheet, an admission summary) showed that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection) site not specified, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), depression unspecified, anxiety disorder unspecified, and fibromyalgia (long-term condition that involves widespread body pain and tiredness). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with decreased range of motion and mobility received consistent daily treatment of a hand splint to prevent contractures or further contraction for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for position and mobility (Resident #94). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #94 seated in a wheelchair and wore a splint on their left hand. Resident #94 stated that he/she wore the splint during the day. On 6/25/24 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's electronic medical record. Resident #94's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side (affected extremity exhibits decreased muscle tone and cannot be actively moved by the patient), type 1 diabetes mellitus (lifelong condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the incontinence care plan was developed according to the resident's assessment to provide appropriate treatment and services for the care of the resident who had frequent urine and occasional bowel incontinence according to the facility's policy and procedure, for one (1) of one (1) resident, Resident #134, reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 seated in a wheelchair in the Therapy room (also known as the dining area) with other five residents for early lunch. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #134. Resident #134's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hypotension unspecified (low blood pressure), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) a non-certified Nurse Aide (NA) did not continue to work as an NA after the specified 120 days for one (1) of two (2) NAs reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task (NA #1); and b.) there was a delineated policy and/or program in place for the hiring of non-certified NAs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health memo dated April 21, 2023 sent to Nursing Homes included the following: On February 27, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that all nurse aide emergency training waivers will terminate at the end of the Federal Public Health Emergency (PHE). The PHE is expected to end on May 11, 2023. At that time, all Temporary Nurse Aides (TNAs) hired prior to the end of the PHE and who have enrolled in a NATCEP program and completed the first 16 hours of training prior to May 11, 2023, must complete the NATCEP and pass the nurse aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report was posted and in a prominent place within the facility readily accessible to the residents and the visitors. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 9:00 AM and 6/25/24 at 8:55 AM, the surveyor entered the facility and observed that there was no Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted in the entrance area. On 6/25/24 at 9:37 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Receptionist regarding the posting of the NHRCSR. The Receptionist stated that the NHRCSR was usually posted on the wall behind her. The surveyor observed three sheet protectors that did not have any documents in them hanging on the wall. The Receptionist stated that the Staffing Coordinator (SC) would post them and that the last time she saw them posted was last week. On 6/25/24 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor interviewed the SC regarding the posting of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication for one (1) of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident #67). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #67 lying in bed. The resident agreed to speak with the surveyor. During the brief interview, the surveyor asked the resident if they can toilet themselves. The resident stated, no, the nurses aides come to assist them and change if needed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #67's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed the following. Resident #67's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes (a disease where the body does not regulate blood sugar properly, anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication administration observation on 6/26/24, the surveyor observed four (4) nurses administer medications to six (6) residents. There were 25 opportunities for error, and three (3) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 12%. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of six (6) residents, (Resident #34 and Resident #132), that were administered medications by two (2) of four (4) nurses that were observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/26/24 at 8:31 AM, during the medication (med) administration observation, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) preparing to administer medications (meds) to Resident #34. The surveyor observed the resident's Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) which reflected an order for Colace oral capsule (a medication used to soften the stool), give one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled appropriately. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of five (5) medication carts inspected and two (2) of two (2) medication storage rooms inspected on three (3) of four (4) units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the surveyor inspected the Pink Unit Medication (med) Room. The surveyor accessed the med refrigerator located in the med room. The surveyor observed an unlabeled amber plastic vial in the refrigerator. Upon inspection of the amber vial, the surveyor observed an unlabeled vial of Retacrit (a med used to increase red blood cell production) located inside. The surveyor opened an under counter drawer in the med room and observed a Novolin R Flex Pen (a self-contained device used to administer insulin, a med used to treat high blood sugar) with a pharmacy label and dispensed date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT: NJ#172727 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete, available, and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for three (3) of the 31 residents reviewed (Residents #86, #134, and #196). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/24/24 at 9:15 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, regarding the process for reportable, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator stated that when an incident occurred, he was supposed to be notified with the Director of Nursing (DON) immediately. We also notify the physician, family, state agency and the ombudsman's office for a reportable. The LNHA also stated that determining the cognitive level such as the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score, when a resident was not able to explain, that needs to be investigated and depending on what was learned will depend on if it should be a reportable or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent and control the spread of infection: a) improper storage of a urinary drainage bag for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #103), reviewed for urinary catheter care, b) performing hand hygiene during a wound treatment observation by one (1) of one (1) nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse), and c) doffing (taking off) of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when exiting an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) room during a wound treatment by one (1) of one (1) nurse. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: 1. On 6/24/24 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #103 with their face only visible from behind the privacy curtain drawn. Resident #103 greeted the surveyor and for the surveyor to approach their bedside. Resident #103 was observed lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive. The surveyor observed the resident's incontinent brief was open, their pants were below their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure have an Infection Preventionist (IP) dedicated solely to the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) who worked at least part-time and had completed specialized training in infection control and prevention for one (1) of two (2) staff. According to the NJ Executive Directive 21-012 (revised 12/22/22) included The facility's designated individual(s) with training in infection prevention and control shall assess the facility's IPCP by establishing or revising the infection control plan, annual infection prevention and control program risk assessment, and conducting internal quality improvement audits. According to the CMS QSO-22-19-NH Memo dated 6/29/22 and Fact Sheet, Updated Guidance for Nursing Home Resident Health and Safety dated 6/29/22, effective date on October 24, 2022 Overview of New and Updated Guidance, Summary of Significant Changes, included that in Infection Control, requires the facilities to have a part-time IP. While the requirement is to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent provided facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) each resident was offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations, b.) education was provided regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations, c.) resident or representative has the opportunity to refuse immunizations unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had been immunized. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents, Resident #134, reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/24 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 seated in a wheelchair in the Therapy room (also known as the dining area) with other five residents for early lunch. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #134. Resident #134's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to have written procedures in place to ensure: a.) all residents were protected from abuse when an allegation of staff to resident abuse occurred, b.) a process was in place for identifying other potential victims of abuse, and c.) a process to ensure all potential witnesses/persons aware of the allegation were interviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced for 4 of 4 resident units, and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, and occurred when an allegation of abuse by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) against a resident (Resident #182) was received on 01/17/23 and CNA #1 proceeded to work a resident care shift the following day, 01/18/23, and had access to Resident #182 and other residents who resided at the facility, and was prior to an abuse investigation being completed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to 600J On 01/19/23 at 8:27 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with a request to speak with a family member. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to treat all residents in a dignified manner by failing to provide: a.) oral and incontinence care to a resident assessed to be dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's), and prior to serving the resident meal, b.) a timely clothing change to a resident whose clothing was visibly soiled, and c.) a resident with respect and dignity. This deficient practice was identified 2 of 26 residents reviewed (Resident #45 and #179), on 2 of 4 units, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/04/23 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #45 in bed. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was at the bedside assisting the resident with care. On 01/04/23 at 10:37 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the CNA who revealed that Resident #45 required extensive assistance with care, could feed his/herself after set up, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 01/06/23 at 7:45 AM, the surveyor completed a care tour with one of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of records, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care, and personal hygiene care for 6 of 26 residents (Resident #19, #45, #66, #75, #92 and #179) sampled on 2 of 4 resident units, and failed to offer oral hydration and mouth care to a dependent resident (Resident #179). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/03/23 at 10:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in bed, the head of the bed was elevated, and the resident was able to answer questions. The residents lips appeared very dry and crusty. The resident's right hand was contracted. On 01/04/22 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in bed in the dorsal recumbent position (a reclining position with both knees flexed, hips rotated outward, and both soles kept flat on the bed), the resident informed the surveyor that she/he had not been changed. On 01/04/22 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor returned to the room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and related services were provided, and failed to follow their change in condition policy to identify and assess a resident who had a change in condition, and there was a delay in treatment, and the resident subsequently required hospitalization on 01/09/23. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for care, (Resident #92), and who was transferred to the hospital emergency department via 911, and was diagnosed with hypernatremia and sepsis and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 01/03/23 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #92 in bed facing the wall. On 01/04/23 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #92 in bed, and was facing the wall. The breakfast tray was on the bedside table and was untouched. On 01/05/23 at 8:37 AM, the surveyor entered the room and observed Resident #92 in bed and was facing the wall, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to enter signed progress notes (PN) in the hybrid medical record (electronic or paper) at each visit. This deficient practice was identified on 4 of 4 units and was evidenced by the following. On 01/11/23 through 01/13/23, the surveyor began to review the hybrid medical records of sampled residents. The surveyor reviewed the following: The Behavioral Health Unit (BHU): Resident #6: hybrid record revealed late entries: Effective Date (the date the resident was seen by the practitioner): 12/23/2022; Department: Physicians; Position: Physician; Created By: a physician's name was entered; Created Date: 01/3/2023. This represented an 11-day delay in the Progress Note (PN) being entered into the hybrid record. Effective Date: 12/15/2022; Department: Physicians; Position: Physician; Created By: a physician's name was entered; Created Date: 01/9/2023. This represented a 25-day delay in the PN being entered into the hybrid record. Effective Date: 01/06/2023; Department:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient and competent staff to provide: a.) nursing and related services to meet the residents's needs as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and b.) sufficient staffing numbers to meet minimum staffing requirements. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 4 nursing units and for 6 of 23 sampled residents, Resident #19, #45, #66, # 72, #92 and #179, reviewed for care related services. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. Refer to F677 and F 689 1.) On 01/03/23 at 10:05 AM, on 01/04/23 at 8:15 AM, and on 01/04/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in bed in dorsal recumbent position. The resident indicated that he/she had not been turned and had not been provided with incontinence care. Resident #19's mouth was dry and a crusty white substance was noted around the mouth. On 01/05/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed during a care tour, that the resident had not been changed and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record reviews, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) implement infection control practices and adhere to the facility's policy in regards to hand hygiene during medication administration, b.) store a Foley urinary catheter drainage bag in a manner to prevent infection for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #19), c.) ensure a visitor was educated and instructed to wear a mask while in the facility, d.) wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while in the room of a residents on transmission-based droplet precautions for 2 of 4, and use hand hygiene prior to donning (putting on) PPE on 1 of 4 units, and e.) follow their Covid-19 Outbreak Response Plan and Policy for Infection Control, and follow the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the surveillance of Healthcare Personnel (HCP) to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was observed during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to identify a bed that was broken for 1 of 26 residents reviewed who had a visibly broken bed (Resident #180). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/03/23 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #180 while the resident was sitting in bed. The resident stated the only issue was that he/she could feel the screws from the bed frame and it was hard to sleep. Resident #180 stated he/she had to sleep a certain way, and kept telling them (the facility staff) and nothing is done. Resident #180 was sitting in the bed and the surveyor was unable to observe the mattress at that time. On 01/04/23 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #180 was not in the room and observed that the mattress was not covered by a blanket and was visibly sunken in, in a circular pattern about a foot long. The surveyor brought the Unit Manager (UM) into Resident #180's room and asked him to look at the mattress. The UM looked at the mattress, felt the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported timely to the Department of Health. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #182) and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 600J and 600F On 01/19/23 at 8:46 AM, the surveyor contacted the family member (FM) of Resident #182 and conducted a telephone interview. The FM stated Resident #182 had an issue with CNA #1 who had walked into Resident #182's room and was nasty to Resident #182 on 01/17/23. The FM stated CNA #1 told the resident that she was not going to have to change (provide incontinence care) the resident again, since Resident #182 was not her only resident. CNA #1 told Resident #182 that she was on her break at the time, and CNA #1 refused to change Resident #182. CNA #1 then proceeded to throw down the food lid with force on Resident#182's over bed table. The FM stated that he/she had made the Director of Social Services (DSS) aware of what happened on the same day, 01/17/23. On 01/19/23 at 8:46 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document the administration, or refusal of medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #6) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) identify through their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, that their abuse prevention program did not incorporate a component to protect all residents from potential abuse. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. Refer to F 600 J and F 607 F On 01/03/23 at 10:26 AM, the facility provided the survey team with a copy of their, Abuse Prevention Program, revised 10/21/22. On 01/19/23 at 8:27 AM, the survey team reviewed an allegation of abuse reported by a resident's family member. The abuse allegation referred to a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) being abusive towards a resident on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on 01/17/23. On 01/19/23 at 8:46 AM, a surveyor interviewed the resident who confirmed on 01/17/23, a CNA was nasty, threw down a meal tray, and refused to provide incontinent care. The resident stated that the incident had been reported to the Director of Social Services (DSS) on 01/17/23 (no time provided). On 01/19/23 at 9:23 AM, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALARIS HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/27/2004 |
| EISENREICH, AVERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/27/2004 |
| REYES, GRACE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2018 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/27/2004 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315357. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.