Alaris Health at The Chateau

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 311 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (R) (R6, R8, R9 and R10) out of fifteen residents reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were not bathed according to their plans of care. The facility's failure to ensure residents were bathed routinely created the potential for the residents to experience negative effects related to poor hygiene. A total of 15 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:1. Review of R6's admission Record, dated 04/16/26 and located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included dementia and history of stroke. Review of R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/06/26 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors were not made during the administration of medication for one of one resident (Resident (R) 2) observed for medication administration. The facility's failure to ensure R2 received his/her medication as ordered created the potential for this and other residents to experience significant negative physical effects related to the incorrect administration of medication. A total of 15 residents were reviewed in the sample.Findings include:Review of R2's admission Record, dated 04/16/26 and located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included history of stroke, type 2 diabetes, prostate cancer, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gastrostomy (g-tube) status, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right dominant side. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) R3) three residents reviewed for dental services received timely dental services related to a decaying tooth. The facility's failure to ensure timely dental care was provided for R3 created the potential for R3 to experience pain and/or infection related to the decaying tooth. A total of 15 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:Review of R3's admission Record, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included history of stroke. Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/25/25 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 5 out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired.Review of R3's Care Plan, most recently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed during the administration of medication and feeding for one of one resident (Resident (R) R2) observed for medication administration. The facility's failure to ensure infection control procedures were followed for R2 created the potential for this and other residents to develop infection. A total of 15 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:Review of R2's admission Record, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included history of stroke, type 2 diabetes, prostate cancer, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gastrostomy (g-tube) status, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his/her right dominant side. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/03/25 and found in the EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure notification and/or timely notification was made to two resident's (Resident (R) 278 and R328) representatives (RR) when a change of condition occurred out of a total sample of 43 residents reviewed. This had the potential for the RRs to not be informed of the resident's condition and to be able to make informed decisions regarding the care of the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of Change last revised 12/27/22 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member of the following changes . Procedures: 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status (i.e. a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) . 4. A decision to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to by the physician for one resident (Resident (R)160) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 43 residents. This had the potential for the resident to have unmet health needs by not providing medication management. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Consultant Pharmacy Reports last revised 04/2024 revealed, It is the policy of the facility that a Licensed Nurse along with the Consultant Pharmacist will review the resident drug regimen upon admission, throughout the stay depending on the resident condition and in any event of risk of adverse consequences . Any irregularities will be reported and documented to the attending physician and DON [Director of Nursing] . Procedure . 4. Any medication irregularities identified will be documented on a separate, written report and notification to the attending physician, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the Maintenance Logbook, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure eight resident rooms (Rooms 225W, 213W, 209, 211D, 227P, 262, 230 and 229) on the second floor of the north building was maintained to promote a homelike environment. The facility further failed to ensure formica coverings on a half wall in the Activity room was repaired to potentially prevent injury. This affected eight rooms of 38 resident rooms occupied on the second floor of the north building and the Activity room. This had the potential for the residents not to have a home like room in good repair and had the potential to cause an injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Maintenance Repairs last revised 05/24 revealed, Policy: To maintain a safe, clean, and functional environment for residents, staff, and visitors through timely repairs, routine maintenance, and room inspections. Procedures: 1. The Maintenance Department is responsible for conducting routine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0924 — isolated
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of Maintenance Logbooks, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure handrails located in the corridors throughout the second floor of the north building on all four hallways had handrails in good repair and/or were not missing. This had the potential for the residents to potentially injure themselves when using the handrails during ambulation. This affected all four hallways of the second floor in the north building out of three floors in the building. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Maintenance Repairs last revised 05/24 revealed, Policy: To maintain a safe, clean, and functional environment for residents, staff, and visitors through timely repairs, routine maintenance, and room inspections. Procedures: 1. The Maintenance Department is responsible for conducting routine checks, repairs, and inspections throughout the facility . 3. Staff report issues (e.g., broken equipment, hazards) to the Maintenance Department. 4. Submit repair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ00147498, NJ00149099 Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documentation on 8/8/23, 8/11/23, and 8/14/23, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's medical record (MR) was complete and accurate according to facility policies titled Clinical Charting and Documentation for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #3) reviewed for incident/accident and documentation. This deficient practice is evident by the following: According to the admission RECORD (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but was not limited to: Dementia Severity Without Behavioral Disturbance. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/4/23, showed that Resident #3's cognition was severely impaired and needed help from staff in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/28/23, reflected an order for Tylenol 325 milligram (mg) to give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Mild Pain (pain scale of 1-3). The Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-21 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  7. The surveyor reviewed the Discharge MDS 3.0 assessments, including all the completed MDS's for Resident #208 which revealed that the resident had a discharge MDS with an ARD of 9/5/22 and was due to be transmitted no later than 10/3/22. The MDS was not completed and transmitted until 10/4/22.8. Review of a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 8/28/22 for Resident #41 was due to be transmitted to CMS no later than 9/25/22. The MDS was not transmitted to CMS until 9/26/22. 9. Review of an admission MDS with an ARD of 8/11/22 for Resident #124 was due to be transmitted to CMS no later than 9/8/22. The MDS was not transmitted to CMS until 9/21/22. 10. Review of a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 7/10/22 for Resident #16 was due to be transmitted to CMS no later than 8/7/22. The MDS was not transmitted to CMS until 9/2/22. 11. Review of a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 7/13/22 for Resident #5 was due to be transmitted to CMS no later than 8/10/22. The MDS was not transmitted to CMS until 9/2/22. Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALARIS HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ