Oaks At Denville, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 415 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 206 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 65.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.25 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.83 to 1.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 3008061 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a staff member, Unidentified Person (UP #1), who was providing resident direct care as a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) was a.) certified as an nursing aide and b.) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide resident care in a manner to assure resident safety and ensure each resident attained or maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided on 2 of 3 nursing units. On 4/29/2026 at 6:36 PM, the Staffing Coordinator called Agency CNA #1 with the phone number listed on the online staffing agency platform seeking CNA coverage for 4/30/2026. The woman who answered the phone identified herself as Agency CNA #1 and informed the Staffing Coordinator that she was currently out on disability and not working. The Staffing Coordinator identified that Agency CNA #1 had worked at the facility the day before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat deficiency Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 1/27/25 at 9:55 AM, while on the 4th floor in the kitchenette the surveyor observed the following: in refrigerator #1 had an individual cheesecake without a cover and missing a use by date, an open jar of molasses without an open/use by label, and in freezer #2 a paper cup with a brown frozen substance not dated and without a use by label. On 1/27/25 at 10:15 AM, while on the 2nd floor in the kitchenette the surveyor observed the following in refrigerator #1: a zip lock bag of sliced pickles and red cup with oatmeal-like substance both missing labels and use by dates. On 1/27/25 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager (UM), who stated all items in the refrigerator and freezers should be covered as well as have a label with an open and use by date. The UM further stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plans (CP) for 2 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #35 and #13). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/27/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #35 sitting in the wheelchair inside the recreation room, unable to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 1/27/25 at 1:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #35, which revealed the following: A review of the Face Sheet (FS; an admission summary) reflected that Resident #35 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified dementia (loss of memory), unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A review of the recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) dated 6/18/24 indicated that the facility assessed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently monitor, document, and evaluate the ongoing benefits of continued use of psychoactive medications for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #3, #4, and #35). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/27/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 out of bed to the wheelchair inside the activity room, able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. On 1/29/25 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #3, which revealed the following: A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified dementia (loss of memory), unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (A/MDS), (an assessment tool used to facilitate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to treat all residents in a dignified manner by failing to provide a resident with respect and dignity during wound care. This deficient practice was identified 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #231). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/27/25 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #213 in their room. The resident was observed with a gauze (gauze wrap is a sterile material used to wrap or cover wounds) wrapped around their right elbow. During the interview the resident stated they had a skin tear prior to coming into the facility. Resident #231 was agreeable to allow the surveyor to observe the wound care treatment. A review of Resident #231 medical record revealed that the resident had diagnosis that included but were not limited unspecified fall, anemia (a deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood), and hypertension (high pressure in the arteries). A review of the admission MDS, (an assessment tool…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat deficiency Based on observation, interview, and record review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed secure medications within the medication cart. This deficient practice was observed during wound care observation and was evidenced by the following: On 1/28/25 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN#1) provide wound care on Resident #213. RN#1 was observed gathering medication from the medication cart outside of Residents #213's room. Once RN#1 gathered all medications and supplies from the medication cart, the surveyor observed RN#1 close the drawer to the medication cart and walk away. Surveyor asked RN#1 if they had locked the medication cart. RN#1 went back to the medication cart and stated, I forgot to lock the cart. That was a mistake on my part On 1/29/25 at 9:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the surveyor with a facility policy titled, Storage of medications with a revised date on 5/1/2017. Under the procedure section of the policy it states, 7. Compartments (including but not limited to, drawers,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness as evidenced by the following: On 10/30/2023 at 9:59 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Manager (FSM) the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the tray line freezer, room service the surveyor observed a pack of vegetable burgers undated and opened, and six (6) trays of pastries prepared by the baker, the FSM was unable to state when the package was received, opened, or expiration date. 2. In the room service storage, cold prep, [soda brand] refrigerator the surveyor observed shredded mozzarella cheese that was opened and undated. The FSM was unable to state when the package was received, opened, or expiration date. 3. In the freezer walk in the surveyor observed 10 trays with frozen cupcakes and cookies not labeled with a prepared date or a use by date. The FSM was unable to state when the trays were prepared or would expire. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) identify irregularity for a total of twelve months and b) act upon the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #17). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/30/23 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #17 in bed asleep. The surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical records. The resident's admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses that were not limited to essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), unspecified dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), sick sinus syndrome (a disease in which the heart's natural pacemaker located in the upper right heart chamber (right atrium) becomes damaged and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate Pharmaceutical Services and ensure a) a biological was properly labeled with an expiration date, b) removal of a discontinued biological from active inventory for a discharged resident (Resident # 23), c) medications were secured within the medication cart, and d) a narcotic medication for Resident #38 was properly labeled with an expiration date. This deficient practice was observed in two (2) of two (2) refrigerators located in the medication storage room, and one (1) of two (2) medication carts inspected and was evidenced as follows. A review of the manufacturer's specifications for Daptomycin (an antibiotics that can treat infections) under section 2.7 titled, Preparation and Administration of Daptomycin for Injection. In-Use Storage Conditions for Daptomycin for Injection Once Reconstituted in Acceptable Intravenous Diluents Stability studies have shown that the reconstituted solution is stable in the vial for 12 hours at room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0882 — pattern
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the a) employed designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had at least part time position for one (1) of three (3) IP and b) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance prior to assuming the IP role for three (3) of three (3) employees reviewed for IP. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of CMS QSO-19-10-NH, dated 3/11/19, included but was not limited to Background: Effective November 28, 2019, the final requirement includes specialized training in infection prevention and control for the individual(s) responsible for the facility's IPCP (infection prevention and control program). Specialized Training for Infection Prevention and Control: In order to receive . a certificate of completion, learners must complete all modules and pass a post-course exam . The Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course is available on CDC's (Centers for Disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0944 — pattern
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program for five (5) of five (5) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the annual in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNA files, which were provided by the facility. The Training Hours Transcripts showed the following: CNA #1 had a hire date of 8/09/10. The facility could not provide a Training Hours Transcripts. CNA #1 did not have QAPI training. CNA #2 had a hire date of 8/09/10. According to the Training Hours Transcripts, CNA #2 did not have QAPI training. CNA #3 had a hire date of 10/13/14. According to the Training Hours Transcripts, CNA #3 did not have QAPI training. CNA #4 had a hire date of 9/08/16. According to the Training Hours Transcripts, CNA #4 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,335 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,335 — penalty dated 2026-05-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ