Atrium At Navesink Harbor, The
40 Riverside Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701 · Non profit - Corporation · 43 certified beds · (732) 842-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.0% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.0% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.3% | 80.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.8% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.5%CMS range 56.7–71.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.8–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.6–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 35.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.35 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss of 5.5 pounds (lbs.) which was 5.4% in 20 days from admission on [DATE] through 6/5/23 and an additional 0.7 lb. loss from 6/5/23 through 7/1/23. The facility failed to: a.) consistently ascertain and monitor weekly weights for 4 weeks after admission and implement weekly weights for 4 weeks after a significant weight loss occurred, b.) obtain a re-weight to verify a significant weight loss, c.) implement a comprehensive admission nutritional assessment and care plan in a timely manner, d.) consistently record and monitor meal consumption, and e.) ensure a recommended nutritional supplement was prescribed and provided to the resident prior to surveyor inquiry. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition and resulted in a significant and avoidable weight loss (Resident #8). The evidence was as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the the facility failed to ensure that the Dietary staff had the appropriate skill sets and competencies to ensure a) staff maintained a sanitary dietary environment, b) a process was in place to ensure recipes were followed to ensure nutrition adequacy of fortified foods, and appropriate physician ordered diets were provided to residents, c) cooking temperatures were consistently monitored, d) staff were competent in utilizing food temperature measuring devices, e) infection control practices were consistently implemented with glove use and hand hygiene, and f) foods were appropriately labeled, dated and discarded by use by dates. The deficient practice places all resident at risk for potential food borne illness, affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F812, F804, and F805 On 02/18/26 at 8:24 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Executive Chef (EC), and the Director of Dining Services (DDS) observed that refrigerated and potentially hazardous foods were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to ensure a) modified texture foods were prepared utilizing standardized recipes to ensure adequate nutritional content and appropriate modified food texture, b) appropriate portions were provided for all texture modified foods and c) ensure all foods were served at appropriate temperatures. The deficient practice was observed during a meal observation and affected 6 of 6 residents who received puree diets and 4 of 4 residents who received mechanical soft diets, and was evidenced by the following: On 02/18/26 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor observed the meal service in the 3rd floor food service pantry and observed the following: A person was observed in the pantry with their hair not fully covered and one side was hanging outside of the hair net. They identified themself as the Senior Director of Nutrition, Registered Dietitian (SRD) for the management company. When the surveyor asked her what role was regarding the meal, she stated QA (quality assurance) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) all food was appropriately stored and food temperatures were monitored in a manner to prevent foodborne illness, b) all kitchen equipment and the environment in the main kitchen and remote service kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, c) staff practiced hand hygiene and restrained their hair appropriately. This deficient practice affected all residents and increased the potential for the development of food borne illness, the potential from contamination from foreign substances and was evidenced by the following: On 02/18/26 at 8:24 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Executive Chef (EC), the Director of Dining Services (DDS) and observed the following: -The EC exited the refrigerated walk- in box and did not have all his facial hair covered. -The [NAME] was cooking and he did not have all of his facial hair covered. When asked if it should be covered, he confirmed that the facial hair should be covered. Inside the refrigerated walk-in box:-Two stacks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage was properly contained in dumpsters and ensure cardboard was properly disposed of and the garbage area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 2/18/26 at 8:54 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Executive Chef (EC), the surveyor observed an alcove area prior to the exit from the kitchen toward the dumpster area. The area had cardboard boxes strewn about and were piled up on the floor, and were against the walls. The cardboard boxes were also covering a black bin that appeared to have broken down cardboard boxes inside. Immediately outside the exit door revealed that multiple large garbage bags were piled up in a garbage can, the blue dumpster was overflowing with what appeared to be cardboard boxes, in clear bags which were lifting up the lid the the dumpster, the adjacent dumpsters were also overflowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed identify and include the staff competencies and skill sets that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population which included the contracted food service department. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was identified by the following: On 2/18/26, the facility provided the survey team with a copy of the Facility Assessment (FA). A review of the document revealed the following: Staff training/education and competencies: Describe the staff training/education and competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for your resident population. Include staff certification requirements as applicable. Potential data sources include hiring, education, training competency instruction and testing policies. The [facility name] utilizes [name of computer training as well as live training, conduct competencies and review policies and procedures. See competency binder. There were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to self-identify areas of concerns and develop comprehensive data driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plans to address sanitation, pest management, garbage disposal, appropriate meal preparation and meal service, and also failed to self-identify concerns related to timely implementation of wound care recommendations and clarification of wound care orders. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to : F550, F686, F802, F804, F805, F812, F925 On 02/25/26 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) about the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process and what the current active QAPI plans included. The LNHA stated the most recent QAPI was the 4th Quarter QAPI meeting that was held on 1/15/26. The LNHA stated that if the QAPI team thought a process had improved, that it would not be included. The LNHA stated the current QAPIs included the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance for one (1) of one (1) employee reviewed for IP.Refer to: F882: An IP must have obtained specialized IPC training beyond initial professional training or education prior to assuming the role. Training can occur through more than one course, but the IP must provide evidence of training through a certificate(s) of completion or equivalent documentation. CMS recommends specialized training include the following topics: Infection prevention and control program overview, The infection preventionist's role, Infection surveillance, Outbreaks, Principles of standard precautions (e.g., content on hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, injection safety, respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette, environmental cleaning and disinfection, and reprocessing reusable resident care equipment),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective pest management program was in effect to control flies in the kitchen. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 2/18/26 during a kitchen tour conducted by the surveyor that began on 8:24 AM, with the Executive Chef (EC),and the Director of Dining Services (DDS), the surveyor observed small black flies sporadically in the kitchen, and observed black flies were on the front and side of the white microware oven in the area where the ice cream freezer was located. The EC stated the flies were due to a leak in a pipe that had a crack. On 02/19/26 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Facility Management (DFM) who was responsible for maintenance, housekeeping and security. The surveyor inquired if there was a pest log for the kitchen and if there were any concerns reported regarding an issue with a leak due to a cracked pipe. The DFM stated there was no pest log and he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently treat residents in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was identified during the meal observation for three 4 of eight 8 residents (Resident #5, Resident #18, Resident #22, Resident #24) observed during breakfast and lunch on 2 of 2 resident units and was evidenced by the following. 1. On 02/18/26 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor toured the 300 Unit and observed the meal delivery system. Some residents were observed eating in their rooms while other residents were at the nursing station waiting for assistance with the breakfast meal. The surveyor observed Resident #24 in bed with the breakfast tray positioned on the bedside table. The surveyor observed that Resident #24 was eating with their bare hands. The surveyor observed that Resident #24 had tremors on both hands and had difficulty holding the pancake and bringing the pancake to their mouth at the same time.On 02/20/26 at 8:40AM, the surveyor observed the residents eating breakfast in the dayroom, there was no staff in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure a) prior to hire, all employees were pre-screened to ensure that they had not been found guilty in a court of law of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, or had findings entered into the state nurse aide registry or against a professional license, and b) a process was in place to maintain documentation to confirm an appropriate pre-screening had occurred for all contracted facility employees which included dietary. The deficient practice was identified for 3 of 56 employee files reviewed that were provided by the facility. The evidence was as follows:A review of facility policy Hiring Policy: Employment Application & Pre-Employment Checks, revised April 2025 included:Policy: [Facility Name], Inc. (SSL) is an equal opportunity employer and believes in the fair treatment of all applicants. It is SSL's policy to hire only those individuals who successfully complete the pre-employment assessment criteria, mandatory drug screen, fitness for duty exam, criminal background…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided with routine and appropriate nail care in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living Care (Residents #18) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/18/2026 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #18, seated in a recliner chair adjacent to the nursing, their breakfast tray was on the bedside table. The surveyor observed the resident's nails long, jagged and discolored with a black substance underneath the fingernails. The resident was unable to answer the surveyor's inquiries when asked if they would like their nails to be trimmed and cleaned.On 02/19/2026 at 12:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #18 being assisted with the lunch meal by a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA), the resident's fingernails were long, jagged and the black substance was still present underneath the fingernails.On 02/20/2026 the surveyor reviewed Resident #18's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to ensure wound treatment recommendations were clarified and implemented in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #1), who had a wound treatment recommended by the Wound Consultant (WC) on 1/13/26, which was implemented on 1/21/26 (7 days later) and the dose was not clarified by the physician until 2/19/26 (38 days later). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/18/26 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 in the seated in a recliner in the dining room and was being assisted with the meal by facility staff. On 2/19/26 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 sleeping in bed. At that time, the surveyor then reviewed the medical record for Resident #1which revealed the following: The admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure a) weights were consistently and accurately monitored and verified a weight loss and implemented interventions in response to a significant weight loss, and b) staff implemented identified nutritional interventions appropriately and consistently. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition, who sustained significant unplanned weight loss (Resident #1 lost 9.53% in 10 days (from 12/17/25 to 12/27/25) and Resident #5 who had a 14 % weight loss x 6 months). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F804, F805 a) On 2/18/26 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 in the dining room seated in a recliner with legs elevated and was being assisted with the meal by a facility staff. The meal appeared pureed, and the cold tea nectar thickened On 2/19/26 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 was asleep in bed and the surveyor then reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to assure the nursing staff had the competency and skills sets to provide nursing care to two sampled residents to provide appropriate wound care and ensure nursing staff were competent in a process to verify physician recommendations and clarify orders for wound care. The deficient practice was evidenced for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #1 and Resident #3) and was evidenced by the following: a. On 1/13/26 [untimed], WC #2's documented, on a Consultation form, New Findings and Recommended Treatment: measurements 13.5 [cm] x 8.5[cm] x 2[cm]; and wound was debrided. the wound was debrided; Cleanse wound with Vashe, apply Santyl to slough, pack with Dakin's (sodium hypochlorite; modified bleach used as an antiseptic to clean and treat infected wounds or ulcers; dosing available in full strength equivalent to 0.5%, half strength equivalent to 0.25% and quarter strengths equivalent to 0.125%) soaked gauze [twice daily] and cover with foam dressing. The Attending Physician and Consulting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to ensure that a resident who required a mechanically altered diet, received appropriate meal items. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #5) and who required a mechanical soft diet and had the potential to affect all residents who required a mechanical soft diet. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/19/26 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Dietitian (RD) about Resident #5's weight loss. The RD stated that the resident has had weight loss, has become increasingly confused, and she has added interventions in response to the weight loss. On 2/19/26 at 2:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #5 which revealed the following: The Face Sheet (an admission summary) revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty initiating a swallow,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices for a) hand hygiene and establishing a clean field during a wound treatment b) hand hygiene during resident meal service one (1) of two (2) nurses who administered medications to one (1) of four (4) residents during the medication administration observation, to limit the potential of spreading infection. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, dated 11/28/23, included that: Semicritical items contact mucous membranes or non-intact skin. This category included respiratory therapy. These medical devices should be free from all microorganisms. a. On 2/20/2026 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2) perform a treatment for Resident #3 in the resident's bathroom. Prior to performing the treatment LPN #2 was observed performing hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required Skilled Nursing Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) in the proper time frame for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #12, and Resident #46) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/18/26 at 1:36 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided list of residents who were discharged from Medicare covered Part A in the last six months and randomly chose three residents and requested the Beneficiary Notices from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA). On 2/21/26 at 1:55 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Beneficiary Notices provided which revealed the following: Resident #12 had a Medicare Part A episode that began on 8/28/25 and a last covered day of 9/26/25. An email provided by the facility revealed the SNF ABN and the NOMNC were both sent to the Resident #12's responsible party (RP) on 9/25/25 at 4:06 PM. Resident #46 had a Medicare Part A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to identify medication irregularity from 1/13/26 to 2/19/26, during the monthly Medication Record Review (MRR) of the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/18/26 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 in the dining room seated in a recliner with legs elevated and was fed by a facility staff.On 2/19/26 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 asleep on their back, unaroused by the surveyor's voice, head of the bed was elevated, and legs were covered with a blanket. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), pressure ulcer of the sacral region (bottom of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a current written agreement between the Medicare-certified hospice and the facility for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for hospice/end of life care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/20/2026 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor observed and interviewed Resident #28 who was in their room. On 2/24/26 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the resident's hard chart (paper chart) which revealed the following: The Face Sheet revealed the resident had diagnoses including but not limited to; arteriosclerotic heart disease (thickening and hardening of the arteries of the heart). The physician's orders included an order dated 10/27/25 for [name redacted #1] Hospice (H #1). A review of Resident #28's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following: The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 2/25/26 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. A review of the individual comprehensive care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store food in a manner to prevent food-borne illness and, b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/17/24 at 7:30 AM, an initial brief tour of the kitchen was conducted in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), and the surveyor observed the following: - The large commercial food processor was stored on the metal table with the lid, and when the FSD lifted the lid the inside was wet. The FSD stated it should not have been left wet. - Various crumb type debris was observed on the bins which stored bulk flour and sugar. - The base of the can opener, affixed to the stainless steal table debris on the base and around - A large meat slicer was observed on the corner of the metal steam table, covered in plastic, and was identified as clean by the FSD. The FSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an Automated External Defibrillator (AED-equipment used for the purposes of immediate response for cardiac arrest) and other emergency items prior to their expiration date. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 expired AED kits located on 2 of 2 resident units (2nd and 3rd floor), which contained expired defibrillator pads dated [DATE], and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 11:01 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), the surveyor observed an AED emergency response kit, mounted on the wall of the AED room on the Third floor. The surveyor observed the LPN, remove the AED kit from the wall mounting, opened it, and observed one defibrillator pad (AED electrode pad, an essential component of an AED to treat a sudden cardiac arrest emergency) attached to the AED machine, that expired on [DATE]. No other AED pads were observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to consistently offer residents a pneumococcal vaccine. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (#2, #18) reviewed for immunizations and was evidenced by the following. Reference: A review of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations dated/last reviewed on 2/13/23, included the following. The CDC recommends routine administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15 or PCV20) for all adults 65 years or older who have never received any pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or whose previous vaccination history is unknown . 1. The surveyor reviewed Resident #12's immunization history on the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record on 9/18/24. Documentation supporting the administration of pneumococcal immunization could not be located on the paper or electronic sections of the record. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain the dignity of an unsampled resident. This deficient practice was found with 1 of 2 Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) observed during a dining observation on the third floor, and b.) place a urine drainage collection bag in a privacy cover to ensure a resident's dignity for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for urine catheters. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 9/17/24 at 12:40 PM, during a lunch meal dining observation on the 3rd floor in the main dining room, an unsampled resident asked the surveyor a question regarding wanting pineapple chunks with their meal. The CNA was next to the resident when the request was made, and the CNA did not say anything. The surveyor asked the CNA if she could help the resident with their request. The CNA looked at the surveyor and said, the resident knows that the dessert is not given until after the meal is served. The surveyor asked the CNA if she could speak directly to the resident about the concern. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, review of facility policy, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure a criminal background checks were completed prior to the start date of employment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 employee files reviewed (Employee #7) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed ten employee files who had been hired since the last standard survey conducted on 7/7/23, which revealed the following incomplete pre-employment screening documents: Employee #7, Activities Aide, hired 5/13/24. The background check revealed a report date of 5/17/24. A review of the employee's position description, signed on 5/13/24, revealed a job summary to provide therapeutic activity programs to the residents. Essential Functions, as follows but not limited to; assist in organizing, developing, and directing therapeutic activities for groups or individuals to meet the needs of the residents. A review of Employee Acknowledgement Form was a signed document acknowledging receipt of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage collection bag and drainage tubing were not in direct contact with the floor to prevent potential contamination. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for urinary catheter use and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility provided policy, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion/Maintenance (Male/Female) revised 01/29/24, included but was not limited to; 5. Both the drainage tubing and bag must be kept from touching the floor. On 09/17/2024 at 7:41 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 lying in bed with part of the urinary drainage tube and urinary drainage bag lying in direct contact with the floor. On 09/17/2024 at 10:41 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 in a high-backed wheelchair in the third-floor activity day room. The surveyor observed part of the urinary drainage tube and the urinary collection bag lying directly on the floor under the wheelchair. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who received pain management: a.) had a comprehensive patient-centered care plan for pain, and b.) the pain management physician recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, reviewed for pain management (Resident #15) and was evidenced by the following: On 9/17/24 at 7:43 AM, a surveyor observed Resident #15 in bed who complained of pain. The resident stated that the pain medication would be administered after breakfast. On 9/17/24 at 11:11 AM, a surveyor observed the resident in the rehabilitation room. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, the Physical Therapist (PT) stated that they would provide a hot pad for the resident's back pain. The surveyor then interviewed the Registered Nurse/Charge Nurse (RN/CN) who informed the surveyor that they charted the resident's pain by exception (documenting only when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately administer medications used to manage low blood pressure in accordance with physician orders. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #15) and was evidenced by the following: On 9/17/24 at 7:43 AM, a surveyor observed Resident #15 in bed who complained of pain. The resident stated that the pain medication would be administered after breakfast. On 9/17/24 at 11:11 AM, a surveyor observed the resident in the rehabilitation room. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, the Physical Therapist (PT). The surveyor then interviewed the Registered Nurse/Charge Nurse who informed the surveyor that they charted the resident's pain by exception. On 9/18/24 at 10:47 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Registered Nurse/Charge Nurse (RN) stated the resident had a fall on 6/4/24 while going to the bathroom and a risk assessment was conducted. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a fall investigation for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/29/23 at 9:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 ambulating with a walker with a staff member. On that same day at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed the resident seated a table with another resident. The resident had a wander guard to the left ankle. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1. Review of the face sheet (an admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 6/16/2023, reflected the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for a resident within 48 hours of admission. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for person-centered baseline care plans (Resident #8) and was evidenced by the following: The evidence was as follows: On 6/28/23 at 10:55 AM, two surveyors observed Resident #8 in a wheelchair on the third activity room. This resident was noted to require assistance at meals. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident # 8. Review of the resident's Face Sheet (an admission record) reflected the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; Alzheimer's disease, oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hypothyroidism. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 5/22/23 reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician a.) addressed a significant weight loss of 5.5 pounds (lbs.) which was 5.4% in 20 days from admission on [DATE] through 6/5/23, b.) monitored weekly weights, and c.) implemented nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for nutrition. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/28/23 at 10:55 AM, two surveyors observed Resident #8 in a wheelchair on the third activity room. This resident was noted to require assistance at meals. On 7/07/23 at 8:40 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The resident's eyes were opened, and he/she smiled, appeared to be missing his/her top two teeth. The residents Certified Nurses' Aides (CNA) opened the residents breakfast tray, sat at the bedside and fed Resident #8. The CNA stated that she was familiar with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medication was administered according to physician orders and acceptable standards of practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing. This deficient practice was identified in 1 (one) of 9 (nine) residents (Resident #9) observed during the medication observation pass. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARGONDIZZA, ANTHONY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/19/2006 |
| CAFFERTY, MAUREEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2006 |
| MIDGETT, GARRETT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/19/2006 |
| SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/19/2006 |
| KOPEC, MARYBETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315515. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.