Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Pediatrics

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 227 beds and averages 207.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical records (MR), and other pertinent facility documentation on 10/4/2023,10/5/2023, 10/6/2023, and 10/11/23, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident with a known history of behaviors for self-harm and suicidal ideation and follow the facility policy titled Suicidal Residents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for incident and accident. This deficient practice was evidenced by: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 8/18/23, Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #4 needed help in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was able to feed herself/himself. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-03 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #2580072Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report was accurately posted within the facility for the residents and the visitors to view for 2 of 2 observations.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/3/25 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor entered the facility and observed that the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) that was posted on the receptionist desk was dated 11/2/25, day shift. The NHRCSR was not up to date. On 11/3/25 at 2:18 PM, both the surveyor and the Unit Clerk/Certified Nursing Aide (UC/CNA), observed the posted NHRCSR was dated 11/2/25 for day shift. The UC/CNA informed the surveyor that she was covering for the Receptionist. She stated that she was unsure if she can update the posted NHRCSR because it was the responsibility of the Receptionist to post updated NHRCSR. On 11/3/25 at 2:21 PM, the surveyor notified the Director of Nursing (DON) of the above findings and concerns with regard to NHRCSR posted dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ00186369Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 07/23/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a ventilator tubing/circuit and tracheostomy tube were changed as deemed necessary and consistent with the professional standards of practice for Resident #7. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 9 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care and services and was evidenced as follows: A review of Resident #7's admission Record (AR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to: chronic respiratory failure, epilepsy (condition characterized by sudden, uncontrolled jerking or stiffening of the body), aphasia (an impairment in the ability to comprehend or formulate language because of a disorder in specific brain areas), Rett's syndrome (a genetic condition affecting the brain development in children), tracheostomy (a hole made by doctors through the front of neck which allows air to pass into the windpipe to help with breathing), gastrostomy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete post-dialysis assessments for residents on dialysis (a treatment that replicates the kidney's function and cleans the waste from blood for individuals with kidney disease or kidney failure). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident # 127 and #179) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/21/25 at 11:00 AM, during the initial tour of the 4th floor unit, the surveyor observed that Resident #127 was not in his/her room. The Charge Nurse (CN) stated that the resident was at dialysis. The CN stated that the resident received renal dialysis three times a week. On 1/27/25 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #127 in bed on a specialty mattress. The resident did not respond to the surveyor's greeting. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #127. A review of the admission Record reflected Resident #127 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a dignified living environment for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident # 83). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 83 in bed which was in a low position, with a sheet covering the resident. There was a staff member in the room seated next to the resident and the staff member stated that he was an aide who provided one-to-one care for Resident # 83. There were no personal belongings in the resident's room, and the wall in the resident's room were bare and had nothing on them. There was brown colored cardboard and tape covering over the air conditioning unit in the resident's room. The floor tiles were discolored and mismatched and there was an approximately 8-inch hole in the wall. At 1:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the aide, who could not explain what happened and why the hole was there. The aide stated that Resident # 83 gets one to one supervision, 24 hours a day because the resident has behaviors…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of residents. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for the accommodation of needs (Resident # 39), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 11:38 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #39 in bed on a specialty mattress. The resident responded to the surveyor's greeting with a thumbs up and a smile. Resident #39 did not respond verbally. The surveyor observed Resident #39 had a tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck into the windpipe to help air and oxygen reach the lungs), with an oxygen concentrator in place infusing at 1.5 Liters per minute (lpm) via trach collar tubing. The surveyor observed that the resident's call bell (used to summon staff for assistance) was affixed to the left siderail, not within his/her reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #39. A review of Resident #39's admission Record reflected that the Resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for care and service needs. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 35 residents reviewed, Resident # 28, as evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/21/25 at 1:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 28, in the dayroom and the resident was unable to answer the surveyor's questions. The surveyor reviewed Resident #28's Electronic Medical Records. Resident #28's face sheet revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; pulmonary embolism. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 10/11/24, which revealed that there was no Brief Interview for Mental Status, as the resident was assessed as rarely or never understood. A review of the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) revealed the resident had a physician's order for Apixaban 5 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. The surveyor reviewed the resident's current care plans. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of nursing practice by not following a physician's order for 2 of 35 of the residents (Resident #39 and #50) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ 175442 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain timely assistance with breakfast, and morning care (assistance with, but not limited to feeding, continence care, dressing, and grooming) for a resident who was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 residents (Resident #169) reviewed for ADL and was evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 11:07 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor, from the hallway, observed Resident #169 in their room, seated in a wheelchair, well dressed, and was in the middle of a video conference call. The video conference device utilized by Resident #169 appeared mounted on a stand. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #169. According to the admission Record, (an admission summary), reflected that Resident #169 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included the following: unspecified injury of the cervical spinal cord (damage to spinal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that urinary drainage bags were stored and secured in a manner to prevent contamination and infection control. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident # 39 and #70), and was evidenced by the following: 1.On 1/21/25 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #70 in bed. The surveyor observed the resident had a tracheostomy with a large portable oxygen tank infusing at 6 Liters per minute (lpm) via trach collar tubing and two urinary drainage bags lying on top of the resident ' s bed, one on each side of the resident. The surveyor observed there were two privacy bags affixed to the lower aspect of the upper left and right-side rails. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #70. A review of Resident # 70 ' s admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store 1 of 35 residents (Resident # 83) personal clothing in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was as evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 83 in bed which was in a low position, with a sheet covering the resident. There was a staff member in the room seated next to the resident and the staff member stated that he was an aide who provided one-to-one care for Resident # 83. The surveyor observed that inside the resident's bathroom, the resident's clothing was on hangers and located hanging on the shower curtain rod, which was approximately 5 feet from the resident's toilet. At 1:00 PM, the aide stated that Resident # 83 gets one to one supervision, 24 hours a day because the resident has behaviors of aggression, pulling things off the wall and has a history of knocking furniture over. The aide stated that the resident is blind in both eyes and cannot have furniture or belongings in the room as Resident # 83 will feel around the room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,900 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,900 — penalty dated 2023-10-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PHILOSOPHY CARE CENTERS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ