The Hamptons Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 254.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake # 2660131) the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from alleged sexual abuse for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident#1 and Resident #2, both with intact cognition, reported allegations of sexual abuse. Resident #1 alleged on 08/25/2025 that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 made a sexually inappropriate comment while providing care. Resident #2 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant #1 touched and rubbed their genital area on 08/21/2025 that made them feel unsafe in the facility. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was suspended for three (3) days without a thorough investigation and returned to work and had access to all 248 residents in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.The findings are:The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention dated 11/02/2022 reviewed 07/2025 documented sexual abuse is the non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident and this may include touching intimate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake #2660131) the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made. This was identified for two (2) of eight (8) Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #1 reported an allegation that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 stated to them they did not see many women with a shaved vaginal area in the nursing home and this made Resident #1 not feel safe. Resident #2 reported an allegation that Certified Nurse Assistant #1 touched and rubbed their genital area in a manner that made them feel violated. There was no documented evidence the alleged abuse was reported to local law enforcement or the New York State Department of Health. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are:The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake #2660131), the facility failed to ensure that an investigation of alleged sexual abuse was thoroughly and timely investigated to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. This was identified for two (2) of eight (8) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents/incidents. Specifically, Resident #1 and Resident #2 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was sexually inappropriate which made them feel unsafe in the facility. There was no documented evidence that an investigation to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment was initiated. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention dated 11/02/2022 and reviewed 07/2025 documented all allegations of abuse must be immediately reported to the administrator and no later than two (2) hours to the other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) after the allegation is made, if the events…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every three (3) months. This was identified for four (4) (Resident #25, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #184) of ten (10) sampled from 61 residents triggered for the resident assessment task. Specifically, Resident #184's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 02/06/2026 was not completed; Resident #35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed until 77 days after the Assessment Reference Date of 02/06/2026; Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed until 71 days after the Assessment Reference Date of 01/21/2026; and Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed until 22 days after the Assessment Reference Date of 11/28/2025. The findings include but are not limited to:The facility's policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure that all completed Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services within 14 days of the resident assessment completion. This was identified for three (3) (Resident #36, Resident #43, and Resident #178) of ten (10) residents sampled from 61 residents triggered for the resident assessment task. Specifically, Resident #178's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment was not electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services until 56 days after the completion of the assessment; Resident #43's admission Minimum Data Set assessment was not electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services until 42 days after the completion of the assessment; and Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services until 27 days after the completion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during surveys, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards. This was identified for one (1) (Unit G) of seven (7) units reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, a free-standing E-Cylinder oxygen tank (a portable, high-capacity metal cylinder used to store compressed medical grade oxygen) was observed in the Unit G nursing station. The E-Cylinder tank was free standing and was not secured in a safety stand or a rack. The findings include: The facility's policy, titled Oxygen Tank Storage and Handling last revised on 02/2026, documented that all-oxygen tanks must be secured to a wall with a chain or heavy cable. No oxygen tanks will be left unattended on a transport dolly (a small, wheeled platform or cart used to move heavy items). Full oxygen tanks will be separated from empty oxygen tanks and identified as such. During an initial tour of the G Unit on 04/21/2026 at 12:15 PM, an unsecured E-Cylinder tank (a portable, high-capacity metal cylinder used to store compressed medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a survey (Complaint #2962369), the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to retain personal possessions. This was identified for one (1) (Residents #266) of two (2) residents reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, Resident #266 was transferred to the hospital. The facility staff packed Resident 266's belongings. After the resident's was readmitted to the facility from the hospital, the facility did not return the resident's belongings. The findings include: The facility's Policy titled Personal Belongings last reviewed on 10/2025 documented upon discharge of residents to a hospital, the facility will send all valuables to the basement for storage. All clothing and other personal belongings may be left in the room if the door can be locked or the security of the items can be ensured. Property left in the facility for more than 30 days after discharge will be disposed of at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00368741) on 2/26/2025 the facility did not ensure that all residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was identified for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for restraints. Specifically, Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 were observed in their beds with the bed in the lowest position with thick fall prevention mats observed on their side (length wise), pushed up against both sides of the bed restricting the resident's freedom of movement. The findings are: The facility's policy titled, Physical Restraints effective September 2018 and reviewed June 2024 documented it was the policy of the facility to promote and maintain the residents' highest practicable well-being in a restraint free environment and only utilize a physical restraint in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00368741) on 2/26/2025 the facility did not ensure call systems were accessible to each resident while the resident were in their rooms. This was identified for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for call systems. Specifically, Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 were observed, multiple times in their beds, with no access to use their call bells preventing them to be able to call for assistance. The findings are: The facility's policy titled, Call Bell and Alarm Response effective October 2019 and reviewed September 2024 documented call bells and alarms will be answered promptly by all staff and to ensure the call bell has a clip for placement. The policy did not include where the resident's call bell should be placed. 1) Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, and Dysphagia. Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, on 9/23/2024 Resident #5's room was observed with a strong urine odor. A disposable bed pad with a large urine stain was observed on the floor adjacent to the resident's bed with three urinals one of which was full. Resident #5 stated they wanted the area to be clean. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Dignity, last reviewed May 2024, documented it is the policy of the facility to promote an environment in which the resident's dignity is evident in all interactions between caregivers and residents. Dignity means staff carry out activities that assist the resident to maintain and enhance their self-esteem and self-worth. Resident #5 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00354353) initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's primary representative was immediately informed when a resident had an accident resulting in injury that had the potential for requiring Physician intervention. This was identified for one (Resident #230) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 9/17/2024 Resident #230 fell from the bed and sustained bruising to their face. The resident's representative was not informed of the fall. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Change in Condition, last reviewed 10/2023, documented any deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status causing either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications, as well as any deviation from the resident's baseline medical condition, which constitutes an abnormal condition, will be reported to the Nursing Supervisor and Physician. Criteria for reporting a change in condition include incident/accident with or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was identified for one (Unit E) of four units observed during the environmental task. Specifically, during an environmental tour of Unit E, Resident#144's bathroom door was observed with broken hinges and was not able to be closed; Resident#56's privacy curtains were observed with dark brown and yellow stains, and the bathroom floor was soiled with dark grayish stains. The findings are: The facility's policy for Cleaning Resident Bathrooms and Public Bathrooms, dated February 2024, documented that daily cleaning will ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infection, and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. The facility's policy for Cleaning Resident Rooms, dated March 2024, documented the purpose of this policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00351219) initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that accidents were thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. This was identified for one (Resident #161) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #161 was found on the floor in their room near the bed on 7/28/2024 and sustained a six-centimeter laceration (cut or tear) with bruising to the left side of their face. The facility did not obtain statements from each staff member involved with the resident to identify the root cause of the accident. The finding is: The facility's Accident and Incident policy and procedure reviewed on 8/2024 documented that the charge nurse or supervisor will initiate the collection of statements from staff. The statement will be collected from Certified Nursing Assistants, caregivers, Licensed nurses working that shift, and all others assigned to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$150,990 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $150,990 — penalty dated 2025-11-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PHILOSOPHY CARE CENTERS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY