No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Excel Care At Manalapan

104 Pension Road, Manalapan, NJ 07726 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 132 certified beds · (732) 446-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$63,238 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $63,238 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-06)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
225 Gordons Corner, Ste 2H · (732) 360-7005 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
557 Englishtown Rd · (732) 446-5445 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
508 Englishtown Rd · (732) 492-2011 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Parkview Way · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.7%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%2.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%97.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.1%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.8%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.992.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 36.4–57.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.6–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.1–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
50.6%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 124.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that accommodated a resident's known food allergy to eggs and egg-derived products. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for meal observations. On 02/27/24 at 8:32 AM, Resident #32 was observed eating a hard-boiled egg. The meal ticket on their breakfast tray had documented allergies to eggs and egg-derived products. This posed the likelihood of serious harm to the health and wellbeing of Resident #32. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The IJ was identified and began on 02/27/24 and the IJ template was given to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) on 02/27/24 at 12:48pm. An acceptable removal plan was received on 02/28/24 at 2:20 PM and was verified on-site on 02/29/24 at 9:13 AM. The evidence was as follows: A review of the facility policy for Food Allergies and Intolerance's, revised August 2017, included but was not limited to: Residents with food allergies Are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure adequate supervision to prevent falls, b) ensure current documented fall prevention interventions were consistently implemented, and c) ensure the Falls Policy was consistently followed to complete an assessment of the causal factor and identify and implement pertinent fall prevention interventions to prevent further falls, . This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5), reviewed for accidents. Resident #5 was identified as a fall risk for falls. Sustained 13 falls from 09/11/22 through 02/25/24, including falls with major injuries on 09/11/22 (72 hours after admission) sustained a hematoma to the right forehead and pain to the right shoulder. On 09/15/22, sustained a non-displaced fracture of the medial malleolus of left tibia (bony prominence of the left ankle). On 10/27/23, Resident #5 had an unwitnessed fall, required emergent 911…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #159956 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for a resident with a history of chronic UTI's (from 06/17/2022 through 01/03/2024) which required oral and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, and required hospitalization. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #51) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections and was evidenced by the following: On 02/23/24 at 6:15 AM, Surveyor #5 completed an incontinence care tour on the 200 Unit, a strong urine odor permeated in the hallway of the low side of the 200 Unit. Surveyor #5, in the presence of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1), observed Resident # 51 was wearing two incontinent briefs that was saturated with urine. On that same date and time, a nurse was also present, who stated that some of the residents wore double briefs. At that same time, Surveyor #5 interviewed the CNA who stated that if a resident was a heavy wetter, a pad would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-03-06 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #s 154702, #154763 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) antipsychotic medications were administered daily per physician orders for two residents, Resident #19 who missed 8 daily doses, and Resident #45 who missed 9 daily doses. This resulted in increased combative and hallucinatory behaviors that necessitated transfer to Crisis via 911 (emergency) for both residents, and b) behaviors were monitored and documented and appropriate interventions were developed and implemented for Resident #76 who required antipsychotic medication. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #19 and #45) reviewed for change in condition and for 1 of 4 resident (Resident #76) reviewed for use of psychotropic medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1.) On 02/20/24 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which revealed diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #2963689, 2978806 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 5/28/26 and 5/29/26, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the resident's discharge plans. This deficient practice was identified for 6 residents reviewed (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) and was evidenced by the following:1.) A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: chronic kidney disease, hypotension, and mild cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #1's care plan did not reveal a focus related to the resident's preference and potential for future discharge. 2.) A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, and dementia. A review of Resident #2's care plan did not reveal a focus related to the resident's preference and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #2963689, 2978806 Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation on 5/28/26 and 5/29/26 it was determined that the facility failed to a.) keep resident's medical information confidential and b.) follow facility policy titled Release of Information on maintaining the confidentiality of residents' information. The deficient practice was identified for one resident reviewed (Resident #6), and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: metabolic encephalopathy, secondary parkinsonism, and dementia. Further review revealed that the resident's address and that of their two contacts including phone numbers, were included in the resident's admission form. A review of Resident #6's care plan did not reveal a focus related to the resident's preference and potential for future discharge from the facility. A review of Resident #6's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2708219Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 1/8/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy, upon admission, for a resident that was identified as needing continuous oxygen therapy.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3), as evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pneumonia and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, Resident #3 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score completed at the time of survey due to recent admission.A review of a document provided by the facility titled Discharge Instructions with a printed date of 12/26/25 at 01:32 P.M., for Resident #3, reveals Oxygen therapy for 2 liters per minute applied via nasal cannula (a device used to supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2708219Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 1/8/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to address a resident's oxygen therapy and failed to address the resident's known non-compliance with oxygen use. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3), as evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pneumonia and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, Resident #3 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score completed at the time of survey due to recent admission.A review of a document provided by the facility titled Discharge Instructions with a printed date of 12/26/25 at 01:32 P.M., for Resident #3, reveals Oxygen therapy for 2 liters per minute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # 2672054 Based on interviews, review of the Medical Records (MR), and pertinent facility documents on 12/9/25, it was determined that the facility Nursing staff failed to notify the Resident's family when a Resident had a change in condition for 1 out of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: According to Resident #2's MR, the Resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the care of a resident, dated 10/31/25, indicated that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, indicating the Resident was moderately impaired. A review of Resident #2's Progress Notes (PN) documented by the Nursing Supervisor dated 11/01/25 at 9:50 AM, revealed: Resident with a Medical diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis was observed during the AM shift with an episode of bloody diarrhea. Upon assessment, resident stated 'I already called my son'. Resident appeared anxious at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Nurse Staffing Report sheets, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 1 of 28 days reviewed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the Nursing Staffing Reports completed by the facility, the facility provided no RN services on 7/20/25. NJAC 8:39-25.2(h)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a refrigerated controlled medication (Lorazepam oral concentrate solution) was removed from active inventory when the controlled medication was discontinued on [DATE] and when six (6) of the 15 Lorazepam oral syringes were expired on [DATE]. The deficient practice was identified when one (1) of two (2) medication room refrigerators were inspected and evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 1:37 PM, the surveyor inspected the 200 Unit medication room refrigerator in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM). The surveyor observed six (6) of 15 oral syringes of Lorazepam oral concentrate 0.5 milligram per 0.25 milliliters labelled for Resident #30 with a use by date of [DATE]. LPN/UM stated the six (6) Lorazepam oral syringes with the use by date of [DATE] should have been removed from the refrigerator. The LPN/UM added that she would have to bring the Lorazepam oral syringes to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment (used to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies) was updated to address the care and needs of a resident with a LVAD (a left Ventricular Assist Device-a mechanical pump that helps a weakened heart pump blood).On 8/7/2025 at 11:00 AM, during a resident council meeting, which included unsampled Resident #67 and two surveyors, Resident #67 stated they had a LVAD. The surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record for unsampled Resident #67. A review of the admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; end stage heart failure (the heart can no longer pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and presence of a heart assist device. A review of the Order Summary Report revealed a physician order for Monitor pump parameters q-shift.LVAD team.start date 2/14/2024. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate and easily accessible for 1 of 30 residents reviewed (Resident #116). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/12/2025 at 8:41 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed electronic medical record for Resident #116. A review of Resident #116's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease characterized by ongoing inflammation and narrowing of the airways, leading to difficulty breathing), hypertensive heart disease (heart conditions caused by long-term high blood pressure), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, enlarged prostate, is a common condition in older men where the prostate gland enlarges, potentially causing urinary problems). A review of Resident #116's progress notes and miscellaneous section of uploaded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for timing of assessments and was evidenced by the following: This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/8/25, a review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed that Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Comprehensive admission MDS, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/27/25, was noted to be signed as completed on 3/18/25. On 8/8/25, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator who stated this admission MDS should have been completed by March 6th (3/6/25). She further stated that she did not have an explanation as to what happened.Review of facility policy MDS Completion and Submission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 2 of 27 residents reviewed (Resident #10 and Resident #13). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.On 8/6/25 at 11:54 AM, Resident #10 refused to speak with the surveyor. The resident refused to speak with the surveyor for the duration of the survey. On 8/12/25 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, who stated that Resident #10 had specific CNAs that they want and only allowed them to provide care and would shout, yell, curse, and refuse everything for others. The surveyor reviewed the Comprehensive admission MDS dated [DATE], which indicated that Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident had an intact cognition, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #401653, #401655Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for medication management, (Resident #9, #120 & #57), and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication administration observation performed on 8/7/25, the surveyor observed two (2) nurses administer medications to five (5) residents. There were 35 opportunities, and three (3) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 8.57 %. The deficient practice was identified for two (2) of five (5) residents, (Resident #30 and #55), that were administered medications by two (2) of two (2) nurses. The deficient practices were evidenced as follows: 1.On 8/7/25 at 8:24 AM, the surveyor observed the Registered Nurse (RN) #1 administer four (4) medications to Resident #30. The resident then stated that they wanted their cough medicine.On 8/7/25 at 8:29 AM, the surveyor observed RN #1 measure 10 milliliters (ML) of Gertussin DM (Guaifenesin Dextromethorphan) liquid. RN #1 stated Guaifenesin DM was an over-the-counter/house stock (OTC/HS) medication meaning that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ401652Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively accommodate the needs and preferences of residents during dining. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for tray accuracy during dining and was evidenced by the following: On 8/6/25 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #43 lying in bed asleep, with the head of the bed elevated, on an air mattress. The resident did not respond when the surveyor knocked on the door or in response to verbal stimuli. The surveyor observed a sign that hung over the resident's bed which indicated, No Straws and Thickened liquids, do not leave thickener packets with the resident. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #43. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ401661, NJ401667, NJ401652Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures during the provision of incontinence care for a resident who was previously identified to have been at risk for recurrent urinary tract infection.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #43) reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence and was identified by the following: On 8/6/25 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #43 lying in bed asleep, with the head of the bed elevated, on an air mattress. The resident did not respond when the surveyor knocked on the door or in response to verbal stimuli.The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #43. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: urinary tract infection, site not specified, overactive bladder, other specified noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis (conditions that affect the gastrointestinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #s NJ 152910, 152911, 159956 Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents were treated with respect and dignity by ensuring the facility acted promptly to respond to ongoing residents grievances affecting quality of life by failing to consistently and uniformly address grievances regarding: a) ensuring residents had consistent access to their personal needs account funds (PNA), b) food complaints identified on 02/28/2022 when the resident council was alerted to the menu being changed to kosher style, and c) the menu not being posted, not having access to menus to select meal choices and the repetitiveness of the menu. This deficient practice was identified by 6 of 6 residents who attended a resident council meeting and affected all residents who resided on 2 of 2 units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to: 567F and 568F On 02/20/24 at 9:41 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a system was in place for residents to receive their Personal Need Account (PNA) funds without restrictions, ensure that the residents had access to at least $50.00 which would be provided the same day it was requested, and ensure a system was in place which included receipts provided to residents to confirm disbursement. The deficient practice effected all residents who maintained PNA funds who resided in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to 565F On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with the requested list of current PNA balances and stated that the Human Resources Director (HRD) was responsible for the PNA accounts. The list included 94 accounts and listed 6 residents with a Current Balance more than $50.00 who were listed as Expired [deceased ] under Status. On [DATE] at 1:22 PM, the surveyor interviewed the HRD who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0568 — widespread
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure all residents who had the facility manage Personal Needs Account (PNA) funds were provided with a quarterly statement. The deficient practice effected all resident who had PNA funds and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 565F and 567F. On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with the requested list of current PNA balances and stated that the Human Resources Director (HRD) was responsible for the PNA accounts. The list included 94 accounts and listed 6 residents with a Current Balance more than $50.00 who were listed as Expired [deceased ] under Status. On [DATE] at 1:22 PM, the surveyor interviewed the HRD who confirmed that she handled the PNA money for the resident's accounts during the week. She clarified and stated, during the week, the residents will come find her and on the weekends the residents would obtain money from the activity staff. She stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0569 — widespread
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that within 30 days of a resident's death the facility conveyed, the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate. This deficient practice occurred for 6 of 6 expired residents identified with a current Personal Needs Account balance (Resident #236, #237, #238 and 3 unsampled residents) and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with the requested list of current PNA balances and stated that the Human Resources Director (HRD) was responsible for the PNA accounts. The list included 94 accounts and listed 6 residents with a Current Balance who were listed as Expired [deceased ] under Status. The Expired residents included: 1. Unsampled Resident (UR #1); Expired [DATE] with a Current Balance $100.15. 2. UR #2; Expired [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 169440 Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure all resident rooms and common areas were maintained in a clean, sanitary and homelike manner, and resident equipment was maintained in good condition. The deficient practice was observed throughout the 200 unit and was observed by the following: On 02/20/24 at 10:26 AM through 11:15 AM, surveyor #1 observed the following on the 200 Unit: -room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident in bed, a gray chair next to the bed was visibly stained on the seat cushion, the bed and bed frame appeared rusted, the bedside table had chips, and the privacy curtain was visibly soiled. -room [ROOM NUMBER] A, There was no handle on the middle drawer of the door side bedside table. Bed frame appeared rusty, and a male Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) entered room with a burgundy recliner chair that had a ripped arm rest and was for resident use. -room [ROOM NUMBER], The resident was in bed and the bedside curtain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — widespread
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaints NJ #s: 159956, 161569, 165971, 169440 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Activities of Daily Living Care (ADLs) was consistently provided to residents by failing to a.) provide appropriate incontinent care to dependent residents (Resident #6, #18, #22, #23, #31, #32, #38 #50, #51 #53 #55); and b.) provide residents with scheduled showers (Resident #233 and #80). This deficient practice occurred for 12 of 12 residents, 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #80) reviewed for ADLs, and 1 of 6 residents who attended a resident council meeting. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/23/24 at 11:14 AM, a resident council meeting was held with 6 residents which revealed that 1 of 6 stated they leave me wet for hours sometimes, and double diaper me, which I don't ask them to. On 02/20/24 at 9:16 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the survey team observed a strong odor of urine that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #s NJ 152905, 152910, 152911, 159956, 161569, 165971, 160660, 169440 Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient and competent staff were available to a) provide appropriate incontinence care to dependent residents (Resident #6, #18, #22, #23, #31, #32, #38, #50, # 51, #53 and #55), b) provide residents with scheduled showers (Resident #80 and #233), and c) ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was identified for 12 of 12 residents, 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #80) reviewed for ADLs, expressed by 6 of 6 Residents who attended a Resident Council meeting, and affected all residents on 2 of 2 units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to 677F, 690H On 02/23/24 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor held a resident council meeting with six residents. The resident's expressed the following concerns: -3 of 6 Residents stated they waited anywhere from 30 minutes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the designated licensed Director of Nursing (DON) worked on a full-time basis as DON to oversee the care of all residents in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/21/24 at 11:34 AM, the DON stated that the previous facility Infection Preventionist (IP) was a corporate nurse who was covering multiple facilities. He stated that the facility had been interviewing candidates for the IP position, but they did not have enough experience or wanted a lot of money so he had been also performing the job as IP. On 02/22/24 at 11:02 AM, the DON in the presence of the survey team, confirmed his job was to be the full-time DON, but he was also working as the facility IP. On 03/05/24 at 10:44 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) in the presence of the survey team, stated that the DON assumed the responsibilities of the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility a few months ago in the fall. The LNHA stated he was responsible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ # 160660 Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to serve hot and cold foods at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 4 hot food items, 2 of 2 cold food items and for 6 of 6 residents who attended a resident council meeting. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/22/24 at 8:44 AM, the last meal tray was tested for temperature by two surveyors utilizing a calibrated thermometer and the Food Service Director (FSD). The resident meal was labeled a Chopped Diet. Hot food items: -Chopped French Toast; FSD- 90 degrees Farenheight (F), Surveyor-88 F. -Sausage; FSD- 89 F, Surveyor -90 F. -Hot Cereal; FSD-132 F, Surveyor-129 F. -Coffee; FSD- 124 F. The surveyor asked the FSD what the hot food temperature should be, and he stated 140 F or above. Cold food items: -4 ounces skim milk; both 51 F -4 ounces orange juice; FSD-54 F The surveyor asked the FSD what the cold food temperatures should be, and he stated cold should be 35 F or below. The surveyor asked if the food temperatures were in appropriate range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) foods were stored properly and labeled with a use by date, b) equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, and c) hair restraints were appropriately worn to prevent the spread of potential infection or food borne illness. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/20/24 from 9:41 AM through 10:15 AM, the surveyor conducted an initial tour with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: The walk-in refrigerator contained: -A package of undated meat was in a plastic -type wrap, stored in a metal pan, on a shelf and was covered with aluminum foil. The FSD stated, sometimes they throw on a use by date and stated it was pulled from the freezer on 02/17/24 and it's beef stew for tomorrow. -A large metal pan of chicken thighs was next to the container of meat, had a plastic covering on it with a handwritten label Chicken Pulled 2-17-24 and did not contain a use by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility administration failed to ensure policies, procedures and effective systems were implemented to maintain each resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by failing to ensure a) a resident with documented food allergies were provided with appropriate food items, b) that appropriate and timely incontinence care was provided to dependent residents, c) residents were treated with dignity and respect, d) residents were consistently provided with physician ordered medications, e) interventions were implemented to prevent falls for a resident with frequent falls with history of fractures, residents received appropriate incontinent care to limit urinary tract infections, f ) resident council grievances were addressed, e) residents resided in a homelike environment, g ) resident's had unrestricted access to their Personal Needs Accounts, h) transportation was available to ensure outside trips were scheduled, i) the facility maintained a comprehensive emergency preparedness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical record access was provided in a timely manner during an on-site survey conducted from 02/20/24 through 03/06/24. The deficient practice was evidenced the following: On 02/20/24 11:19 AM, the surveyor conducted an entrance conference with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the [NAME] President of Nursing (VPON) from a management company. The VPON stated the management company was the company that was purchasing the facility. The surveyor asked about the electronic medical record (EMR) system the facility utilized and the LNHA stated they have a new EMR since November 2023. The surveyor asked if the facility still had access to records prior to the November 2023 and he stated, the facility still has access and the information was imported into the new system. On 02/21/24 at 11:21 AM, the facility provided the survey team with a tablet and was informed that the EMR access for medical records prior to 11/2023 would need to be accessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAPI) failed to ensure the facility self- identified areas for improvement including environmental concerns, resident care related concerns, the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and adverse events. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F550F, F565F, F567F, F584F, F677E, F689G, F690H, F742H, F806J, F890G 1.) During a tour of the 200 unit on 02/20/24 and 02/21/24, the surveyors observed several rooms with broken furniture, soiled privacy curtains, missing privacy curtains, dust in rooms and air conditioners cracked. On 02/21/24 at 11:25 AM, two surveyors (Surveyor #1 and #2) conducted a tour with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and observed the broken furniture, soiled privacy curtains, missing privacy curtains, cracked air conditioners. The LNHA stated that he made environmental rounds daily but did not document the rounds. On 02/21/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and the review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have the a.) the Medical Director (MD) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) present for one (1) of four (4) quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings and b.) Infection Preventionist (IP) report on the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for four (4) out of four (4) QAPI meetings reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: a.) On 03/06/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor reviewed the last four (4) quarterly sign in sheets for the QAPI meetings. The sign in sheet dated 04/18/23 did not include the signature of the IP and the sign sheet dated 07/08/23 did not include a signature that the MD was in attendance. The 10/17/23 and the 01/17/24 sign in sheets were missing the IP's signature. On 03/06/24 at 10:24 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) acknowledged that the IP signature was missing on 04/18/23 and the MD's signature was missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control practices to prevent the spread of potential infection by a) storing dirty meal trays apart from clean, not yet served, resident meals trays on 1 of 2 units; b) adhering to accepted standards of infection control practices for the proper storage of respiratory tubing and mask after use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #31); c.) ensuring the ice scoop and ice scoop container were clean for 1 of 2 units; and d.) ensuring staff performed appropriate hand hygiene (HH). The deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 units and evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/22/24 at 8:35 AM, Surveyor #1 went to the 200 Unit to observe the breakfast meal. The surveyor observed a facility's staff exited a room with an uncovered dirty tray with the remaining of the food not eaten and placed the tray on the food cart with the other breakfast trays that had not yet been served. The surveyor remained in the hallway and observed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #159556 Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 51) was reviewed for reoccurring Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), and b.) a facility-wide implementation of the Antibiotic Stewardship program, which included a system for routine feedback reports and tracking measures of outcome surveillance related to antibiotic use was followed, as per facility policy and national standards. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 02/21/24 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #51 awake and alert sitting in his /her wheelchair in dining room eating lunch. A review of the Electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following physician's orders (PO) and corresponding progress notes: On 11/15/23, a PO for Keflex (an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) 500 mg (milligram) 1 capsule orally three times a day for Extended Spectrum. Beta-Lactamase (ESBL- enzymes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by failing to ensure a) resident requests for water were honored, b) meals were served in a dignified homelike manner without the use of disposable dishware, c) consistently communicated with residents by their preferred name and not label residents as feeders, d) staff did not speak in a foreign language in the presence of the residents, e) staff conducted personal phone calls during resident interactions, and f) all residents were provided with privacy curtains. The deficient practice was identified during a resident council meeting held with six residents, and evidenced during a survey conducted from 02/20/24 through 03/06/24, and affected all residents who resided on 2 of 2 resident units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/23/24 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor held a resident council meeting with six residents. The following concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized resident-centered comprehensive care plans with measurable goals: a) to integrate approaches for a resident with a history of aggression and exhibited behaviors, b) for a resident with a history of falls including falls with injury, c) and interventions for a resident who had a history of psychosis, and d) for a resident with allergies. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 18 residents (Resident #1, #5, #76, and #32) reviewed for Care Plans (CP) and was evidenced by the following: a. On 02/20/24 at 12:34 PM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #1 in bed with the lunch tray on the bedside table. The lunch tray was covered with a plastic wrap and the resident was eating off of disposable dinnerware and with disposable cutlery. The surveyor left the room and observed the Director of Nursing (DON) in the hallway. Surveyor #1 inquired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ 161569, NJ 169440 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call bells were accessible. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 18 residents (Residents #1, #78 and #288) reviewed for the call bells and was evidenced by the following: 1) During the tour of the facility on 02/20/24 at 10:04 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #1 sitting in the bed. The resident responded to the surveyor's greetings then asked for a drink of water. The surveyor informed the resident that she was just a visitor and not staff and instructed the resident to activate the call light. The resident informed Surveyor #1 that [he/she] did not have a call light. The surveyor looked on the bed and on the floor and did not observe a call light. The surveyor left the room and observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 in the hallway. The surveyor asked CNA #1 to activate the call light. The CNA was unable to locate the call light. The surveyor asked the CNA to send the nurse to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were submitted timely as evidenced by 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #66) for a system selected MDS Record over 120 days old. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/22/24 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed the MDS for Resident #66 and interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse MDS coordinator (MDSC) regarding submission of the MDS. The MDSC stated she was not at the facility at that time and an old medical record system was utilized. The MDSC then viewed an MDS report on the old system and stated the quarterly MDS and discharge MDS did not appear to be submitted and she would research further. On 02/23/24 at 10:00 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided a report for Resident #66's Discharge Assessment scheduled as due no later than 09/14/23 which was Accepted. The Quarterly Assessment stated was Submitted, not accepted per the document, and Transmission date no later than 09/26/23. On 03/05/24 at 1:35 PM, the surveyor informed the LNHA and Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an ongoing activity program was designed to meet the needs of all residents, specifically those who enjoyed outside of the facility trips. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #18) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/29/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record for Resident #18, and reviewed the current Care Plan which did not include a care plan for activity preferences. The annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, and was cognitively intact. The Interview for Activity Preferences revealed it was very important to go outside for fresh air when the weather was good. On 02/29/24 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #18 who also served as the resident council president. The surveyor asked Resident #18 if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #75 and #286) reviewed for pain and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 02/20/24 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #75 lying in bed awake and alert. Resident #75 stated that his/her back had been hurting. He/she stated that Tylenol (medication used to relieve mild to moderate pain) helps some. He/she further stated that he/she used to get a patch on their back but not for a while. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #75 had diagnoses which included but were not limited to; repeated falls, muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, and cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat). A review of the Order Summary Report included but was not limited to; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #s NJ 154702, NJ 154763 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident representative and/or physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #19 and Resident #45 reviewed for a change in condition and was evidenced by the following: 1) Review of Resident #19's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that Resident #19 did not receive Clozapine 100 milligrams (mg) as ordered by the physician for three consecutive days 03/18/22, 03/19/22, and 03/20/22. The resident did not receive the same medication on an additional three consecutive days 03/29/22, 3/30/22 and 3/31/22. There was no documented evidence that the resident's physician was notified of the resident not being administered the medication as ordered. Review of Resident #19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a Progress Note dated 03/22/2022 at 9:43 PM, by the Registered Nurse (RN) which revealed, Received resident by front of [his/her]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ 159956 Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order from the attending physician as recommended by the consulting podiatrist for a resident with a diabetic foot ulcer for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #51) reviewed for foot care. A review of the Electronic medical Record (EMR) revealed that Resident #51 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including but not limited to: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, overactive bladder, urinary tract infection (UTI), acquired absence of left great toe and coronary angioplasty implant and graft (a treatment used to widen and open narrowed or blocked arteries supplying your heart muscle). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), as assessment tool, dated 11/30/23, revealed that Resident # 51 had severe cognitive impairment, an active diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, acquired absence of the left great toe, transfers with maximum assistance and is non- ambulatory. A review of the comprehensive care plan, initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to a.) maintain medications with appropriate labeling and b.) maintain a clean, orderly medication cart for 2 of the 3 carts observed on 2 of 2 nursing units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/18/21 from 11:19 to 11:54 AM, in the presence of the Registered Nurse (RN) #1, the surveyor observed the following in the medication cart labeled B on the 100 unit: 1. In the first row of the second drawer, there were two yellow oval tablets, one pink oval tablet, one large white oval tablet, one small white oval tablet, and one white round tablet which were unwrapped and unmarked. There was also paper debris. 2. In the third row of the second drawer, there was one large pink oval tablet, seven white oval tablets, six small white round tablets, one small pink oval tablet, two pink round tablets, one green round tablet, and two yellow oval tablets which were unwrapped and unmarked. There was also paper and foil debris. 3. In the fourth row of the second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff were properly trained and capable of performing assigned duties to maintain proper kitchen sanitation and prevent food-borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/17/21 from 09:47 AM until 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Director of Dining Services (DDS): During an interview with the surveyor at 10:16 AM, the DDS stated that a high temperature dish machine was utilized, and the required wash temperature was 150 degrees or higher and the required final rinse temperature was 180 degrees. The surveyor reviewed the Dish Machine Temperature log for the month of November 2021 which revealed that the required rinse temperature of 180 degrees was not met during all recorded breakfast and lunch washes from 11/1/21 through 11/16/21 and only met the rinse requirement during dinner on 11/01/21, 11/03/21, and 11/08/21. Review of the October 2021 Dish Machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$63,238 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $63,238 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCELA HEALTHCARE — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BERKOWITZ, CHESKELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 03/20/2025
BERKOWITZ, SAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF40%since 03/20/2025
LEIFER, JOELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 03/20/2025
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/27/2021
YUDKOWSKY, NAFTOLIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2026
CHAUDHARY, AYESHAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2026
ZUPNICK, JOELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 9%Other / private 15%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,123per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315282. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next