Avant Rehabilitation And Care Center
1314 Brunswick Avenue, Trenton, NJ 08638 · For profit - Individual · 149 certified beds · (609) 656-9291 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2022
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.1% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 41.0% | 12.1% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.4% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.4% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.2% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.9% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.7% | 80.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.7% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 2.07 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 5.9–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 12.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 142.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2022-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Part B The facility's failure to have a system in place to ensure: a.) that staff immediately reported an allegation of verbal abuse that occurred on 09/23/22 between staff , a Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA #4), and a resident (Resident #56), b.) prevent further abuse from occurring (TNA #4 continued to work, and on 09/24/22 had an allegation of abuse), and c.) conducted an investigation, and implemented interventions to prevent further abuse posed a serious and immediate treat to the health and welfare of all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: An adverse outcome had occurred, and was likely to occur as the identified non-compliance resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation that began on 09/23/22 at 7:20 AM, when TNA #4 was yelling and pointing a finger in Resident #56's face. Resident #56 appeared frustrated and expressed concerns over his/her needs not being met. Staff did not report the incident, and TNA #4 was allowed to work the next day and was involved in another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2022-10-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure policies, procedures and systems were developed and implemented to ensure immediate action was taken to make certain that the facility operated in a manner to ensure residents' attained or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident by ensuring that a resident was free of sexual abuse, and the facility maintained an effective infection control program that limited the spread of COVID-19 an infectious deadly virus as was identified during an on-site survey that began on 09/21/22 and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 600L, 880L, 886L This IJ situation began on 9/28/22 and the facility administration was notified of the IJ on 9/28/22 at 2:55 PM. The facility submitted an acceptable removal plan on 09/27/22 at 3:46 PM. The IJ removal plan was verified as implemented during an onsite visit on 10/04/22 at 12:02 PM. Two Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situations were identified on 09/23/22 at 1:04 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance was implemented to limit the spread of infectious disease by failing to ensure: 1.) a process was in place to conduct comprehensive contact tracing upon the identification of a single new case of COVID-19 for 3 of 3 resident care units, and 2.) a process was in place to ensure all required staff were appropriately fit tested for an N-95 respirator and documentation was completed for 3 of 3 resident care units. This deficient practice placed all residents and staff at risk for contracting a contagious infectious and potentially deadly virus and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), QSO-20-38-NH, revised 03/10/22, Interim Final Rule (IFC), CMS-3401-IFC, Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2022-10-12 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespreadPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) conduct immediate resident and staff testing upon the identification of a single COVID-19 positive staff or resident result, and 2.) ensure a system was in place, and the facility Infection Preventionist followed the facility policy to ensure that all staff who required weekly or bi-weekly COVID-19 testing was completed and documented during a COVID-19 outbreak. The facility's failure to take immediate action, follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, and facility policies to limit exposure risks placed all residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19, a contagious deadly virus. Reference: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), QSO-20-38-NH, revised 03/10/22, Interim Final Rule (IFC), CMS-3401-IFC, Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency related to Long-Term Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2022-10-12 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure the facility policy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for COVID-19 vaccinations was implemented to ensure that all staff were up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations, or have been granted a qualifying exemption during a COVID-19 outbreak that began on 06/24/22; and, b.) ensure all staff that were not up to date with vaccinations, or had been granted a qualifying exemption were not permitted to work in the facility. The facility's failure to take immediate action, follow Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and facility policies to limit exposure risks placed all residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19, a deadly contagious virus. Reference: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pots and pans prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 143 of 145 residents who received dietary services. Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pot Washing revealed, Policy: Kitchen will wash, rinse, and sanitize, all pots, pans, and cook ware and small wares following each meal. Procedure. 10. Air dry all clean and sanitized pots and wares. Do not wipe dry. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Wet Nesting dated Oct.22 revealed, Policy: When ware washing plates, cups, bowls, eating utensils, kitchen utensils, cooking ware, and equipment they must be air dried completely before being placed into storage for use. Procedure. Place items on drying rack and allow them to air-dry. Do not stack. Do not wipe dry any items; they must be allowed to air dry. Once items have dried completely, they can be properly stored. All coffee pots and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents who self-administered medication was assessed for self-administration, had a physician's order for self-administration, and ensure the interdisciplinary care planning team was involved in the decision for the resident to self-administer for one of one residents (Resident (R) 40) reviewed in the sample of 33 residents. As a result of this deficient practice the residents had the potential for harm by self-medicating without the knowledge of the physician or nursing staff.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications revised 04/19 revealed, Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of R40's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written quarterly statements within 30 days of the end of the quarter to residents and/or resident representatives to inform them of the residents' balance in their personal funds accounts. This failure had the potential to affect 10 residents (R)64, R153, R104, R83, R85, R96, R93, R29, R94, and R61) of 55 residents who had a personal funds account in the second quarter (April - June 2025) to be uninformed of the balance in their account. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Accounting and Records of Resident Funds dated April 2021 revealed, Policy Statement: Our facility maintains accounting records of resident funds on deposit with the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The business office maintains a record of all financial transactions involving the resident's personal funds on deposit with the facility. 5. Individual accounting records are made available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request. Quarterly statements include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the code status was in easy access for one of one resident (Resident (R)15) reviewed for Advanced Directive information prominently displayed in the medical record in the sample of 33 residents. As a result of this deficient practice the residents had the potential for receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when potentially against the wishes of the residents.Findings include:Review of R15's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] with medical diagnosis that included end stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Review of R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R15 was cognitively intact. Review of R15's Physician orders under the Orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment related to medications for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R)4), and a urinary catheter for one of one resident (R138) This deficient practice increased the potential for missed opportunities of care or services. Findings include: 1. Review of R4's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated an admission date of 01/05/24 and diagnoses of cerebral infarction, diabetes, and hypertension. Review of R4's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/16/25 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed that R4 was coded that he received an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet medication. Review of R4's July 2025 physician orders revealed R4 had a current order for Plavix (an antiplatelet medication) 75 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily. R4 does not have an order for an anticoagulated medication. 2. Review of R138's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab indicated an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessed as a smoker had a care plan for smoking for one of six residents (Resident (R)7) evaluated for safety when smoking. As a result of this deficient practice the residents had the potential for harm while smoking.Findings include:Review of R7's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 07/18/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included low white blood cell count, chronic viral hepatitis C, and anemia. Review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/01/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R7 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 08/25/2025 at 12:00 PM, R7 confirmed she was a smoker and went out on smoke breaks a couple times a day. Review of R7's Nursing Admission/readmission form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to clean respiratory equipment for one of one resident (Resident (R)56) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 33 residents. The failure to maintain a clean oxygen concentrator filter had the potential to increase the risk of infections for the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration dated October 2010 revealed the policy failed to address the need for routine cleaning and/or maintenance of oxygen concentrators, including the need to maintain a clean filter. Review of R56's undated admission Record located in R56's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included respiratory failure and emphysema. Review of R56's Physician Order dated 05/27/25 located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed, oxygen (O2) at 4 lpm [liters per minute] via nasal cannula continuously…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care of a dialysis resident with a fistula was checked for the patency daily, and document in the medical record for one of five residents (Resident (R)15) reviewed for dialysis care. As a result of this deficient practice the residents had the potential for clotting of the access point for dialysis treatments.Findings include:Review of R15's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 04/21/22 and readmission on [DATE] with medical diagnosis that included end stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Review of R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/05/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating R15 was cognitively intact. Observation on 08/25/25 at 1:53PM, R15 held out her left arm to point to the shunt used by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was posted in a manner that residents and visitors had access to the information. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents and visitors. Findings include: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:00 AM, the daily nurse staffing information was observed in a glassed bulletin board, behind the main reception desk at the upper left corner, approximately six feet high. The posting was current for the day, all three shifts, however, was not readable, or accessible, for residents in a wheelchair or with vision problems. Observations on the subsequent survey days of 08/26/25 at 3:30 PM, 08/27/25 at 1:00 PM and 08/28/25 at 11:15 AM revealed the daily nurse staffing information was in a glassed bulletin board, behind the main reception desk at the upper left corner, approximately six feet high. The posting was current for the day, all three shifts, however, would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) notify a physician of a resident's multiple refusals for a sliding scale coverage insulin (Resident #68) and b.) maintain and monitor the functionality and the effectiveness of a pacemaker since admission to the facility for a resident with a pacemaker (Resident #32) in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #32 and Resident #68). Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) consistently complete the dialysis communication form and b.) maintain a resident's dialysis communication record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident # 60), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/13/24 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #60 in bed in their room, who stated he/she went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #60. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage), anemia( a low number of red blood cells), and chronic kidney disease. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 1/19/24, reflected a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out 15, which indicated an intact cognition. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #37), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/13/24 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #37 in bed with their eyes open; the resident did not speak but responded to the surveyor's greeting with a smile and waved both arms. The surveyor observed the resident's call bell (a bell used to summon staff for assistance) was on the floor, not within his/her reach. On 3/15/24 at 11:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #37 in bed with the call bell tied to the lower aspect of the right side rail (bar positioned on the side of a bed to assist residents with mobility) not within his/her reach. On 3/19/24 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who stated the resident used their call bell to alert staff they needed assistance. At that time the surveyor accompanied by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a re-admission nutrition assessment for a resident with significant weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #60), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/13/24 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #60 in bed who stated he/she just finished breakfast and was still hungry. At this time, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) deliver the resident a sandwich. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #60. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage cause by diabetes), anemia (low red blood cells), and chronic kidney disease. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of Nurse Staffing Report sheets, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked seven days a week for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 4 of 21 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During entrance conference on 3/13/24 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) how the facility's staff was, and the LNHA stated that staffing was good; that the facility primarily utilized agency staff for certified nursing aides (CNA). At this time, the surveyor requested the Nurse Staffing Report to be completed for the following weeks: 6/25/23 through 7/1/23; 7/2/23 through 7/8/23; 3/3/24 through 3/9/24. The surveyor reviewed the Nurse Staffing Reports which revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) to work eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 1. No RN on 6/25/23; the last RN was scheduled on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM (3-11) shift on 6/24/23. 2. No RN on 7/2/23; the last RN was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures during a wound care treatment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 wound observations observed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer and injury (Resident #56), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/13/24 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #56 in bed with a pressure-relieving device who stated he/she had a wound on his/her bottom. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #56. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), dementia, diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to nerve damage), schizophrenia and a wound to the sacrum (lower portion of the spine near the pelvis). A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespreadTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to report a.) an allegation of sexual abuse between two residents, b.) verbal abuse between a staff member and a resident, c.) physical abuse by a resident against two other residents, and d.) an injury of unknown origin for two residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #10, #56, #63, #65, and #72) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization (#193), and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F600 and F684 a.) On 08/10/22, multiple staff members observed on the locked nursing unit, Resident #63, a registered sex offender, exit Resident #10's room. Resident #10 had intellectual disabilities and was dependent completely on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #63 was reported to be happy, bobbing their head side to side while smiling with feces on both of their hands. Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident's highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a.) provide incontinence care on 1 of 3 units (unsampled resident), b.) provide psychiatric consultation per physician order for a resident who expressed suicidal ideation and feelings of loneliness for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for mood and behavior (Resident #63), c.) schedule a resident's appointment with their preferred cardiologist after a hospital visit for 1 of 5 residents who attended a Resident Council Meeting (unsampled resident), and d.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-shift ratios as mandated by New Jersey State requirement, CHAPTER 112 (An Act related to staffing requirements for nursing homes and supplementing Title 30 of the Revised Statutes). The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: Refer to: F584, F740, F636, F638, and F882 a.) On 09/23/22 at 6:53 AM, Surveyor #1 went to the locked unit and observed the following: Resident #54,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure that staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/07/22 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Interim Infection Preventionist (IIP) who had been the facility Educator prior to becoming the IIP regarding staff competencies. The IIP stated that she was only the Educator for a month and that she had been implementing the new computer system during that time. She added that the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant DON (ADON) were the facility's educators and that the competency book would possibly be located in the DON's office. On 10/07/22 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor interviewed the second floor Unit Manager (UM) regarding staff competencies. The UM stated that she had occasionally given in-services to staff but that she had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store, label, and date potentially hazardous food, and maintain kitchen sanitation in a manner intended to limit the spread of food-borne illnesses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 9:38 AM to 10:09 AM, the surveyor entered the facility kitchen and toured with the Food Service Director (FSD). On 09/21/22 at 9:41 AM, the surveyor observed the facility ice machine. The baffle area (the interior back of the basin in direct contact with the ice) located in the bucket with ice, contained black streaked debris, and accumulated debris above it. The FSD confirmed the ice machine was not clean. The FSD stated maintenance would come monthly to clean filters and the cover of the ice machine. On 09/21/22 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor observed 1/2 package of meatballs in the freezer, wrapped, but with no label and no use by date. The FSD stated the meatballs were good for 30 days. On 09/21/22 at 9:55 AM, the surveyor observed two frozen pie shells in plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies was reviewed and updated, as necessary, and at least annually. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 01:09 PM, during the entrance conference held with the facility administration, another surveyor requested a copy of the Facility Assessment (FA). On 9/22/22 at 2:28 PM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the other surveyor with the FA. The FA was not signed or dated to indicate when the FA was conducted or reviewed. On 10/07/22 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed the LNHA regarding the FA. The LNHA stated that the FA should have been dated and signed. He then stated that it looked like the wrong one was given. He added that the corporate person had given it to him. He then added that it was in the binder for survey (binder which contains documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) duties per the MD Job Description were implemented to ensure resident care policies and services were provided to all residents that were consistent with current professional standards of practice on 3 of 3 resident units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to: F600K, F609F, F610F, F684H, F835L, 838F, 850F, F865F, F867F, F880L, F886L, F888L During a recertification survey conducted on 10/12/22, the survey team identified multiple findings of Immediate Jeopardy which included, but were not limited to: The facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse after an allegation of sexual abuse involving (Resident #10), and b.) protect vulnerable residents from being verbally abused by staff (Resident #56). The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure policies, procedures and systems were developed and implemented to ensure immediate action was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/11/22 at 01:00 PM, the surveyor asked the Regional Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (RLNHA) to view the written transfer agreement that the facility had with one or more hospitals. The RLNHA was unable to provide the surveyor a written transfer agreement. On 10/12/22 at 10:53 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) to view the written transfer agreement that the facility had with one or more hospitals. The LNHA stated that the agreement would be in the Emergency Preparedness (EP) manual. The LNHA then, in the presence of the surveyor, began looking through different binders that were not labeled as the EP manual. He then stated that the previous owner would have had the agreement. He stated that he was unable to locate it at this time. The LNHA then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a Social Worker (SW) with the required experience per facility policy and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This was identified for 1 of 1 SW employed and was evidenced by the following: On 09/27/22 at 12:31 PM, during an interview with a surveyor, the SW stated she had been in the position of Social Services Director (SSD) since March 2022. The SW stated some of her responsibilities included initial social services assessments, communication with residents and families, handling concerns such as any investigations, and interviewing anyone involved. The SW reiterated that she had started in March 2022 and added that this was her first job out of school, she had not been educated on this (her job), and had not been provided with clear direction to handle grievances. She stated that the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) had started in June 2022 and had trained her. The SW further stated she could not recall if she was provided a job description but, I'm going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on concerns identified during this survey that ended 10/12/2022, interviews and review of pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to put forth a good faith attempt to identify and correct their own concerns related to infection prevention and control during an ongoing COVID-19 virus (an acute disease in humans caused by a Coronavirus) outbreak that began on 06/24/22. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F880L, F886L, F888L On 09/21/22 at 01:09 PM, during the entrance conference held with the facility administration, another surveyor requested information regarding the QAA (Quality assessment and assurance) committee and QAPI plan. The administration informed the survey team that the facility was presently in an outbreak of COVID-19 which began on 06/24/22. On 10/07/22 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided Quality Assurance Meeting August 2022 minutes which included the following: Outbreak Plan: We…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on concerns identified during the survey through interviews, and review of pertinent facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 01:09 PM, during the entrance conference held with the facility administration, another surveyor requested information regarding the QAA (Quality assessment and assurance) committee and QAPI plan. On 10/07/22 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed facility provided Quality Assurance Meeting minutes for the last three meetings. There was no documented evidence in the minutes to confirm plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies were implemented. On 10/07/22 at 11:29 AM, the other surveyor interviewed the Medical Director regarding the QAPI process. The Medical Director stated that she had been at the facility for more than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-12 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to employ an Infection Preventionist (IP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 employees reviewed for IP and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 1:08 PM, entrance conference was conducted with the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON). At that time, the surveyor was informed that the current position of IP was held by a Registered Nurse (RN) who had not completed the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) specialized training for infection prevention and control. On 09/22/22 at 1:54 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the RN stated she had started as IP at the facility in July 2022 and had not completed her CDC training (IP). On 09/23/22 at 9:42 AM, during an interview with surveyors, the RN who was acting as the facility's IP stated she was new to the role of IP. The RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) notify in writing of residents' room changes for cognitively impaired residents and b.) develop facility policy for room changes in accordance with federal and state regulations. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for room changes (Resident #10 and #47) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/26/22 at 2:52 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Social Services (DSS) who stated the process for a resident room change was the nurse or nurse's aide would inform her the resident's room needed to be changed. The DSS stated if a room was available, she talked to the resident directly as well as the roommate and then let the Director of Nursing (DON) or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) know a room would be changed. At this time, the surveyor requested a list of resident room changes from the past two months. On 09/27/22 at 12:35 PM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the shower room on 1 of 3 units (second floor unit) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 11:55 AM, the surveyor in the presence of two other surveyors were touring the second floor of the facility. The surveyors entered the resident shower room and observed the following: Shower labeled C1 had a visibly stained blanket being used as a shower curtain and tied in a knot on the shower rod. The blanket was wet and lying on the base of the shower. The grout on the floor was blackened. There was an area below the shower handrail which was blackened and chipped. Shower labeled C2 had visibly darkened grout below the shower chair. There was an area below the shower handrail which was blackened and chipped. There was a blanket being utilized as a shower curtain. There was a dried washcloth left on the shower chair rail. On 09/21/22 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor asked the second floor Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN UM) to join the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 6 of 20 residents (Resident #8, #12, #13, #14, #26 and #34) system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: On 9/27/22 at 11:52 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that the MDS coordinator resigned about three weeks ago and that the Regional MDS coordinator was now responsible for completing the MDS. The DON further stated that the Regional MDS coordinator was only in the facility, once in a while but usually communicated via email. The surveyor asked the DON how often the MDS should be completed. The DON replied, quarterly, annually, and for changes in the resident's condition. On 9/28/22 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional MDS Coordinator who stated that she had been the facility's Regional MDS coordinator since August 1, 2021, and the in-house facility MDS coordinator for about five weeks. The MDS coordinator stated that she was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and revise a person-centered comprehensive care plan to: a.) address a resident's aggressive and inappropriate behavior (Resident #63); b.) specify supervision required for residents at risk for falls (Resident #24 and #13); and c.) update the care plan, identify steps to be implemented to manage the behavior of residents with history of sexual assault and prevent them from attempting to engage in inappropriate sexual behavior (Resident #63 and #8), for 4 of 35 residents reviewed for person-centered care plans. Findings included: Refer F600 a. On 09/21/22 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor #1 toured the 300's locked unit and observed Resident #63 lying in bed; he/she was awake and alert. He/she reported to the surveyor that he/she had a headache, the surveyor left the room and informed the nurse. Surveyor #1 reviewed Resident #63's medical record on 09/27/22 which revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed follow the facility policy for fall prevention, and to ensure: a.) interventions in place to prevent accidents were consistently implemented, and b.) residents at risk for falls received adequate supervision to prevent falls. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 of five residents (Resident #13 and #24) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in a low bed and his/her face was discolored. Resident #13 had bruises on the facial area. Resident #13 was alert and was calling out mommy continuously. On 09/21/22 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor returned to the room and observed that Resident #13 remained in bed. Resident #13 was able to hold a conversation for a brief period of time and denied being in pain. On 09/22/22 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) was in the room assisting Resident #13 with the lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document the amount of fluid administered by nursing for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #69) reviewed for fluid restriction while on hemodialysis (HD -the process of purifying the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 10:41 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #69 sitting in a chair by the window in his/her room. Resident #69 stated he/she was on HD and there was an access in their right arm. On 09/26/22 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #69 in their room eating ice chips out of a pink water pitcher. Resident #69 stated that he/she had HD that day and would be picked up at 1 PM. The resident further stated he/she was not on any fluid restrictions. He/she stated they would eat before he/she would leave. The surveyor asked again if anyone ever told him/her to restrict fluids. The resident stated, I don't have any fluid restrictions, I can have what I want. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide psychiatric consultation for a resident who expressed suicidal ideation and feelings of loneliness as ordered by the physician in April of 2022. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for mood and behavior (Resident #63) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/27/22 at 09:57 AM, the surveyor interviewed Temporary Nursing Aide (TNA) #1, who stated the facility's locked unit was for residents who had a tendency to wander off of a unit, had dementia, and more aggressive behaviors. TNA #1 continued Resident #63 was a resident on the unit who usually stayed in their room or in the hallway and went outside to smoke cigarettes. TNA #1 stated the resident had no behaviors, but there was an incident last month where Resident #63 was observed exiting a resident of the opposite sex's room. Resident #63 had not had a tendency to wander, and the incident was reported to the nurse. On 09/27/22 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure: a.) a medication was removed from active inventory after being discontinued in July 2022 for one (1) of three (3) medication carts inspected; and b.) expired medications were removed from emergency (back-up) supply box for 1 of 1 back up supply box. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 09/26/22 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor inspected the Low side medication cart on the third floor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). The surveyor found one bingo card (a multidose card containing individually packaged medication) of Divalproex sodium (Depakote) extended release (ER; used for epilepsy and, or acute bipolar mania) 250 milligrams (mg) with Unsampled Resident #393's name crossed off with a marker and Resident #48's name had been handwritten in. The bingo card was dated 07/19/22, labeled 1 of 1. The bingo card found was opened with 13 tablets remaining. At that time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, date and discard expired biologicals in 2 of 3 medication carts, and 1 of 2 medication rooms inspected on the second floor unit. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/26/22 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the second floor Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM), observed the following items in the High side unit medication cart (second floor): -one unlabeled inhaler [no Resident's name and unmarked with open date] of Ventolin HFA (albuterol oral inhaler; a medication used to help in breathing) 90 micrograms (mcg) per actuation. -one unlabeled bottle [no Resident's name] of Linzess (linaclotide; a medication used to treat chronic constipation or chronic irritable bowel syndrome) 145 milligrams (mg). During an interview with the surveyor at that time, the RN/UM stated that each medication should have been in a bag or a box and labeled with the Resident's name on the medication to avoid medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to promote dignity by failing to ensure: a.) a resident who required assistance at meals and foods in bowls was provided , and b.) a resident was provided with priviacy during dressing. This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #7) and (Resident #54) and was evidenced by the following: a. ) During observation of the lunch meal on 09/23/22 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #7 seated at a table eating lunch. Resident #7 spilled all the food on his/her shirt and was observed picking up the food with his/her hands from the shirt to eat. Two staff members (TNA #1 and CNA #2) were observed in the dayroom assisting the residents. The surveyor observed TNA #1 who poured the remaining food from Resident #7's shirt on their plate and was about to serve the resident the food collected when the surveyor stopped her and asked her to call the kitchen for more food. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #10 and #248), system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: On 9/27/22 at 11:52 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that the MDS coordinator resigned about three weeks ago and that the Regional MDS coordinator was now responsible for completing the MDS assessments. The DON further stated that the Regional MDS coordinator was only in the facility, once in a while but usually communicated via email. The surveyor asked the DON how often the MDS assessments should be completed. The DON replied, quarterly, annually and for changes in the resident's condition. On 9/28/22 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional MDS Coordinator who stated that she had been the facility's Regional MDS coordinator since August 1, 2021, and the in-house facility MDS coordinator for about five weeks. The MDS coordinator stated that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to implement revised interventions to prevent recurrent falls for a resident who had a history of falls and sustained a fall without injury on 01/11/23. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 Residents reviewed for incidents (Resident #9) during a re-visit survey conducted on 01/26/23 and was evidenced by the following: On 01/26/23 at 8:43 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) informed the surveyor team that there had been four investigations/ Reportable Events since 12/05/22. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #9 which revealed: A Resident Face Sheet which indicated the resident had diagnoses which include, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with behavioral disturbance, essential hypertension and chronic ischemic heart disease. An Nursing Progress Note, dated 01/17/23 at 11:12 AM, revealed 01/22/2023 CNA approached writer stating resident is on the floor on the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the care needed to meet the resident's assessed needs. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for care, (Resident #48 and #54) was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 10:20 AM, during the initial tour of the locked 300's unit, the surveyor observed Resident #48 in their room, the room had a strong odor of urine. Flies were noted in the room, the mattress was yellow stained. On 09/21/22 at 11:00 AM, an interview with LPN # 6 assigned to the 300's unit low side, revealed that all residents on the low side were confused, they defecated and urinated on the floor and wandered from room to room. The LPN could not comment if Resident #48 was on a toileting program or what had been done to address the behavior. On 09/21/22 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Housekeeping staff assigned to the 300's Unit, she stated that she reported to work at 7:00 AM daily, her role was to remove the trash, clean the dining room, the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate services for a resident with contractures by failing to ensure: a.) appropriate interventions were in place for a resident with contractures, and b.) a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate services in accordance with person centered care plan to prevent further contractures, and c.) interventions were appropriately documented as administered for resident with limited range of motion for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for position/mobility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/22/22 at 12:43 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 seated in a chair. Resident #20 had contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) of both hands. The surveyor did not observe any devices including a hand roll in either of Resident #20's hands. The surveyor attempted to interview Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ00155999 Based on observation, interview, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for (a) 1 of 4 residents closed medical records reviewed (Resident #194), and (b) 1 of 35 Sampled residents reviewed (Resident #8). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a) On 09/27/22 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor requested Resident #194's closed records from the Medical Records department. On 09/28/22 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Clerk/ Medical Records (UC/MR) who explained her process. She stated she thinned the paper charts, closed charts, and sent data to other physicians when needed. She informed the surveyor that the electronic Medical Record (eMR) started in May 2022. A review of the eMR under admission Discharge Transfer (ADT) reflected Resident #194 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/13/22. On 10/04/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a Pneumococcal Vaccine. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunization status (Resident #11). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/26/22 at 9:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's medical record which revealed the following information: Review of the Resident Face Sheet Record (an admission summary) revealed that Resident # 11 had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, acute embolism, thrombosis of lower extremities and an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10; a diagnostic and procedure coding system) of Z28.39 other under immunization (is for reporting when a patient is not current on other, non-COVID vaccines). Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 08/12/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a COVID-19 Immunization. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunization (Resident #11). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/26/22 09:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's medical record which revealed the following information: Review of the Resident Face Sheet Record (an admission summary) revealed that Resident # 11 had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, acute embolism, thrombosis of lower extremities and an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10; a diagnostic and procedure coding system) of Z28.39 other under immunization (is for reporting when a patient is not current on other, non-COVID vaccines). Review of Resident #11's active Care Plan (CP) printed on 10/03/22 did not reveal any focus, goals, or interventions for vaccinations. Review of Resident #11's electronic Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on 1 of 3 floors (second floor) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/21/22 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor in the presence of a second surveyor was touring the second floor and observed the handrails from the elevator door located in front of the second floor conference room to be unsecure. The surveyors observed the handrail from the elevator to the corner of the low side corridor was visibly leaning outward. The surveyor was able to touch the handrail and it was observed to have almost completely separated from where it was screwed into the wall. The surveyors observed the attached corner handrail, that was meant to hold two handrails together, which was visibly partially separated from the two handrails causing another handrail on the low side corridor to become unsecured. The surveyors next observed the handrail from the elevator towards the high side corridor was visibly leaning outward with a corner handrail piece which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-12 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and or the resident's representative written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital and also send a copy to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 resident's (Residents #86 and #193) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/22/22 at 09:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #86's medical record which revealed a Progress Note (PN), dated 8/4/22, that indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A PN, dated 8/10/22, indicated that Resident #86 returned to the facility from the hospital on that date. There was no documented evidence of written notification to the resident or resident's representative and the Ombudsman of the reason for transfer to the hospital. On 09/28/22 at 01:16 PM, during surveyor interview, the Director of Social Services (DSS) stated that the nurse would notify the family when a resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-12 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of the medical record and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative written notification of the facility's bed hold policy prior to transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 resident's (Resident #86 and #193) reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/22/22 at 09:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #86's medical record which revealed a Progress Note (PN), dated 8/4/22, that indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A PN, dated 8/10/22, indicated that Resident #86 returned to the facility from the hospital on that date. There was no documented evidence of written notification to the resident or resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy prior to transfer to the hospital. On 09/28/22 at 01:16 PM, during surveyor interview, the Director of Social Services (DSS) stated that the admissions department would provide the notification of the bed hold policy. On 09/28/22 at 01:19 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-10-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted 24-hour staffing report was completed in its entirety and provided accurate information. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/30/22 at 11:24 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's version of the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report, dated 09/30/22, posted near the receptionist desk, which included the following: On 09/30/22 Day Shift, the Staffing Report omitted the Current Resident Census, the number of Staff for each staff category and the Staff to Resident Ratios for each staff category. The Total Hours Worked for Registered Nurse (RN) was 3; for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was 4; and Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) was 10. On 09/30/22 Evening Shift, the Staffing Report omitted the Current Resident Census, the number of Staff for each staff category and the Staff to Resident Ratios for each staff category. The Total Hours Worked for RN was 2; for LPN was 4; and CNA was 9. On 09/30/22 Night, the Staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ACCELA HEALTHCARE — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERKOWITZ, CHESKEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| LEIFER, JOEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ORGEL, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ORNSTEIN, MARTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| RUBENSTEIN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ZUPNICK, JOEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| PANDYA, RITEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/29/2021 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/29/2021 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315455. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.