Dellridge Health & Rehabilitation Center
532 Farview Ave, Paramus, NJ 07652 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (201) 265-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.0% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 2.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 8.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 15.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.7% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 80.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 2.07 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.22 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 368 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.5%CMS range 47.0–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.8–11.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.0%CMS range 7.3–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 113.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents' environment in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike surrounding. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 shower rooms in the long term care units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/16/26 at 9:32 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) toured the A side nursing unit shower room that was near the nursing station, and observed in the middle cubicle a shower chair with ripped back cover, below was two broken floor tiles, and the heater grills with heavy accumulation of brownish, rusty like substances. On 4/16/26 at 9:35 AM, S #1 went to B side nursing unit shower room near the nursing station, and observed the ceiling vent just above the sink with accumulation of grayish substances and below was the heater grills with heavy accumulation of rusty like substances brownish in color. S #1 also observed in the shower cubicle wall with an open wire outlet next to the hoyer lift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow the physicians' orders with regard to behavior and side effects monitoring for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #7, #8, #9, and #89) reviewed for unnecessary medications and b.) clarify the physician's order according to the standard of clinical practice and facility's policies.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's medical record included documentation that indicated, at a minimum, that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #6, #7, and #89). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 4/16/26 at 10:46 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) reviewed the medical record for Resident #6. A review of the admission Record (AR) or face sheet (an admission summary) for Resident #6, revealed diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; multiple sclerosis, sepsis, extended spectrum beta-lactamase resistance, acute kidney failure, and depression. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (cMDS) (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/13/26, included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an as needed psychotropic (affecting the brain and nervous system, altering mood, thoughts, perception, and behavior) medication ordered was limited to 14 days, unless the attending physician/prescribing practitioner documents a rationale to extend the medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice (Residents #75). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/15/26 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #75 asleep in bed. On 4/16/26 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #75's medical record. A review of Resident #75's admission Record or face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to anorexia (a serious, potentially life-threatening eating disorder characterized by an intense fear of gaining weight, self-starvation, and a distorted body image) and dementia (a decline in mental ability-such as memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview, review of the medical record, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Resident or Resident Representative with a written notification of the facility's bed hold policy that included the reserve payment information for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #14) reviewed for hospitalizations.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 4/17/26 at 9:44 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who stated that he was the assigned nurse of Resident #14. The LPN informed S #1 that the resident was cognitively impaired, required total assistance with care, with pressure ulcer (PU), and had been in and out of the hospital where PU worsened. S #1 reviewed the medical records of Resident #14, and revealed the following: The admission Record (AR) or face sheet(an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to; PU of sacral region, stage 4, muscle weakness (generalized),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, within 14 days as required, for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #120), reviewed for facility task-resident assessment, in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2025, RAI-required Assessment Summary:-The admission (Comprehensive) assessment, the MDS completion date no later than 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days). The CAA(s) (Care Area Assessment) Completion date no later than 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days). The Care Plan Completion date is no later than CAA(s) Completion date + 7 calendar days. The Transmission date is no later than Care Plan Completion date + 14 calendar days.-The Discharge MDS assessment return not anticipated (DRNA), the MDS completion date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 5 of 27 residents, (Residents #7, #8, #13, #14, and #89), reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 4/17/26 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) reviewed the electronic medical record (eMR) of Resident #7 and revealed: A review of the immunization record reflected that there was no documentation for offered, administered or refusal of flu and pneumonia vaccines. A review of the MDS revealed under section O0250, that C. If influenza vaccine not received, state reason: the code entered in the assessment was 1. Resident not in this facility during this year's influenza vaccination season. Further review of the MDS section O0300 revealed that A. Is the resident's Pneumococcal vaccination up to date? the code entered in the assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice that meet each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs, specifically a.) ensuring a consent was obtained and signage posted for video monitoring for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #16) and b.) ensuring hospice recommendations that were not followed were clarified with the physician and medications discontinued that a hospice resident was refusing to take for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice (Resident #75).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) an air mattress was set according to the resident's weight and b.) the medication administration record was signed in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (PU) (Resident #11).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services of resident that was receiving oxygen according to the standard of clinical practice and the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #8, reviewed for respiratory care, and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the physician must include an evaluation of the resident's condition and total program of care and a decision about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen. The primary physician's history and physical and succeeding visit notes did not reflect resident's skin impairment and pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents, (Resident #14), reviewed for physician services.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/26 at 8:34 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #14, and revealed the following: The admission Record or face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to; pressure ulcer (PU) of sacral region, stage 4 (a severe, full-thickness wound involving extensive destruction, tissue necrosis, and damage to muscle, bone, or supporting structures), muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported irregularities in the medication regimen, b.) ensure duplicate and conflicting physician orders were clarified, and c.) ensure that as needed and routine orders were not duplicative or clinically appropriate. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for orders.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/16/26 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in the resident's room lying in bed. The resident was alert and oriented, with the call bell within reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #6. A review of the admission Record or face sheet (an admission summary), revealed diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; multiple sclerosis, sepsis, extended spectrum beta-lactamase resistance, acute kidney failure, and depression. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCYBased on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and disinfect equipment for 1 of 4 nurses during medication pass observation, b.) perform hand hygiene and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 staff (Housekeeper), and c.) track the extent to which staff were following the facility's policy and procedures to control infections and communicable diseases for all residents with regard to vaccinations, failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice, and the facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 6/28/24, revealed, EBP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents and/or resident representatives must be educated on the COVID-19 vaccine the facility offered, in a manner they could understand for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #6 and #7). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 4/16/26 at 10:46 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) reviewed the medical record for Resident #6. A review of the admission Record (AR) or face sheet (an admission summary) for Resident #6, revealed diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; multiple sclerosis, sepsis, extended spectrum beta-lactamase resistance, acute kidney failure, and depression. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/13/26, included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. A review of the immunization record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/15/24 at 9:28 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and Regional FSD (RFSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the juice dispenser area, there were three 5-gallon beverage boxes that were past their best used by date. A thickened water (nectar consistency) 5-gallon box had a best if used by date of 9/11/24. A thickened water (honey consistency) 5-gallon box had a best if used by date of 7/31/24. A diet lemonade 5-gallon box had a best if used by date of 10/3/23. The FSD stated that the beverage boxes were good for 6 months after their best if used by date. The FSD acknowledged the diet lemonade was expired. The surveyor requested documentation from the RFSD and FSD which indicated the beverage boxes were still good to be used 6 months after the best if used by date. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of clinical practice by failing to: a.) follow the residents' meal tickets for 2 of 2 meal observations for Residents #41, #43, and #44; b.) clarify the physician's order with regard to supplement for 1 of 24 residents, Resident #41; and c.) ensure medication was administered in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, and d.) ensure proper disposal of excess medication in a safe and approved manner for 2 of 6 residents, Residents #45 and #339, reviewed during the medication pass observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices for 5 of 11 staff (1 Housekeeper,1 Recreation Aide, 2 Dietary Staff, and 1 Physician), b.) disinfect the examination area after use, and follow appropriate infection control practices during meal observation, environment tour, and kitchen tour, to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice, and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 2/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient . Before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility-provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a) meals were consistently provided in a dignified and homelike manner and b) resident meal assistance was provided in a dignified manner. The deficient practice was observed in the recreation dining room for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #15 & #44). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/15/24 at 11:46 AM, the surveyor observed the Kitchen Staff (KS) deliver the food truck to the recreation room, there were 6 residents, 4 residents at one table, 1 resident at one table, and another resident at one table, there were 2 Recreation Aides (RA) inside the dining area and later Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) came and assisted in distributing lunch trays. The surveyor observed RA #1, RA#2, and RNS assisted 5 of 6 residents with hand hygiene using individually wrapped hand wipes on each resident's lunch trays. The facility staff did not offer Resident #44 hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a resident's advance directives for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #10) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (electronic and paper) medical records of Resident #10 which revealed: The admission Record (a summary of important information about the resident) revealed that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure (a chronic condition when the airways in the lungs become damaged and narrow), anxiety disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/30/24, indicated the facility assessed the resident's cognition using a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) test. Resident #10 scored a 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. The New Jersey Practitioner Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
COMPLAINT NJ#169518 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Resident's Representative (RR) of a change in condition for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident # 239). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #239's closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record. Resident #239's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), dementia (group of brain disorders that cause a gradual decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function). A review of Resident #239's Universal Transfer Form (UTF) from the return to the facility after the first rehospitalization, indicated that the resident did not have any wounds.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents' environment in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike surrounding. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 21 residents reviewed, Resident #48, #71 and #47. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 12/15/24 at 11:35 AM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER]-LW and Resident #48 was not in the room. The surveyor observed dressers on both sides of the bed. Some areas of the wood on the left dresser and the edges of the right dresser were peeled, exposing the underlying particle board which created a rough surface and edges on the dressers. The heater unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]-LW was observed without the front grill cover. The front grill cover was observed laying against the wall. The surveyor also observed Resident #48's bed frame visibly soiled with a dry, brown substance on the right, foot side of the bed frame. On 12/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary service to maintain good personal grooming for a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for care, Resident #71. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/15/24 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #71 lying on an air mattress inside their room. The resident waved to the surveyor but was unable to answer questions at that time. The surveyor observed Resident #71 unshaven, with hair stubbles on both cheeks, and beard on chin. On 12/16/24 at 11:28 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #71 sitting on the wheelchair (w/c) inside their room, unshaven, and Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA#1) was combing the resident's hair. The resident communicated to the surveyor and whispered their name when the surveyor asked for the name of the resident. On 12/16/24 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor interviewed CNA #1, who stated, I wash them, answer call bells,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policies and procedures for 1 of 24 residents, Resident #86, reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services of residents that were receiving oxygen, according to the standard of clinical practice and the facility's policy and procedure, specifically, administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order by documenting the date and time the oxygen tubing was changed for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #10. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #25), reviewed for dialysis services. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report posted was accurate and in a prominent place within the facility readily accessible to the residents and the visitors. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/15/24 at 8:56 AM, the survey team entered the facility. The surveyor did not observe a 24-hour staffing report in the initial hallway leading to the nursing station or at the nursing station. The surveyor then turned right and proceeded down a different hallway, which contained the lower odd numbered resident rooms and observed a staffing report sheet that was posted on the right wall next to the menu. The surveyor observed that the posting would not be accessible or visible to residents and visitors that were located or visited the resident rooms that were in the hallway that contained the higher odd numbered rooms. The posting observed was dated 12/13/24 evening shift with a census of 85. The posting had not been updated for that day and did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ#169518 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #239). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/18/24 at 9:01 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #239's closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record. A review of Resident #239's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), dementia (group of brain disorders that cause a gradual decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function). A review of Resident #239's Universal Transfer Form (UTF) from the return to the facility after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ00154277 Based on the interview, review of the facility closed record, and the review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) document the skin impairment of the resident, b) provide scheduled showers, c) administer medications according to the order of the physician, and d) notify the physician of late administration of prescribed medications in accordance with the resident's preferences, goals for care and professional standards of clinical practice for one (1) of 19 residents, (Resident#127) reviewed for quality of care and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) proper storage of medication (med) for one (1) of 19 residents, Resident #32 observed during the first day of tour; b) med was available for one (1) of four (4) residents, Resident#45 during med administration observation; c) proper disposal of med for one (1) of three (3) nurses observed during med administration; d) med was administered according to the order of the physician for one (1) of 19 residents, Resident#129 observed during med cart inspection according to the standards of clinical practice and facility policies. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fracture of unknown origin on 3/02/23 of Resident#10. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for incident/accident and was evidenced by the following: On 7/06/23 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 seated in a wheelchair inside their room, with one floor mat to the left side of the bed. The resident stated to the surveyor that he/she had a fall incident last night while in the bathroom. At the same time, Certified Nursing Aide#1 (CNA#1) who was also inside the room informed the surveyor that she was the aide of the resident. The CNA stated that the fall incident happened not on her shift. On 7/11/23 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor observed the resident was not in their room, there was one floormat on the floor to the left side of the bed. On 7/11/23 at 9:10 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse#1 (LPN#1) informed the surveyor that Resident #10 was in the hospital, transferred to ER…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-18 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed for Resident #10. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: According to the MDS (minimum data set) 3.0 RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual October 2019 page 2-22 (pages 44-49) included that the SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident must be completed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: 1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered self-limiting; 2. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; and 3. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 3 (three) of 19 residents, (Residents #10, #11 and #54) reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/06/23 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 seated in a wheelchair inside their room with the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) with one floor mat to the left side of the bed and informed the surveyor that she was the aide of the resident. The resident stated to the surveyor that he/she had a fall incident last night while in the bathroom. The CNA stated that the fall incident happened not on her shift. On 7/11/23 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor observed the resident was not in their room, there was one floormat on the floor to the left side of the bed. On 7/11/23 at 9:10 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) came and informed the surveyor that Resident #10 was in the hospital, transferred to ER (emergency room) on 7/06/23 s/p…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow and revised the diet slip of one (1) of 19 residents, Resident #32 observed during breakfast observation according to the standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for risk for pressure ulcer quarterly and accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury (Resident #40). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/06/23 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #40 lying in bed with an air mattress. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #40 which revealed the following: The admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary) showed that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking), anemia (condition marked by a deficiency of red blood cells or of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) label and properly store the nebulizer (neb) mask for one (1) of two (2) residents, (Resident#126) reviewed for respiratory care and b) perform hand hygiene appropriately for one (1) (Licensed Practical Nurse) of three (3) staff observed during medication (med) administration in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Hand Hygiene Recommendations, Guidance for Healthcare Providers (HCP) for Hand Hygiene and COVID-19, page last reviewed 01/08/2021 included that the HCP should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with the residents, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient, after touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment, after contact with blood, body fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 1 of 24 residents, (Residents #88), reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #88 and revealed: The admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, wedge compression fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra (the fracture occurs when the bone collapses and the front (anterior) part of the vertebral body forms a wedge shape), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, pain in unspecified joint, and encounter for other specified surgical aftercare. The most recent Discharge Return Not Anticipated (DRNA) MDS, Section A-Identification Information revealed that the resident had an unplanned discharge (d/c) to a short-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FAMILY OF CARING HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDMAN, EDWARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 10% | since 03/01/2005 |
| FRIEDMAN, NATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 90% | since 03/01/2005 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315129. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.