Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center At Sewell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 248 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 146 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 129.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 172818 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) hot water temperatures were maintained at safe levels to protect residents from third degree burns and/or serious injury. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units (the Long-Term Care (LTC) unit). Hot water temperatures obtained on 3/4/25, in resident's rooms on the LTC unit registered between 138 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 140 degrees F. Interviews with the Director of Maintenance (DM) confirmed that the water temperatures should be below 120 degrees F to be at a safe level. The facility's failure to ensure that residents were protected from excessive hot water temperatures posed the likelihood of serious harm and injury from third degree burns. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The IJ began on 3/4/25 at 10:47 AM, when the survey team identified hot water temperatures on the LTC resident unit in excess of 120…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 430386Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to protect Resident (R)5's right to be free from physical abuse by a staff member. This deficient practice was identified for R5, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for staff-to-resident abuse. Review of R5's undated admission Record in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5 had diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbances.Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2 out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired.Review of the Facility Investigation Form (FRI) provided by the facility and dated [DATE] revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was observed by Activity Aide (AA) 1 on [DATE] around 10:10 AM, to continue to attempt to give R5's medication despite R5's refusal. When R5 threw juice at LPN1, the LPN grasped R5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint# 430386 and 2595402Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of staff-to-resident abuse were reported timely, and in accordance with federal reporting requirements, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of two sampled residents (Resident (R) 3 and R5) reviewed for allegations of abuse. The facility's failure to promptly report allegations of abuse limited regulatory oversight and had the potential to delay protective interventions for residents. Findings include:1. Review of a complaint intake dated 08/20/25 for R3 revealed R3 made an allegation of sexual abuse against a former facility staff employee, Maintenance Worker (MW) 1, to his/her therapist on 06/29/25, after discharge from the facility. Review of R3's undated admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay. R3 had diagnoses of a traumatic brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure policies, procedures, and effective systems were implemented to maintain each resident's highest practicable wellbeing. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided on 3 of 3 units and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F689 and F812 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following: The Administrator's primary purpose is to direct the day-to-day functions of the center in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guideline, and regulations that govern nursing centers to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. Duties and Responsibilities included but not limited to: plan, develop, organize, implement, evaluate, and direct the center's programs and activities; Develop and maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/3/25 from 8:09 AM to 9:02 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Dietary Assistant Supervisor (DAS): In the Reach-in Refrigerator: 1. A five (5) pound container of hummus which was previously opened, was not labeled or dated with an opened or use-by date. The DAS discarded the container of hummus. The DAS stated that the hummus should have had an opened date and a used by date. 2. A pan of ground beef which was sealed with aluminum foil, dated 2/27/25, had a tear in the aluminum foil exposing the ground beef to the air. The DAS discarded the ground beef. The DAS stated the aluminum foil should not have had a tear in it. In the Walk- In Freezer: 1. A large pan of frozen fish was sealed with aluminum foil, dated 2/25/25, with a tear in the aluminum foil exposing the fish to the air. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ171573, NJ170867 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident hospitalization for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #176) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/3/25 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #176. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, pneumonitis (an inflammation of the lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), unspecified, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified, end stage renal (kidney) disease, Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus (adult onset diabetes) with unspecified complications, anemia (lack of blood), unspecified, other sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke), and malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancerous tumor in the male prostate gland). The resident's most recent comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ171573 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate physician's orders for an enteral tube feeding formula (liquid nutritional products that provide nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract through a surgically created opening in the abdominal wall) in a timely manner in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #176) reviewed for tube feeding administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/3/25 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #176. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, pneumonitis (an inflammation of the lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), end stage renal (kidney) disease, Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus (adult onset diabetes) with unspecified complications, anemia (lack of blood), other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order to provide humidified oxygen and ensure respiratory equipment was stored in an appropriate way to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/3/25 at 8:29 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #89 awake and alert, seated on the bed, wearing a nasal cannula (tubing) attached to an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides concentrated oxygen). The concentrator was set between three (3) and four (4) liters (L) of oxygen. Resident #89 stated, My nose is so congested. At that time, the surveyor observed two concentrators in the resident's room, but the resident stated that only one of the concentrators was operable. There was no humidifier bottle attached to the operable concentrator the resident used. At that time, the surveyor observed a nebulizer mask that was uncovered in a wash basin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #38 and #91), during the medication pass observation on 3/4/25, the surveyor observed four (4) nurses, administer 27 doses of medication to five (5) residents and there were two (2) errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 7%. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/4/25 at 8:35 AM, during the medication administration observation, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 prepare to administer medications to Resident #91, which included a multivitamin with minerals. The surveyor observed LPN #3 place one (1) tab of multivitamin with minerals in the medication cup and then hand the house stock bottle of multi-vitamin with minerals to the surveyor to verify. LPN #3 gathered the resident's medications and water for administration. At that time, LPN #3 confirmed that she would administer the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications under acceptable temperatures and sanitary conditions. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Long-Term Care medication room) and was evidenced by the following: On 3/6/25 at 11:18 AM, the surveyor observed the Long-Term Care (LTC) medication storage room in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and LPN #5. At that time, the surveyor observed two small chunks of ice fell to the floor upon opening the medication refrigerator door. The thermometer hanging on the wire shelf inside of the refrigerator read 26 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A review of the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log posted on the outside of the refrigerator door included January, February, and March 2025, with the following out-of-range temperatures: 1/4/25: 31 F 1/5/25: 33 F 1/6/25: 33F 1/7/25: 31 F 1/8/25: 33 F 1/21/25: 31 F 1/22/25: 31 F 1/27/25: 32 F 2/1/25: 30 F 2/4/25: 32 F 2/5/25: 31 F 2/10/25: 32 F 2/14/25: 32 F 2/18/25: 32 F 2/19/25:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 160965 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility investigation and policies, the facility failed to ensure a fall risk assessment was completed upon admission and quarterly for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for falls out of 15 sample residents. This failure placed the resident at risk of repeated falls and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of R1's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of falls with fracture, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/14/23 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of 15 which indicated she had severely impaired cognition. The assessment further revealed that R1 had a history of falls and had a fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,398 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,398 — penalty dated 2025-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FAMILY OF CARING HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ