Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference to F756. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep a resident free from significant medication errors for 1 (R #25) of 1 (R #25) resident, when staff entered a duplicate medication order of clopidogrel (an antiplatelet; medication that prevents blood clots by preventing platelets in the blood from sticking together) and administered the clopidogrel for a period of 19 consecutive days. This deficient practice had the potential to cause severe complications including but not limited to severe bleeding and death. The findings are: A. Record review of Antiplatelet Drug Toxicity (when a drug causes harmful effects to the body due to various reasons such as overdosing), published in National Library of Medicine (NLM) and dated 06/12/23, revealed Antiplatelet Drug Toxicity can cause the following complications: - Intracranial hemorrhage (a life-threatening bleeding that occurs inside the skull when a blood vessel ruptures or leaks). - Gastrointestinal hemorrhage (blood loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for dehydration and nutrition when: 1. Staff failed to identify the decrease in nutritional intake and weight loss for R #1 as a change in condition. 2. Staff delayed to send R #1 to the hospital for two days after significant change in vitals. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #1's admission to the hospital with dehydration, urinary tract infection and sepsis (severe infection). The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Fetal alcohol syndrome (condition in a child that results from alcohol exposure during the mother's pregnancy), - Severe intellectual disabilities [intelligence quotient (IQ) below 70 and deficits in at least two adaptive behaviors that affect everyday, general living], - Urinary tract infection, - Retention of urine (not fully draining urine from your bladder), - Dysphagia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a Five-Day Report (a report sent to the State Survey Agency which includes the results of the facility's investigation into alleged violations) to the State Agency regarding allegations of abuse for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) residents. If the facility does not submit follow-up reports, then the State Agency cannot ensure the residents are safe and free of abuse. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Reportable Incident, dated 09/15/25, revealed the facility submitted a report for resident-to-resident abuse to the State Survey Agency. B. Record review of State Agency's incident tracking system revealed the State Agency received an initial incident report, dated 09/15/25, from the facility regarding resident-to-resident abuse.C. Record review of facility's records revealed the records did not contain documentation to show the facility submitted a Five-Day Report to the State Survey Agency.D. On 12/12/25 at 2:37 pm during an interview, the Administrator stated she was not able to locate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-11 · tag F0841 — widespread
  Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Cross reference to F756, F868 and F880. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) participated in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI; a structured framework used in healthcare to enhance the quality of care provided to patients), the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP, a set of strategies and practices designed to prevent and control the spread of infections in healthcare settings), and the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) program. This failure had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. If the MD does not participate in QAPI, Infection Control, and MRR to assist in identifying, prioritizing, and correcting quality deficiencies, then the facility cannot ensure quality of care and services are consistently monitored and improved. The findings are: A. On 08/06/25 at 11:15 am, during an interview, the Nurse Practitioner stated she reviewed the facility's monthly MRRs. She stated she did not consult the Attending Physician when she responded to and acted on the Pharmacist's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-11 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director participated in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement/Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAPIQAA) Committee meetings, as required by regulation. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. If the facility does not ensure required members, including the Medical Director (MD), participate in the QAPI/QAA Committee, then the committee may not fully meet regulatory requirements for oversight of quality issues. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's QAPI Program policy, revised September 2024, stated the QAPI/QAA Committee met monthly to review reports, evaluate data, and monitor QAPI activities. Committee membership included the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, and at least three other staff members from different disciplines. The committee was responsible to identify quality deficiencies, develop corrective actions, and ensure ongoing compliance. B. Record review of the facility's QAPI plan, dated January 2025, showed the MD was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective Infection Prevention and Control program (IPCP, a set of strategies and practices designed to prevent and control the spread of infections in healthcare settings) when the facility's Medical Director (MD) failed to attend the scheduled infection control monthly meetings or be part of the program. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. If the MD does not participate in the facility's infection control program, then residents may be at an increased risk of infections due to a delay in identification and response of outbreaks. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Infection Control Online Meeting Invitations, dated 01/28/25, 02/04/25, 02/25/25, 03/25/25, 04/22/25, 05/27/25, and 07/16/25, revealed the MD did not participate in any of the meetings. B. On 08/08/25 at 11:04 am, during an interview, the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) stated he worked for the facility for nine months and did not meet the MD at any of the Infection Control Meetings. The ICP stated he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were stored securely and remained inaccessible to 4 (R #13, R #41, R #46 and R #55) out of 4 (R #13, R #41, R #46 and R #55) residents. If hazardous chemicals are left unattended and accessible to residents with significant cognitive impairments, then residents are at risk for accidental ingestion, misuse, or chemical contact injuries, which can result in serious harm. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment policy (dated 08/12/25) stated the following:- Hazardous areas, devices, and equipment in the facility would be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible.- Hazardous areas included access to toxic chemicals.-Any element of the resident environment that has the potential to cause injury and was accessible to a vulnerable resident was considered hazardous.- Vulnerable residents would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency dental services for 2 (R #4 and R #48) of 2 (R #4 and R #48) residents. If the facility does not ensure residents with identified dental pain are referred for prompt evaluation and treatment, then residents are at risk for unresolved oral pain, infection, poor nutrition, and overall decline in health and quality of life. The findings are: R #4 A. Record review of R #4's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of stage three chronic kidney disease and type two diabetes. B. On 08/05/25 at 10:38 AM, during an interview, R #4 stated she did not have a dental appointment in a long time. She stated she was supposed to have dental appointments every six months, because she was on dialysis (a medical treatment which filters waste and excess fluid from the blood). C. On 08/06/25 at 2:15 PM, during an interview, Social Services stated she did not have anything to do with making any type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained a dignified existence when staff failed to assist a resident with arranging grooming services for 1 (R #50) of 1 (R #50) resident reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice limits the residents' ability to maintain dignity, personal appearance, and quality of life and had the potential to affect all residents who relied on facility staff to arrange grooming services. If the facility fails to assist residents in arranging grooming services, this could impact the resident's dignity, potentially leading to or worsening depression. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised August 2024, stated the residents had a right to privacy, dignity, and self-determination in their care. B. Record review of facility's Dignity Policy, undated, revealed the following:- Each resident shall be cared for in a manner which promoted and enhanced his or her sense of well-being,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's current advanced directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) was properly documented for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) resident. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially lifesaving procedures. The findings are: A. Record review of R #7's Face Sheet, undated, revealed the following: -admission date of 11/18/2022.-Resident was a Full Code (attempt resuscitation). B. Record review of R #7's Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST; a legal document which outlines the care the resident wants when they become incapacitated and unable to speak for themselves), dated 04/18/2024, revealed the following: - Code status of do not resuscitate (DNR; lifesaving measures are not desired). - Comfort measures.- Do not transfer to hospital unless comfort needs cannot be met in current location.- Use medication by any route, positioning, wound care and other measures to relieve pain and suffering. C. Record review of R #7's Progress Notes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 1 (R #66) of 1 (R #66) resident, when staff failed to ensure the resident's as needed (PRN) alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) was prescribed for a limit of 14 days, unless there was documentation in the resident's medical record of the rationale to extend beyond 14 days. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and being at a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result).The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Medication Review Regimen (MRR) policy, undated, revealed the following:- The consultant pharmacist reviewed the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly.- Resident-specific irregularities resulting from or associated with medications were documented in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a Five Day Report (a report sent to the State Survey Agency which includes the results of the facility's investigation into alleged violations) to the State Agency regarding allegations of neglect (the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress) for 1 (R #77) of 1 (R #77) resident. If the facility does not submit follow-up reports, then the State Agency cannot assure the residents are safe and free of neglect. The findings are:A. Record review of R #77's Face Sheet revealed an initial admission date of 06/20/25 with the following diagnoses:- Cardiomyopathy (heart disease),- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition which results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),- Unspecified Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,109 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $11,367 — penalty dated 2025-08-11
• $14,742 — penalty dated 2024-05-10
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-21 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PUREHEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM