Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 149 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 295 beds and averages 289.3 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2699587), the facility failed to ensure the designated resident's representative was notified of changes in the resident's condition. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 12/06/2025 at 5:00 PM Occupational Therapist Assistant #1 documented they saw Resident #1 sliding from the wheelchair to the floor. There is no documented evidence that the facility notified Resident 1's representative that Resident #1 was seen sliding out of the wheelchair to the floor.The findings are:The Facility's Policy on Notification of Changes dated on 12/2024, documented it is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative, according to their authority, and reported to the attending physician or delegate (hereafter designated as the physician). The resident and/or their representatives will be educated about treatment options and supported to make an informed choice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during an Abbreviated Complaint Survey (Complaint # 2699587), the facility failed to ensure resident's care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 12/06/2025 at 5:00 PM Occupational Therapist Assistant #1 documented they saw Resident #1 sliding from the wheelchair to the floor. Registered Nurse Supervisor #2 was notified on 12/06/2025. There was no documented evidence that Resident #1's care plan was reviewed and revised with new interventions after Resident #1 slide from the wheelchair to the floor on 12/06/2025. The findings include:The facility policy titled Care Plan Comprehensive dated 12/2024, documented an Individualized Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Also care plans are revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate. Care plans are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during an Abbreviated Complaint Survey (Complaint # 2699587), the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 12/19/2025 License Practical Nurse #2 administered a stool softener to Resident #1 without a physician's order for the stool softener. License Practical Nurse #2 did not document the administration of the stool softener to Resident #1. The findings include:The facility policy titled Administering Oral Medication dated 12/2024, documented the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. Verify, that there is a physician's medication order for this procedure.Resident #1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses included constipation, chronic pain syndrome, and history of falling.Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 11/22/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during Abbreviated Complaint Survey (Complaint #2699587), the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 was a high risk for falls, the physician's order dated 11/11/2025 documented Resident #1 may be out of bed to standard wheelchair with bilateral elevating leg rests and with manual transfer of one (1) person. On 12/06/2025 at 5:00 PM, Occupational Therapist Assistant #1 documented Resident #1 was seen sliding from the wheelchair to the floor. There is no documented evidence on the Documentation Survey Report or on the Resident Nursing Instruction form instructing staff members on how to supervise Resident #1 to prevent fall.The findings include:The facility policy titled Fall Risk assessment dated 12/2024, documented the nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during Abbreviated Complaint Survey (Complaint #2699587), the facility failed to ensure that medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were accurately documented. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 12/06/2025 at 5:00 PM Occupational Therapist Assistant #1 documented they saw Resident #1 sliding from the wheelchair to the floor. There was no nursing or medical doctor's documentation in Resident #1's medical record indicating that Resident #1 was assessed after Resident #1 slide out of the wheelchair to the floor on 12/6/2025.The findings are:The facility policy titled Charting and Documentation dated 01/2026 documented all services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Also documented all incidents, accidents, or changes in the resident's condition must be recorded.Resident #1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 12/12/2024 to 12/19/2024, the facility did not ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. Specifically multiple observations were made of resident rooms were observed with wood furniture scratched veneer, missing key holes, missing handles to dressers or wall cabinets, bedside tables were observed with missing paint on the lower leg areas. 2.) resident rooms were observed with mismatched paint, holes in dry wall and duct tape on the floor, missing tile and/or grimy tile. 3.) resident's wheelchair was observed with torn cushion and enteral feeding pumps and poles on 2 East and 2 [NAME] unit was observed with cream-colored stains on the pump and pole bottoms. 4). the whirlpool tub was noted to be dirty with discarded items inside and unit shared bathrooms were observed with discolored damaged or missing tiles. 4.) the step leading to the trash dumpster was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview during the Recertification /Complaint survey (NY00334742) conducted between 12/12/2024 and 12/19/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and injury of unknown origin were reported immediately to the New York State Department of Health, but not later than 2 hours after the alleged abuse and injury were observed. Specifically, (1) an injury of unknown origin found on resident #251's forehead was not reported; (2) Resident-Resident physical abuse resulting to injury involving 3 residents was not reported (Residents #214, #268, and #589); and (3) Injury of unkown origin found on Resident #24's toes was not reported. This was evident for one of three residents investigated for complaints and 4 out of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 38 sampled residents. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Accident and Incident Report dated 07/2024, documented that As soon as possible, but no later than 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview during the Recertification/Complaint survey (NY00334742) conducted between 12/12/2024 and 12/19/2024, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse and injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, (1) Injury of unknown origin observed on Resident #251 was not thoroughly investigated and (2). Resident-to-resident altercation involving Residents #214, #268 and #589 was not thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 of 3 complaint investigations and for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 38 total sampled residents. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting with revision date December 2024 documented Physical Abuse includes, but not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. The policy documented facility will report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse including injuries of unknown origin source and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 12/12/2024 to 12/19/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. Specifically, 1) staff was observed not wearing beard guard on multiple occasions or hair restraints appropriately in the kitchen. 2) the dry storage room was observed with an open box of beverage and food thickener was observed opened on two occasions and was noted with a paper cup in the open box while on the shelf. This was observed during the Kitchen facility task. The findings are: The facility's dietary policy and procedure titled Food Preparation and Handling revised 12/16/2024 documented all food will be prepared and handled using safe and sanitary methods. All staff will avoid bare hand contact with ready to eat food, as well as wear single use gloves and use serving utensils. This policy does not mention any uniform requirements in relation to food handling. The facility's dietary policy and procedure titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 12/12/2024 to 12/19/2024, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status. This was evident for 2 (Resident #237 and #436) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment for Resident #237 did not accurately reflect the resident's preferred activities and the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment for Resident #436 did not accurately reflect the resident use of wander guard as alarm. The findings are: The facility policy titled MDS (Minimum Data Set) Guidelines for Completion with undated effective or revised date documented it is the policy of all Allure Facilities to ensure accurate and timely completion of Minimum Data Set for all residents in accordance with Federal and State Operation [NAME]. 1) Resident #237 had diagnoses which included Unspecified dementia, Anxiety disorder, and Depression. The Annual Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLURE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $10.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY