Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 186 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 62% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 196.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00375711), the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement. This was evident for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #1),sampled for elopement. Specifically, the facility's video surveillance footage dated 03/19/2025 at 4:04:06 PM showed Resident #1 walked past Security Guard #1, who was sitting at the front desk in the lobby with their head down. Security Guard #1 did not stop Resident #1 from leaving the facility. Resident #1 exited the automatic front doors and left the facility. Staff interviews and the facility's investigative report revealed that the facility was not aware Resident #1 was missing until 7:30 PM. To date, Resident #1 has not been located. This resulted in the potential for serious harm to Resident #1 that was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Elopement, dated 02/24/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during an on-site abbreviated survey (457794), it was determined that for five (Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Floors) of five resident-occupied floors, the facility did not maintain a comfortable environment. Issues included residents feeling uncomfortable and resident room temperatures ranging from 46 F to 57 F, from approximately 3:00 AM on 12/16/2025 through approximately 4:00 PM on 12/17/2025.Observations in the presence of the Director of Maintenance during an initial tour of the facility on 12/17/2025, between 9:30 AM and 10:30 AM, included but were not limited to the following: Utilizing an infrared temperature gun, the temperatures in resident rooms on the Sixth Floor were recorded at 49.4 F in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], with the highest temperature 54.6 F in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The corridor temperature was 54.6 F, and the Day Room was 60.2 F.Utilizing an infrared temperature gun, the temperatures in resident rooms on the Fifth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #2634618) the facility failed to ensure that one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for quality of care, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, an order for comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count was made for Resident #1 but was not carried out. There was no documentation available in the medical record to explain why the test was not completed. The findings include:The undated facility policy titled Physician Services documented the resident's Attending Physician is responsible for prescribing new therapy, ordering a transfer to the hospital, conducting required routine visits, delegating and supervising follow-up visits from Nurse Practitioners or Physician Assistants, etc., to ensure that the resident receives quality care and medical treatments.Resident #1 had diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Urinary Tract…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 02/05/2025 to 02/12/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) and Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) committee consisted at a minimum of the Medical Director, or their designee attended quarterly meetings. Specifically, the Medical Director has not participated in Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) and Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) meetings for 4 out of the four meetings as required. The findings are: The facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, last revised on August 31, 2022, documented that the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consists of, at minimum, the director of nursing services, the medical director or designee, and at least one other member of the facility staff. One of them must be the administrator, the owner, a board member, or another individual in a leadership role. Meetings will be held quarterly. The facility policy and procedure titled Medical Director, with the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 02/05/2025 - 02/12/2025, the facility did not ensure that infection control practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for 2 Residents (Resident # 389 and Resident #63) of 12 residents observed for medication administration and 1 Resident (Resident #389) observed for Pressure Ulcer Injury out of a total of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Licensed Practical Nurse #2 failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions by not donning a gown while administering intravenous medications for a Resident with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. 2.) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions by not donning a gown while administering medications for a Resident with a Gastrostomy tube. 3.) Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not establish a clean field for the placement of wound supplies while performing a dressing change and did not perform hand hygiene after removing the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 02/05/2025 to 02/12/2025, the facility did not ensure that care and services were provided according to accepted standards of clinical quality and practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #389) of 2 residents reviewed for Intravenous medication administration out of a total of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, Intravenous antibiotics for Resident #389 were administered through a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter by a Licensed Practical Nurse. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Administering Medication by Central Line Access, reviewed and or revised 01/02/2025, documented guidelines for safe administration of medications intravenously through a central line access: 1) An LPN may Not Flush any venous central line for patency including a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. 2) An LPN may Not administer any intravenous solutions through a central venous line including a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Recertification survey from 02/5/2025 to 02/12/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #389) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer Injury out of a total of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #389 did not receive pressure relieving devices and preventative measures to promote wound healing. The findings are: The Facility Policy titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers reviewed/revised 01/02/025, documented the purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure ulcer risk factors, interventions for specific risk factors, and preventative measures. General preventive measures include 1) Identify risk factors for pressure ulcer development 2) For a person in bed: Change position at least every two hours or more frequently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observations and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 2/5/2025 to 2/12/2025, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse were disposed properly. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, the facility garbage bins did not have a lid or cover to prevent the harborage and potential feeding of pests. The findings: The facility's policy and procedure titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse revised 1/2025 documented all garbage and refuse will be disposed of in a safe and efficient manner throughout the day. The exterior dumpster area shall be maintained and free of rubbish and other debris. All waste shell be kept in lined containers that are covered with lids, leak-proof and non-absorbent prior to disposal. On 2/10/2025 at 1:02PM, an observation was made of the garbage disposal room. The garbage bins all containing garbage were observed without a lid or cover. On 2/10/2025 at 1:13 PM and 2/11/2025 at 3:40PM, the garbage bin located in the garbage pickup area was observed without lid or cover, exposing garbage piled high in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00347998) and Recertification Survey from 2/5/2025 to 2/12/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident records were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #66 was not provided with Range of Motion exercises, but documentation reflected that resident was provided with Range of Motion exercises. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Charting and Documentation undated documented all services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Hemiplegia, and Osteoarthritis. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #66 is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00347998) and Recertification survey from 2/5/2025 to 2/12/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion received treatment and services to maintain and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #66 was not provided with range of motion exercises in accordance with a Physician's Order. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Rehabilitative Nursing Care undated documented rehabilitative nursing care is performed daily for those residents who require such service include assisting residents with their routine range of motion exercises, floor ambulation, standing and transfer. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Hemiplegia, and Osteoarthritis. The Minimum Data Set,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 3/9/23 to 3/16/23, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evidenced for 2 of 5 units (Unit 5 and Unit 2). Specifically, 1) Unit 5 had multiple rooms with dirty and stained bathroom disinfectant tanks (DT) in disrepair, a wheelchair in disrepair, and a missing closet door in resident's room, and 2) Unit 3 contained wheelchairs in disrepair, a rusty shower chair, torn mesh on a large shower chair, torn mesh covering the clean linen carts, and heaters in the dining room area littered with dirt and debris. The findings are: The facility policy titled Equipment - General Use for All Residents last reviewed 2/2023 documented wheelchairs are maintained by the facility for general use of all residents. The facility policy titled Building Services last reviewed 2/2023 documented the Building Services employees maintain restrooms and toilets. Broken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLURE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $9.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY