No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Elderwood At Cheektowaga

225 Bennett Road, Cheektowaga, NY 14227 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 172 certified beds · (716) 681-9480 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (716) 681-9480 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2929 Union Road
Pharmacy
134 Bennett Rd · (716) 601-3333 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2500 Walden Ave · (716) 896-3669 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Union Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.7%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.1%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.3%12.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.5%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.1%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.3%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.6%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.3%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.531.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.691.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.5%CMS range 37.5–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 9.2–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.7–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
63.0%
Total nursing turnover
57.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 152.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that each residents' environment remained as free of accidents as possible and each resident received supervision to prevent accidents for three (3) (Residents #30, #87, and #116) of nine (9) residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, Resident #87 had frequent witnessed and unwitnessed falls from 12/03/2025, through 04/20/2026. The facility failed to assess, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of safety interventions. As a result of the repeated falls, Resident #87 suffered multiple injuries such as bruising, cuts and abrasions. The resident also suffered pain, a left wrist fracture and non-displaced acute fracture of the lateral humeral condyle (elbow); fractures of their left 11th and 12th ribs; an avulsed component (occurs when a ligament or tendon pulls a small piece of bone away from the main bone, caused by sudden, high-tensile force) of the lateral humeral condyle; and a head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for four (4) (Unit One, Unit Two, Unit Three, and Unit Four) of four (4) resident units. Specifically, Resident #155's bathroom was damaged and dirty; bathing suites exhibited damaged floor and wall tiles, a damaged corner wall, damaged and loose grab bars, chipped paint, soiled shower curtains, dead flies, clogged drains, and a florescent light outage; and resident-use corridors had discolored and malodorous carpeting throughout the entire facility.The findings included: The facility policy titled Kitchen, Dining and Dietary Equipment Routine Cleaning Policy, last revised 04/26/2019, documented the dietary work areas would be kept clean and in order by designated department staff and daily housekeeping staff duties included: cleaning of floors after a meal in the dining areas and in other eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review conducted during the survey, facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with the facility assessment and to meet the needs of each resident. Residents #1, 3, 10, 30, 52, 69, 70, 90, 102, 117, 122, 151, 155, 156, and 167 were involved.The findings include:Refer to F 561 Self Determination, Scope and Severity D Refer to F 677 Activities of Daily Care for Dependent Residents, Scope and Severity DRefer to F 689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision Scope and Severity GThe policy titled Minimum Nursing Staffing Requirements dated 08/21/2025 documented staffing levels will be determined by the Administrator in cooperation with the Regional Director of Operations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, observations of one (1) of one (1) kitchen revealed active wastewater discharge in the main kitchen's dishwashing area; two (2) of two (2) walk-in freezer units had an accumulation of ice on interior wall surfaces, floors, and ceilings, and one (1) of two (2) walk-in refrigeration units had an accumulation of water on the floor.The findings include: The policy titled Kitchen, Dining and Dietary Equipment Routine Cleaning Policy, last revised 04/26/2019 documented the dietary work areas will be kept clean and in order by designated department according to routine schedules established by the Director of Dietary Services. The cleaning procedures will be planned and conducted in conformance with pertinent sections of the State Health Code, Rules and Regulations. The monthly cleaning schedule included but was not limited to the following: freezer and cooler,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during an extended Standard survey completed on 04/23/2026, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the administration did not ensure residents were free of accident hazards had adequate supervision and facility policies and protocols were consistently implemented and monitored for their effectiveness. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Care Standards dated 10/22/2018 documented the Administrator will assure that standard of resident care was maintained at all times in accordance with the standards adopted by Medical Services Policy Committee. the Administrator was responsible for the provision of resident care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each residents' quality of life. Including providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies related to resident safety with the potential to cause serious harm to residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement effective systems to maintain resident safety. The findings include:Refer to F 689- Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, Scope and Severity GThe facility policy and procedure titled QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Program dated 03/18/2025 documented to assure development, implementation and maintenance of an effective, comprehensive, data driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility will undertake systematic analysis and action aimed at performance and improvement and,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to establish smoking policies in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account nonsmoking residents. Specifically, one (1) of one (1) facility reviewed did not develop a smoking policy for residents who smoke and were not grandfathered in. This involved Resident #30 and #116. The findings include: REFER TO: F689 - Free from Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices scope and severity G The facility policy titled Smoke Free Environment dated 10/30/2018 documented based on the Public Health Law, New York State Clean Indoor Air Act, smoking is prohibited in all areas inside the facility. A separate outdoor area may be designated on the ground (the area within the facility property lines) where smoking is permitted by residents/patients, visitors and guests, provided that the designated area was not within thirty (30) feet of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to choose activities, schedules, and health care consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care for two (2) (Resident's #3 and #30) of five (5) residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, showers were not offered twice weekly as planned (Resident #3) and Resident #30 was not out of bed and in the dining room for all meals as planned as per their preference.The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Accommodation of Needs and Self Determination dated 04/10/2018 documented Residents/Patients at the facility will receive reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences, except when the health or safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. Residents will have the right to choose activities, schedules and health care consistent with his or her interests, assessments and plan of care; interact with members of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) (Resident #102) of six (6) residents observed for activities of daily living care provided to dependent residents. Specifically, Resident #102 was observed on multiple occasions with greasy hair and there was no documented evidence they received their scheduled showers.The findings include:The facility policy Hygiene and Grooming last revised 02/07/2024 documented designated nursing staff would ensure that resident were always clean and appropriately groomed. The individual preferences of residents for personal care and grooming would be established and documented. Residents would be provided with care to maintain or improve abilities to perform hygiene and grooming tasks, as needed. Bath/shower scheduled and services: the preferences or care plan for bathing were recorded on the Interdisciplinary Profile of Care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure that all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive centered care plan for one (1) (Resident #162) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, there was a lack of communication between staff when Resident #162 was admitted to the facility resulting in delayed admissions processes which included physician's orders, assessments and meeting the needs of the resident.The findings include:A booklet provided by facility titled Your Rights as A Nursing Home Resident in New York State dated 2022 documented as a resident in the facility, you have the rights guaranteed to you by state and federal laws. The facility was required to protect and promote your rights. You have the right to be cared for in a manner that enhances your quality of life and receive adequate and appropriate care.The facility policy titled Nursing Assessment/ Evaluation Requirement & Schedules last modified 02/03/2023 documented the facility would conduct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide pain management to residents who require such services, consistent with standards of practices, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (1) (Resident #69) of one (1) resident reviewed for pain management. Specifically, Resident #69 did not receive their pain medication in a timely manner on 04/17/2026. The findings included: The facility policy titled Pain Management, dated 03/17/2025, documented the facility shall provide adequate management of pain to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Chronic Pain refers to pain that typically lasts greater than three (3) months and can be the result of an underlying medical disease or condition, injury, medical treatment, inflammation, or unknown case. The purpose of pain management was to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews were completed once every 12 months per year for three (3) (Certified Nurse Aides #3, #9, #10) of five (5) reviewed. Specifically, there was no evidence Certified Nurse Aides #3, #9, #10, who had worked for the facility more than 12 months had performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months.The findings include:The policy and procedure titled In-Service Attendance Program dated 07/19/2023 documented all staff/workforce will be expected to attend mandatory and non-mandatory in-service programs. Administrators were responsible for ensuring all employees and contractors attend annual mandatory training. At the time of the annual job performance review of a staff member, the evaluating manager will take into consideration as to whether or not the staff member was in compliance with mandatory in-service attendance.Review of the In-Service Education Record Binder on 04/23/2026 at 1:00 PM revealed Certified Nurse Aide #3's last annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to maintain drugs and biologicals labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary standards, and expiration date when applicable for one (1) of four (4) resident units reviewed for medication storage. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of medications. The Unit four (4) South medication cart was not locked and under the direct view of authorized staff. The computer system on the cart had visible patient health information displayed in an area where residents, staff, and visitors had access. Resident #75 was involved. Additionally, the Unit four (4) medication refrigerator had one (1) opened multidose vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (Mantoux) solution that was opened on 12/13/2025 and not discarded after twenty-eight days and one (1) opened bottle of Humalog (insulin lispro injection) medication without an opened date that was not discarded after twenty-eight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for one (1) (Resident #164) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #164 received pork against their religious food preference. The findings include: The facility policy titled Accommodating Cultural Food Preferences revised 05/24/2019 documented the cultural or religious food preferences of residents will be accommodated whenever necessary by the dining services staff, and cultural preferences will be respected and accommodated upon request. The facility policy Assessment of Needs - Dietary revised 07/22/2025, documented each resident will have an assessment of dietary and nutritional needs completed by a Registered Dietitian or Diet Technician. The assessment was done for the following reasons which included but not limited to: record and follow the diet requirements specified by the Attending Physician; to fulfill immediately the personal preferences of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure they established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) (Resident #8 and Resident #70) of three (3) residents reviewed for Infection Prevention and Control. Specifically, staff failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduced transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and wear the appropriate personal protective equipment while providing hands on care to Resident #8 who had pressure ulcers and an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and when providing wound care to Resident #70 who had pressure ulcers.The findings include:The facility policy titled Transmission Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the survey completed the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides were provided the required hours of training and/or annual in-services to ensure safe delivery of care for two (2) (Certified Nurse Aides #2 and #9) of five (5) reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aides #2 and #9 did not receive 12 hours of nurse aide in-services and education in 2025.The findings include:The policy and procedure titled In-Service Attendance Program dated 07/19/2023 documented administrators were responsible for ensuring all employees and contractors attend annual mandatory training. Announcements for the availability of online and instructor-led training were sent via email, electronic medical record and employee bulletin boards. At the time of the annual job performance review of a staff member, the evaluating manager will take into consideration as to whether or not the staff member was in compliance with mandatory in-service attendance.Review of the Job Description titled Educator dated 07/2023 documented the Educator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure infection control practices were maintained to include when the COVID -19 vaccine is available to the facility, each resident is offered the COVID -19 vaccine unless immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. Before offering COVID-19 vaccine, each resident or the resident representative received education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine; the resident has the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccine and change their decision and that the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicated if a resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, the medical record did not have evidence of declination for the refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination for Resident #3 and there was no evidence that education regarding the risks and benefits about the COVID-19 vaccination was provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident has the right to refuse treatment for two (2) (Resident #1 and #2) of three (3) residents reviewed for immunizations. Specifically, Resident #1 and Resident #2's Representatives did not give consent to administer the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, and the residents received them. The findings are:The policy titled COVID-19 Vaccine Policy dated 07/25/2025, documented vaccination fact sheets will be made available to residents and resident representatives prior to administration. Informed consent either written or verbal will be obtained from all individuals being vaccinated. The vaccination is voluntary for all residents. Facility staff will monitor for potential side effects, in accordance with CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).The policy titled Influenza Immunization (Residents) Policy dated 09/24/2024, documented the facility will notify all residents and/or responsible parties…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not maintain accurate medical record documentation for three (3) (Resident's #1, #2, and #3) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #1, #2 and #3 were administered vaccinations by an outside pharmacist that were documented as being administered by facility nurses. The findings are:The policy titled Influenza Immunization (Residents) Policy revised 09/24/2024, documented residents will receive immunizations from a licensed nurse of this facility according to the physician's order. The administration of the vaccine will be documented on the Medication Administration Record. For residents that receive influenza vaccines from other than facility staff, historical documentation will be completed on the master log in the medical record utilizing the immunization module in the electronic medical record.The policy titled Medication Administration Methods revised 01/25/2024, documented the Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during a Complaint (2590368) investigation completed on 11/05/2025 the facility did not ensure that residents who had an indwelling Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services to manage catheters for one (1) (Resident #3) of three (3) residents reviewed for foley catheters. Specifically, Resident #3 had a history of urinary tract infections and staff did not keep the urine collection bag below the level of Resident #3's bladder while the resident was sitting in their wheel chair, was not wearing a urine collection leg bag (a drainage bag that is attached to the thigh) as care planned, and there was no medical provider orders for the indwelling catheter and/or care of it. Additionally, Resident #3's comprehensive care plan was not updated to accurately reflect their urinary status. The finding is: The policy titled Catheter, Daily Care (Indwelling) dated 11/23/2022 documented residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00376392) the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from verbal/mental abuse for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #1 was witnessed yelling at Resident #1. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, Protection and Reporting revised 4/30/24 documented the facility will provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident residing in the facility. The undated New York State Department of Health document titled Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident in New York State documented as a resident in this facility you have the right to be free from physical, sexual, mental, and verbal abuse, corporal punishment, financial exploitation, and involuntary seclusion including physical and chemical restraints. Resident #1 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 6/18/24, the facility did not ensure that the pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON) for one (Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for drug regimen reviews. Specifically, the Consultant Pharmacist did not identify, or report medications prescribed and administered (antibiotic) for an excessive duration and did not identify and report inadequate indications for the continued use of that antibiotic. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Medication Regiment Review by Pharmacy Consultant dated 12/2021 documented the pharmacy consultant will assess the medication regimen and review the medical chart of all residents monthly. The pharmacy consultant will review the medication regimen for appropriateness and rationality to determine if the medication therapy is optimally effective and has the least possible risk of adverse effects and identify irregularities. Irregularities include but are not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Standard survey completed on 6/18/24, the facility did not ensure that the facility's infection and control program included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #25 was receiving an antibiotic since 11/22/20. The use of the antibiotic was not monitored and tracked by the Infection Preventionist (IP)/Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The finding is: Review of the policy and procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 1/2018, documented that the antibiotic stewardship program will provide a framework to ensure that antimicrobials are used appropriately and prudently within the facility. The framework would be overseen by the Infection Prevention and Control Committee. The Consultant Pharmacist will be aware of established guidelines and verify appropriate doses of antimicrobial therapy upon review of the medical chart. Tracking of antibiotic usage will occur by the Infection Preventionist/designee and will be reported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed [DATE], the facility did not ensure the system developed for advanced directives was implemented in a manner that was consistent with residents' wishes for one (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. Specifically, Resident #8's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form and was not reviewed and renewed since [DATE]. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Advanced Directives Surrogates and MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment)-NY (New York) dated [DATE] documented Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) works in alignment with known directives to assure that resident preferences are known and available across all continuum settings at the point of care, to guide 'right now' and 'from this time forward' treatment decisions. Do Not Resuscitate orders on Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) will be reviewed and renewed no less than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00330303) during the Standard survey completed on 6/18/24, the facility did not ensure the residents representative was notified of the need to alter treatment or to commence a new form of treatment and when there was a change in room assignment for one (Resident #152) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, the resident and resident's responsible party were not notified of a room change on 11/30/23. Additionally, when Resident #152 tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/17/23, there was no evidence their responsible party was notified. The finding is: Review of the policy and procedure titled Notification of Resident Changes dated 5/31/18 documented the facility will immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member when there is a need to alter treatment, commence a new form of treatment or a change in room or roommate assignment. Resident #152 had diagnoses which included hypertension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00340373) during a Standard survey completed 6/18/24, the facility did not ensure residents have the right to personal privacy for one (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, staff did not provide privacy during personal care. The finding is: The policy and procedure dated 6/6/22 documented that each staff member will be personally responsible for ensuring that the rights of each resident are respected and not violated. Staff shall ensure that all residents are afforded their right to privacy in treatment and care for personal needs. The policy and procedure dated 8/1/2019 documented each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. All activities and interactions with residents by any staff must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing their self-esteem and self-worth. Resident #41 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle), and osteoarthritis (degenerative joint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 6/18/24, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for one (Unit 4) of two medication storage rooms observed. Specifically, the Unit 4 medication storage room refrigerator had three opened, undated and one opened, outdated multi-dose vials of Tubersol solution (medication injected just under the skin to test for tuberculosis). Additionally, the Unit 4 medication storage room cabinet had issues with expired over the counter medications. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Medication Rooms on Nursing Units dated 1/18/2024 documented medication rooms on the nursing units of the facility will be the areas where medications for residents are stored. The policy documented authorized persons are allowed in the room for the purposes outlined: Licensed Nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse, Registered Nurse) for administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00336714) during the Standard survey completed on 6/18/24, the facility did not obtain or provide radiology services to meet the needs of its residents for one (Resident #150) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #150 was ordered to have a lumbar (section of the spine) x-ray completed on 2/28/24 but did not have the x-ray completed until 3/4/24. Additionally, the order for x-rays obtained on 2/28/24 was not entered into Resident #150's electronic medical record. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Electronic Physician Orders (Create, Confirm, Processing Orders) dated 7/23/2018 documented the licensed nurse who has obtained the order from the Medical Doctor, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner transcribing the medical order into the electronic medical record will ensure the correct date, time, ordering prescriber, medication name, order category, communication method, route of administration, frequency, schedule, indications for use or diagnosis and source details are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (#NY00328763) completed 2/8/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the facility's Administrator and the State Survey Agency for one (Resident #1) of three resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 reported an allegation of abuse/mistreatment to facility staff on 11/24/23 and it was not reported in the required timeframe to the Administrator and the New York State Department of Health. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Facility Incident Reporting to DOH-NYS, modified on 9/20/23, documented the facility will be responsible for reporting allegations or occurrences to the New York Department of Heath that involve physical abuse or mental/verbal abuse. The policy and procedure documented that the facility Administrator or designee will report all alleged violations to state agencies immediately, but no later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00328763) completed on 2/8/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no evidence that Resident #1's allegation of abuse/mistreatment on 11/24/23 was thoroughly investigated. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, Protection and Reporting, modified 6/19/23, documented upon identification of an observed act or outcomes of abuse and mistreatment or expressions of fear that could be an indication of abuse and mistreatment, all staff were required to report the observation immediately to their direct supervisor, the Director of Nursing, or the Administrator so an investigation could begin. The policy documented that the facility Administrator, Director of Nursing, or designee would be responsible for the investigation and that all allegations of abuse, mistreatment or neglect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00322117) started completed 11/21/23, the facility did not ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality care for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, medications were left unattended on Resident #1 bedside table and were not verified that they were taken as ordered. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medications Administration Methods last modified 7/12/2022 documented a medication must never be left at bedside or be out of sight of the nurse administering the medication. The nurse must watch each resident take the medication, and ensure the medication is swallowed, unless the resident has an order for self-administration of medications. Medication administration is recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 10/13/23 documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed 9/27/22 through 10/3/22, the facility did not ensure that a resident, with an indwelling catheter (Foley - tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) to the extent possible for two (Residents #106 and 120) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Specifically, staff improperly handled the urinary catheter tubing and urinary collection bag while resident displayed symptoms of a UTI (Residents #106 and 120). In addition, Resident #120 had no leg bag in place when out of bed as ordered by the physician. The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Catheter, Daily Care, (Indwelling) dated 4/2018 documented residents with indwelling catheters will have daily cleansing of the catheter tubing and perineal area for the purpose of preventing urinary tract infections. Ensure the drainage bag is inside a privacy bag. Attach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during the Standard survey conducted 9/27/22 through 10/3/22, the facility did not ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for one (Resident #88) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, a physician order to discontinue the antipsychotic medication Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) was not implemented, which caused the resident to receive the medication without adequate indication for continued use. The finding is: Review of facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Psychotropic Drugs last modified 7/6/18, documented residents prescribed psychotropic drugs will receive only those medications, in doses and for duration clinically indicated to treat the resident's assessed condition(s). Re-evaluation of medications by the medical provider may be indicated during routine order renewals and upon any irregularity identified in the consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey started 9/27/22 and completed on 10/3/22 the facility did not provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, two (Units one and two) of four resident units reviewed for food temperatures during meals had issues involving food items that were not served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Residents #1, #14, #63 and #73 were involved. The findings are: Review of the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Food Temperature Requirements and Holding Time dated 6/28/19 documented steamtable thermostats will be turned on 30 minutes prior to meal service and set to maintain hot food between 140-160° F (degrees Fahrenheit). Cold food items should be held in an appropriate container or bin to maintain the temperature below 41 degrees. a. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 10:36 AM, Resident #63 stated staff poured the coffee and let it sit on the table and then it gets cold, most of the food is lukewarm and bland. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to designate one (1) or more individuals as the Infection Preventionist responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Practices. Specifically, the facility did not have a designated Infection Preventionist qualified with specialized education, training, experience, or certification on a part time or fulltime basis. The findings include: The policy and procedure titled Infection Prevention Control Program dated 11/26/2024 documented the Infection Preventionist will oversee the implementation of the program in collaboration with the administrator and each department head in the facility. The facility will designate one (1) or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist(s) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program as required. The Infection Preventionist will have primary professional training in nursing, medical technology, microbiology, epidemiology or other related fields; be qualified by education, training, experience or certification;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-04-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the Standard survey completed on 04/23/2026, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for screening employees that would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, three (3) employees (Certified Nursing Assistant #12, Activity Leader #1, and Housekeeping Aide #1) of 11 employees that were subject to the New York State Nurse Aide Registry Verification, were not reviewed through the New York State Nurse Aide Registry prior to their employment as required. The findings include:Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, Protection and Reporting ADHCP, ALF, SNF last modified 04/30/2024 documented, the facility will provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident residing in the facility. The administrator of the facility is responsible for the development and implementation of written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, mistreatment, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-04-23 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Standard survey completed on 04/23/26, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with Section 915 of the 2025 Fire Code of New York State, which requires that an interior space in a Nursing Home that contains a direct carbon monoxide source shall be provided with carbon monoxide detection if there are communicating openings between the spaces, and on-going preventative maintenance of carbon monoxide detectors. This affected four (4) (Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3, and Unit 4) of four (4) resident units and one (1) of one (1) Service corridor on two (2) (First floor and Second floor) of two (2) resident use floors. The findings include but are not limited to: According to the 2025 Fire Code of New York State, new and existing buildings shall be provided with carbon monoxide (CO) detection and notification in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDERWOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COLE, WARRENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 10/14/2011
RUBIN, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 10/14/2011
PISELLI, LAWRENCEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 5%Other / private 31%

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$387per resident / day
operating cost
$11,776per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335752. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next