No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Elderwood at Burlington

98 Starr Farm Rd., Burlington, VT 05408 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (802) 658-6717 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (802) 658-6717 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)5 actual-harm citations$220,961 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $220,961 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-11)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1127 North Ave Ste 41 · (802) 846-8100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1219 North Ave · (802) 658-9664 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1563 North Ave · (802) 829-1291 · Call to confirm hours
Park
96 Starr Farm Rd · (802) 864-0123 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.0%19.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.2%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.5%13.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%5.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened37.2%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.9%16.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%97.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%5.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.9%26.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%19.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.1%78.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%22.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit29.9%17.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.241.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.392.881.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.7%CMS range 49.8–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.7–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting89.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 3.5–8.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
67.9%
Total nursing turnover
56.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 119.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-25)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · H2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide safe and effective skin and wound care consistent with facility policy and professional standards of practice for preventing and treating existing pressure ulcers for 7 of 37 sampled residents (Residents #50, #7, #1, #99, #43, #21, and #107), resulting in new or worsening pressure ulcers for all 7 residents. Findings include: Facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer, Pressure Injury & Other Skin Conditions: Initial Assessment, Care Planning, Ongoing Evaluation and Management (HAM, [NAME], SS, WAV, WMS [facility name initails]) SNF, last revised on 2/27/2023 reveals the following under procedures: Care Plan Development & Implementation: a baseline care plan will be developed by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] within 48 hours of admission identifying appropriate interventions to stabilize, reduce or remove underlying risk factors to prevent or treat skin conditions. The individualized care plan will be reviewed and revised as needed to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management to a resident experiencing pain for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #7) related to not providing pain medication per physician orders and not administering pain medication that met professional standards of practice resulting in Resident #7 having significant, untreated pain. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #7 has diagnoses that include spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a physical disability that causes muscle rigidity that affects all four limbs and often a person's torso, facial, and oral muscles), polyneuropathy (nerve damage which can cause symptoms including pain and trouble swallowing), dysphagia (difficulties swallowing), and anarthria (loss of speech). Resident #7's 10/2/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) dated 10/2/23 reveals that s/he shows indicators of pain daily and is assessed to have a BIMS of 15 (brief interview for mental status;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Per interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the prescriber to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #7, #52, #102, and #81). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #7 has diagnoses that include spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a physical disability that causes muscle rigidity that affects all four limbs and often a person's torso, facial, and oral muscles), polyneuropathy (nerve damage which can cause symptoms including pain and trouble swallowing), dysphagia (difficulties swallowing), and anarthria (loss of speech). Resident #7's 10/2/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care- planning tool) dated 10/2/23 reveals that s/he shows indicators of pain daily. A 10/16/23 progress note indicates that Resident #7 has difficulties with oral secretions. Physician orders reveal that Resident #7 has orders to receive oxyCODONE HCl Oral Solution 5 MG/5ML (Oxycodone HCl) Give 5 ml by mouth three times a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 35 sampled residents (Residents #7 and #52) are free from significant medication errors related to missed medication administration. As a result, Resident #7 experienced significant, untreated pain and Resident #52 was at increased risk for increased behavioral and mental health symptoms. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #7 has diagnoses that include spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a physical disability that causes muscle rigidity that affects all four limbs and often a person's torso, facial, and oral muscles), polyneuropathy (nerve damage which can cause symptoms including pain and trouble swallowing), dysphagia (difficulties swallowing), and anarthria (loss of speech). Resident #7's 10/2/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) dated 10/2/23 reveals that s/he shows indicators of pain daily and is assessed to have a BIMS of 15 (brief interview for mental status; a cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 eligible residents (Residents #50, #270, and #80) on one unit received the influenza vaccine. As a result, one unvaccinated resident (Resident #50) developed influenza and required hospitalization for dehydration and abnormal lung sounds, and two residents (Resident #270 and #87) were at increased risk for contracting influenza and/or developing influenza complications. 1. Per record review, Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes and severe kidney disease. S/He was recently assessed at the emergency room related to elevated kidney function labs and a urinary tract infection according to a 12/16/23 emergency visit note. Resident #50 is considered high risk for influenza complications because of his/her diagnoses and nursing home admission. An undated form titled Vaccination Review: Consent/Declination Resident Form, entered into Resident #50's medical record with the effective date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide quality care to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) related to skin assessment, and non-pressure wound care. Findings include:1.) Resident #3 is a long term resident of the facility with diagnoses including lymphedema (swelling caused by fluid build up), chronic venous insufficiency (veins in the legs do not work well resulting in blood buildup), diabetes, chronic pain, depression and anxiety. Per interview with Resident #3 on 6/24/2026 at 10:45 AM, s/he stated that his/her legs have been unwrapped for days. S/he reported that the bandages were removed earlier in the week before his/her shower and that they have not been replaced. S/he voiced concern about the open areas on his/her legs and stated they hurt a lot. Per observation of Resident #3's lower legs at the time of his/her interview, legs were open to air, both lower extremities were reddened, a dime sized blister could be seen on the inner aspect of his/her lower leg, and 2 open areas of skin on both of his/her shins. Per review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2) remained as free from fall-related accidents as possible by failing to ensure that direct care staff properly use an assistive device and prevent an avoidable accident from occurring. Findings include:A facility policy titled, Safe Patient Handling Program, last modified on 1/16/20, states All employees responsible for resident movement shall attend a Safe Patient Handling Training Program and demonstrate competency in resident transfers, lifts and positioning /repositioning of residents. A full-body mechanical lift will be used by those residents who have no weight-bearing abilities and/or other indicated medical conditions.Two (2) or more caregivers must be present.A review of the facility fall investigation revealed that Resident # 2 sustained a witnessed fall from the mechanical lift on 6/19/26. A statement from the supervising Registered Nurse reveals that LNA #1 and the Support Aide were present in the room at the time of the fall. A review of a provider's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staff had the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to meet residents' needs related to the use of a mechanical lift for 1 of 4 sampled Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) [LNA#1]. Findings include: A review of the facility fall investigation revealed that Resident # 2 sustained a witnessed fall from the mechanical lift on 6/19/26. A statement from the supervising Registered Nurse reveals that LNA #1 and the Support Aide were present in the room at the time of the fall. A review of a provider's progress note dated 6/19/26 indicates that Resident #2 is being evaluated following a fall from a Hoyer lift during a transfer from a chair to a bed by two staff members. The nurse reports that the resident is experiencing pain in the right upper extremity and bilateral hips, and reports that Resident # suffered a head strike as well. See F689 for more information.A review of the Facility Assessment, last updated 11/11/25, reveals that the residents who reside in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to communication and coordination between the staff with all departments special dietary for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include diabetes type 2, disorders of phosphorus metabolism, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, and is on a Monday, Wednesday, Friday schedule for dialysis. Per review of Resident #1 medical record, s/he had dialysis nutrition labs dated 6/12/26 that revealed a Phosphorus level at 7.8 and a note requesting to encourage the resident to avoid ice cream. Per record review Resident #1, they have been partaking in dairy products since the recommendation from dialysis was sent to the facility on 6/12/26, to encourage the resident to not eat ice cream. The resident was noted to have eaten ice cream, yogurt, and milk since 6/12/26. Resident's orders or care plan do not reflect the recommendation. Per interview on 6/30/26 with the Unit Manager at 2:50 PM, verbalized that when a resident returns from dialysis they have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months or provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 4 of 4 sampled employee files. Findings include: A review of 4 employee files indicated that Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) #1 was hired on 10/1/2024, LNA #2 with a hire date of 7/18/2023, LNA # 3 with a hire date of 7/24/2025, and LNA #4 with a hire date of 12/17/2018 did not have evidence of performance reviews for 2025 in their employee files.Per the interview with the Administrator on 3/25/26 at 2:40 PM, she confirmed that the 2025 employee reviews had not been completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were stored or disposed of properly for 3 of 3 units. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys dated 4/2/25 and 1/11/24. Findings include:Per review of the facilities policy titled Medications Administration Methods dated 1/25/24, it states that medication expiration dates are checked prior to administration. Per observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 10:30 AM, the [NAME] medication room had seven cases, 69 packs of nystatin oral suspension packs 500,000 units/5ml (a medication used to treat fungal infections), that had expired in 2025. A nurse confirmed this medication was expired.Per observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 11:12 AM of a medication treatment cart on the [NAME] Unit, a medication called Benzonatate 100 mg tablets (a medication used to help alleviate coughing) expired on 10/31/25 along with Aspirin 325mg (a medication used to make the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (A life-sustaining medical treatment that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys have failed.) receive services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents (Resident #112). Findings include:Per review of the facility policy and procedure titled Dialysis- Care of Resident Receiving Off Site Dialysis, revised on 7/6/18, it revealed that vital signs, including weights, should be performed as ordered by the provider.Per record review, Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include end stage renal (kidney) disease, anemia (low red blood cells) in chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure (CHF), and pulmonary edema (fluid in lungs). The Resident has a central catheter (a soft plastic tube, tunneled under the skin and placed in a vein in the neck, chest, or groin, which enters a central vein…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) was conducted for 1 applicable resident (Resident #20), who was admitted with a 30-day exemption and has exceeded the expected 30-day stay. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #20 had a PASARR Level 1 exception form signed and dated by a physician on 4/15/2025 that stated, If the individual is found to meet the conditions of this exemption, the individual may be admitted to a nursing facility without further screening. Hospital Discharge for Short-Stays (30 days or less) less) Is this individual being admitted to a nursing facility directly following an acute hospitalization for treatment of a condition that he/she was hospitalized for? (The attending physician must certify by signing below, before admission, that the individual is likely to require less than 30 days in the nursing facility to qualify for this exemption.)If it is later decided the individual will exceed the 30 days, another Level 1 form screening for serious mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the providers' orders in administering a medication for one of eight residents (Resident #64).Per record review, Resident #64 has the medical diagnosis of cellulitis of left lower limb, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection (MRSA), and pain in their left leg. On 2/19/26, a telehealth provider created a treatment plan including Start linezolid 600 mg BID for five days to cover for MRSA. A second progress note on 2/24/26 by a provider identified that the Resident had been prescribed linezolid on 2/19/26 and that they could not see that it was ever obtained or administered.Per interview on 3/25/26 at 4:05 PM with the infection preventionist (IP) nurse, she provided a text message with the provider that asked if Resident #64 had been given the linezolid per the telehealth orders and indicated that linezolid would have been a good choice. When asked who enters the orders for telehealth providers, she stated that typically it's whoever…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 applicable unit. Findings include:Per observation of the kitchenette #1 refrigerator on the [NAME] unit on 3/23/26 at 11:21 AM there was a can of Redi-whip that expired on 3/16/26. There were (2) 32-ounce bottles of milk that expired on 3/19/26. In the freezer there were three packs of two donuts with no label or date. An interview was conducted with the Kitchen Manager on 3/23/26 at approximately 11:30 AM. The Kitchen Manager confirmed the items in the fridge were expired stating, I'll throw these [items] away. He confirmed that the packs of donuts had no label or date on them stating, I don't know what these are from.Per review of the facility's Dietary, Food and Supply Orders-Storage policy [last revised 10/26/18] it states, 1. Food and non-food items are removed from storage areas by kitchen personnel, as needed on a per meal basis. 2. Before use, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices during medication administration via tube feed for one sampled resident (Resident #14). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys dated 4/2/25 and 1/11/24. Findings include:1. Medication administration via a tube feed was observed on 3/25/26 at approximately 8:45 AM for Resident #14 by LPN#2. Per observation, Resident #14 had an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign outside of their room. Per record review, Resident #14 has an order stating Precautions: Maintain barrier precautions r/t [related to] hx [history] of MRSA [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureaus, a bacterium that is resistant to many antibiotics], PEG [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy] tube use.Per observation, LPN#2 did not don PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] prior to going into the room.Per review of the facility's Transmission Based Precaution Levels (Type of Infectious Condition, Techniques and Documentation)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to document for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #124) whether the resident was offered, educated, and received or declined the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. Findings include:Per record review on 03/25/2026, Resident #124 was admitted on [DATE], and no documentation was located in the electronic medical record (EMR) to indicate the resident, or their representative had been educated, offered, and received or declined vaccinations. The Immunizations Report generated from the EMR indicates Resident #124's influenza status is historical, but lacks documentation of the immunization. The report doesn't indicate whether the resident received the pneumococcal vaccination. Per interview on 3/25/2026 at approximately 11:39 AM, the Infection Preventionist was asked to provide the Vaccination Review: Consent/Declination SNF Resident Form for Resident #124. Per interview on 3/25/2026 at approximately 4:05 PM, the Infection Preventionist confirmed documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #124) whether the resident was offered, educated, received, or declined the COVID-19 vaccinations.Findings include: Per record review on 03/25/2026, Resident #124 was admitted on [DATE], and no documentation was located in the EMR to indicate the resident or their representative had been educated, offered, received, or declined the COVID-19 vaccinations. The Immunizations Report generated from the EMR indicates Resident #124's COVID-19 status is historical with a date of receiving it on 12/5/24, however it lacks documentation of the immunizations. Per interview on 03/25/2026 at approximately 11:39 AM, The Infection Preventionist was asked to produce the Vaccination Review: Consent/Declination SNF Resident Form for Resident #124. Per interview on 3/25/2026 at approximately 4:05 PM, the Infection Preventionist confirmed documentation of offering, educating, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that 10 of 10 residents sampled (#1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) were free from misappropriation of 6 different types of controlled medications identified by the facility audit. Findings include:Per review of the facility's reported investigation, a concern was raised on 12/15/25 regarding documentation of resident #1 receiving an as-needed (prn) medication. The assigned medication nurse reported that resident #1 hadn't received the medication for 3 months, which they confirmed with the resident. The facility conducted audits of all Control Medication logbooks (record-keeping systems used by facilities to track the inventory, administration, and disposal of controlled substances) and the medication administration records of residents who were to receive these medications. It was found that on 2 separate occasions, for ten different residents (#1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) in the facility and on two units, a Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 nursing staff had an active [NAME] license to practice. Findings include:A review of credentials for a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) investigation for misappropriation of medications (see citation F602 for additional information) revealed that the LPN lacked an active [NAME] license to practice. The nurse's multistate compact license (a license with the authority to practice in multiple member states), which permitted practice in [NAME], had expired on [DATE]. A request for an updated license was made to the Administrator on [DATE] at 12:00 PM, and nursys.com (the national nurse licensure and disciplinary database) was used to search for it. The search confirmed the LPN's license was only active in North Carolina, a single-state license, and was no longer valid for [NAME]. The Administrator stated, I asked her to fix this. She was asked who she was referring to, and she stated she had spoken to the LPN by phone regarding the LPN's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure nursing staff members administering medications maintain ongoing qualifications for 1 of 5 nursing staff sampled. Findings include:Per the facility's reported investigation, a concern was raised on [DATE] when the oncoming shift medication nurse reported that a resident hadn't received an as-needed (prn) medication for 3 months, a claim the nurse confirmed with the resident. The facility conducted audits of all Control Medication logbooks (record-keeping systems used by facilities to track the inventory, administration, and disposal of controlled substances) and the medication administration records of residents who were to receive these medications. It was found that on 2 separate occasions, for ten different residents in the facility and on two units, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) had not followed the procedure for administrating medications as evidence identified by the facility as irregularities with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Per interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident #2) was free from chemical restraints by prescribing an as needed psychotropic medication with no stop date of 14 days. Findings include:Per review of Resident #2's medical record, Resident #2 has major diagnoses of vascular dementia [a form of dementia associated with impaired reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to your brain], Stage 2 chronic kidney disease, and COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease]. Resident #2 had a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 9 as of 7/17/25. A BIMS score of 9 indicates that Resident #2 is cognitively impaired. Per record review of a physician order dated 7/23/25 states, Lorazepam tablet 0.5 mg [milligram]: Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for itching and anxiety. There was no documented stop date of 14 days on this order. Resident #2 was administered the Lorazepam 8 times from 7/23/25 to 8/11/25.An interview was conducted with the DON [Director of Nursing] on 8/11/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Per interview and record review the facility's failed to prevent significant medication errors for one of four residents [Resident #1] sampled. Findings include:Per review of Resident #1's medical record, s/he had major diagnoses of Type II Diabetes, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, Schizoaffective Disorder [a mental illness where the person experiences symptoms of both schizophrenia and a mood disorder], and anxiety. Resident #1 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 4 as of 6/27/25. A BIMS score of 4 indicates Resident #1 was cognitively impaired. Per record review of the Resident #1's July 2025 MAR [Medication Administration Record] a medication order on the MAR states, Lisinopril [a medication used to treat high blood pressure] tablet 40 mg [milligrams] Give one tablet buy mouth in the morning for hypertension. Hold for SBP [systolic blood pressure] <100 [under 100] mmHg [millimeters of mercury] and notify provider. The MAR shows that the medication was ordered on 6/27/25.Per record review of Resident #1's nurse progress note written on 7/20/25 at 7:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents. Findings include: Per interview with the State Surveyor on 5/12/25 at 10:30 AM and per review of the State Surveyor's written report, Resident #1 reported to the Surveyor allegations of employee misconduct and possible abuse involving Resident #1's roommate and a Licensed Nursing Assistant on 2/18/25. The Surveyor reported the allegations of abuse and misconduct to both the facility's former Administrator [FADM] and Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON] on the same date, 2/18/25. Additionally, the Surveyor reported the allegations of abuse and misconduct to Adult Protective Services. An interview was conducted on 5/12/25 at 11:47 AM with the facility's current Administrator [ADM] and Director of Nursing [DON]. The ADM and DON confirmed that Adult Protective Services arrived at the facility 7 days after the incident on 2/26/25 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately put measures in place to ensure that further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment did not occur after allegations of abuse were reported to the facility for 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents. Findings include: Per interview with the State Surveyor on 5/12/25 at 10:30 AM, and per review of the State Surveyor's written report, Resident #1 reported to the Surveyor allegations of employee misconduct and possible abuse involving Resident #1's roommate and a Licensed Nurse's Aide on 2/18/25. The Surveyor reported the allegations of abuse and misconduct to both the facility's former Administrator [FADM] and Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON] on the same date, 2/18/25. Additionally, the Surveyor reported the allegations of abuse and misconduct to Adult Protective Services. An interview was conducted via phone with the Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON] on 5/12/25 at 12:40 PM. The ADON stated that an investigation into Resident #1's allegations was done by the former ADM who was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the individual who has completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control oversees the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: Per review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/15/24, Education/Training Requirements are, Have primary professional training in nursing, medical technology, microbiology, epidemiology, or other related field; Is qualified by education, training, experience or certification; Works at least part-time at the facility; and has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Per review of the facility's infection control log, that included the facility line listings, policies and procedures, and training, it was revealed that all infection prevention and control documents were completed by the facility's DON (Director of Nursing). Per interview on 4/2/25 at approximately 4:59 PM, the DON stated that s/he is responsible for both the facility's infection prevention and control program and the DON position and has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are given the opportunity to eat meals in the dining room during breakfast, dinner, and the weekend meal service for 7 randomly sampled residents (Residents #73, #4, #13, #10, #54, #6, #74). Findings include: Per observation throughout the recertification survey on 3/31/25 through 4/2/25, the dining room was observed to be closed for meal service during breakfast and dinner. Per interview on 4/2/25 at 8:12 AM, Resident #73 stated, I prefer to eat breakfast in my room and have lunch and dinner in the dining room. Per interview on 4/2/25 at 8:25 AM with Resident #4 stated, I would like to have all of my meals in the dining room. Per interview on 4/1/25 at 11:56 AM, Resident #13 stated s/he really likes the dining room and would like to be able to come more often. S/he would like a place to go. Per interview on 4/1/25 at 11:57 AM, Resident #10 prefers to eat in the dining room. She/he would like it if s/he could eat more of her/his meals in the dining room. She/he does not like eating in his/her room. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Per observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish an anonymous grievance reporting system that supports the resident's right to voice any grievance without discrimination, reprisal, or the fear of discrimination or reprisal for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #72 and Resident #82). Findings include: A resident council meeting was held on 4/1/25 at 2:00 PM. Five residents attended the resident council meeting. During resident council Residents #72 and Resident #82 discussed their concerns with grievances stating, Sometimes we don't get a response at all. Resident #82 discussed feelings of retaliation if a grievance is filed. An interview was conducted with Resident #82 on 4/2/25 at 5:12 PM. Resident #82 discussed that s/he did not know how to file a grievance anonymously, stating, We have to give them to the nursing supervisor. I don't even know where they go. Resident #82 also stated s/he has never received a copy of his/her grievances. S/he stated s/he filed two grievances, both within the last year and never received a written copy back.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide trauma informed care by not identifying triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 5 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #31, #60, #464,#99,#110). Findings include: 1) Record review shows that Resident #31 suffers from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). Review of the resident's care plan did not identify any triggers that may re-traumatize this resident. A note from Deer Oaks (an outside provider of mental health services), dated 12/17/21, states do not talk about war trauma per resident's requests. The note also goes on to identify concerns about family members health, and the recent death of Resident #31's fiancé as triggers that may re-traumatize the resident. A Facility policy titled Trauma informed Care, last updated on 3/4/24 reads, The facility will ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough nursing staff to administer medications timely for 1 of 27 sampled (Resident #45) and meet resident preferences of where to dine for 7 randomly sampled residents (Residents #73, #4, #13, #10, #54, #6, #74). This has the potential to impact multiple residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during a partial survey, dated 8/15/24, and the previous recertification survey, dated 1/11/24. Findings include: 1) Per record review, Resident #45 has diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease and hypothyroidism. S/he had the following medications orders, Levothyroxine 75 mcg, give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for hypothyroidism. Give before breakfast, starting 12/15/24. Per the facility medication administration record (MAR) the medication is scheduled between 7:00 AM and 10:00 AM every day. Per review of the medication administration record Resident #45 received his/her thyroid medication after breakfast four times in the month of March. Per drug guide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food served to residents is palatable, attractive, and served at an appetizing temperature for 12 randomly sampled residents, (Residents #44 , #74, #4, #14, #72, #50, #97, #74, #33, #25, #68, and #83). Findings include: 1) Per interview with Resident #25 on 3/31/25 at 11:29 AM, s/he stated, The food is too salty, there are a lot of gristles in the ground meat, and the food does not look appetizing. S/he stated, I don't like it that they give us fried baloney sandwiches for dinner at least once a month. Per interview on 3/31/25 at 11:41 AM with Resident # 33, s/he stated, The food is terrible and the presentation is terrible. S/he also stated, The Kitchen Manager is very nice but does not make changes to the taste of the food and how it is cooked. Per interview on 3/31/25 at 12:09 PM with Resident # 83, s/he stated, The food is so/so, it is too salty, and buns are usually wet from the vegetables. S/he also stated, It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents appealing menu items that meet the preferences and choices of the residents for 6 randomly sampled residents (Residents #5, #82, #50, #34, #80, and #18). Findings include: Per interview with Resident #5 on 3/31/25 at approximately 2:55 PM, s/he stated that the meals offered are a lot of sandwiches and the alternative option is often sandwiches. Resident #5 reported buying ramen to have a hot meal. On 4/2/25 at approximately 10:01 AM, Resident #5 reported that staff don't show the menu to her/him, ask her/him what they want for food, and they don't offer her/him choices for meals. Resident #5 reports not having seen a menu in a very long time. At 6:00 PM on 4/2/25, Resident #5 reported they didn't get to choose their meal, that dinner is gross, and they were not offered anything different. Per interview with Resident #82 on 4/2/25 at approximately 3:25 PM, s/he reported about how they will frequently mess up their food order and s/he will have to ask for something else. They report s/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices specific to medication administration for 1 resident (#464) in a standard survey sample of 27, and failed to ensure facility equipment used for mechanic lift transfers was cleaned and maintained sanitarily. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 1/11/24 and 12/7/22. Findings include: 1) Per observation on 4/2/25 at approximately 3:15 PM of the facility's laundry processing area, it was revealed that mechanical lift pads (a fabric sling that is used in conjunction with a patient lifting device to support and transfer individuals who have mobility limitations) are washed and then hung to dry on a hook in the laundry room. It was noted that there were 4 hooks under an open window in the laundry room and on all 4 hooks there were numerous mechanical lift pads of various sizes. On the third hook from the left there were 3 lift pads at the front of the hook that were wet and resting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 2 of 27 residents in the sample (Resident #464 and Resident #34). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 1/11/24 and 12/7/22. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #464 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He/she has an admission document from the admitting hospital, Hospital Medicine admission History and Physical, dated 11/19/24, in his/her medical record. The document states Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): sexually assaulted, prefers female caregivers. Resident #464 has a care plan for Trauma with Anxiety, dated 11/25/24 and revised 4/1/25. It does not address a preference for female caregivers or a history of sexual assault. On 4/02/25, at 10:00 AM, the Social Worker stated, We don't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1) Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards as evidenced by failing to follow physicians' orders related to the timing of administration for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #45 and #34). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 1/11/24. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #45 has diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease and hypothyroidism. Per interview with Resident #45 on 3/31/25 at 3:30 PM, s/he stated that his/her medications for his/her Parkinson's disease are often late. S/he stated that s/he experiences increased tremors and pain when his/her medications are late. S/he stated when my medications are late, I start to have more tremors which are really painful, then I have a bladder spasm causing me to urinate in the bed. [Resident #45] further stated s/he has tried to explain this to the staff but s/he does not feel that they understand or listen. Per record review, Resident #45 has the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice including prevention of skin breakdown for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident # 14). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, muscle weakness and a need for assistance with personal care. Resident #14 has a care plan focus stating I have an alteration in bladder/bowel elimination related to incontinence and CVA [cerebrovascular accident, a stroke] with an intervention, dated 6/10/19 incontinent care every 2 to 4 hours and as needed, and a care plan focus stating I am at risk for impaired skin integrity with interventions, dated 6/10/19, for, apply/administer barrier creams as ordered and provide timely toileting incontinence care. He/she has a care plan intervention, dated 3/24/25 to be turned and repositioned every two hours. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments/medication carts and only permit authorized personnel to have access to 1 of 6 medication carts. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 1/11/24. Findings include: Per observation on 3/31/25 at approximately 11:15 AM on the [NAME] Unit, a licensed nurse was observed walking away from an unlocked medication cart that was abutting the [NAME] Unit nurses station. S/he walked down a hallway on the [NAME] Unit pushing a wheelchair while following a resident. S/he did not have direct view of the medication cart from 11:16 AM until 11:21 AM. There were numerous residents in the area of the unlocked medication cart. Upon her/his return to the medication cart and while greeting the surveyors the nurse locked the medication cart. Per interview on 3/31/25 at approximately 11:23 AM with the licensed nurse, s/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, or plan of care, potentially impacting all residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Observations and interviews reveal that ADL care (activities of daily living) was not provided in a timely manner. a. Per record review, Resident #7's care plan states that s/he has an alteration in bladder/bowel elimination [related to] impaired mobility, initiated on 3/18/19 and that s/he has a deficit in ADL function/mobility related to cerebral palsy and schizoaffective disorder, revised on 4/28/24. Care plan interventions include total dependence for toileting hygiene, revised on 3/20/24, maximum assistance for transferring, revised on 5/23/24, and for staff to provide prompt incontinent care, initiated on 8/7/19. On 6/10/24, Resident #7 was assessed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and resident representative interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) without assistance receives the proper level of assistance for 8 of 11 sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and an anonymous resident). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #7's care plan states that s/he has an alteration in bladder/bowel elimination [related to] impaired mobility, initiated on 3/18/19 and that s/he has a deficit in ADL function/mobility related to cerebral palsy and schizoaffective disorder, revised on 4/28/24. Care plan interventions include total dependence for toileting hygiene, revised on 3/20/24, maximum assistance for transferring, revised on 5/23/24, and for staff to provide prompt incontinent care, initiated on 8/7/19. On 6/10/24, Resident #7 was assessed to have a BIMS of 15 (brief interview for mental status; a cognitive assessment score indicating cognitive intactness). Per observation and interview on 8/13/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor 3 out 3 residents sampled for the adverse side effects related to psychotropic medications (Resident's #5, #9, and #10). Findings include: (1.) Per record review Resident #9 was admitted with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's, dementia with behavioral disturbances. S/He has the following medication orders written by the Advance Registered Practice Nurse (APRN): Haloperidol oral tablet 2 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for agitation, (Antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia) (Schizophrenia is a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. Mayo Clinic 2024), Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, Zyprexa oral tablet 5 mg give one tablet by mouth in the morning for agitation and one tablet by mouth in the evening for behaviors. (Zyprexa is an antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia). Per Manufacturers warning for Haloperidol,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physicians and other providers (as delegated to per regulation) review the residents' total program of care, including medications and treatment plan at each visit as required for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident's #9). Findings include: Physician note dated 6/4/2024 under section titled Assessment and Plans reads ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED - G30.9-With behaviors, [s/he] has episodes of screaming out, restlessness and agitation. [S/he] currently is on Seroquel Haldol and Ativan without behavior changes continue meds for now . Per record review Seroquel was discontinued 05/23/2024. Per review of Resident #9's physician orders starting on 4/3/2024 shows that Resident #9 was taking the following medication at the time of regulated visit: Haloperidol oral tablet 2 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for agitation, Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, A Physician note dated 7/20/2024 Assessment and Plans ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations involving abuse are reported no later than 2 hours to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1); the facility failed to provide the State Agency sufficient information to describe the alleged violation and indicate how residents are being protected in its initial report for 3 of 3 sampled resident to resident altercations; the facility failed to provide sufficient information to describe the results of an investigation, and indicate any corrective actions taken, if the allegation was verified in its final investigation 5 day summary report for 2 of 2 sampled resident to resident altercations; and the facility failed to develop policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. Findings include: 1. Per review of a facility investigation report submitted to the State Agency on 12/12/2024, a staff member was made aware on 12/12/2024 of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented related to skin for two of three sampled residents (Residents #3 and #4). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services following hospitalization for a left humerus fracture and a left femur fracture. A 1/22/24 Physician note reveals that Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital on 1/22/23 due to a displaced catheter. Per a complaint submitted to the State Agency on 1/25/2024, Resident #3 had questionable bruising to his/her right arm on transfer from the facility to the hospital on 1/22/24. Per review of Resident #3's medical record, there was no documentation that Resident #3 had any bruising on his/her body while at the facility between 1/15/24 through 1/22/24. The following interviews and record reviews reveal that Resident #3's skin condition was not accurately documented in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, or plan of care, impacting all residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Staff schedules reveal that there is frequently not enough staff working to consistently meet the needs of the residents. Review of facility direct care staff schedules and PPD (direct care staff to resident ratios) for October, November, and December 2023 reveals that the facility failed to maintain required [NAME] minimum staffing levels to allow for 2.0 hours of direct care per resident per day (PPD) on a weekly average by Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) for 7 of the 8 sampled weeks and failed to maintain required minimum staffing levels to allow for 3.0 hours of direct care per resident per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, staff education record review, and the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses and licensed nursing assistants were assessed for competency and skill sets to provide care and respond to each resident's individualized needs. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility's Facility Assessment (an assessment that determines what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies), last reviewed 10/2/2023, reveals under section 3 titled Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Resident Support and Care Daily and During Emergencies a chart that lists the required staff competencies required to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population, both initially and annually. Per this chart, licensed nurses use the Nurse Competency Skills Evaluation which lists 9 pages of skills licensed nurses are required to demonstrate. This list includes skills such as handwashing, safe medication administration, Treatment Administration Record (TAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food is stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility also failed to ensure that dishwasher temperatures were monitored to ensure proper sanitation. Findings include: On 12/17/23 at 4:10 p.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following observations were made: 1. In the walk-in cooler observed a milk crate with 8 containers of egg nogg being stored directly on the floor. The facility cook confirmed the egg nogg should not be on the floor it should be on a shelf. 2. In the walk-in cooler a box of celery was wilted, with soft and bendable stocks and the color of the celery was pale indicating that it is not suitable for eating. The facility cook confirmed the celery was spoiled and removed it from the walk-in cooler. 3. In the walk-in cooler a watermelon had mold and brown spots on the outer rind. The facility cook confirmed the watermelon was spoiled and removed it from the walk-in cooler. 4. In the walk-in cooler there were 6 half-gallon containers of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) duties per the Medical Director Agreement and Medical Director facility policy were implemented to ensure resident care policies and services were provided to all residents that were consistent with current professional standards of practice on 3 of 3 resident units. Findings include: A document titled Medical Director Agreement, signed by the facility on 5/31/23 [NAME] the following services will be provided by the MD: Minimum Qualification Standards and Performance Requirements of a medical Director 1.2.9.2 Review of the resident's overall condition and program of care at each visit, including medication and treatment 1.2.14 Process for accurate assessments, care planning, treatment implementation, and monitoring or care and services to meet resident needs. 1.3 Physician shall review and update resident care policies and procedures to reflect current standards of practice for resident care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program that ensures the facility is free of pests. Findings include: 12/17/23 4:10 p.m. On the initial tour of the facility kitchen observed several fruit flies in all sections of the kitchen, including the food prep area, food storage areas, and dishwashing areas. Also during the initial tour observation of a blue light unit mounted on the wall in the kitchen had many trapped flies and fruit flies in the unit. An interview with the facility cook on duty during the initial tour confirms that the fruit flies come from the sink drains and that they need to contact the exterminator for control of these pests. On 12/17/23 at 6:26 p.m. observed during the supper meal tray pass, fruit flies came out of the tray cart that resident's meal trays were on waiting to be passed out. On 12/18/23 at 11:55 a.m. fruit flies were observed in the resident's dining room while the lunch meal was being served. Fruit flies are mainly attracted to extra ripe, fermenting fruits and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to treat those residents reliant on wheelchairs with dignity by failing to clean the wheelchairs. The facility has 80 residents who utilize wheelchairs. Findings include: On December 19, 2023, at approximately 9:00 AM Resident #5 was sitting in his/her power wheelchair waiting to leave the facility for an outing. The base of the wheelchair housing the motorized mechanisms was noted to have a coating of sticky, dusty grime, this coating was noted along all flat surfaces of the chair. The posterior view of the backrest was noted to have an approximately 2 inch streak of a dark colored smeared sticky substance on the top edge. A unit Licensed Nurses Aid in the area at the time confirmed the chair was unclean. Further observations of wheelchairs in resident rooms, in hallways, or being used by residents revealed similar dusty, dirty surfaces, one with what appeared to be hair or thread wound around 2 of the spokes on the left large back wheel. Per facility policy entitled Wheelchair, Geri-Chair Inventory, Maintenance, Cleaning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine whether it is clinically appropriate for residents to self-administer medications for 2 of 35 residents (Resident #31 and #81). Findings include: Per facility policy titled Medication Administration Methods, last revised on 7/12/23, A medication must never be left at bedside or be out of sight of the nurse administering the medication. The nurse must watch each resident take the medication, and ensure the medication is swallowed, unless the resident has an order for self-administration of medications. 1. Per observation on 12/19/23 at 10:53 AM Resident #31 was lying in their bed in their room. On his/her bedside table was a respiratory inhaler labeled Trelegy Ellipta Aerosol Powder. Resident #31 explained that the nurse left it there this morning but s/he also has another inhaler that s/he keeps in the room all the time. Resident #31 then revealed a respiratory inhaler labeled Albuterol Sulfate from a cup on his/her bedside table. Record review reveals that Resident #31 has diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review the facility failed to use the data collected using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process, specifically the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, as part of an ongoing process to develop a comprehensive care plan, to provide the appropriate care and services and to modify the care plan for 1 of 35 Resident's sampled (Resident # 28). Additionally, the facility failed to accurately code the MDS assessment, due to lack of accurate review of records and/or lack of actual assessment of the resident's wounds by the facility, for 3 of 35 Resident's sampled (Residents #47, #99, and #1). Findings include: 1. Resident #28 has a score of 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment indicating a high level of cognitive function. Section D regarding mood on the MDS assessment includes questions asking if the resident has been feeling down or depressed, have little interest or pleasure in things, or feeling badly about themselves. If so, how many days during the past two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #111 and #88). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Per interview on 12/18/23 at 9:08 AM, Resident #111 expressed that s/he was sad. S/He got teary three times during the interview and cried twice. S/He talked about wanting to commit suicide prior to being admitted to the facility. When asked if anyone had hurt her at the facility, s/he replied no but became very upset; his/her voice became louder and s/he began to cry again, as if asking him/her about getting hurt was a trigger for him/her. Record review reveals that Resident #111 showed symptoms of depression prior to the creation of the comprehensive care plan. Resident #111's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 4 residents of 35 sampled residents (Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #69 Resident #47) and failed to develop or revise resident's care plans after each assessment and with the required team for 9 of 37 sampled residents (Residents #7, #31, #111, #99, #1, #43, #50, #107, and #21). Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #47's care plan reveals two separate activities focus problems. #1 states I have the potential for alteration in activities related to Parkinson's, heart disease, lumbar fracture, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, and artificial knee joint. The goal states I will interact with others on a daily basis and have positive social experiences. I will interact with family and friends via visits, mail, and phone calls. Interventions include My faith is: Catholic. Religious Services Attendance - Mass. The 2nd Activities focus problem states Activities-Leisure: I have potential barriers related to my leisure activities of choice related to cognitive skills Goals include I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 3 of 35 sampled residents (Residents #111, #7, and #269). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Per Resident #111's MDS (Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) dated 10/17/23, s/he requires supervision or touching assistance for showering. Per interview on 12/18/23 at 8:40 AM, Resident #111 expressed that she would like to get showered more. Per review of Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) documentation, there are zero documented showers for Resident #111 in October 2023, zero showers in November 2023, and only 2 showers are documented in December 2023. 2. Per record review, Resident #7 has diagnoses that include spastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion rehabilitation services for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #81 and #43). Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #81 has diagnoses that include acute transverse myelitis (inflammation of the spinal cord; symptoms may include pain), anxiety, and lower back pain. Per interview on 12/19/23 at 10:45 AM, Resident #81 stated that s/he is concerned that staff are not doing ROM (range of motion) exercises with him/her. S/He explained that his/her goal is to at least do some stretches and s/he has declined in his/her ROM. S/He revealed that s/he had been told by staff that they have to be trained to do the exercises with him/her and there are not enough trained staff to do the ROM with him/her. Resident #81 has the following care plan focus RANGE OF MOTION: I have limitations or I am at risk for limitations in my ROM related to progressive weakness neurological, created 4/3/21, with the following intervention, NURSING REHAB:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and per medical orders for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #23 & Resident #66). Findings include: 1. Resident #23 has diagnoses that include pericarditis (inflammation around the heart), and congestive heart failure (failure of the heart to provide sufficient blood flow caused by an impairment of the heart's pumping function). On 11/10/23 the following order was placed - BiPap-Apply at HS (bedtime), monitor placement and usage. Remove in AM. Settings BIPAP auto titrate IPAP max 24 EPAP min 4 PS 8 with 3 L bleed. At bedtime for SOB (shortness of breath)/COMFORT O2 (oxygen) at 3 L (liters per minute), 15 tube type, ramp 4 time 0:05. These settings are highly complex therefore on 12/21/23 at 10:15 AM the Surveyor and the Unit Manager viewed the machine (Dream Station) together to allow the Unit Manager to demonstrate how the settings are applied. The Unit Manager was unable to provide an explanation or a demonstration of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that a physician reviewed the total program of care during the required regulatory visits for 9 of 37 sampled residents (Residents #7, #31, #111, #99, #1, #43, #50, #107, and #21). Findings include: Facility policy titled, Attending physician Medical Services Responsibilities- [NAME], last modified on 4/28/23 states Documentation of mandated visits must include documentation showing evidence that the provider reviewed the total plan of care . Per record review of 40 physician notes for the above 9 residents between 6/1/23 and 1/9/24, which were provided by the facility to this surveyor, a majority of them did not contain evidence that the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including the resident's progress and problems in maintaining or improving their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and decisions about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen. Many…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are receiving as-needed psychotropic medications have a 14-day stop date for 5 of 5 residents sampled. (Residents #2, #5, #6 #7 and # 8) Per record review on 3/7/24 Resident #7 has a Physician's order that started on 2/28/24 for Lorazepam (an anti-anxiety psychotropic medication) give 0.25 milligrams (mg) sublingually (SL) a route of administration in which the medication is placed under the tongue and is absorbed through the mucous membrane) every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety/SOB (shortness of breath). There is no 14-day stop date included in the order. Resident #7 also has a Physician order started on 2/28/24 for Haldol (an antipsychotic psychotropic medication given for agitation) give 0.5 milliliters (ml) by mouth every 6 hours as needed for agitation. There is no 14-day stop date for this psychotropic medication order. Per record review Resident #6 has a physician's order that started on 12/9/23 for Haldol to give one 1 tablet (0.5mg) by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. There is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are kept in locked compartments only accessible to authorized personnel for one applicable treatement cart; failed to ensure that medications and biologicals were removed from use when expired for 2 of 3 units; and failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #31 and #81). Findings include: 1. The facility's treatement cart was not kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it. Per observation on 12/17/23 at 5:43 PM, a treatment cart in the common area of Unit A was observed unlocked making the items in the drawers accessible. There were noted to be prescription medication ointments in the unsecured drawers. At 5:43 PM the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was notified that the cart was not locked. The LPN stated, It's the other nurse's cart. The LPN walked away without locking the cart. At 6:03 PM the 2nd LPN on duty was shown that the treatment cart was not locked and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by the improper use of PPE (personal protective equipment) for 1 of 3 residents on precautions (Resident #50) and throughout the facility; failure to use proper hand hygiene during medication administration; and the failure to clean respiratory equipment (C-PAP and Bi-PAP) machines per orders and facility policy for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #69, 5, & 23). Findings include: 1. Staff did not wear the appropriate PPE in the facility when there was active COVID-19 and influenza. Per observation, on entry to the facility on [DATE] through 12/21/23 and 12/26/23, signs are posted to inform all entering of the use of facemasks facility wide. Record review reveals that Resident #50 tested positive for influenza on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 eligible residents (Residents #50, #271, and #37) on one unit received the COVID-19 vaccine. 1. Per record review, Resident #50, who is [AGE] years old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes and severe kidney disease. Resident #50 is considered high risk for COVID-19 complications because of his/her diagnoses and age. An undated form titled Vaccination Review: Consent/Declination Resident Form, entered into Resident #50's medical record with the effective date of 11/20/23, reveals that his/her vaccination history was assessed for influenza, COVID-19, and pneumococcal. The form indicates that s/he did not receive a 2023 COVID-19 vaccine. Under decision to vaccinate, the choices not eligible, consented, and declined are all left blank. The resident, nor their representative, did not sign off that they were provided education or that they consented or declined the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure that staff had effectively been trained in trauma informed care. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment (an assessment that determines what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies), last reviewed 10/2/2023, indicates that the facility is able to provide care and services for individuals with psychiatric mood disorders that include post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and behaviors that needs interventions. Section titled Education/In-services describes the staff education and training necessary to maintain the level and the types of support and care needed for the resident population. Included in both the general orientation and the annual education program is the topic behavior stress management. The trauma informed care education that is incorporated into the general orientation includes 2 basic slides that describe the definition of trauma and general symptoms of trauma, depression, and PTSD.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to schedule timely care plan meetings and facilitate the inclusion of the resident's representatives to attend the meeting. Findings include: Per record review, Resident # 65 has resided at the facility since 09/15/2021 with a diagnosis of vascular dementia. Per an interview on 12/18/2023 at 10:44 AM with a family member, s/he explained that Resident #65 was cognitively impaired due to dementia and often declined to participate in the meetings. S/he made decisions regarding financial and medical issues. Her/his work schedule needed to have advance notice to allow for attendance. The meetings were canceled often or not scheduled at all. Per record review, a care plan meeting was held on 3/23/2023 and 10/27/2023; there was no evidence of a care plan meeting between March and October. A review of Resident 65's care plan shows the following under Cognitive Skills: I am significantly Impaired, and my son makes decisions regarding my financial needs and medical care related to vascular dementia. Per interview on 12/26/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive choices were indicated for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #7). Findings include: Record review reveals that Resident #7 has two conflicting code statuses in their medical record and facility documentation. Their most recent COLST form (clinician orders for life sustaining treatment), entered into Resident #7's electronic medical record (EMR) on [DATE], reveals that Resident #7 gave informed consent for a DNR (do not attempt resuscitation) and no intubation or ventilation interventions. This was signed by the Attending Physician. This COLST form is also in a binder located at the nursing station with the unit's residents' most up to date COLST forms. Physician orders and the resident profile banner in the EMR do not reveal a DNR order; instead, the code status order that appears in the EMR is CPR/Full Code, created on [DATE]. The unit assignment sheet that nursing staff use on a daily basis also indicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Residents #50). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services following a below-knee amputation (BKA) with diagnoses that include diabetes, osteomyelitis (bone infection), and severe kidney disease. A 11/20/23 form titled Braden Scale for Predicting Skin Ulcers, (a tool used to identify the level of risk a resident has for developing pressure ulcers), reveals that Resident #1 is at risk. A 11/20/23 skin assessment form reveals that Resident #50 has four skin issues: two moisture associated skin damage areas, an abrasion, and a surgical incision. Vital signs reveal that Resident #50 experienced 10 out of 10 pain within the first 48 hours of admission [DATE]). While a baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality related to the Social Services for 1 of 35 residents sampled (Resident # 28). Findings include: Per record review on 12/5/23 Resident #28 stated thier roommate made the room smell like mold, and on 12/12/23 Resident #28 called the roommate a fat slob. On 12/17/23, Resident #28 was reported by a Licensed Nurse Assistant to have thrown a full cup of fluid at and utilized verbally abusive language towards the roommate, necessitating a room change. During an interview on 12/22/23 at 12:00 PM with the facility's Social Service team, they were asked about the behaviors displayed by Resident #28 towards his/her roommate. The Social Service team admitted they were not aware of the behavior that had occurred precipitating the room change 4 days earlier. They were not aware that the care plan for Resident #28 had been revised on 12/17/23 to state monitor/document/report to the Medical Provider of danger to self and others as needed indicating a significant psycho-social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities that support each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #65). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #65 has resided in the facility since 9/15/21 and has diagnoses that include vascular dementia, memory deficit related to a cerebral infarct (stroke), and cognitive communication deficit. A review of his/her care plan reveals that s/he yells or calls out to staff for attention. Resident #65's care plan states, I prefer social and entertainment activities involving music, happy hour, parties, outdoor parties, and socials. In an observation of Resident # 65 on 12/18/2023 at 9:12 AM, the resident was heard yelling, Help, help, help. staff were observed entering the room several times for such calls over the next few hours. An interview with a family member on 12/18/2023 at 10:51 AM revealed concerns that the facility was not adequately attempting to engage Resident # 65 in less isolating activities. An interview with the charge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and treatment consistent with the resident's physician orders and professional standards of practice, placing the resident at risk for infection for 1 of 4 residents in the sample (Resident #4). Findings include: During an interview with Resident #4 on 3/6/24 at 11:40 AM it was noted that they had a dressing on their lower right leg with a date of 3/3/24 written on it indicating that the dressing was last changed on 3/3/24. Per record review, both the physicians orders and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicate that Resident #4 has a wound on their left leg [instead of the right] and that the dressing should be changed daily. A physician's order dated 2/28/24 states LLE (left lower extremity) Wound Care: Cleanse with NS (normal saline), and skin prep around open area, apply non-adherent, cover with coversite, every day shift for Wound Care. The TAR also reflected that nursing staff had been signing that the dressing on the left lower leg had been changed daily through 2/28/24 - 3/6/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 2 of 35 sampled (Resident #5 & #47 ). Findings include: 1. On 12/18/23 at 2 PM Resident #5's room was noted to be very warm, it was also noted that a cord from the oxygen concentrator was resting on top of the heat vent along the wall. The heater was hot to touch and the cord was very warm and spongy. The Director of Maintenance was paged and using an infrared thermometer gun the heat vent temperature was measured to be 108 degrees fahrenheit. The Director of Maintenance confirmed the cord was very warm should not be resting on top of the heat vent and immediately moved it. 2. Per observation of Resident #47 on 12/17/23 at 5:10 p.m., the resident is sitting in a wheelchair at a table in a common area. S/he is sitting on the edge of his/ her wheelchair, s/he appears…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #31) with an indwelling catheter receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. Findings include: Record review reveals that Resident #31 has diagnoses that include benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage and reflux of the urinary system). A MDS (Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) dated 10/5/23 reveals that Resident #31 has an indwelling catheter. Resident #31's care plan states INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER: I require an indwelling urinary catheter use r/t Urinary Retention, revised on 12/28/22. Interventions include Foley Catheter care every shift and as needed, revised on 11/3/23, and Urinary Output: Empty urine & Record every shift, initiated on 9/12/2023. Physician orders include: Urinary Output - verify documentation in POC and notify provider if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 applicable resident (Resident #7) a urostomy receives care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and professional standards of practice. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #7 has diagnoses that include spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a physical disability that causes muscle rigidity that affects all four limbs and often a person's torso, facial, and oral muscles) and a history of bladder cancer requiring a urostomy (a surgically created opening to allow urine to exit the body). Measuring urinary output, providing urostomy care every shift, and changing the urostomy drainage bag can reduce the risk for developing the complications such as infection, stomal (opening in the body) problems and skin irritation in addition to alerting staff to other serious complications. Resident #7's care plan reveals the following focus: ELIMINATION: I have an alteration in bladder/bowel elimination r/t [related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status as evidenced by failing to obtain weights as ordered, failing to consistently document resident meal intakes and meal refusals, and failing to update the physician of refusal of weights for one of the 35 residents sampled (Resident #92). Findings include: Per observation of Resident #92 on 12/18/23 at 11:43 am s/he was sitting in the common area in a wheelchair. S/he was thin, his/her face appeared drawn, and their clothes were loosely fitting. Resident #92 is not interviewable due to cognitive decline and inability to understand questions, with a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 10. Record review reveals Resident #92 had a significant weight loss of 10.66% in 6 months. His/her weight on 6/13/23 was 178.2 pounds and on 12/14/23 their weight was 159.6, a total loss of 18.6 pounds. Further record review reveals there is no documentation from the Physician that addresses the resident's significant weight loss. Resident # 92's Nutrition care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observstion, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #92). Findings include: Per observation of Resident #92 on 12/18/23 at 11:43 a.m., s/he was sitting in the common area in a wheelchair. S/he was thin, his/her face appeared drawn, and their clothes were loosely fitting. Resident #92 is not interviewable due to cognitive decline and inability to understand questions, with a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 10. Record review reveals Resident #92 had a significant weight loss of 10.66% weight loss in 6 months. His/her weight on 6/13/23 was 178.2 pounds and on 12/14/23 their weight was 159.6, a total loss of 18.6 pounds. Further record review reveals that no documentation from the Physician addresses the resident's significant weight loss. Per the interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/21/23 at 11:46 a.m. DON reviewed Resident #92 Physician progress notes, and the DON confirms that the MD has not addressed Resident #92's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-10 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send written documentation to resident and resident representative about transfers to outside facilities for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility also failed to send transfer records to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for three of three sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was transferred to an outside facility on 10/3/25 for geriatric psychiatric care. Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Per record review of the transfer notices for Resident #1, #2, and #3, the bottom of the document states, Copy sent to Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman on . This left blank for all three notices of transfer forms. There was no record of any information being sent to the residents' representatives.Per review of the facility's Discharge Planning, Death and Notice of Discharge/Transfer policy [last revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$220,961 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $220,961 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-23 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDERWOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
98 STARR FARM ROAD OPERATING HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/17/2018
COLE, WARRENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 12/17/2018
RUBIN, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 12/17/2018
MARAMA, MEGANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/19/2022
QUILLARD, PHILIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/17/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 12%Other / private 20%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$514per resident / day
operating cost
$15,631per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$436per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Vermont
$14,113/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,597/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475030. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next