No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ferncliff Nursing Home Co Inc

21 Ferncliff Drive, Rhinebeck, NY 12572 · For profit - Corporation · 309 certified beds · (845) 876-2011 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
108 Montgomery St · (845) 876-7082 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
18 E Market St · (845) 876-3939 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6565 Spring Brook Ave · (845) 516-4847 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Traver Ln · (845) 876-6161 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
102 Montgomery St · (845) 876-7666

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.8%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.1%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.5%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.4%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%6.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.7%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.721.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.411.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 257 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 125 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.9%CMS range 42.0–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.5–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 5.3–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
40.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 309 beds and averages 224.5 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during an abbreviated survey (# 2658277), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by a staff member for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 10/13/2025, Resident #1 who had severe cognitive impairment was slapped in the face by Licensed Practical Nurse #3 after an argument between Resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #3 over a piece of cake. Subsequently, Resident #1 sustained redness and swelling to their right cheek and was crying. Resident #1 was led to their room by Certified Nurse Aide #1 where they consoled them and encouraged the resident to relax. Applying the reasonable person concept, this resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: The policy titled Resident Abuse Reporting and Investigation last reviewed 08/28/2023, documented to protect residents and ensure freedom from abuse and mistreatment. Resident #1 had the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (condition that occurs when blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00368899) surveys from 2/20/25 to 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, 1) on sixty-nine (69) of ninety-six (96) shifts the facility did not provide the minimum number of staff documented in the facility Minimum Staffing Standard Matrix, and on nine (9) of thirty-two (32) night shifts the facility did not provide the minimum number of staff documented in the general staffing plan in the Facility Assessment, and several staff stated resident's care and resident's meals were delayed when they were short staffed, 2) observations were made of unsupervised residents on the dementia unit and 3) lunch was served late on the 3rd floor. Findings include: The facility Minimum Staffing Standard Matrix levels documented the facility staffing should include 3 certified nurse aides on all units on day shift and evening shifts,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 2/20/25 to 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure specific food items were maintained in accordance with professional standards for food safety and infection control prevention. Specifically, opened and not dated potentially hazardous foods were observed in one of the refrigerators and the dry pantry, and 3 of 4 dietary aides were observed wearing disposable gloves for meal service and did not change gloves after touching other non-meal service objects. The findings are: The facility policy last revised on 1/2025, 'Production, Purchasing, Storage: Food and Supply Storage' included documentation procedure to cover, label and date unused portions and open packages, using Medvantage/Freshdate labeling system. The facility policy last revised on 1/2024 'Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control: Disposable Glove Use' included documentation procedure disposable gloves must be changed, and hands washed when moving from one task to another. The initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 2/20/25 at 10:31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00368899) surveys from 2/20/25-2/27/25, the facility did not ensure that the environment was maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike manner. Specifically, 1.) the shower room on the 3A unit had black stains on the shower curtain, the tiles at the base of the toilet had brown discoloration, and the tile grout in the shower stall was discolored with black and orange stains. Furthermore, there was an air conditioner in the window next to the shower stall that caused a cold draft in the room. 2). Dirty linens were observed on the floor next to Resident #27's bed. 3) A broken handrail with a sharp edge was found on the right side of the entrance to the 3A dining room. The findings are: 1) During an interview on 2/20/25 at 11:39 AM, Resident #18 stated that the shower room on 3A was cold and had mildew. During observations of the shower room on the 3A unit on 2/20/25 at 11:59 AM and 2/25/25 at 10:23 AM, shower tiles along the base of the shower stall had black and orange discoloration. Black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the Recertification survey from 2/20/25 through 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #27 required staff assistance with personal hygiene was observed on 3 occasions with long and dirty fingernails. Findings include: The policy and procedure titled Clinical, Activities of Daily Living Protocol, Policy and Procedure last revised 11/2022 documented the facility will implement measures to assess the resident's ability to perform Activities of Daily Living and based on the assessment, will implement treatment and services, based on the resident's needs and choices, to maintain/improve and prevent decline due to reversible causes whenever possible. The facility provides services for the following Activities of Daily Living, which included but not limited to hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 2/20/25-2/27/25, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 4 residents (Resident #122) reviewed for positioning and limited range of motion, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #122 had a history of difficulty swallowing and was not positioned properly while eating. The finding are: The undated facility policy titled Resident Positioning Policy for Therapy and Nursing Staff documented that the purpose of the policy is to establish standardized guidelines for proper positioning to ensure optimal comfort, prevent complications, and promote the overall health and safety of residents. Assistive devices should be used whenever necessary to minimize risk and injury to residents and staff. Resident #122 had diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, during the Recertification Survey from 2/20/25 to 2/27/25 the facility did not ensure that needed services, care and equipment were provided to assure that resident with limited range of motion and mobility to maintain or improve function based on the residents' clinical condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for position mobility. Specifically, a resident #36 had limited range of motion in their lower extremities was observed to have right or left foot dangling off the foot pedal of their wheelchair, not appropriately positioned on the foot pedal. The findings are: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses that included , Diabetes, Cerebral Vascular Accident, and Anxiety Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident was independent in cognition. The MDS further documented the resident had limited range of motion in bilateral lower extremities. The 2/7/25 Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) titled Need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 2/20/25 through 2/27/25, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and/or the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #183 and #242) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1. Resident #183 was at risk for elopement related to wandering in and out other resident's rooms, roaming, trying to open exit doors and get in the elevator without staff supervision and 2. Resident #242 sustained falls on 11/15/24, 11/27/24, 1/10/25, 1/19/25 and 1/25/25. The findings are: Resident #183 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to non-Alzheimer's dementia, traumatic brain dysfunction, and seizure disorder. The 12/6/24 Care Plan titled Risk for Victimization documented encourage resident to attend specific task/activity of interest, separate from others as needed and engage in task/activity of interest, visual checks as indicated per protocol and plan of care, and keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/20/2025 and completed on 2/27/2025 the facility did not ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible for one (Resident #112) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder. Specifically, Resident #112 was not assessed and care planned to improve and restore continence to the extent possible. Findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure, dated 11/1/2026, titled Clinical Bladder Management, documented it is the policy of the facility to assess each resident's bladder continence status on a defined schedule. This assessment will enable the staff to implement a resident-specific re-training, toileting program that addresses the individual's bladder function needs. Resident #112 had diagnoses including fracture of the left patella, cellulitis, and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 2/20-2/27/2025, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 93) reviewed for nutrition were monitored within acceptable parameters for nutritional status. Specifically, Resident #93's weight loss a 7.5% in three months, and a 13% weight in four months was not addressed. Additionally, the resident's weight was not recorded for the last 2 months. The findings include: Resident #93 had diagnoses that included Huntington's Disease, Dysphagia, and Disturbances in Salivary Secretion. Resident MOLST dated 1/27/2018 documented no limitation on medical interventions and long-term feeding tube if needed. Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented severely impaired cognition, dependent on assistance for activities of daily living, no swallowing disorder, no significant weight loss, height 65 inches, 134 pounds. The registered dietician's note dated 8/30/24 documented the resident weighed 134.4 pounds,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY 00361358) from 2/19/25-2/27/25 it was determined that for one (Resident #400) of two residents reviewed for notification of change, the facility did not notify the resident's representative timely when there was a change in their plan of care. Specifically, Resident #400's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) and Sertraline (antidepressive medication) were discontinued after a gradual dose reduction, and their representative was not notified of the change in the plan of care. The findings are: The facility policy titled Psychoactive Drugs dated 9/2017, documented the attending physician will monitor and modify the medication regimen in conjunction with the resident and/or representative and other members of the Interdisciplinary Team including psychiatry. A resident or resident representative has the right to be informed about the resident's condition, treatment options, relative risks and benefits of treatment, required monitoring, expected outcomes of the treatment and has the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00355382 and NY00362103), the facility did not provide adequate supervision/monitoring to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed. Specifically, on 9/3/2024 Resident reported they were bumped by the elevator door [NAME] exiting and reported pain 3 out of 10 to their right hip. 2) On 9/30/2024 while exiting the core elevator on the 4th floor, the elevator door closed hitting Resident #1's right hip causing pain and discomfort. 2) On 11/25/2024, Resident #3 was found inside of the facility housekeeping closet on the 4th floor. Facility investigation revealed the housekeeping door was unsecure due to the striker plate being broken. Resident #3 who had a history of wandering behaviors, was able to gain entry to the unit 4A utility closet due to a screw being loose on the striker plate which prevented the door from closing and locking as expected. Findings include: The facility's policy on Accidents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure 4 of 6 residents (Residents #432, #218, #48, and #54,) reviewed for pressure ulcers, received care and services to promote healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing. Specifically, (1) Resident #432 acquired a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer at facility and treatments were not completed as ordered. (2) Resident #218 was observed 4 times without a pillow under their right elbow and their right elbow stage 4 pressure ulcer had re-opened, (3) Resident #48 was admitted with moisture associated skin damage to the right sacrum which developed into an deep tissue injury and an unstageable wound, and (4) Resident #54's sacral pressure ulcer increased in size during a time period when 3 of 10 topical wound dressing treatments were not documented as administered. Findings include: The facility's policy, 'Pressure injury care and prevention' last reviewed 12/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, 1) multiple residents reported during confidential interviews and the group meeting that the facility was short staffed at times especially at night and there was a lack of timely staff response to call bells, 2) multiple nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing, 3) a review of one month of facility staffing revealed the facility did not ensure that the minimum staffing levels for certified nurse aides was met on the night shift. Findings include: Review of the facility staffing from 2/13/24-3/13/24 revealed: - on 2/13/24, 7 CNA slots were unstaffed on the night shift, - on 2/15/24, 3 CNA slots were unstaffed on the night shift, - on 2/19/24, 2 CNA slots were unstaffed on the night shift, - on 2/23/24, 2 CNA slots were unstaffed on the night shift, - on 2/27/24, 1 CNA slot was unstaffed on the night shift, - on 2/29/24 1 CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed from 3/13/24 through 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure each resident received drinks, including health shakes and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for 17 (Residents #1, 6, 11, 34, 53, 63, 65, 84, 85, 145, 177, 204, 216, 237, 250, 258, and 278) of 36 residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #1, 6, 11, 34, 53, 63, 65, 84, 85, 145, 177, 204, 216, 237, 250, 258, and 278 did not receive coffee or tea, and health shakes as per meal ticket. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled Resident Meal Service, documented beverages were to be provided as listed on ticket or per resident preference. On 03/13/24 from 12:21 PM-01:05 PM, during the dining room lunch observation, Residents #1, 11, 84, 177, 237, 250, 258, and 278's meal tickets all documented 6 ounces of a hot beverage (tea, coffee, and decaffeinated tea or coffee). None of the residents received the hot beverages listed on their meal tickets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1. Portable food storage bins used for storing bulk dry foods were not maintained in a sanitary condition, 2. A cooling log was not used to monitor cooling of potentially hazardous cooked food (poultry), 3. Storage racks used to store cleaned and sanitized food preparation equipment were not maintained in a sanitary condition and the floor under the storage racks was not maintained in a sanitary condition, 4. Eight (8) food transport trucks used for transport of foods to the resident units were not maintained in a sanitary condition, and 6. A formica countertop located directly in front of 1 of 8 kitchenette hot food holding areas was in poor repair and presented a risk for food contamination and potential injury to residents. The findings are: During a follow up tour of the main kitchen on 3/19/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00334054) from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, it was determined that the facility did not ensure an effective pest control program was maintained to ensure the facility was free of pests and rodents. Specifically, facility staff and residents reported mice sightings. Additionally, there were multiple observations of mice droppings in resident rooms. Findings include: During an interview on 3/13/24 at 4:15 PM Resident #206 stated that there were black mouse traps on the unit and in their room, pointing to their radiator. The trap killed about three mice within the past few weeks. During an observation on 03/14/24 at 09:54 AM in Resident #206 room, small black mouse droppings were noted on the floor around the black mouse trap at the base of the radiator. During an observation on 03/14/24 at 12:47 PM while in Resident # 93's room, a mat against the radiator was pulled back, and a black box mouse trap with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure residents had a right to a dignified existence in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. Specifically, Resident #133 was observed on multiple occasions, not shaved with a large amount of facial hair, and hair on the head was disheveled. The findings are: Resident # 133 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, and history of traumatic brain injury. The 02/17/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set ( an assessment tool ) documented Resident #133 had severely impaired cognition, required partial assistance with personal hygiene, and had no behavioral symptoms and no rejection of care. The comprehensive care plan titled impaired activities of daily living, dated 1/18/22, documented Resident #133 would remain clean, neat, dressed appropriately for the season and free of body odor. Interventions included Resident #133 would be provided privacy, and dignity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not maintain a homelike environment for 4 of 8 rooms observed on unit 5B. Specifically, for Residents #154, #210, #135 and #131, observations were made of ripped and peeled protective padding in bathrooms, particles of food and other debris on the floor, dirty adult briefs on the floor, and a toilet paper dispenser with fecal remains dried on over a period of 6 days. Findings include: On 3/13/24 at 11:16 AM, Resident #210's bathroom, located on unit 5B, was observed with an adult brief soiled with urine and feces lying on the floor. Feces were observed on the toilet and the toilet paper dispenser. A soiled gown was observed on the floor. A heavy urine odor was noted in the room. The resident's bed headboard was observed with protective padding that was ripped, peeling and damaged. On 3/13/23 at 3:33 PM, Resident #210's bathroom was observed with the soiled adult brief still on the floor. The feces were still on the toilet and the toilet paper dispenser and a soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure 4 of 5 residents (Residents #114, 161, 216 and 258), reviewed for abuse, had the right to be free from abuse. Specifically, Resident #258 was observed on multiple occasions exhibiting physical and verbal aggression towards other residents including Residents #114, #161 and #216, and the facility did not ensure interventions were implemented to prevent abuse. Findings include: The facility policy titled Clinical, Resident Abuse Reporting and Investigation Protocol, Policy and Procedure dated 1/11/20 and last revised on 8/28/23 documented to protect residents' and ensure freedom from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility takes all witnessed and/or suspicion of resident/patient abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of funds and/or exploitation by anyone including facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record review and interviews, during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00306213 and NY00316087) from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and for 2 of 6 reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, (1) Resident #97 had suicide attempts on 11/23/22 and 11/29/22 and the Care Plan was not updated to reflect the second suicide attempt and was not revised with new interventions to prevent reoccurrence; (2) Resident #432 had a Stage IV pressure ulcer on the sacrum and their Care Plan was not revised with new interventions to reflect resident's current wheelchair being used, and (3) Resident #218 had a Stage IV pressure injury to the right elbow, and the Care Plan was not revised to include Resident #218's noncompliance with having pillows placed underneath their right elbow for offloading, and the Care Plan was not reviewed to determine the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 3/13/2024-3/29/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #152) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #152 was observed with untrimmed fingernails and visible scratch marks to scalp. Findings include: Resident # 152 admitted with diagnoses that include hypertension, dementia, and Huntington disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 1/28/24 documented the resident was severely impaired and was dependent with eating, oral care, hygiene, toileting, shower, bath, and personal hygiene. The care plan dated 1/7/22 titled Skin integrity at risk for skin breakdown or pressure ulcer related to right hand contracture as evidence by right hand contracture, Resident #152 frequently scratched scalp. Interventions included to apply white glove as tolerated and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00332770) from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #382), reviewed for change of condition. Specifically, Resident #382 did not receive antibiotic Flagyl / Gentamicin topical treatment dressings as recommended by the wound care consultant physician; the resident was admitted to the hospital with a malodorous (bad smelling) wound and was started on antibiotics for wound cellulitis (infection of the skin). Findings include: The facility policy, 'Surgical Wounds', effective 5/2010 and reviewed 3/22/24 documented that all licensed nurses are responsible for assessing/observing the status of wounds, determining the effectiveness of the current treatment dressing, and to report and document any untoward findings to the health care provider. Resident #382 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24-3/29/24, the facility did not ensure for 2 (Residents #74 and #218) of 7 residents reviewed for positioning and limited mobility, that appropriate treatment and services were provided to improve and/or prevent a further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, Resident #74 was observed on multiple occasions not wearing a resting hand splint to the left hand as ordered and Resident #218 was observed with a right hand contracture and on multiple occasions, no adaptive devices were observed in place to prevent a further decrease in range of motion. The findings include: 1) Resident #74 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular infarction affecting the left dominant side. The 12/11/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required setup with eating, and required extensive assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00306213 and NY00316087) from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided and that the residents environment remained as free of accidents hazards as possible for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #97 and #168) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, (1) Resident #97's supervision was not maintained after an attempted suicide resulting in another attempt 6 days later, and (2) Resident #168 sustained two falls on 5/6/23, the second of which resulted in Resident #168 fracturing their tibia (lower leg) and femur (upper leg). The findings are: The facility policy titled Occurrence Reporting and Investigation Policy and Procedure dated 11/28/2017 documented an occurrence report is initiated so that the facility obtains information relevant to each occurrence and allegation as well as to obtain information for analysis of the cause of the event in order to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the post survey revisit (PSR) from 5/30/24 to 6/3/24, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #500). Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #500 received a 5/22/24 physician ordered fentanyl patch until 5/26/24. Additionally, there was no documented evidence of pain monitoring on 5/30/24 after Resident #500 received physician ordered as needed pain medication for a complaint of 8/10 pain and/or prior to the nurse performing a wound dressing change. Findings include: Resident #500 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain), pressure ulcer of the sacral region Stage 3, and urinary tract infection. The Nursing admission Assessment, dated 5/22/24, completed by Registered Nurse #22, documented occasional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure that special eating equipment and utensils were provided for residents who need them. This was observed during dining observation for 3 of 15 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #135, #229, and #236). Specifically, Resident #135 was observed dropping food when trying to scoop an item from a regular plate. Resident #229 was observed on three occasions eating without the use of an adaptive bowl and cup as indicated in the meal tray ticket and ordered by occupation therapy. Resident #236 was observed on three occasions being fed without the use of the adaptive maroon spoon, as documented on their meal ticket. Findings include: 1. Resident # 135 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, Huntington's Disease, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 2/24/24 documented the resident had modified independence in cognition and the resident required set up or clean up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/13/24 to 3/29/24, the facility did not ensure that an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infection was maintained for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #12, # 70, #93, #210) reviewed for infection control and prevention practices. Specifically, for Resident #12, during a wound care observation, the nurse did not wash their hands and don clean gloves after cleansing a pressure ulcer and before applying treatments The findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Infection Prevention and Control Manual last reviewed March 5, 2024. The facility policy stated they review infection control surveillance reports and statistics to implement corrective actions through monitoring aseptic techniques and procedures utilized within the facility. The facility hand hygiene/hand washing protocol stated the facility considers, hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All staff are expected to perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00319337), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 who had a previous incident on 04/19/2023 of touching Resident #3's upper thigh through clothing had no appropriate care plan review conducted, and no new interventions placed post incident (2) Resident # 2 was witnessed walking up to Resident #1, and using both hands, rubbed and fondled Resident #1's breasts through clothing on 7/02/2023 after chapel. Resident #2 was not adequately supervised. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Resident Abuse Reporting and Investigation Protocol created 01/11/2010, last revised 06/27/2019 documented that the facility leadership will assess the needs of the residents in the facility to be able to identify concerns to prevent potential abuse. The interdisciplinary team will identify the vulnerabilities and interventions on the resident's care plan. The facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 610 Based on record review and interviews conducted on a recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a full investigation was conducted for one of three residents (R #189) reviewed for medication errors. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a full investigation into a medication timing error involving psychotropic and benzodiazepine medications was performed, or that vital information was communicated to the physician. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Errors and dated July 2012 documents it is the policy of the facility that residents are to remain free from medication errors. The Licensed Nurse who identifies the error conducts an immediate evaluation and notifies the Nursing Supervisor. The Nursing Supervisor assesses the resident, initiates the investigation of the medication error and directs notification of appropriate staff (Attending Physician, Director of Nursing and Pharmacist are notified) Poison Control is to be contacted if necessary. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was revised for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident # 252) reviewed for vision and hearing. Specifically, (1) Resident #252 Hearing Impairment Care Plan was not revised to reflect the resident's recent complaint of changes in hearing loss, (2) orders for audiology consultation for hearing aids; and (3) to determine if the interventions remained appropriate. The findings are: Resident # 252 is an [AGE] year-old who was admitted to facility on 12/5/2012. Diagnoses included Major Depression, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Hearing Loss. According to the 9/2/2020 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool), the resident had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had minimal difficulty hearing in some environment. This MDS stated the resident had no hearing aid. A subsequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident receive proper treatment and assistive device to meet the resident's hearing needs. Specifically, 1of 2 residents (Resident #252) reviewed for vision/hearing complained to the facility staff about hearing difficulties and was not provided the audiology consultation or hearing aids ordered by the physician. The findings are: Resident #252 is an [AGE] year-old who was admitted to facility on12/5/2012. Diagnoses included Major Depression, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Hearing Loss. According to the 9/2/2020 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool), the resident had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had minimal difficulty hearing in some environment. This MDS stated the resident had no hearing aid. A subsequent Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] also stated the resident had minimal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review during a recertification survey the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and effective use of the facility's monitoring program to prevent elopement was provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #81). Specifically, Resident #81 entered an elevator on the 3rd floor and was found by staff on the 4th floor. The findings are: The facility occurrence report indicates on 4.6.21 the resident stated she was leaving, her boss said she could go. The resident, who resides on Unit 3A was found in the core elevator at 1:50pm on the 4th floor unit A. Staff on the 4th floor responded to the alarm and found the resident sitting her wheelchair in the elevator. The therapy aide who got on the elevator notified the 3rd floor unit manager that she was taking the resident outside for a few minutes. Upon returning to the unit 3A the Unit Manager assessed the resident and determined she was not harmed. The facility policy regarding Wander Guard dated 8.5.2005 and revised most recently on 1.14.2015 was reviewed and indicated for residents who are determined to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews during a recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that one (Resident # 189 ) of three residents reviewed for medication administration was free from significant medication error. Specifically, the nurse did not administer medications at the physican prescribed time placing the resident at risk for dangerous drug interaction/reactions. The findings are: The facility policy dated May 1, 2009 documented Medications and Treatments shall be administered in a timely manner that is safe, timely, and reduces the incidence of error as much as humanly possible. Medications may be administered one hour before and one hour after the scheduled ordered time. The facility policy titled Medication Errors and dated July 2012 documents it is the policy of the facility that residents are to remain free from medication errors. The Licensed Nurse who identifies the error conducts an immediate evaluation and notifies the Nursing Supervisor. The Nursing Supervisor assesses the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 55.0≈ chain avg
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALBERTO, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2019
BUJNO, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
CAHILL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
CORTES, TARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2019
FAHEY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/22/2010
FELDMANN, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2019
GLEASON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
GRAY, KARENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
JOHNSON, CLARIONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
KASERGRANDE, LESLIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
KELLEHER, RORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/22/2010
LAMORTE, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
O'BRIEN, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/22/2010
PARK, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
ROBERTI, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
ROONEY, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2019
SAPORITO, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
SERBAROLI, FRANKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
SWEENEY, GERALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2019
TOOKER, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
WALSH, GERALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
WHISTON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2024
COVONE, ANNMARIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/02/2024
LARUE, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/02/2024
CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2005
ANTOINE, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
AUGUSTINE, GEMMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/14/2025
TOKARZ, DORICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$35.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 5%Other / private 20%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$431per resident / day
operating cost
$13,117per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$366per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335405. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next