Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 924 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 329 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 378 beds and averages 294.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #427) of 4 residents reviewed for Catheter out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #427's suprapubic catheter drainage bag and tubing were not covered with a privacy bag.The findings include:The facility policy titled Residents Right to Privacy and Dignity that was last reviewed on 01/2025 documented that residents are treated in a dignified manner and their privacy rights are upheld as outlined in the resident bill of rights.The facility's policy titled Close Urinary system that was last reviewed on 02/2025 documented that drainage bag cover should be utilized for privacy.Resident #427 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Neurogenic Bladder, Cystostomy, Quadriplegia and Seizure Disorder. The Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #139 was not showered once a week as scheduled.The findings included:The facility's policy and procedure titled Shower with a reviewed date of 02/2025 documented residents will be given showers in accordance with residents' wishes.Resident #139 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular Accident, Aphasia, and Hypertension.The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #139 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for oral/personal hygiene and showering. The assessment documented it was very important for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters received appropriate care and services to manage the urinary catheter. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 427) of 4 residents out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #427, who had a suprapubic urinary catheter, was observed with the urinary drainage bag and the spigot lying on the floor without a barrier.The findings include:The facility's policy on Suprapubic Catheter that was last reviewed on 01/2025 documented that the drainage bag must not touch the floor and privacy cover must be in place. Resident #427 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Neurogenic Bladder, Cystostomy, Quadriplegia and Seizure Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #427 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of 2 staff members for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received care and services for the provision of parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #270) of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #70's midline intravenous catheter insertion site dressing was undated, and the dressing appeared brownish and was peeling off. The findings include:The facility's policy titled Intravenous Therapy dated 02/2022 that was last reviewed on 03/2025 documented that standard precautions and aseptic technique will be used in the initiation and maintenance of intravenous therapy. The procedure documented, after insertion of intravenous catheter, to secure the catheter with a sterile transparent dressing and to place the label on the dressing indicating nurse's initials and date.Resident #270 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure that food was distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident for 1 (Resident #123) of 2 residents reviewed during the dining task observations out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 who was assisting Resident #123 at lunch time, held a sandwich with bare hands before giving it to the resident.The findings include:The facility policy titled Resident Dining Procedure with Staff with a revision date of 01/2025 documented staff must avoid touching food with bare hands. Food shall be received by the resident in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. During dining observation on 07/01/2025 at 12:51 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 removed the plastic wrap on a chicken sandwich and held the sandwich with bare hands and gave it to Resident #123. On 07/01/2025 at 1:09 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 was interviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation task. Specifically, the facility's waste compactor was not kept closed when not in use, exposing garbage and refuse and had the potential to attract pests.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Solid Waste Disposal with a revised date of 01/2025 documented food waste and rubbish will be disposed of in an approved manner to prevent contamination of food, clean dishes, or clean working areas. Lids must be kept closed on all outside trash receptacles. During observation on 07/08/2025 from 10:09 AM to 10:22 AM, Dietary Worker #1 and Food Service Director were observed removing garbage from the kitchen to the compactor located outside of the building. The compactor lid was observed to be open and uncovered.Dietary Worker #1 was immediately interviewed and stated they do not know why the compactor was left opened, but it should have been closed after whomever disposed garbage in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00369908/728066), the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from the misappropriation of resident property and/or exploitation. This was evident for one out of nine residents (Resident #9) reviewed for personal property. Specifically, on 01/23/2025 at 7:10 AM, when counting narcotics (pain relieving) medications, Registered Nurse #1 reported a blister pack containing thirty Oxycodone 2.5 mg tablets that belonged to Resident #9 was missing from the medication cart drawer. During the facility-wide search, the empty medication blister pack had been torn into pieces in the shredder, and 30 Oxycodone tablets were missing. Additionally, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 was seen on the facility surveillance counted the narcotics medications alone and then removed the medications from the medication cart drawer. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure entitled Abuse Prohibition Protocol, dated 01/2025, documented that residents must not be subject to abuse, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00374579), the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 out of 9 residents sampled (Resident #8). Specifically, on 03/09/2025 at approximately 5:22 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 noted a small area of purpura (discoloration) on Resident #8's left knee and informed Registered Nurse #1. Registered Nurse #1 did not do a physical assessment, did not document in the medical record, and failed to inform the Medical Doctor, which resulted in a delay in diagnosis and treatment. On 03/10/2025, Resident #8 was transferred to the hospital due to a swollen left knee with discoloration and was diagnosed with a closed fracture of the Left femur (the thigh bone) and required surgery. Findings are:The facility's Policy and Procedures titled Notification of Resident's Change in Condition, dated 04/2020, documented that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00344007), the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident to prevent an accident. This was evident in one out of four residents (Resident #1) sampled for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 was left unattended in the shower room by Certified Nursing Assistant #1 on 06/01/2024. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Certified Nursing Assistant #2 observed Resident #1 sitting on the wet floor in the shower room with the shower chair titled behind Resident #1 on 06/01/2024 at 9:30am. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] and returned to the facility the same day with their left arm in a sling. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure of Resident Accident or Incident Reporting dated 02/14/2024 documented that an accident is defined as a second-degree burn, laceration requiring sutures, fracture, or event requiring hospitalization that has occurred in the facility or outside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/21/23 through 3/28/23, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination by supporting resident choice. Specifically, residents' bathing preferences were not honored. This was evident for 2 of the 2 residents reviewed for Choices out of 38 sampled residents. (Resident #5, and #22). The findings are: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Quadriplegia, and Trigeminal Neuralgia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 as cognitively intact and dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The MDS documented that no rejection of care occurred. The Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented that it is very important for Resident #5 to choose between a tub bath, shower, or sponge bath. On 03/21/23 at 11:12 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #5. Resident #5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY