Glendale Place Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 110.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of grievance forms, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) log, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 113 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the facility grievance form for Resident #15 dated 01/16/26 revealed the resident reported to a nurse he was missing $250.00 and last saw it on 01/11/26. There were no actions or resolutions noted on the form.Review of the facility SRIs dated 01/11/26 to 05/19/26 revealed the facility did not report the allegation of misappropriation.Interview on 05/19/26 at 2:45 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 stated she completed the grievance form for Resident #15 and turned it in to the social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of grievance forms, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) log, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 113 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the facility grievance form for Resident #15 dated 01/16/26 revealed the resident reported to a nurse he was missing $250.00 and last saw it on 01/11/26. There were no actions or resolutions noted on the form.Review of the facility SRIs dated 01/11/26 to 05/19/26 revealed the facility did not report the allegation of misappropriation.Interview on 05/19/26 at 2:45 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 stated she completed the grievance form for Resident #15 and turned it in to the social worker.Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate pain management. This affected one (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for pain management. The census was 113 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission of 12/19/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and delusional disorder, and a discharge date of 02/14/26. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #12 revealed an order dated 12/19/22 for Tylenol 325 milligrams (mg) two tablets every four hours as needed for pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 01/13/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of care plan for Resident #12 revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in comfort related to functional limitations with an intervention to administer pain medications as ordered. Review of the Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during the meal service. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff followed sanitary practices regarding resident refrigerators. These different practices had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the dietary department. Findings included: 1. An undated facility policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling, indicated, Employees should wash their hands prior to putting gloves on and after removing gloves. The policy also indicated, Tongs or other serving utensils will be used to serve bread or other items to avoid bare hand contact with food.During an observation on 08/06/2025 at 4:26 PM, Dietary Aide (DA) #11 touched his facemask with his left hand, which was gloved. Without changing his glove or washing his hands, he then touched a roll of bread with the same gloved hand.During an observation on 08/06/2025 at 4:45 PM, the Assistant Dietary Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to allow residents to withdraw greater than $25.00 at a time from their personal funds accounts for 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #87) of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 55 residents with personal funds accounts managed by the facility. Findings included: An undated Resident Handbook revealed the section titled, Resident Funds Policy Statement, specified, Residents/Authorized representative have access to these funds Monday-Friday from 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Advanced arrangements may be made by the Accounting Department for funds over the weekend through the Gift Shop or Nursing Supervisor with a maximum of $25.00 dollars available for withdrawal per day. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #12 on 02/01/2024. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/05/2025, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to choose a medication administration schedule consistent with resident preferences for 1 (Resident #97) of 2 residents sampled for choices. Findings included:During an interview on 08/07/2025 at 11:21 AM, the facility's Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) stated the facility did not have a policy related to resident choices and/or resident preferences. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 08/19/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/19/2025, revealed Resident #97 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #97's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 07/01/2025, contained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently provide routine baths to 1 (Resident #112) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care, reviewed 01/2024, indicated, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Nursing staff will assist residents with receiving care and services for residents with ADL needs which may include (but not limited to): basic-self-care tasks such as bathing, dressing, eating, toileting and mobility, oral care based on individual needs.An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #112 on 05/09/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the left non-dominant side, acquired absence of right foot, adult failure to thrive, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were followed for 2 (Resident #12 and Resident # 16) of 5 residents reviewed for medication management. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration, reviewed 03/2021, revealed, F. Follow the 5 [five] rights of medication administration when administering medications: (1) Right Drug; (2) Right Patient; (3) Right Dose; (4) Right Route; and (5) Right Time. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #12 on 02/01/2024. According to the admission Record, Resident #12 had a medical history that included a diagnosis of muscle spasms. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/05/2025, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #12's 08/2025 Order Recap [Recapitulation] Report contained an order, dated 07/29/2025, for methocarbamol (a muscle relaxer) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times daily for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored securely in a resident room for 1 (Resident #97) of 1 resident sampled for self-administration of medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Meds [Medications], last reviewed by the facility 03/2021, revealed, Residents may be permitted to self-administer medications when, in the judgement of the care team, it is appropriate and safe to do so. The decision to allow self-administration must be based on an interdisciplinary assessment and documented agreement that the resident has the capacity to manage their medications responsibly. The policy also revealed, Residents may be considered for self-administration of medications following an interdisciplinary review of relevant factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the resident's physical and cognitive abilities, understanding of their medications, and ability to store medications safely.A facility policy titled Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record reflected the experiences of the resident for 1 (Resident #16) of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #16's Medication Administration Records (MARs) had several missing entries in May and June 2025. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 02/05/2020, indicated, K. After administration, return to cart and document administration in the (MAR or TAR [Treatment Administration Record]). L. If the resident refuses medication, document refusal on the (MAR or TAR).An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #16 on 09/13/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, multiple sclerosis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/14/2025, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARING PLACE HEALTHCARE GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $900K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH