Lodge Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on observations, closed medical record review, review of the facility investigation and witness statements, staff interviews, review of the police incident report, review of the hospital report, review of the local weather report, and review of the facility policy addressing elopement, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from eloping from the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and subsequent serious harm and/or injuries when one resident (Resident #115) eloped from the facility without staff knowledge, was missing approximately one hour and thirty minutes and was found approximately 0.3 miles from the facility by a police officer and was taken to the hospital and admitted with a right hip fracture and hypothermia. This affected one (#115) of three residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The facility identified 35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner to prevent spoliage and protect against a foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except for the three residents (#6, #13 and #15) with diet orders of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 117.Observation on 04/06/2026 at 9:05 A.M. revealed a red plastic bucket with a liquid inside being stored in the food preparation sink. Interview with Dietary Director (DD) # 446 revealed that the red bucket contained sanitizer and that it should not be stored in the food preparation sink. Observation on 04/06/2026 at 9:05 A.M. revealed two cracked eggs were stored in a small pastic bowl on ice in the kitchen. Further observation revealed that the ice was almost completely melted. Observation on 04/06/2026 9:07 A.M. revealed DD #446 taking a temperature of the eggs. DD #446 verified that the ice had melted and the eggs were at 46 degrees F. DD #446 verified that the eggs should be stored below 41 degrees F. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity. This affected two (#8 and #11) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 114. 1.Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of base of tongue, general anxiety disorder, and delusional disorders. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/06/2026 at approxiamately 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #11 was standing in her door way and visibly agitated. Resident #11 was being argumentative with staff while they were attempting to assist her. Interview on 04/09/2026 at the same time as the observation, Registered Nurse (RN) #418 made a comment to the surveyor stating that with the way Resident #11 is acting it appears the cancer has spread to her brain. 2.Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff received adequate activities of daily living (ADL) care. This affected three (#29, #65, and #115) of four residents reviewed ADL's. The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 02/26/26. Diagnoses included right femur fracture, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, and history of breast cancer. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required setup/cleanup assistance with eating, substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and was dependent for toileting and bathing. Observation on 04/06/26 at 3:00 P.M. revealed Resident #29 lying in bed. Resident #29 had several chin hairs, varying in length from 1 to 1.5 inches. Interview on 04/06/26 at 3:04 P.M., Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive psychiatric services in a timely manner. This affected one (#11) of one resident reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 117. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of base of tongue, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and delusional disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 has moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process. Interventions include keeping family and care giver informed of Resident #11's capabilities and needs. Monitor, document and report to the physpician any changes is Resident #11's cognitive function. Observation 04/06/2026 at 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #11 standing in the doorway of her room. Resident #11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:24Number of residents cited:2 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were appropriately locked while nurses administered medications. The facility identified one (Resident #31) resident residing on the Central Unit who was cognitively impaired with mobility. Additionally the facility failed to ensure eye drops were stored according to manufacturer's recommendations. This affected one (Resident #17) of one residents receiving eye drops from the Shelter-Even medication cart. The facility census was 114. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified cerebral infarction, unspecified vascular dementia with mood disturbance, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, and malignant neoplasm of the colon with colostomy status. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's fall and failed to implement new fall interventions to prevent future falls. This affected one (#42) out of three Residents reviewed. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and hypotension. Review of the fall care plan for Resident #42 dated 02/10/24, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to dementia, impaired safety awareness, resistance to care at times, fear of falling, and fluctuations of assistance with transfers and toileting assistance. The fall care plan revealed no new interventions to prevent additional falls after the resident's fall on 08/29/24. Review of the facility's incident log from 07/01/24 through 09/24/24 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were accurately reconciled. This affected two (Residents #64 and #404) of 19 residents with narcotics medications stored on the Shelter Hall and East Hall odd-side medication carts. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, severe vascular dementia with anxiety, type II diabetes mellitus, and other chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/07/24 revealed Resident #64 had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the physician orders dated 01/04/2024 revealed an order for Morphine sulfate 20 milligrams (mg) per (/) milliliter (ml) solution give 0.25 ml (five mg) under tongue every four hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath. Review of the Controlled Drug Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure record of meal intakes were consistently documented. This affected four (Residents #1, #3, #36, and #92) of five residents reviewed for meal consumption. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/05/23 with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and nutritional deficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 02/04/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the care plan for Resident #1 dated 12/13/23 revealed the resident had nutritional problems and was at risk for malnutrition related to inadequate meal intake. Interventions included to monitor intake and record every meal. Review of the meal intake records for Resident #1 from 02/27/24 through 03/26/24 revealed there were no intakes documented for the following dates: 02/28/24, 02/29/24, 03/08/24, 03/09/24, and 03/10/24. There were only two meal intake…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-04-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the main laundry room dryers were free of lint build up. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Facility census was 86. Findings included: During observation of the laundry room on 04/22/21 at 2:33 P.M. with Maintenance Director # 78 revealed dryer #01 (far right) had a large build-up of lint in the front of the dryer where the lint trap was located. Observation revealed a large build-up of lint on top of the lint screen mechanisms, bottom of the drum and lint twisted around to the electric wires. Further observation revealed Dryer #03 (far left) had a hole in the dryer lint screen, a build-up of lint within the lint trap device and large build-up of lint within the vents leading out of the dryer. During interview with Maintenance Director #78 on 04/22/21 at 243 P.M. verified the lint build up in the dryers (#01 and #03) . Maintenance Director #78 stated he was responsible for the back of the dryers and Laundry staff was responsible for the front of the dryers where the lint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy to residents while in their rooms regarding the use of a video monitoring device and the facility failed to ensure private medical information was secured and kept confidential. This affected four (#3, #72, #74 and #233) out of four residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #72's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; major depressive disorder, respiratory disorders in diseases classified elsewhere, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, overactive bladder, heart failure, other chronic pain and hypertensive retinopathy. Review of Resident #72's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident to be cognitively intact and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,924 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,924 — penalty dated 2023-12-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARING PLACE HEALTHCARE GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $960K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH