Indianspring Of Oakley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 134.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of staff witness statements, review of hospital records, review of facility Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) fall follow-up notes, staff interview, review of online clinical resources per Medline Plus Medical Encyclopedia, and review of the facility policy, the facility staff failed to safely and properly position a resident in bed during incontinence care. Actual Harm occurred on 05/30/25 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #521 rolled Resident #108 who was in a raised bed away from the aide and onto the floor, resulting in a right nondisplaced intertrochanteric hip fracture which required a hospital admission and subsequent surgical repair of the right hip fracture on 06/02/25. This affected one (Resident #108) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 123 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #108 revealed an admission date of 01/09/25 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, left below the knee amputation (BKA), diabetes mellitus, and intellectual disabilities. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor a resident's skin which resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #20 who was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers and developed a stage three pressure ulcer (a full thickness skin break into the subcutaneous tissue which did not go into muscle or bone) to the right ischium which was not identified until it had reached an advanced stage. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/29/20 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery, and hypertension. Review of the care plan for Resident #20 dated 02/12/24 revealed the resident had potential for skin impairment related to impaired mobility, fragile skin, and incontinence. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food was maintained at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This had the potential to affect 121 of 123 residents of the facility, excluding two facility-identified residents who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 123 residents. Findings include: Observation of the facility kitchen on 06/23/2025 at 9:28 A.M. revealed the inside of the walk-in refrigerator was warm. The thermometer on the outside of the door read 60 degrees F. There was no thermometer was located inside the refrigerator. Interview on 06/23/25 at 9:28 A.M. with Executive Chef (EC) #601 confirmed that the temperature of the walk-in refrigerator located was 60 degrees F, and all refrigerated foods should be maintained at or below 41 degrees F. Observation on 06/25/2025 at 11:59 A.M. of the refrigerator in the first-floor dining room kitchenette revealed the digital thermostat on the unit was 65 degrees F. The temperature fluctuated during the lunch meal from 57 degrees F to 67 degrees F.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans in the main kitchen were covered with lids. This had the potential to affect 121 of 123 residents of the facility, excluding two facility-identified residents who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 123 residents. Findings include: Observation on 06/23/25 at 9:28 A.M. revealed there were three garbage cans in use in the main kitchen which did not have lids. Interview on 06/23/25 at 9:29 A.M. Executive Chef (EC) #601 confirmed the three garbage cans in use in the main kitchen did not have lids and the lids would need to be ordered. Observation on 06/25/25 at 9:48 A.M. revealed the three garbage cans in use in the main kitchen did not have lids. Interview on 06/25/25 at 9:49 A.M. with EC #601 confirmed the three garbage cans in use in the main kitchen still did not have lids, but they were being procured. Interview on 06/26/25 at 1:00 P.M. with the Administrator on 06/26/2026 confirmed the facility did not have a policy regarding garbage can covers for the kitchen.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, interview with home health staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate information was communicated to resident family and home health provider upon discharge. This affected one (Resident #271) of three residents reviewed for discharge rights. The facility census was 123 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #271 revealed an admission date of 01/28/25 with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition, malignant neoplasm of breast, acute kidney injury, dehydration, adult failure to thrive, iron deficiency anemia and intellectual disabilities. Resident #271 discharged from the facility back to her group home on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #271 dated 01/31/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was frequently incontinent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder, was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview with staff and emergency services provider (EMT), review of resident medical records, hospital records, emergency services (EMS) reports, and manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure Resident #109 was safely assisted with personal care to prevent a fall with injury and failed to thoroughly investigate the fall. This affected one (Resident #109) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Resident #109 was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 12/29/24 for diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease, and seizures. Review of Resident #109's care plan initiated 03/17/24 for an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit due to impaired mobility and balance revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure staff prime an insulin pen prior to administration. This affected one (#11) out of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/31/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), chronic pulmonary edema, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the care plan dated 08/31/24 revealed Resident #11 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included administering diabetes medication as ordered. Review of the physician order dated 08/31/24, revealed Resident #11 was ordered Humalog (quick acting insulin) Kwik Pen 100 unit per milliliter (ml) solution pen-injector, inject subcutaneously with meals for DM II per a sliding scale. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and secure manner. This affected one (#4) of four residents observed for medications. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 04/03/24 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed the resident was ordered the cholesterol medication atorvastatin 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime, the supplement cyanocobalamin 1000 micrograms (mcg) by mouth daily, the blood pressure medication amlodipine besylate 10 mg by mouth daily, and the combination blood pressure medication hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril 12.5 mg-20 mg by mouth daily on 04/03/24. On 04/16/24, Resident #4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions for a resident with significant weight loss in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/29/20 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20 dated 02/27/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance for eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the care plan for Resident #20 dated 02/27/24 revealed the resident had a nutritional problem and was at risk for malnutrition related to unintentional weight changes, altered diets, and dysphagia. Interventions included the following: administer medications as ordered staff to monitor weight and make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to prevent potential contamination and spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all eight residents (#2, #3, #33, #37, #50, #53, #60, and #82) who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/23 at 11:18 A.M. revealed [NAME] #159 use her gloved hand to take four chicken breasts from a baking sheet, and placed them in a food processor, located directly next to the baking sheet, containing approximately ten additional chicken breasts. [NAME] #159 then reached on top of the steamer, located directly behind her, and obtained and donned a rubber oven mitt. [NAME] #159 pureed the chicken in the food processor, then removed the oven mitt, setting it on the counter. The arm of the oven mitt was observed sitting directly on top of two chicken breasts still remaining on the baking sheet. Interview on 07/12/23 at 11:20 A.M. with [NAME] #159 verified the arm of the oven mitt was resting directly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain Resident #62's room in a clean manner. This affected one (Resident #62) of six residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Record review for Resident #62 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/23, revealed Resident #62 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note, dated 07/10/23, revealed Resident #62 had emesis two times on this day (07/10/23). Interview on 07/11/23 at 9:33 A.M. with Resident #62 revealed she was lying in bed watching television. Resident #62 stated she had vomited two times the previous evening on 07/10/23. Resident #62 stated she vomited in her sink and was concerned because she did not think staff had cleaned her sink out. Observation on 07/11/23 at 9:45 A.M. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders from a wound clinic were implemented and followed for a resident with multiple diabetic wounds. This affected one (#70) of one resident reviewed for diabetic ulcers. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed Resident #70 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included morbid obesity due to excess calories, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, gangrene, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #70 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #70 had venous/stasis ulcer to his bilateral feet/heels and right ankle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-16 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARESPRING — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $832K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH