Shawneespring Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 123.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital medical records, interview with staff, Medical Director (MD) #90 and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #9, policy review and review of information from the National Library of Medicine, the facility failed to monitor a resident's bowel movements and implement their bowel monitoring policy when the resident did not have a bowel movement for five consecutive days. This resulted in a fecal impaction with a perforated bowel requiring hospitalization. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #10, with a history of constipation, was placed at risk for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when the facility failed to monitor the resident's bowel status by implementing their bowel monitoring policy when the resident did not have a bowel movement for five consecutive days. Resident #10 began experiencing abdominal pain and labored breathing and was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #10 was treated for a bowel impaction with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in a manner that prevents the potential spread of food-borne illness to the residents. This had the potential to affect 128 residents who received meals in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/02/26 at 9:00 A.M. in the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #380 revealed a total of three crates of milk sitting directly on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator. DM #380 confirmed this observation and stated their milk delivery was received the day prior (03/01/26).Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage dated 01/2019 revealed all foods stored in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer will be stored at least six inches above the floor on shelves, racks, dollies, or other surfaces that facilitate thorough cleaning.Observation and interview on 03/04/26 at 10:35 A.M. revealed [NAME] #265 was preparing pureed food and had facial hair measuring approximately one-half inch in length, and was not covering his mustache with a facial hair restraint. Regional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain a resident's consent prior to searching the resident's personal belongings. This affected one (Resident #66) of four residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 128. Findings include: Record review of Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 11/15/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation and tobacco use.Observation on 03/02/26 at 11:27 A.M. revealed Maintenance Director #311 entering into Resident #66's room. Unit Manager (UM) #350 and Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) #382 were standing near Resident #66's bedside stand inside the bedroom. Maintenance Director #311 then unlocked the drawer on the night stand and UM #350 removed an object from Resident #66's drawer. Resident #66 was not observed to be in the room or vicinity of the room when the resident's locked drawer was unlocked and property removed.Interview on 03/02/26 at 11:27 A.M. with UM #350 confirmed they removed a vape pen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of witness statements, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI's), staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state survey agency. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admissions date of 10/28/25 with diagnoses including psychosis, hallucinations, Parkinson's disease, and neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies. Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Administrator's written witness statement dated 10/31/25 revealed Administrator spoke with Resident #14 regarding a sexual abuse allegation. Resident #14 stated that someone had grabbed his penis. Further review revealed that Administrator had talked to Resident #14's son, determining that the resident was having hallucinations and decided not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of witness statements, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI's), staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admissions date of 10/28/25 with diagnoses including psychosis, hallucinations, Parkinson's disease, and neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies. Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Administrator's written witness statement dated 10/31/25 revealed Administrator spoke with Resident #14 regarding a sexual abuse allegation. Resident #14 stated that someone had grabbed his penis. Further review revealed that Administrator had talked to Resident #14's son, determining that the resident was having hallucinations and decided not to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #104) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104 dated 09/25/23 revealed the resident was not able to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because she was rarely/never understood, required extensive assistance of two staff with toileting, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan for Resident #104 dated 11/27/23 revealed the resident had bladder incontinence related to Alzheimer's disease, confusion, impaired mobility, and side effects of medications. Interventions included the following: use disposable briefs, staff to clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and review of faciliyt policy, the facility failed to ensure food items were maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected all residents except Resident #75 and Resident #251 that were no food by mouth. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 01/23/23 at 8:12 A.M., revealed there to be food debris on the edge of the fryer and in the oil of the fryer that were brown in color. Observation of the reach in refrigerator in the kitchen, revealed there to be an open and undated bag of provolone cheese, an open and undated plastic tub of vegetable base, an open and undated plastic tub of beef base on the first shelf, a half-full plastic cup of iced coffee with a straw in it that was not labeled, dated or covered, two full plastic cups of ice coffees that were not labeled, dated or covered, an opened and updated bottle of soda on the second shelf and a opened package of diced bacon that was not labeled or dated and a plastic container kitchen of boiled eggs that were not labeled or dated. Continued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were cleaned after usage. This affected 19 residents (#54, #15, #31, #55, #47, #10, #57, #37, #11, #20, #46, #83, #73, #74, #45, #86, #61, #25, and #13) who received medications from the 2400 hall medication cart. The facility also failed to ensure staff's personal belongings were not stored in the medication carts. This affected 17 residents (#70, #62, #252, #39, #75, #27, #22, #30, #81, #68, #77, #26, #5, #3, #201, #82, and #88) who received medications from the 1200 hall medication cart. Facility Census was 106. Findings Included: Review of record for Resident #86 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but not limited to, diabetes, urinary tract infection, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, acute kidney failure, chronic systolic heart failure, and dementia. Review of quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policy and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to monitor and ensure residents were up to date on pneumonia vaccinations and facility failed to ensure their pneumonia policy was updated annually. This affected four of five residents (#4, #69, #84, and #87) reviewed for immunizations. Facility census was 106. Findings include: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 02/16/21 with congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the immunizations for Resident #69, revealed resident received the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPSV23) on 04/27/00 and was due for another pneumonia vaccination at time of admission to the facility. Medical records revealed no declination/consent form being present in resident's hard chart. Review of Influenza-flu and Pneumococcal-Pneumonia vaccination…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's anticoagulant medications were accurately coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected one resident (#81) out of 22 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of the Resident #81's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, spinal stenosis, history of other venous thrombosis and embolism unspecified lump in unspecified breast, disorder of kidney and ureter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, personal history of Coronavirus (COVID-19), weakness, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #81's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #81 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #81 required supervision with eating. Further review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident's hearing loss and the facility failed to implement a resident's falls care plan. This affected two residents (#26 and #81) out of the 22 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 106. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #81's chart revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, spinal stenosis, history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, unspecified lump in unspecified breast, disorder of kidney and ureter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, insomnia, disorder of bone density and structure, tobacco use, repeated falls, personal history of Coronavirus (COVID-19), weakness, restless leg syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $28,190 — penalty dated 2026-01-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARESPRING — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $837K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH