Sanctuary At Wilmington Place
264 Wilmington Avenue, Dayton, OH 45420 · Non profit - Corporation · 63 certified beds · (937) 256-4663 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 41.5–61.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.2–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.2–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 54.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident, and Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #19 interviews and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately assessment and implement a physician ordered treatment for a residents newly identified skin breakdown on the residents toes on the left foot. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #22's newly identified open areas on the resident's left toes were not assessed, and a physician ordered treatment was not implemented subsequently resulting in worsening of the area and hospitalization. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. Facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/21/23 and was recently readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include prostate cancer, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, depression, anxiety, contact and expected exposure to other hazardous substances (agent orange), lower extremity venous insufficiency with recurrent ulceration, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-11-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide adequate pain control for a resident after her admission to the facility. This resulted in actual harm when nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #110 received an as needed (PRN) pain medication when she rated her pain a 10 out of 10 (a scale indicating zero for no pain and ten being the worse pain ever) and when interviewed described it as excruciating pain resulting in crying. This affected one (#110) of six residents reviewed for pain during the annual survey. The facility identified 24 residents on a pain management program. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Record review for Resident #110 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness and age-related osteoporosis. Review of the plan of care, dated 11/18/19, revealed the resident was at risk for acute and chronic pain related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with eating for a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #22) of four residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, overactive bladder, and spinal stenosis.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had moderately impaired cognition and required supervision for meals. Review of the care plan dated 04/30/25 revealed Resident #22 required assistance with meals as needed. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 had physician orders dated 05/28/25 for pureed texture, thin/regular consistency, for upright during meals, and total supervision during meals as resident needs assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party/power of attorney (POA) of health changes. This affected one (#30) of the three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 04/12/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anxiety, hypertension (HTN ), and glaucoma. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #30's son was listed as the POA. Review of a progress note dated 09/23/24 for Resident #30, revealed the resident had a change in condition due to the resident's oxygen saturation being low at 82 percent (%) and was wheezing. The physician was called and ordered for the resident to receive oxygen, a breathing treatment and a chest X-ray. There was no documented evidence of the resident's POA being notified. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed. This affected one (#41) of the two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 01/06/23. Diagnoses included Dementia and Schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #41 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of eight. Review of the medical record for Resident #41, revealed a PASARR was completed on 01/06/23, indicating Resident #41 had no indications of serious mental illness such as Schizophrenia, mood disorders, delusional disorders, panic or other severe anxiety disorders, somatic symptom disorders, personality disorders, or other psychotic disorders. Further review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely develop and implement fall interventions to help reduce and/or eliminate falls. This affected one (#210) of the three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #210 revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 and a discharge date of 02/16/25. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, altered mental status, Type Two diabetes mellitus (DM II) with hyperglycemia, depression, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, visual hallucinations, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic atrial fibrillation, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Review of the admission Assessment initiated on 02/11/25 and completed on 02/16/25, revealed Resident #210 was at risk for falls. The interventions marked were to follow the facility's fall protocol and anticipate the resident's needs. Review of the admission Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed as ordered. This affected one (#05) of the two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 02/01/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a history of pulmonary embolism. Review of a physician order for Resident #05 dated 10/27/22, revealed the resident was ordered to have oxygen applied continuously at two liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula at bedtime. An additional physician order dated 08/17/23, revealed for staff to change the oxygen tubing weekly on Sundays. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #05 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Observation of Resident #05's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by the nurse who prepared the medications. This affected one (#15) of the seven residents investigated for medication administration. This had the potential to affect all twelve Residents (#08, #11, #15, #20, #21, #22, #25, #28, #31, #32, #38, and #47) on 200-hall. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident was dependent on staff for medications. Observation of medication administration on 05/27/25 from 5:06 P.M. through 5:09 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #53, revealed LPN #53 pulled and prepared medications from the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and interview with contracted pharmacy staff, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations agreed upon by the facility's physician. This affected one (#15) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses of dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of a New admission Review by the contracted pharmacy dated 04/25/25, revealed a recommendation by the pharmacist for the ordered Lidocaine Patch (topical pain medications applied in a patch) as needed (PRN) every twelve hours to be changed to one Lidocaine patch daily. Additional recommendations included discontinuing Oxybutynin (for overactive bladder) and change Xarelto (anticoagulant) to Eliquis (anticoagulant). The physician reviewed the recommendations (undated) and ordered the Lidocaine Patch to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders. This affected one (#15) of the seven residents investigated for medication administration. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: a) On 05/15/25 at 11:00 A.M., Rivaroxaban 20 mg for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) was not administered due to being out of stock. b) On 05/23/25 at 10:19 A.M., Rivaroxaban 20 mg was not administered due to being out of stock and the pharmacy was notified. c) On 05/24/25 at 8:55 A.M., Rivaroxaban 20 mg was not administered due to medication being unavailable and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly. This affected one (#30) of the 12 residents who resided on the 400-hall and received medications. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included open angle glaucoma, hypertension, Parkinson's Disease, and chronic kidney disease Review of the May 2025 active physician orders for Resident #30, revealed the resident was ordered Rhopressa Ophthalmic solution (for open angle glaucoma) 0.02 percent (%) one drop instilled in both eyes daily. Observation of the 400-hall medication cart on 05/29/25 at 08:01 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #39, revealed an open container of Rhopressa 0.02 % Ophthalmic Solution for Resident #30 with no open date. Interview with LPN #39 at the same time, verified the container of Rhopressa was opened and undated. Interview with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Review of the undated facility form titled Legionella Environmental Assessment Form with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #58, revealed the facility's WMP included monthly chlorine testing and visual inspections for biofilm. The Legionella Assessment form did not include a description or diagram of the facility's water system. Interview on 06/02/25 at 2:29 P.M. with MS #58, verified there was no description or diagram of the facility's water system. MS #59 stated he had no documentation related to biofilm inspections or chlorine testing because they had not been completed. Review of the facility's undated Water Management Program revealed the facility would establish a WMP for reducing risk of pathogens in the facility's water systems. The policy indicated a variety of control measures may be used, such as visual inspections and disinfectant level control. The policy also stated testing protocols and control limits would be established, and individuals responsible for testing or conducting visual inspections would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed ensure medications were available to administer as ordered. This affected one (#13) of three residents received for medication administration. The census was 54. Findings Included: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, diabetes mellitus type II, atrial fibrillation, and bipolar disorder. Review of a hospital discharge document dated 12/15/24 revealed Resident #13 had a medication order for the decongestant guaifenesin 600 mg one tablet every 12 hours. Review of a physician order dated 12/17/24 revealed Resident #13 was ordered guaifenesin extended release 600 mg one tablet twice daily for cough for seven days. Review of a nursing progress note dated 12/17/24 by Registered Nurse (RN) #219 revealed Resident #13's guaifenesin 600 mg extended release tablet twice a day for seven days for cough was on order. Review of Resident #13's December 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, resident and staff interview, review of a photograph of a medication package, review of a contingent medication inventory list, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered to prevent significant medication errors. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 54. Findings Included: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, diabetes mellitus type II, atrial fibrillation, and bipolar disorder. Review of a hospital discharge document dated 12/15/24 revealed Resident #13 had medication orders for the diuretic furosemide 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth once a day and the steroid Medrol dose package (pack) four (4) mg with instructions to follow the dose pack. Review of physician orders dated 12/16/24 revealed Resident #13 was ordered Medrol 4 mg two (2) tablets in the morning scheduled for 9:00 A.M., 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate size brief was provided to the residents who require and prefer a specific size brief. This affected two (#8 and #16) of two residents reviewed for briefs. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 03/20/17. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack, coronary artery disease, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Resident #7 was dependent on staff for toileting and was incontinent for bowel and bladder. Interview with Resident #7 on 11/21/24 at 3:21 P.M. revealed the nursing aides do not provide her with a brief that fits. She has asked many times for a three x-large (XML) brief and the facility doesn't have them. Observation of Resident #7 on 11/21/24 at 3:30 P.M. with Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #169…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a change of condition was reported to the physician. This affected one (#64) of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 08/06/24. Diagnoses included aftercare for a displaced supracondylar fracture with intercondylar extension of lower end of right femur, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, and cerebrovascular accident. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact. Review of the Physical Therapy (PT) notes dated 08/12/24, 08/16/24, 08/20/24, 08/21/24, and 08/22/24 revealed Resident #64 was bleeding from her surgical incision site to her right lower extremity. These notes were absent for notifying the physician of the bleeding. Review of the Occupational Therapy (OT) notes dated 08/12/24, 08/22/24, and 08/30/24 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided appropriately and thoroughly. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 03/20/17. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack, coronary artery disease, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Resident #7 was dependent on staff for toileting and was incontinent for bowel and bladder. Interview with Resident #7 on 11/21/24 at 3:21 P.M. revealed the aides do not clean her very good when they provide her with incontinence care. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #7 on 11/24/24 at 6:40 A.M. with Certified Nursing Aide (CAN) #186 and CNA #188 revealed CNA #186 took a end of the bath towel and wet it and placed soap in the cloth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered the COVID-19 vaccine when requested. This affected one (#7) of three residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 03/20/17. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack, coronary artery disease, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. Review of the vaccine consent form dated 11/05/24 revealed Resident #7 had read the above information concerning risks for vaccines and had an opportunity to ask questions. The form was checked mark the resident requested to have two COVID-19 vaccines administered. Review of the progress notes and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 11/05/24 through 11/25/24 revealed no evidence the COVID-19 vaccines were administered to Resident #7.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with arranging transportation to physician appointments. This affected one (#52) of three residents reviewed for appointments. The censes was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission dated of 12/27/23. Diagnoses listed include type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic viral hepatitis, hypertension, and osteoarthritis of the hip. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 12/28/23 for schedule an appointment with ortho (orthopedic physician). An order dated 01/19/24 was for schedule a follow-up with cardiologist (heart physician). Review of progress notes and transportation information revealed Resident #52 had yet to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation involving misappropriation of resident's medications to the Ohio Department of Health as required. This affected one (#18) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #18 revealed admission date of 09/13/23. Diagnoses include wedge compression fracture, hypertension and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had impaired cognition. He required partial assistance for eating and substantial assistance for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone (narcotic for pain) five milligram (mg) capsule every six hours as needed for pain with a start date of 09/13/23. Further review of the controlled substance record sign out sheet from 09/27/23 through 10/16/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely incontinence care. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #22 revealed admission date of 05/21/23. Diagnoses include prostate cancer, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, depression, anxiety, contact and expected exposure to other hazardous substances (agent orange), non-pressure chronic ulcer of right lower leg and left lower leg. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicating impaired cognition. He required set up for eating, maximum assistance for toileting, lying to sitting and dependent for transfers. Review of Resident #22's care plan for alteration in elimination was last revised on 07/26/23 with an intervention to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing schedule and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) services were used for at least eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedule, dated 12/10/22, revealed no Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the facility on 12/10/22. Interview with Corporate Registered Nurse (CRN) #81 on 12/20/22 at 10:03 A.M. verified the facility did not have an RN present in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 12/10/22. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00138026.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to complete nurse aide performance reviews at least every 12 months for two State Tested Nurse Aides. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #02's personnel file revealed STNA #02 was hired at the facility on 10/01/19. Further review of STNA #02's personnel file revealed STNA #02 did not have any performance reviews completed from 10/01/21 to 12/21/22. Review of STNA #14's personnel file revealed STNA #14 was hired at the facility on 05/24/16. Further review of STNA #14's personnel file revealed STNA #14 did not have any performance reviews completed from 05/24/21 to 12/21/22. Interview on 12/21/22 at 10:50 A.M. with Human Resources (HR) #32 verified STNA #02 and STNA #14 did not have performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. Review of the facility's undated Evaluation policy revealed the facility will complete formal written work performance evaluations of employees annually.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hair nets were worn appropriately, proper hand hygiene was followed, and food items were maintained in a sanitary manner in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 12/18/22 at 8:33 A.M. revealed a gallon zip lock bag of raw chicken which was open to air and dated 12/22/22 sitting on a pan in the walk in refrigerator. The observation further revealed an open undated bag of shredded cheese, an open undated package of American singles, an open undated and unlabeled bag of white substance, and an open undated package of bologna sitting on the shelf in the walk in refrigerator. Further observation of the kitchen revealed an opened undated box of hamburger patties which was open to air and an opened and undated box of tilapia filets in the walk in freezer. Interview with [NAME] #09 on 12/18/22 at 8:33 A.M. verified there was a gallon zip lock bag of raw chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner to prevent the falsification of documentation. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents who resided at the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the Administrator's personnel file revealed the Administrator was hired at the facility on 08/22/22. Further review of the Administrator's personnel file revealed the Administrator had a physical date of 08/20/22 that had all original ink except for the signature of Nurse Practitioner #83 which was a copied signature and appeared to be a part of the original form. Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #22's personnel file revealed STNA #22 was hired at the facility on 06/01/22. Further review of STNA #22's personnel file revealed STNA #22 had a physical date of 06/02/22 that had all original ink except for the signature of Nurse Practitioner #83 which was a copied signature and appeared to be a part of the original form. Review of STNA #67's personnel file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from unspecified intracranial artery, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #15's significant change MDS assessment, dated 10/05/22, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #15's code status care plan, dated 10/31/22, revealed Resident #15 was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). Interventions included code status orders reviewed as needed, offer religious services per advanced care planning preferences, and review advanced care planning wishes upon admission, quarterly and as needed. Review of Resident #15's code status in the paper chart on 12/18/22, revealed Resident #15 was a DNRCC. Further review of the code status form revealed Resident #15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of menu spreadsheets, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals according to the menu spreadsheet. This affected all 52 residents residing in the facility who received a regular or mechanical soft diet. The facility identified six residents (#3, #14, #16, #19, #20, and #104) who did not receive a regular or mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the undated menu spreadsheet revealed regular diets and mechanical soft diets were to receive four ounces (oz) of ham and cheese strata, a slice of toast, and six oz of cold cereal or oatmeal. Observation of tray line on 12/19/22 at 7:52 A.M. revealed [NAME] #09 was serving regular diets and mechanical soft diets three oz of ham and cheese strata, a slice of toast, and six oz of cold cereal or oatmeal. Interview with Dietary Manager #05 and [NAME] #09 on 12/19/22 at 8:13 A.M. verified the residents on regular diets and mechanical soft diets were served three oz of ham and cheese strata instead of the four oz of ham and cheese…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from unspecified intracranial artery, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #15's significant change MDS assessment, dated 10/05/22, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #15's code status care plan, dated 10/31/22, revealed Resident #15 was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). Interventions included code status orders reviewed as needed, offer religious services per advanced care planning preferences, and review advanced care planning wishes upon admission, quarterly and as needed. Review of Resident #15's code status in the paper chart on 12/18/22, revealed Resident #15 was a DNRCC. Further review of the code status form revealed Resident #15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) when required. This affected two (#33 and #46) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, contracture of muscle of the left lower leg, and contracture of muscle right lower leg. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/09/22, revealed Resident #33 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #33's payer source documentation revealed Resident #33 was on Medicare Part A with a last covered day of 11/09/22. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident representatives with bed hold notices upon transfer to the hospital. This affected two (#15 and #43) out of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed Resident #15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from unspecified intracranial artery, hypertension, displaced fracture of shaft of right clavicle, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #15's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/05/22, revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #15's progress note, dated 09/26/22, revealed Resident #15 was sitting in the front lobby at 10:15 A.M. and was unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician order. This affected one (#26) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 58. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 09/30/20. Resident #26's medical diagnoses included respiratory failure, heart failure, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #26's physician orders, dated 11/27/22, revealed an order for Midodrine HCl (medication used to treat orthostatic hypotension) oral tablet, give 10 milligram (mg) by mouth every eight hours related to hypotension. Hold if systolic (the first number in a blood pressure reading) blood pressure was above 110. Review of Resident #26's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 12/01/22 through 12/21/22 revealed for the 6:00 A.M. dose of Midodrine, Resident #26's blood pressure (BP) on 12/07/22 was 125/75, on 12/08/22 was 119/70, on 12/12/22 was 121/80, on 12/14/22 was 128/45, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a monthly medication reviews were completed monthly by a licensed pharmacist. This affected two (#26 and #39) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 58. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 09/30/20. Medical diagnoses included respiratory failure, heart failure, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/21/22, revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26's required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and supervision for eating. Review of the monthly pharmacy reviews since 01/01/22 revealed there was no evidence of a monthly pharmacy review having been completed by a licensed pharmacist since June 2022. Interview with the Minimum Data Set Licensed Practical Nurse (MDSLPN) #82 on 12/21/22 at 1:20 P.M. confirmed Resident #26 did not have a monthly pharmacy review since June 2022. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dental issues received routine dental care. This affected one (#43) out of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, diverticulosis of large intestine without perforation or abscess without bleeding, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, unspecified osteoarthritis, cervicalgia, rectal abscess, other specified abdominal hernia with obstruction, peptic ulcer, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/11/22, revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact. Resident #43 had a broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture that was chipped, cracked, uncleanable, or loose. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, food was stored off the floor, and food was dated and labeled. This affected 59 of 60 residents who receive food from the kitchen (Residents #11 received nothing by mouth). Findings include: Observations of the kitchen on 11/24/19 from 8:15 A.M. through 8:47 A.M. revealed there was a black, hairy, removable substance on the wall above the sink area. There was also a black, hairy, removable substance inside the ice machine. The refrigerator had a package of uncooked meat that was not dated. Observation of the dry storage area revealed the following items were stored on the floor: one case of peanut butter snack crackers on floor, one case of saltine crackers, one case of dry noodles, one case of individual mustards, one case individual pudding in cups and one case of canned tomato juice. Observation of the facility freezer revealed the following items were stored on the freezer floor: two cases of turkeys, packed four to a case, one case of frozen vegetables, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, review of Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (CDC) guidelines and policy review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection control practices were followed for the residents. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for infections. The facility additionally failed to provide monitoring of their water management plan to assist in the prevention of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis of upper and multiple myeloma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors. Review of the physician orders, dated 11/22/19, revealed the resident had the following orders for caladryl lotion 1-8% apply to rash on the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to store medications, inhalation medications and nutritional supplements according to their expiration dates. This had the potential to affect six residents (#11, #15, #26, #31, #44 and #110) who were identified as having used inhalation medications and seven residents (#20, #27, #33, #38, #43, #45 and #111) as having used nutritional supplements by the facility. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 11:42 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #701 revealed a medication storage room on the 300 and 400 hall. Inside the medication storage room, there were 20 containers of Boost Plus Creamy Strawberry nutritional supplements dated [DATE] and four containers of Med Pass 2.0 Butter Pecan Flavor Nectar Consistency Nutritional Supplement dated [DATE]. Further observation with LPN #701 revealed inside the refrigerator of the 300 and 400 hall medication storage room, there was one box of 10 each 25 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have an accurate advance directive status for one (#40) of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool during the annual survey. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 06/20/19. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, osteomyelitis of vertebra lumbar region, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage one through four chronic kidney disease, Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, acute kidney failure and Charcot's joint. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/19, revealed the resident's cognition was slightly impaired. Review of the resident's electronic physician orders, dated 06/20/19, revealed an order for the advanced directive status of full code. Review of the resident's hard chart revealed a signed Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) form dated 04/18/19. Interview on 11/25/19 at 11:24 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 701…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents on their Minimum Data Set assessments. This affected two (#11 and #48) of 20 resident records reviewed. The total facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician orders, dated 10/17/19, revealed Resident #48 had a new order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25 milligrams (mg.) by mouth daily at 2:00 P.M. for dementia with psychosis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/09/19, revealed the resident was not coded to have the recently new diagnosis of dementia with psychosis. During an interview with Registered Nurse #703 on 11/26/19 at 11:09 A.M., it was verified the resident did not have dementia with psychosis coded on the MDS assessment dated [DATE] when the resident had the diagnosis added as indication for use with the antipsychotic medication Seroquel on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-12-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #67's personnel file revealed STNA #67 was hired at the facility on 11/28/22. Further review of STNA #67's personnel file revealed STNA #67 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) #25's personnel file revealed RN #25 was hired at the facility on 10/11/22. Further review of RN #25's personnel file revealed RN #25 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of the Administrator's personnel file revealed the Administrator was hired at the facility on 08/22/22. Further review of the Administrator's personnel file revealed the Administrator did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Interview on 12/21/22 at 10:50 A.M. with Human Resources #32 verified STNA #67, RN #25, and the Administrator did not have reference checks completed upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-12-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was posted every day. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation of the daily nurse staffing information on the receptionist desk on 12/20/22 at 11:27 A.M. revealed the posted daily nurse staffing data was from 12/18/22. Interview with Administrative Assistant #34 on 12/20/22 at 11:27 A.M. verified the daily nurse staffing data that was posted on 12/20/22 was from 12/18/22.
- No harm found · Ccited before2019-11-26 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed for state tested nurse aides (STNA). This affected two of two personnel records reviewed for annual performance reviews. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Review of the personnel record for STNA #702 revealed a hire date of 06/04/18. The personnel record for STNA #702 lacked any evidence that an annual performance review was completed. 2. Review of the personnel record for STNA #704 revealed a hire date of 08/10/18. The personnel record for STNA #704 lacked any evidence that an annual performance review was completed. Interview with Staff Scheduler #600 on 11/26/19 at 2:45 P.M. verified there was no evidence of annual performance reviews completed for STNA #702 and STNA #704.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAEMMERLE, J MICHAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| HAEMMERLE, JEFFREY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| LEHMAN, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| HAEMMERLE, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/20/1996 |
| HAEMMERLE, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/29/1995 |
| MCDONOUGH, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| LEHMAN, SUZANNE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| AHF MANAGEMENT CORP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2025 |
| AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION , INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
| HUNTER, RACHEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| RAMSEY, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/11/2025 |
| SALSER, ANNETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $333K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365789. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.