Samaritan Care Center And Villa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 38.9 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to label food items to prevent potential food borne illnesses. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents at the facility. Findings include:Observation and interview on 02/11/26 at 9:34 A.M. with Dietary Manager #346 revealed the following items in the fridge that were not labeled or dated: two containers of mushrooms, a plastic container of cooked vegetable mix, peaches, potato soup, a pitcher of tea, a pitcher of lemonade, a plastic package of cheese slices, a plastic container of cooked steak for Philly cheese steak, plastic container of chicken salad, a plastic container of Jell-O, a container of muffins, a bag of shredded cheese and plastic container of chili. This observation was confirmed with Dietary Manager #346 who revealed she did not work last night and staff from last night did not label or date the food.Review of facility policy Date Marking for Food Safety dated 2025 revealed the following: The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained at appropriate temperatures. This affected Resident #1 and had the potential to affect all 6 residents on 100 Hall. Findings include:Interview 02/11/26 at 10:18 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed the water in his bathroom sink is cold.Interview and observation on 02/11/26 at 10:44 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #326 of water temperatures in resident rooms. Resident #1 in room [ROOM NUMBER] water temperature was 101 degrees Fahrenheit (F) after running for 3 minutes. room [ROOM NUMBER] that was not occupied had a water temperature of 102 F. Interview on 02/11/26 at 2:00 P.M. with Resident #1 revealed the water in her room had not been hot since she was admitted in September 2025. Resident #1 said she had told staff previously about the cold water. Review of Tap Water Temperature Checks from July 2025 through January 2026 revealed in August 2025 the water temperature was 101 F in room [ROOM NUMBER].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistance safely to prevent falls during care. This affected two residents (Resident #9 and #39) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 07/14/25 with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, muscle weakness, dementia, cardiac murmur, hyperlipidemia and venous insufficiency. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was dependent for bed mobility, transfers and mobility. The brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 02 indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the quarterly Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was a high risk for falls with a score of 16.Review of the Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents with food that met their preference. This affected two residents (Resident #1 and #22) of three reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 38.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/11/25 with diagnosis that include post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, history of traumatic brain injury, convulsions, anemia, essential hypertension, vitamin D deficiency and insomnia. Review of Resident #1 food preferences and allergy dietary sheet revealed resident dislikes any type of tomato products, apricots, pears, pineapple, raisins, hotdogs, liver, fish, tuna, egg, salad, rice, spaghetti, goulash, pancakes, rye bread, lemon bars, salami, lima beans and stewed tomato. Observation and interview on 02/11/26 at 11:35 A.M. through 12:12 P.M. of lunch tray line revealed Resident #1 was plated rice. Review of Resident #1 tray card on tray revealed resident disliked rice. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the food stored in a designated refrigerator for resident use and resident personal room refrigerators were labeled, dated and expired items were disposed of timely. This affected three (Residents #8, #11, and #18) of five residents reviewed for personal resident refrigerators. The facility indicated 17 residents had personal refrigerators in their rooms. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents at the facility using facility refrigeration for personal food items. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Observation on 06/17/25 at 11:05 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #249 of the nutrition refrigerator for resident use located on the 300 hall revealed the following concerns: - A four ounce (oz) nutritional shake with a use by of 06/05/25. - An undated, unlabeled foil wrapped breadstick and red sauce that appeared to be hard and stale. - An unlabeled, undated 16-ounce bottle with unidentified liquid with separated particles. - A one-cup container of a facility prepared side salad…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's responsible party was notified of a change of condition. This affected one resident (#27) of one residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of Resident #27 medical record revealed admission date of 02/27/25 with diagnosis of diabetes type II with foot ulcer, protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, abnormal posture, benign prostatic hyperplasia, essential hypertension, fatigue, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, major depressive disorder, history of traumatic brain injury, heart failure, history of pulmonary embolism, hypoglycemia, hyperlipidemia, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and acquired absence of left leg above knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of court records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date 09/07/23 with diagnoses bipolar, acute respiratory failure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and type II diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 MDS comprehensive assessment, dated 05/23/25, revealed Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care for Resident #30 dated 02/25/25 revealed a plan for alteration in mood and behavior related to bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression and unspecified mood disorder. Resident #30 shows little interest or pleasure in doing things and frequent crying. There was no evidence of a plan of care that addressed the resident's history of PTSD. Observation on 06/16/25 at 11:34 A.M. Resident #30 was in her room lying in bed grunting and yelling out. Interview on 06/18/25 at 11:28 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #249 revealed Resident #30 yells out, cries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention protocols were maintained for Resident #27, who required enhanced barrier precautions. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes type 2 with foot ulcer, protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, essential hypertension, fatigue, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, major depressive disorder, history of traumatic brain injury, heart failure, history of pulmonary embolism, hypoglycemia, hyperlipidemia, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and acquired absence of left leg above knee. Review of Resident #27's physician order for enhanced barrier precautions dated 6/14/25 revealed a gown and gloves were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility policy review, and review of manufacturer prescribing information, revealed the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were appropriately prescribed with a correct indication, dose, and duration. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed an order for Macrobid 100 milligrams (mg) every ten days to be administered at 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order dated 11/27/24 for Macrobid 100 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth two times a day, every ten days, for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis (prevention). Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based observation, review of pest control service inspection report, review of a maintenance request form, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program. This affected seven residents (Residents #23, #15, #11, #14, #35, #2 and #4) and had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. The census was 35. Findings include: Observation on 05/05/25 at 9:05 A.M. revealed Resident #23 was lying in bed, watching television with his half-eaten breakfast meal tray on the overbed table next to him. There were several tiny flying insects swarming around his face and meal. There were approximately 20 tiny flying insects on the wall, in the sink, on the toilet and the door of his bathroom. Interview, during the observation, with Resident #23 revealed his room had a gnat problem for a couple of weeks and the facility had sprayed his room and bathroom and poured a chemical down his drain to eradicate the gnats. Interview on 05/05/25 at 9:19 A.M. with Housekeeper #1 revealed the facility had a gnat problem for a week and he believed the gnats…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $198K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH