No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchards Of East Liverpool, The

709 Armstrong Lane, East Liverpool, OH 43920 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (330) 382-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 382-0101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
16844 Saint Clair Ave · (330) 385-2413 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2249 Lisbon St · (330) 386-5521 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1216 Avondale St · (330) 385-2738 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Co Hwy 428 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.1%CMS range 57.7–74.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 9.7–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.2–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
37.2%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 43.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-17)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure routine skin assessments were completed for Resident #28 to timely identify the deterioration of a pressure ulcer. Actual Harm occurred on 09/23/22 after the facility failed to complete routine assessments (from 09/02/22 to 09/23/22) and evaluation of treatments for skin impairment resulting in Resident #28's sustaining a deterioration in skin integrity and subsequent Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage or premature death of subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to, but not through, underlying connective tissue. The ulcer presents clinically as a deep crater with or without undermining of adjacent tissue) pressure ulcer to the right buttocks. This affected one resident (#28) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers with the exclusion of Stage I pressure ulcers (non-blanchable redness with unopened skin). Findings include: Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of insulin inserts, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to label and store medication in a manner that enabled staff to know when the medication should be discarded. This affected four (Residents #12, #36, #41, and #60) of five residents who had insulin stored on the [NAME] wing medication cart. The facility census was 45.Findings include:During observations of the medication cart for rooms 21-31 in the long-term care building with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #270 on 12/15/25 at 11:45 A.M., the following medication storage concerns were identified:1. Resident #60 had an open Basaglar insulin (insulin glargine) pen. The pen was not dated with the date it was opened. Review of the Basaglar insulin insert revealed instructions not to use the pen more than 28 days after the pen was first used.2. Resident #41 had an open Lantus Solostar (insulin glargine) pen with no information regarding when it was opened.Review of the Lantus Solostar insert revealed instructions to throw the pen away after 28 days.3. Resident #12 had an open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure chemical sanitation was completed on kitchen dishes in the rehabilitation unit. This had the potential to affect all ten (Residents #9, #19, #20, #23, #32, #40, #42, #44, #45, and #57) residing on the rehabilitation unit. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Initial tour of the kitchen on [DATE] from 9:13 A.M. to 9:20 A.M. with Dietary Manager #310 revealed the kitchen contained a low temperature dish washer that utilized chlorine for chemical sanitation. Observation on [DATE] at 9:13 A.M. of the chemical sanitation of a dishwasher cycle revealed the test strips did not register the chlorine dilution level 50 to 100 parts per million (PPM) as required. A total of three dishwasher cycles were ran all of which failed to register any chemical dilution level.A review of the Hydrion Chlorine test strips revealed they expired [DATE]. Dietary Manager #310 verified available test strips were all expired. Interview on [DATE] at 9:40 A.M. with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments of skin impairment were documented for one (Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure-related skin impairment. 16 residents were screened for non-pressure skin impairment. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis (also known as flesh-eating disease; is a bacterial infection that affects the tissue under your skin called fascia), Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection (type of infection that many antibiotics don't work on), osteomyelitis (serious bone infection), displaced trimalleolar fracture (fracture of the lower leg sections that form the ankle joint and help move the foot and ankle) of the right lower extremity, fracture of the shaft of the right tibia (shin bone), peripheral vascular disease, and local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from pharmacy reviews were addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #40) of five residents reviewed for medication use and one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 45. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. On 09/09/25 an order was written for protonix (pantoprazole sodium - a proton pump inhibitor that decreases the amount of acid produced in the stomach) 40 milligrams (mg) twice a day. A medication regimen review dated 10/01/25 addressed the use of pantoprazole since 09/09/25. A request was made for the physician to consider changing the frequency of administration to as necessary or changing to another class of acid reducing medication related to increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while administering medication intravenously (IV) and failed to maintain infection control practices while changing an IV access dressing. This affected one (Resident #42) of four residents observed for medication administration and one (Resident #42) of one resident observed for dressing change. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening illness that develops when an existing infection triggers an extreme immune system response in the body) and osteomyelitis (infection in a bone). Physician orders included changing the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dressing every Monday (ordered 09/06/25) and Vancomycin Hydrochloride (antibiotic) 1.5 grams IV every day (ordered 09/10/25). During observation of medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #244 to Resident #42 on 09/29/25 between 8:45 A.M. and 8:47 A.M., LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, anemia, heart failure, major depressive disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder. The resident was cognitively intact. Review of complaint information received by the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) on 08/29/24 revealed on 08/27/24 at 10:27 P.M., Resident #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #40 that she checked her wallet and $60.00 was missing; the resident stated that she had $100.00 and now only $20.00. Concierge #54 confirmed she had not recently given the resident any monies from her fund. Resident #1's guardian visited on 08/27/24 and did not report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #33, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living care was provided adequate grooming and personal hygiene. This affected one resident (#33) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, severe intellectual disabilities and unspecified mood disorder. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/21/22 revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment and required extensive one person assistance for personal hygiene. On 11/21/22 at 3:35 P.M. Resident #33 was observed sitting in the dining room with multiple other residents. The resident's hair appeared dirty and she had a large amount of small facial hair on her chin area. The resident was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure a fall investigation was completed after a resident reported a fall and failed to update the comprehensive care plan for Resident #37. The facility also failed to ensure adequate assistance using a mechanical (Hoyer) lift was provided to Resident #33 during a transfer to prevent a possible fall/injury. This affected two residents (#37 and #33) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 10/14/22 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, wedge compression fracture of T11 and T12, and multiple fractures of ribs on the right side. Review of fall risk observation tool completed on admission [DATE] and on 11/14/22 revealed Resident #37 was assessed to be at high risk for falls. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 10/20/22 revealed Resident #37 had mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 had a medical necessity for a urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility identified two residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed diagnoses included acute nephritic syndrome (a syndrome comprising signs of nephritis, which is kidney disease involving inflammation), infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis and type two diabetes mellitus. An admission assessment, dated 10/22/22 indicated Resident #41 had a urinary catheter (reason for use was not indicated) and was scheduled for dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. An incision on the right knee was intact with 17 steri strips present. admission orders included use of an indwelling catheter, monitoring output, and providing catheter care twice a day. A care plan initiated 10/22/22 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's oxygen tubing and humidification bottle were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and changed weekly as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an initial admission date of 09/11/22 a readmission date of 09/27/22 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial flutter and anxiety disorder. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 09/11/22 to change oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle weekly every Sunday. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/03/22 revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition. The assessment revealed Resident #4 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing, was independent with set up help only for eating and required staff supervision with one-person physical assistance for personal hygiene. The assessment also noted Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 received medication/treatment only while necessary by failing to discontinue an antibiotic medication cream after an area to the resident's back was healed. This affected one resident (#11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/25/21 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dysphagia and scoliosis. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 05/18/22 for Silvadene cream 1% silver (antibiotic cream) to affected areas topically every shift for purpura with drainage. Review of the Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record from 05/18/22 to 11/22/22 revealed Resident #11 received this cream twice daily. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/22 revealed Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment with memory problems. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive two-person physical assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medication (Xanax) ordered for Resident #33 was not ordered longer than 14 days, had a specific duration for use and stop date. The facility also failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use of the anti-psychotic medication (Seroquel) for Resident #26. This affected two residents (#26 and #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, severe intellectual disabilities and unspecified mood disorder. Review of Resident #33's physician's orders revealed an order, dated [DATE] for the anti-anxiety medication, Xanax 0.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth every twelve hours as needed for behaviors. Record review revealed the medication was discontinued on [DATE] Review of Resident #33's physician progress note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #32's Levemir long-acting insulin was discarded once expired. This affected one resident (#32) of one resident identified during the medication storage review who had insulin stored in the medication storage cart on the East Wing. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type one diabetes, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #32's physician's orders revealed an order, dated [DATE] and discontinued [DATE] for Levemir (long acting insulin) inject 20 units subcutaneously at bedtime related to diabetes. Review of Resident #32's physician's orders revealed an order, dated [DATE] to inject Levemir 18 units subcutaneously at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication was stored, labeled and disposed to meet professional standards. This had to the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. The facility's census was 45. Findings Include: Observation on [DATE] from 2:28 P.M. to 2:52 P.M. of the facility medication storage rooms, medication cart and refrigerator revealed, an open stock bottle of Calcium with vitamin D with an expiration date of 09/2019 in the medication room, an open bottle of eye drops being stored with an open bottle of ear drops, open nasal sprays being stored in the same bin as open eye drops in the top drawer of the medication cart, and an open undated vial of tuberculin that was dispensed on [DATE] in the medication refrigerator. Interview on [DATE] at 2:52 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #400 confirmed the facility failed to remove the expired bottle of calcium, failed to store eye, ear, and nasal medication separately, and failed to label a vial of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-11-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of survey findings and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure corrective plans were initiated and/or comprehensively evaluated in regard to identified concerns. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents. Findings include: During the survey, deficient practices were identified regarding inconsistencies in code status records, pressure ulcer assessments and care, falls, and use of psychotropic medications. On 11/14/19 at 5:40 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #120 stated a concern was identified in a sister facility regarding advance directives not matching so an audit was completed at this facility and no issues were identified. RN #120 stated the facility had identified concerns with pressure ulcers in October 2019. The facility instituted weekly visits by a wound care nurse. Nurses were educated on how to complete and accurately document skin assessments. Continuing education regarding pressure ulcers was planned for nurses upon hire and annually. On 10/01/19, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee identified concerns with falls and addressed the concerns.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of infection control monthly tracking sheets and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy and completeness of the logs and failed to monitor infections on an ongoing basis in order to identify patterns or trends in a timely manner. The facility also failed to implement appropriate infection control practices during cleaning of glucometers and during provision of incontinence care. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents and affected Residents #14, #19, and #242. Findings include: 1. On 11/13/19 at 11:27 A.M., infection control logs were reviewed with Registered Nurse (RN) #120. RN #120 stated the October 2019 surveillance logs had not been completed as she did not usually start the logs until the beginning of the following month. RN #120 verified the September 2019 log indicated Resident #19 had a urine sample 09/19/19 which tested positive for extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL), escherichia coli, and proteus mirabilis. The log indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement the bowel protocol for Resident's #3, #8, #18 and #27 and failed to comprehensively assess a non-pressure skin area for Resident's #32 and #8. This affected four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and two of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin areas. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included constipation and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/13/19 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) with one or two staff including toileting. Review of the bowel movement (BM) report revealed the resident had a BM in the morning of 09/20/19. Further review revealed the resident did not have another BM until the afternoon of 09/24/19. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for September 2019…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility building was maintained. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Observation on 11/14/19 at 9:05 A.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #143 revealed the following: - the facility's shower room had eight two inch x two inch holes in the wall and one large hole, several feet long and six inches wide, from where a bath tub was removed in 2014; - the shower room mortar board, located on the wall to the right of the toilet, was separated from the wall from the floor up approximately 12 inches; - the heater in the bathroom had paint peeling away and visible rust; - Resident #32's room, the wall to the right side of the door had a moderate amount of paint missing with varies gouges approximately three feet in length; - Resident #14's light above her bed had not been in working order for some time according to the resident and since observation on 11/12/19, the light would not turn on; - Resident #28's room revealed rust above the door frame…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Advanced Directive was clearly and accurately represented on a resident's medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/06/19 with diagnoses that included, chronic atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of physician's orders revealed a 02/04/19 order for a code status Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care (DNR-CC). Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNR-CCA). An Advanced Directive that was signed by the physician on 01/03/19. Observation on 11/12/19 at 5:39 P.M. of Resident #28's room revealed a red sticker outside of her door, on her name plate. There were no markings on the red sticker. Review of the facility policy, Code Status Determination, dated 08/2019 stated, to assist with quick identification for timely interventions, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified with a change in condition for Resident #8's bruising and Resident #39's development of a pressure ulcer. This affected two of 12 residents (Residents #8 and #39) reviewed for notification of change. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on on 10/10/19 with diagnoses which included fractured hip status post repair, multiple pressure ulcers and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known. Review of the nurse practitioner wound care assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an Stage II pressure ulcer to the left inner thigh, an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel and an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx. Further review of the 10/29/19 nurse practitioner wound care assessment revealed the above areas were healed and after 10/04/19 the heel was to be left open to air. There were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the abuse policy when Resident #8, who was cognitively impaired, was found to have injuries of unknown origin (IUO). This affected one of one residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #8). Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/12/19 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) with one to two staff. The resident was mobile in a wheelchair but was not able to stand independently. The resident was not receiving anticoagulants but had been on aspirin at 81 milligrams (mg) daily since 08/24/17. Review of the state's computerized tracking of facility self reported incidents (SRI) related to allegations of abuse revealed the last submission from the facility was on 09/17/18. Review of the nursing note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin (IUO) obtained by Resident #8, who was cognitively impaired, to the state agency as required. This affected one of one residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/12/19 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) with one to two staff. The resident was mobile in a wheelchair but was not able to stand independently. The resident was not receiving anticoagulants but had been on aspirin at 81 milligrams (mg) daily since 08/24/17. Review of the state's computerized tracking of facility self reported incidents (SRI) related to allegations of abuse revealed the last submission from the facility was on 09/17/18. Review of the nursing note dated 07/14/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #8's injuries of unknown origin (IUO) were thoroughly investigated. This affected one of one residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/12/19 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) with one to two staff. The resident was mobile in a wheelchair but was not able to stand independently. The resident was not receiving anticoagulants but had been on aspirin at 81 milligrams (mg) daily since 08/24/17. Review of the state's computerized tracking of facility self reported incidents (SRI) related to allegations of abuse revealed the last submission from the facility was on 09/17/18. Review of the nursing note dated 07/14/19 revealed the resident was found to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail and oral care were provided to a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #191) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Review of Resident #191's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured left femur, severe protein calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, end stage renal disease with dialysis, and anemia. A comprehensive assessment was not due. Review of a 11/11/19 at 10:37 P.M. nurse note revealed the resident was having difficulty sucking from straw as well as difficulty swallowing, coughing on thin liquids and very weak. Observation 11/12/19 at 3:05 P.M. revealed the resident was in bed on his back, his nailbeds were dark with debris bilaterally. The resident's lips were dry and cracked. Resident #191's tongue was dry. His head was leaning against the side rail of the bed. He was unshaven. There was a water pitcher with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #39's multiple pressure areas were comprehensively assessed with ongoing tracking to ensure interventions were in place to prevent re-occurrence of the pressure area specifically the left heel. This affected two of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents #39 and #191). Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on on 10/10/19 with diagnoses which included fractured hip status post repair, multiple pressure ulcers and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known. Review of the nursing data collection tool dated 10/11/19 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility without any pressure areas. Review of the nursing note dated 10/11/19 revealed the resident was sent to the hospital, was admitted for dehydration and urinary tract infection and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #91 was properly assessed and had proper interventions in place when the resident was determined to be at risk for falls. After the resident sustained falls the facility failed to implement further interventions in an attempt to prevent the resident from further falls and injuries. This affected one of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of falls and malnutrition. Review of the current fall care plan, initiated 11/05/19 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to weakness and otitis media. The goal was to decrease the risk for falls. Interventions included to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, encourage the resident to use her call light for assistance, ensure the resident was wearing the appropriate footwear and have physical therapy evaluate and treat as needed. There had been no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive nutritional plan was in place including accurate weights, monitoring/offering supplements and ensuring the resident's meal consumption was optimal for Resident #39, who sustained severe weight loss and developed multiple pressure ulcers. This affected one of three residents revealed for nutrition. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fractured hip status post repair, dehydration and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known. Review of the resident's weight on 10/11/19 was 242 pounds which was not determined to be an error until 10/16/19. Review of the 10/11/19 nutritional data collection tool form revealed there was no evidence the resident was interviewed but the liquid nutritional supplement, Ensure, was to be started (there was no documented evidence the Ensure was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a record of fluid intakes for a resident receiving dialysis who had orders for fluid restriction. This affected one (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified three residents as receiving dialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 09/26/19. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, cardiomegaly, heart failure, and chronic pulmonary edema. A physician's order was written 10/04/19 indicating a 1000 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction according to the power of attorney (POA). Notify dialysis if resident intake was greater than 1000 ml in 24 hours. A five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #36 was severely cognitively impaired. A nursing note dated 10/17/19 at 12:10 P.M. indicated a state tested nursing assistant (STNA) reported she observed the speech therapist provide Resident #36 with several cups of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia, dementia with behaviors and brief psychotic disorder which was diagnoses on 02/04/18. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/13/19 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident had no concerns with mood or behaviors and the resident needed extensive assistance of one to two staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the nursing note dated 05/03/19 revealed the resident was exit seeking. There was no evidence of non-pharmalogical interventions. Review of the nursing note dated 05/04/19 revealed the resident was rocking back and forth in her chair and was spitting out half chewed food. Review of the 05/06/19 psychiatric nurse practitioner (PNP) note revealed the resident was on Buspar, an anti-anxiety (AA) medication at five milligrams (mg) twice a day, Remeron, an anti-depressant (AD) medication at 15 mg at night and Dispersal, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate resident medical record. This affected two of 17 records reviewed (Residents #32 and #191). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #191's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured left femur, severe protein calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, end stage renal disease with dialysis, and anemia. Review of the admission Data Collection Tool included a Sacral pressure ulcer 0.75 cm x 0.75 cm x 0.2 cm and a left buttock pressure ulcer 2.0 cm x 2.0 cm x 0.1 cm both listed Stage 1. The pressure ulcers were inaccurately Staged I when they had a depth, indicating the skin was broken. The Weekly Skin Integrity Review for 10/29/19 stated Sacral wound, 0.75 cm x 0.75 cm depth none and a left buttock 2.0 cm x 2.0 cm depth none with no other description. A 11/05/19 at 1:41 P.M. nurses note included the State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) reports that resident now has an opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were maintained in good condition. This affected two (Resident's #21 and #36) out of 16 residents in the initial pool. The facility's census was 45. Findings include: Observation on 11/12/19 at 9:30 A.M. revealed Resident #21's armrest on his wheelchair had a large rip. Observation on 11/14/19 at 9:05 A.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #143 of the facility revealed the following; The arm rest of Resident # 21 wheelchair had a six-inch tear exposing the foam and various cracked plastic on the front half of the arm rest. Resident #36's wheelchair cushion was ripped; the inside of the cushion was visible and approximately one third of the surface material was off the cushion. Interview on 11/14/19 at the time of the observations with MA #143 confirmed that the arm rest on Resident #21 wheelchair had a six-inch chair exposing the foam, and Resident #36 wheelchair cushion was ripped with the inside of the cushion exposed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-11-14 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA) meeting attendance records, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum required QA committee members met quarterly. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents. Findings include: Review of QA meeting attendance records revealed no physician attendance during quarterly meetings held 10/23/18 and 10/09/19. On 11/13/19 at 12:29 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #120 verified the medical director did not attend quarterly meetings on 10/23/18 or 10/09/19 and there was nobody designated to attend in his place. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and policy (not dated) revealed the QAPI committee included the medical director and the committee was to meet, at a minimum, on a quarterly basis.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 1 home this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FOX, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/26/2022
FOX, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 09/02/2014
ORCHARDS FAMILY MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/26/2022
BARNETT, GERALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FOXCREST, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/02/2014
THE ORCHARD'S REAL ESTATE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2014
HARSHAW, DEREKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$264K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 21%Other / private 59%

This home reported $264K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,789per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$351per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366309. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next