No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stone Pear Pavilion

125 Fox Lane, Chester, WV 26034 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (304) 387-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 387-0101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2022
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1100 Pennsylvania Ave · (330) 385-7394 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
559 Carolina Ave · (304) 387-1741 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18 W Carolina Ave · (304) 387-0146 · Call to confirm hours
Park
616 Pyramus Road · (330) 303-0037 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.7%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%27.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%13.4%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.7%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.5%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.251.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.031.841.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.1%CMS range 28.4–54.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.6–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.9–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
38.0%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-04)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ kitchen staff with the appropriate credentials. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all of the residents receiving meals in the facility. Facility Census: 56.Findings include:03/04/2026 2:49 PM Dietary employee #28, #56 and #78 did not have their food handler card after 30 days of employment, as per [NAME] Virginia code 16-2-16. Employee #100 gave this surveyor a copy of the job description for the three employees in the kitchen that did not have their food handler cards during the beginning of the survey process. The job description states the following: assists in preparation of meal services and servingassist cook in setting up and covering dessertspour and cover beveragesattend and stir foods during the cooking process to prevent burningrelieve the cook of duties such as preparing fruits and vegetables and making toast and beveragescomplete annual state mandated training requirementsobtain food safety certificationhave skills specific to preparing meals for geriatric residents are requiredthe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all food was temped before leaving the kitchen, to ensure safe food temperatures to prevent foodborne illness and an appetizing temperature of the food. The facility failed to ensure hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold. This failed practice had the potential to affect all of the residents. Facility census: 56 Findings include: a)The facility is not following state or federal guidelines, or their own policy for taking and recording food temperatures on all food items prepared in the dietary department, before serving the residents these items. Their policy states: No food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures. They do not know if the temperatures meet the food code standards, because they were not taking all of them per the guidelines. 03/02/2026 at 11:40 AM This surveyor asked to see the the food temperature logs. There were none documented for the Month of March 2026. The Director of Dining filled them in. The food temperature logs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the proper sanitation practices for the kitchen and the food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect all of the residents. Facility census: 56.Findings include: a) 03/02/2026 11:35 AM Initial walkthrough of the kitchen The Director of Dining (DOD) accompanied the surveyor during and acknowledged the following findings to be accurate. The facility did not follow the FDA Food Code or their own policies for the following: The three fan guard covers in the walk in refrigerator are soiled with debris and needed to be cleaned.The air filter covers on the ice machine had dust and debris.Two (2) packages of rolls not dated on the bread rack.The can opener was soiled.One (1) oven rack was sitting directing on the floor.Both ovens needs to be cleaned. Heavy debris buildup found.The shelf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The dumpster had two sliding doors that were both open. The lid on the trash can located in the kitchen was not on securely, during two different observations of the kitchen during the survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery that has the potential to affect every resident at the facility. Facility census: 56. Findings include:a) On 03/02/2026 at 12:11 PM, the lid on the trash can located in the kitchen was not on securely. Employee #100 acknowledged that it should be on securely when not in constant use.On 03/03/2026 at 12:35 PM, the lid on the trash can located in the kitchen was not on securely. Employee #100 acknowledged that it should be on securely when not in constant use.On 03/03/2026 at 12:55 PM, both sliding doors were opened on the dumpster. Employee #100 stated we got to start closing the doors.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the faciltiy failed to ensure resident dignity during dining. The facility failed to ensure roommates and tablemates in the dining room received their meal trays at the same time. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #27, #55, #15, #54, #40, #31, #50, #13, and #43. Facility Census: 56. Findings included: a) Residents who dined in their rooms During the survey resident council meeting on 03/02/26 at 1:00 PM, residents were asked about their dining experiences. The residents reported that roommates did not receive their meal trays at the same time when they dined in their rooms. On 03/02/26, the following observations were made of residents dining in their rooms: Resident #27 received a dinner tray at 4:46 PM. Resident #27's roommate, Resident #55, received a dinner tray at 5:01 PM. After Resident #27 received a tray, Resident #55 was observed asking a staff member where her tray was. Resident #15 received a dinner tray at 4:55 PM. Resident #15's roommate, Resident #54, received a dinner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop/implement a care plan for resident #2 regarding their role as Resident Council President. The facility also failed to follow interventions for Resident #10's falls. This finding was true for one (1) of 14 resident care plans reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #2, #10. Facility census: 56a)Resident #2During an interview with Resident #2 on 02/03/26 at 1:20 PM she revealed she was the Resident Council President. During the interview, Resident #2 expressed concern about not having enough evening activities. She stated she holds a weekly reading group at 6:00 PM, but some residents would enjoy crafting and games such as Bingo in the evenings. Record review completed on 02/03/24 of Resident #2's care plan revealed an intervention stating the following (Residents name here) Resident #2 serves as Resident Council [NAME] President as of February 2022.During an interview with the facility's Activity Director on 02/04/26 at 2:30 PM she stated that Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the ongoing activity program met the interests and psychosocial needs of residents by a) failing to provide sufficient evening activities desired by residents, b) listing hydration cart services on the activity calendar as an activity, and c) failing to provide sensory stimulation programming for lower-functioning residents. These failures demonstrate the facility did not ensure residents were provided person-centered activities designed to meet individual interests, preferences, and functional abilities. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.Resident identifiers: #7, #10, #13, #14, #18, #24, #32, and #48 Facility census: 56.Findings Include:Review of the facility's activity program, resident council concerns, and activity calendars for January through March 2026 identified concerns related to the variety, appropriateness, and availability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazzards. this failed practice was found true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for falls during the Long term Care Survey pricess. Resident identifier: #2 Facility census: 56 Findings include:Record review completed on 03/04/2026 at 10:19 AM revealed Resident #10 had falls on the following dates;11/18/25 1:05AM12/25/25 2:50 PM12/31/25 7:29PM1/14/26 12:37PM2/6/26 4:27 AM Further record review on 02/04/25 the following fall interventions was on the residents person centered care plan: Bilateral Hip protectors when in bed Call don't fall sign in room within view for reminder not to self transfer r/t confusionand poor memory. Fall mat to right side of bed for safety d/t hx of fallingAn observation on 03/04/26 at 11:00 AM of resident #10 While in bed revealed the fall mat was placed on the left side of the bed, there was no sign hanging in the room stating Call don't fall. During an Interview on 03/04/26 at 11:15 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #35 who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing information was accurate by not havinf total hours worked on the staff posting. This was found true for all staff postings reviewed for the past year. Facility census: 56Findings include:An observation on 03/02/26 at 12:04 PM showed the staff posting did not have the total hours worked posted.]Record review on 03/02/26 for staff postings for the past year revealed none of the staff posting contained total hours worked. During an interview on 03/02/26 at 1:04 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) who questioned what's missing? When informed of the requirement for staff posting the DON stated Ok, i will get working on fixing this now. confirming the staff postings did not contain the required information.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%). Three (3) medication errors were made during 25 medication opportunities to make an error rate of 12%. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 56. Findings included:a) Resident #9 On 03/04/26 at 9:24 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #41 was observed giving morning medications to Resident #9. LPN #41 administered the following medications to the resident: - Ferrous sulfate, 325 milligrams (mg)- Mirtazapine, 15 mg- Rivastigmine tartrate, 1.5 mg LPN #41 had dispensed the pills from a pill packet containing all three (3) pills. Review of Resident #9's physician's orders showed the resident's morning medications were as follows: - Losartan potassium, 50 mg, in the morning for hypertension - Metoprolol tartrate, 25 mg, in the morning for hypertension - Ferrous sulfate, 325 mg, two (2) times a day for supplementation due to amenia - Rivastigmine tartrate, 1.5 mg, two times a day for dementia Mirtazapine, 15 mg, was ordered at bedtime for depression and poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were completed during medication administration and hand hygiene for staff between passing trays and offering residents hand hygiene on the resident halls. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 56. Findings Include: a) Medication Administration On 03/04/26 at 9:39 AM, an observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #26 preparing medication for Resident #3 was made. During the observation, RN #26 dropped a pill (Zoloft) directly on the medication cart, which had no barrier, and picked the pill up with a bare hand. RN #26 did not complete hand hygiene before or after administering the medication. On 03/04/26 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the medication should have not been picked up with a bare hand and a barrier should be used on the medication cart. The DON, also, confirmed hand hygiene should have been completed before and after medication administration had been completed. a) Staff hand hygiene The facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation the physician was notified when the resident experienced a change in condition. Resident Identifier: #2. Facility Census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #2 On 03/02/2026 at 3:45 PM, Resident #2 stated she wanted to see the physician today regarding bleeding, but she thought the physician had already left for the day without seeing her. She stated she wasn't sure if the bleeding was vaginal bleeding or urinary bleeding. Review of Resident #2's electronic health records showed the following nursing notes:-Written on 02/28/2026 at 10:45, Small amount of dark red discharge noted from vaginal area during AM [morning] care.- Written on 03/2/2026 at 9:02 AM, CNA [Certified Nursing Aide] reports vaginal blood noted when placing resident on bed pan. RN [Registered Nurse] in room to assess, dried blood noted to thighs and vagina. blood noted in Residents urine after getting off the bed pan. Nurse practitioner to evaluate upon rounds this AM. Resident afebrile. On 03/04/26 at 4:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store medications within acceptable standards of care. A bottle of Aplisol (tuberculin purified protein derivative) located in refrigerator in med room had been opened more than 30 days ago. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the facility task of medication storage and labeling. Facility Census: 56. Findings included: On 03/02/26 at 9:30 AM, the medication preparation room was inspected with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #41 in attendance. An opened multi-use vial of Aplisol (tuberculin purified protein derivative) was in the refrigerator. Aplisol is used to diagnosis tuberculosis. The bottle had an opening date written on it. The opening date was 01/23/26. The medication packaging insert was no longer with the vial. According to Aplisol packaging insert, available on-line on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website, Vials in use for more than 30 days should be discarded. LPN #41 confirmed the Aplisol vial was out of date since it had been opened 01/23/26. She stated she would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with established national guidelines due to not following the menu. The facility failed to follow the approved menus, making random substitutions of food items. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. This is true for Resident #51, Resident #35 and Resident Council. Facility census: 56.Findings include: a) 03/03/2026 11:55 AM Resident #51 states the food is cold and bad. I am a diabetic and need to be on a diabetic diet. I have never seen a dietitian since I have been here. At 1:30 PM following the resident council meeting, Resident #51 gave me her tray ticket and let me know that it did not match the copy of the menu that she was given by the facility to keep in her room. She also did not receive the corn chowder that was on her tray ticket. She received vegetable soup. She said that she wasn't allergic to anything in the vegetable soup, but what if I would have been, or what if someone that has dementia received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Room identifier: east and west shower rooms. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) East Shower Room During an interview with Resident #1 on 08/06/24 at 12:46 PM she stated the shower room had mold on the floor and up the walls. She continued to say she did not like to put her feet down because they do not clean the shower room very well. An observation, on 08/06/23 1:33 PM, of the east shower found a black substance on the floor and up the walls, and a thick layer of lent and debris on the ceiling vents. During an interview on 08/06/24 at 2:15 PM the Environmental Services Supervisor confirmed the shower room floor, walls, and vents needed cleaned. She stated, It's hard to keep up on because of the moisture in the room, so they power wash the black substance off the floors and walls once a month. b) [NAME] wing shower room Inspection of the [NAME] wing shower room on 08/06/24 at 2:10 PM revealed a black substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when Resident #56's blood sugar levels were above 400. This affected one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the long-term care survey process. Additionally, the facility failed to have matching treatment orders when comparing the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form and written physician orders on the chart. This was true for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #56 and #3. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #56 During a resident representative interview on 08/06/24 at 12:01 PM, it was discovered Resident #56 occasionally had high blood sugar levels. A record review, completed on 08/07/24 at 1:59 PM, revealed the following physician order: NovoLOG FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML. Inject subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the staff schedules for Registered Nurse (RN) coverage and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Facility census: 58. a) RN Coverage A review of the staffing schedules for RN coverage, completed on 08/08/24 at 12:30 PM, revealed ten (10) occasions when RN coverage did not occur eight (8) consecutive hours a day: 01/13/24 - RN Coverage was 7.00 hours 01/14/24 - RN Coverage was 7.00 hours 02/03/24 - RN Coverage was 6.00 hours 02/04/24 - RN Coverage was 6.00 hours 02/11/24 - RN Coverage was 6.00 hours 02/25/24 - RN Coverage was 0.00 hours 03/09/24 - RN Coverage was 7.00 hours 03/23/24 - RN Coverage was 6.25 hours 03/30/24 - RN Coverage was 6.75 hours 03/31/24 - RN Coverage was 7.00 hours During an interview on 08/08/24 at 2:50 PM, the Administrator reported the facility was unable to produce evidence of RN coverage for eight (8) consecutive hours on the above-mentioned dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to have a clean sanitized mobile utility food cart and debris under the kitchen prep tables, the stove and [NAME]. This had the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census. 58. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During Initial tour on 08/06/24 at 9:44 AM found: 1- One (1) mobile utility cart with the toaster, having old food and other debris on all three (3) shelves. 2-old food and debris under prep tables, the stove and [NAME]. An Interview with the Dietary Manager during initial tour verified all issues noted. She stated that she was unaware of the issues, and she would fix the issues.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that are significant to the resident, including the right to participate in social, religious, and community activities that do not interfere with the rights of other residents in the facility. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for the category of choices, during the long-term care survey. Resident Identifiers: #25 and #40. Facility Census: 58. Findings Included: a) Resident #25 During an interview on 08/06/24 at 11:05 AM, Resident #25 revealed she would like to have three showers a week, but the facility only schedules her for showers on Tuesdays and Saturdays. She stated that she had mentioned her preference to the Nursing Assistants (NAs) on more than one occasion, but her requests had been ignored. Record review revealed a shower schedule for the facility's East Wing with Resident #25 scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Saturdays in the AM. In an interview with NA #42 on 08/07/24 at 12:06 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This was true for one (1) of three (3) grievances reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #55. Facility census: #58. Findings Include: a) Policy Review Record review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance, revision dated 09/14/22, showed: -Upon receipt of an oral, written or anonymous grievance submitted by a Resident, the grievance official will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any residents' rights while alleged violation is being investigated, if indicated. -The Grievance Committee / Grievance official shall complete an investigation of the resident's grievance. This may include a review of facility processes, programs and policies, as well as interviews with staff, residents, and visitors, as indicated. And any other review deemed necessary by the Grievance Committee. -The facility will keep evidence of the resolution of all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey process. The MDS for Resident #36 did not accurately reflect the resident had bilateral hearing amplifiers. Resident identifier: Resident #36. Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #36 During an interview, on 08/06/24 at 1:15 PM, Resident #36 reported, she was hard of hearing and was dependent on bilateral hearing amplifiers to hear better. Resident #36 stated, the Social Worker had helped her purchase the hearing amplifiers. The Social Worker reported the resident had her bilateral hearing amplifiers since 05/16/24. A review of Resident #36's Medicare - 5 Day MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/23/24, revealed Section B titled Hearing, Speech, and Vision, answered Question B0300 titled Hearing Aid as: No. During an interview on 08/08/24 at 11:12 AM, MDS LPN #57 acknowledged the MDS with ARD date of 06/23/24 had incorrectly coded NO to Question B0300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the category of PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Record Review), during the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifier: #58. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #58 A record review, completed on 08/06/24 at 12:53 PM, revealed Resident #58 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. The admitting Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 05/08/24, did not identify Resident #58 had a major depressive disorder on Section III, Question 30 of the PASRR. This PASRR indicated no Level II was required. A continued record review also revealed a there was never a new PAS completed to reveal resident's major depressive disorder diagnosis in order to address whether or not specialized services were needed. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement measures to reduce hazards and risks, and to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who resided at the facility. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census:58. Findings Included: a) On 08/06/24 at 1:24 PM, it was observed that two bathrooms in close proximity to the physical therapy room, and conference room/lounge, were unlocked and accessible to both staff and residents at any time. Upon further inspection, it was discovered that these bathrooms were not equipped with nurse call devices or emergency pull alarms. During an interview with Administrator #72 on 08/06/24 at 1:39 PM, he stated that Those bathrooms are not for residents. When asked what prevented residents from using those bathrooms, he could not provide a reason. However, he mentioned that if residents did use the bathrooms, they were equipped with grab bars for safety. He also mentioned that these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide services to provide appropriate toileting schedule for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the bowel and bladder care area during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #32. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) Resident #32 During an interview 08/06/24 at 12:53 PM with Resident #32's sister, she stated, the staff don't take her to the bathroom when she needs to go. She continued to say her sister has accidents because they make her wait. A Medical record review found a physician order dated 9/6/22: Toilet upon rise, before meals and after meals at bedtime (HS) as needed if voiced. A continued review of Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) Toileting documentation showed Resident #32 was only toileted two (2) times a day. During an Interview on 08/08/24 at 11:00 AM, Minimum Data Set Coordinator #57 verified, the documentation of toileting did not follow the active physicians order.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of documents, facility failed to adequately assess and control resident's pain. This failed practice had the potential to cause harm to one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #13. Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #13 During an interview with Resident #13 on 08/06/24 11:32 AM, Resident #13 stated that she had fractured her right ankle and previously a cast on her leg. She stated that the cast had been removed on 08/02/24 and a cam walker boot had been applied. Resident was seated in a wheelchair and stated that she was in pain. She rated her pain at a level of ten (10) on a scale of ten (10). LPN #60 stated that she was aware and administered Acetaminophen 650 MG as prescribed. When this surveyor performed a follow-up interview with the resident at 12:55 PM, the resident was in bed, and rated her pain as five (5) on a scale of ten (10). During an interview with LPN #60 she stated, she always rates her pain high. Document review revealed a physicians note dated 6/24/2024 at 3:03 PM which stated: I certify that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to have the required members attend the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly. The facility failed to ensure the Medical Director or designee attended the QAA meetings at least on a quarterly basis. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Quarterly QAA Meetings During an interview on 08/08/24 at 2:20 PM, the Director of Nursing and Administrator reported the the facility had QAA Meetings on a quarterly basis. Sign in sheets for QAA meetings were reviewed from August 2023 through August 2024. The sign in sheets for the meetings showed no attendance, by signature, of the Medical Director or designee for the quarter for January 2024 through March 2024. The DON reviewed for the minutes for the 01/24/24 QAA meeting and failed to find any evidence the Medical Director was present.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review and staff interview The facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that include, but are not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. In addition, pharmacy recommendations were kept in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office and not forwarded to the physician for a timely response. This is true for one of five reviewed for unnecessary medications, but has the potential to affect all residents. Resident identifier: #51. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a) Facility policy The undated facility policy titled Village Long Term Care Pharmacy Services Policy and Procedures for Documentation and Communication of Consulting Pharmacist Recommendations states pharmacist recommendations regarding residents' drug therapy are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement the recommendations, and respond to in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on Resident Council Interview, observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review and documentation review the facility neglected to have a system in place for Residents to notify staff when outside on the patio. Resident identifier: #7. Facility census: 56. Findings included: a) Non-Functioning Doorbell/Call System During an interview on 09/13/22 at 2:00 PM, Resident Council identified a concern related to re-entry back into the facility from the patio area. Resident Council disclosed that the doorbell does not work, and most Residents cannot physically open the door to go back into the facility. Resident Council stated that Residents had to wave to alert the staff to get back inside the facility from the patio. An observation on 09/13/22 at 2:20 PM showed Resident #7 sat outside alone. An observation on 09/13/22 at 2:20 PM of the patio door doorbell revealed no sound when pushed. The doorbell located beside the patio door was pushed by two (2) Surveyors multiple times over a 15-minute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to report alleged violation related to, neglect, or abuse, and report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within prescribe time frames. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 56. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, showed: -It is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations involving Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, including injuries of unknown source, in accordance with this policy. -Facility staff should immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator and to [NAME] Virginia Office of Health Facility Licensing and Certification (OHFLAC) in accordance with the procedures in this policy. -If Abuse or serious Bodily Injury is Alleged. If the event that caused the allegation involves an allegation of Abuse or serious bodily injury, it should be reported to OHFLAC immediately, but not later than two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to take actions to investigate an alleged violation related to, verbal abuse. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #1. Facility Census 56. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, showed: -It is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations involving Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation of Resident Property, including injuries of unknown source, in accordance with this policy. -Facility staff should immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator and to [NAME] Virginia Office of Health Facility Licensing and Certification (OHFLAC) in accordance with the procedures in this policy. -If Abuse or serious Bodily Injury is Alleged. If the event that caused the allegation involves an allegation of Abuse or serious bodily injury, it should be reported to OHFLAC immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made. Findings include: a) Resident #1 An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide Notice of Discharge to the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman during a discharge / transfer or the Resident Representative. This was true for two (2) of three (3) Hospitalizations reviewed. Resident Identifier #40 and #54. Facility Census 56. Findings Included: a) Resident #40 Record review on 09/13/22 at 1:27 PM, revealed resident #40 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and 09/02/22. Subsequent review of the resident #40's medical record showed it did not contain documentation that the Notice of Transfer or Discharge was provided to the Resident Representative, or the Ombudsman of the discharges on 08/28/22 or 09/02/22. b) Resident #54 Record review on 09/13/22 at 1:27 PM, revealed resident #54 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Subsequent review of the resident #54's medical record showed it did not contain documentation that the Notice of Transfer or Discharge was provided to the Resident Representative, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan. Resident #50's foot brace was not applied when up in her wheel chair. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #50 Observations on 09/12/22 at 3:00 PM and on 09/13/22 at 10:00 AM, found R# 50 in her wheel chair without a right foot brace. Review of the medical record on 09/13/22 revealed R #50 had a stroke affecting her right dominant side. The care plan updated on 08/18/22 states Brace to right foot when up in w/c (wheel chair). During an interview on 09/13/22 at 1:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 and LPN #82 confirmed R #50's care plan includes an intervention to place the right foot brace on when she is up in her wheel chair. LPN #82 acknowledged R# 50 has not been wearing her foot brace. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician orders were not followed for the application of a foot brace when up in a wheel chair. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #50 Observations on 09/12/22 at 3:00 PM and on 09/13/22 at 10:00 AM, found R #50 up her wheel chair without a right foot brace. Review of the medical record on 09/13/22 revealed R #50 had a stroke affecting her right dominant side. A physician order written 08/04/22 states Brace to right foot while up in chair. During an interview on 09/13/22 at 1:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 reported R #50 has not been wearing her foot brace. LPN #7 confirmed R #50's physician orders include directions to place a right foot brace when she is up in her wheel chair and acknowledged the medical record lacks information indicating R #50's refusal to wear the brace. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Weekly pressure ulcer assessments were not completed. This is true for one of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: R #106. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #106 Review of the medical record on 09/13/22 revealed R #106 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The wound nurse's initial visit / assessment dated [DATE] states R #106 was admitted to the facility with two pressure ulcers. The left heel had an unstageable 3.1 centimeter (CM) long by 2.9 cm wide pressure ulcer with a black eschar wound bed. The left second toe had an unstageable 0.4 cm long by 0.3 cm wide pressure ulcer with a black eschar wound bed. The physician history and physical dated 09/01/22 identifies a stage 2 pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to store oxygen tubing in the appropriate bag when not in use and ensure there was a physician order to administer oxygen to a resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #10 An observation on 09/12/22 at 4:57 PM showed Resident #10 laid in bed with nasal cannula in place and oxygen being administered at four (4) liters per minute. An observation on 09/13/22 at 10:21 AM showed Resident #10 was not in room and the oxygen nasal cannula tubing was stored on top of concentrator and not in the storage bag that was present. Review of Resident #10's medical record showed there was no current physician order for oxygen administration. An observation on 09/13/22 at 12:03 PM, showed Resident # 10 was sitting in wheelchair with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula with wheelchair oxygen canister. The bedside oxygen concentrator was also beside bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 1 home this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FOX, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2009
FOX, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2009
TINZ, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FOX & FOX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2009
THE ORCHARD'S REAL ESTATE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2009
PATANI, HEMANTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 10%Other / private 22%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$394per resident / day
operating cost
$11,962per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$416per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515130. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next