O'neill Healthcare North Olmsted

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 49.2 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure individualized care plan interventions were developed, updated, and initiated following falls for Resident #33 and Resident #36. The facility also failed to conduct thorough post-fall investigations with root cause analysis to ensure a comprehensive fall management program was in place for Resident #8, Resident #33 and Resident #36. This affected three residents (#8, #33, and #36) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 57. Actual Harm occurred on 01/29/25 when Resident #33, who was identified as high risk for falls, had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance with ambulation and partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, was left unattended in the bathroom resulting in a fall with a left wrist fracture. Prior to this fall with injury, Resident #33 had a history of falls (03/24/24, 09/11/24, 10/20/24, and 12/05/24) without thorough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the Arbitration Agreement and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident or representative had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days after signing it. This affected four residents (#41, #46, #315, and #318) of five residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility identified 33 residents who agreed to the facility's binding arbitration agreement upon admission. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 10/30/24. Review of the Arbitration Agreement revealed Resident #41 and the facility entered into an agreement that if a dispute arises between them, they desire to avoid costly and time-consuming litigation. The agreement stated the agreement may be terminated by either the resident or the facility upon written notice given to the other party within 21 days of the execution of the agreement. The agreement was signed by Resident #41 and Admissions Director (AD) #899 on 11/08/24. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident #161 out of bed. This affected one resident (#161) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Resident #161 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) with hemiplegia/hemiparesis, diabetes mellitus, intracardiac thrombosis, peripheral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, vitreous degeneration and aphasia (disorder that affects how you communicate. It can impact your speech, as well as the way you write and understand both spoken and written language). Resident #161's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #161 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #161 had an impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff for oral /personal hygiene, shower/bath, upper and lower body dressing, and rolling from left and right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow-up eye appointments were provided as indicated. This affected one (Resident #14) resident out of one reviewed for vision appointments. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #14 medical record revealed an admission date of 01/18/22 with diagnoses including acute kidney injury, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety, insomnia, muscle weakness, and cervicalgia. Review of medical record revealed Resident #14 was seen by the ophthalmologist on 02/05/25. The ophthalmologist indicated Resident #14 should have a cataract evaluation with ophthalmologist of facility choice. Review of Resident #14's physical medical chart revealed an optometry order form dated 02/05/25 for referral to ophthalmologist for cataract surgery for both eyes. There was no evidence in the resident's medical chart that a referral had been sent to or scheduled as recommended. Interview on 03/31/25 09:45 A.M. with Resident #14 revealed she needed cataract surgery, and it had not been scheduled.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer dressings were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#33) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/29/21. Medical diagnoses included fracture of the lower end of the left radius (arm fracture), generalized idiopathic epilepsy, aphasia (difficulty speaking), history of falls, obesity, and history of transient ischemic attacks. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident #33 was recorded to use a walker, required supervision to walk ten feet, and required moderate assistance for toileting. The assessment did not indicate Resident #33 had any behaviors or areas of skin impairment. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow-up dental appointments were provided as indicated. This affected one resident (#6) out of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/20 with diagnosis including heart failure, morbid obesity, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominate side, idiopathic neuropathy, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, venous insufficiency, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, primary osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, anemia, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, tinnitus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of a dental note for Resident #6 revealed she was seen by a consultant dentist on 02/11/25 for mouth pain. The dentist indicated a referral for a consult with Oral Maxillofacial Surgeon was needed. An interview on 03/31/25 at 09:58 A.M. with Resident #6 revealed she needed a follow-up dental appointment since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, policy review, and signage review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for residents as required. This affected three Residents (#33, #315, and #317) of 15 residents identified as requiring enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #315 revealed an admission date of 03/24/25 and diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/30/25 for Resident #315 revealed an order for intravenous midline site for intravenous antibiotic administration. Review of the physician's order dated 03/31/25 for Resident #315 revealed order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to intravenous access. Observation on 03/31/25 at 10:36 A.M. revealed Resident #315 was sitting up in bed with visible intravenous access to the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for vaccination status and offered the influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccines. This affected three residents (#59, #315, and #317) of six residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 01/25/25 with diagnoses including left artificial joint, loose left hip artificial joint, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, iron deficiency anemia, hypothyroidism, depression, anxiety, cardiac/vascular implant, and insomnia. Review of Resident #59's physical medical record revealed no influenza vaccination assessment and consent forms. Resident #59's medical record revealed no documentation or influenza vaccinations being offered for the 2024-2025 influenza season. Interview on 04/02/25 at 10:49 A.M. with Unit Manager #832 confirmed the above findings. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #315 revealed an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccine was timely offered to residents. This affected three residents (#59, #315, and #317) of six residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/25 with diagnoses including left artificial joint, loose left hip artificial joint, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, iron deficiency anemia, hypothyroidism, depression, anxiety, cardiac/vascular implant, and insomnia. A review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the facility did not offer the COVID-19 (corona virus 19) vaccine to Resident #59. The consent for the COVID-19 vaccine was unsigned, undated, and the information on the consent had not been completed. Interview on 04/02/25 at 10:49 A.M. with Unit Manager #832 confirmed the above findings. 2. Review of Resident #315's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/24/25 and diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and reasonable accommodations of needs were in place to ensure resident safety. This affected one resident (Resident #63) of four residents (#40, #61, #62, and #63) reviewed for falls. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 10/31/24. Diagnoses included history of falling, nondisplaced fracture of right leg, polyarthritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the admission/readmission nursing progress note dated 10/31/24 at 4:20 P.M. revealed on 10/31/24 at 2:30 P.M. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility from a short term general hospital with the diagnoses of falls and closed fracture of right tibia no surgical intervention. The resident was oriented to the room and instructed on the use of the call light. The note stated Resident #63 was alert, oriented to self, not oriented to place, not oriented to the day, not oriented to the date, and not oriented to time. The note also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility accident logs, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented and investigated with follow-up interventions implemented as needed. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs.) The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/29/23 with diagnoses including spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy to the lumbar region, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and arthrodesis. Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #42 dated 12/29/23 revealed the resident required an assistive device for mobility and assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Further review of the assessment revealed Resident #42 was at a moderate risk for falls. Review of the physician orders for Resident #42 revealed an order dated 12/29/23 to keep call light within reach at all times. Review of the care plan for Resident #42 dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to O'NEILL HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH