No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Buckeye Terrace Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

140 N State Street, Westerville, OH 43081 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (614) 882-4055 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$140,849 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $140,849 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2 N State St · (614) 398-1192 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
23 N State St · (614) 882-2392 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
State St · (614) 216-7673 · Call to confirm hours
Park
108 Old County Line Rd · (614) 901-6513 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms92.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.2%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.3%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.8%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
64.5%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 59.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-11)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility assessment, hospital record review, review of police reports, review of facility policies, and interviews, the facility failed to identify potential risks/hazards for residents with a substance use disorder, develop and implement comprehensive and individualized care plans and provide adequate supervision to prevent unintentional/intentional drug overdoses for residents in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/death on 03/31/24 when Resident #1 overdosed by shooting opioid medications in his peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line after he obtained a syringe from the trash bin on the facility medication cart. Resident #1 had a history of intravenous illicit substance abuse prior to admission and had an intravenous line while at the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy and potential for actual harm/death continued on 04/16/24 when Resident #2 was found unresponsive in his room from a drug overdose. The resident was transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 62.Findings include:Observations on 03/23/26 beginning at 7:43 A.M. revealed in the first-floor dining room there was a mattress against the wall near the corner cabinet. There were two wheelchairs pushed in front of mattress to hold the mattress up. The wall behind the mattress had holes in it where the wallpaper had been torn off. There was a part of a broken chair under the mattress edge. There was a hole in the wall to the right of the entrance door to the dining room. The hole was a streak which ran along the entire wall with the hole measuring approximately seven inches in length and two inches in width at its largest opening. The first-floor hallways had dirt and brown smears throughout the first floor, and the first floor was littered with small pieces of white paper which looked like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain proper justification for decisions on pharmacy recommendations. This affected four (Residents #7, #9, #23 and #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Also, the facility failed to ensure there was proper monitoring/oversight for the use (unuse) of as needed pain medications. This affected one (Resident #23) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 60.1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were paranoid schizophrenia, muscle weakness, unspecified fracture of right ischium, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, dysphonia, hypertension, lack of coordination, insomnia, and xerosis cutis. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #7 Consultant Pharmacist Recommendation to Prescriber report, dated 11/23/25, revealed a recommendation for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the blood glucose meter was sanitized after use for Resident # 39. This had the potential to affect six residents identified by the facility as receiving blood glucose monitoring from the East Hall nurse. The facility census was 60.Review of Resident # 39's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 1, morbid obesity, hypertension and cholecystitis. Review of Resident # 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact and that he required assistance from staff with toileting, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident # 39's December 2025 physicians orders revealed the following pertinent orders:-Accu Check (type of blood glucose monitor) in the morning every other day for diabetes.-Disinfect glucometer (blood glucose meter) between each use every shift for infection control.-Disinfect glucometer between each use as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely and adequate vision services were provided to Resident #26. This affected one (Resident #26) out of one resident reviewed for communication and sensory problems. Facility census was 60. Review of Resident # 26's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/07/25 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to left femur fracture, asthma, diabetes type 2 with diabetic neuropathy, chronic diastolic heart failure and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition and that she required assistance from staff with toileting, showering/bathing and dressing.Review of Resident # 26's progress notes dated November 2025 to December 2025, revealed no documentation for offering of ancillary services or residents request to be seen by an optometrist.Observation and interview on 12/10/15 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for Resident # 18. This affected one (Resident #18) out of four residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 60.Review of Resident # 18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, depression, polyneuropathy and irritable bowel syndrome. Review of Resident # 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition and required assistance from staff with showering and bathing. Review of Resident # 18's Physician's Orders dated December 2025, revealed the following orders: -Oxycodone (medication used for moderate to severe pain) HCL Oral tablet 5 mg (milligrams); give one tablet every four hours as needed (PRN) for pain level 1-10. -Gabapentin (medication used for nerve pain) Oral tablet 600 mg; give one tablet three times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to a psychiatric consult as ordered. This affected one (Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for behavioral services. The census was 60.Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, alcohol abuse, polyneuropathy, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/15/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #43 physician orders, dated 08/13/25, revealed there was a psychiatric evaluation that was ordered to be completed. Review of Resident #43 medical records, dated 08/13/25 to 11/24/25 (date of discharge), revealed there was no completed psychiatric evaluation. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) #189 on 12/11/25 at 11:38 A.M. and 1:00 P.M. confirmed there was no completed psychiatric consult for Resident #43.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain hospice notes and records on-site for all residents. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The census was 60.Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were hemiplegia, vitamin D deficiency, osteoarthritis of knee, osteoporosis, hypertension, rheumatic heart disease, and dementia. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/25, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #31 hospice records in the facility, found there were no hospice notes in their physical hospice binder for the last three months. Review of Resident #31 hospice notes, dated 09/15/25 to 11/26/25, revealed all these hospice notes and records were delivered to the facility by the hospice agency on 12/10/25. Interview with Regional Director of Clinical Services (RCDS) #189 on 12/11/25 at 1:10 P.M. confirmed they received the hospice notes from the hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility in a safe, comfortable, and functional manner. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for environment. The census was 58.Findings Include:Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, seizures, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, personal history of transient ischemic attack, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, chronic pain syndrome, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/16/25, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment.Observation on 09/17/25 at 10:15 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., and on 09/18/25 at 6:15 A.M. and 9:30 A.M. revealed a large portion of Resident #22's wall was missing beside the right side of her bed. The approximate size of the hole in the wall (missing paint and drywall) was approximately three feet wide by two feet long. On 09/18/25, the facility began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions for pressure relief were administered to residents with pressure ulcers as ordered. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 58.Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and paraplegia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. The resident was assessed to require self-care assistance.Review of the care plan dated 07/14/25 revealed Resident #30 had multiple pressure ulcers due to immobility as a result of his paraplegia. Interventions included assisting the resident with turning and repositioning and weekly monitoring and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications to residents in a timely manner as prescribed. This effected three (#54, #30, and #27) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #54 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including intraspinal abscess and granuloma, syphilis, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The resident was assessed to require self-care assistance. Review of Resident #54's current physician orders revealed an order for trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) to treat insomnia, due at 9:00 P.M. Review of Resident #54's medication administration record between 09/01/25 and 09/18/25 revealed trazodone was administered more than 90…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, hospital visit summary review, hospital discharge summary review, review of drainage guidelines for the PleurX, (a thin, flexible tube that's placed in your chest to drain fluid from your pleural space, to make it easier to breathe) and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary and adequate care for Resident #60 who had a PleurX chest tube. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were properly educated on the tube and failed to ensure the PleurX chest tube was routinely monitored, assessed (for proper placement), monitored for signs/symptoms of infection, accessed, and drained. This affected one resident (#60) of one resident reviewed for chest tubes. The facility census was 58. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #60 revealed an initial admission date of 01/16/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience. This affected one (Resident #61) of two residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/30/18 with diagnoses that included dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hemiplegia. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #61 required partial to moderate assistance with eating. Review of Resident #61's care plan revised 05/09/19 revealed the resident required nursing assistance and supervision to eat. Resident #61's care plan was silent for an intervention that included standing while feeding the resident. Review of Resident #61's speech therapy dysphagia discharge notes on 05/28/24 were silent for recommendations for nursing to stand while feeding the resident her meals. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview. review of the Electronic Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC) portal and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to report an incident of alleged sexual abuse to the state survey agency andfailed to implement their abuse policy after an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #23) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of schizophrenia, post traumatic seizures, traumatic brain injury, and depression. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. allegation made on 10/18/24. Interview with Resident #23 on 10/22/24 at 10:20 A.M. revealed on 10/18/24, Resident #38 placed Resident #23's hand on his clothing over his penis. Resident #23 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy after an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #23) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/30/23 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, post traumatic seizures, traumatic brain injury, and depression. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 07/24/24 revealed that Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed that the progress notes were silent for an allegation of sexual abuse affecting Resident #23 on 10/18/24. Interview with Resident #23 on 10/22/24 at 10:20 A.M. revealed that on 10/18/24, Resident #38 placed Resident #23's hand on his clothing over his penis. Resident #23 stated that she told Resident #38 no, and he stopped. Resident #23 stated that she felt uncomfortable about it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate levels of superstition for residents identified as fall risks. This affected one resident (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/12/22 with diagnoses that included epilepsy, muscle weakness, and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 11, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment, and that Resident #42 needed supervision and/or touch assistance for showering and bathing. Review of Resident #42's care plan initiated 01/13/24 revealed that Resident #42 was at risk of falls due to abnormal posture, impaired gait, muscle weakness, and that he had a decreased awareness of his need for assistance. A care planned intervention is to remove any causes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nail and skin care for Resident #3, who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. This affected one (Resident #3) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, history of transient ischemic attack, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the plan of care dated 04/11/24 revealed Resident #3 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions to anticipate needs and explain process. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated Resident #3 was unable to complete the interview. Resident #3 was dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers and put treatments in place in a timely manner for Residents #1, #2, and #3. The facility also failed to identify a pressure ulcer Resident #3 developed until it was a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible) pressure ulcer. This affected three (Resident #1, #2, and #3) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, history of transient ischemic attack, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the nursing admission care plan dated 04/10/24 revealed Resident #3 had a Stage II (partial-thickness skin loss involving the epidermis and dermis) pressure ulcer to sacrum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents had weekly skin assessments per physician orders, failed to record skin breakdown identified during a bath, and failed to report the skin breakdown to the nurse. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified seven current residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively impaired. Resident #57 was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. Review of the plan of care dated 12/16/22 revealed Resident #57 was at risk for skin breakdown related to diabetes mellitus type two, impaired mobility, weakness, incontinence, episodes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and family, resident, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely repair a resident's sink and ensure it was functional for the resident's use. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for functional sinks in resident rooms. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the facility's maintenance requests revealed Resident #27 had two requests placed on 02/14/24 and 03/14/24 for the room's sink stopped up and both requests were marked as closed. Interview on 04/25/24 at 9:32 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #111 revealed the employee had knowledge of the clogged sink in Resident #27's room and stated it needed to be unclogged to work again. STNA #111 stated she would notify management of Resident #27's clogged sink. Interview on 04/25/24 at 9:36 A.M. with Director of Maintenance #109 confirmed knowledge of Resident #27's lack of water supply from the sink. Director of Maintenance #109 stated the sink was clogged, if water supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect Resident #24 from being verbally abused by Resident #9. This affected one (Resident #24) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of transient ischemic attack, major depressive disorder, pulmonary embolism, heart failure, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired. As of 03/13/24, Resident #9 did not have a care plan in place for behaviors towards other residents. Review of medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of right lower leg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis of right knee, disorder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to follow the abuse policy when there were allegations of verbal abuse towards Resident #24. This affected one (Resident #24) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired. Review of medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of right lower leg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis of right knee, disorder of psychological development, and anxiety disorder. The admission Medicare 5-day MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively impaired. Review of nurse note dated 02/26/24 at 11:18 P.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure an allegation of verbal abuse against Resident #24 was reported immediately. This affected one (Resident #24) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired. Review of medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of right lower leg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis of right knee, disorder of psychological development, and anxiety disorder. The admission Medicare 5-day MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively impaired. Review of nurse note dated 02/26/24 at 11:18 P.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse to Resident #24 and failed to prevent further potential abuse to Resident #24. This affected one (Resident #24) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of transient ischemic attack, major depressive disorder, pulmonary embolism, heart failure, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively impaired. Review of medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of right lower leg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis of right knee, disorder of psychological development, and anxiety disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate bathing and hygiene for residents who required staff assistance with activities of daily living including personal hygiene. This affected two (Resident #26 and #71) out of three residents reviewed for bathing and hygiene. Facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, hemiplegia, and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively impaired. Resident #26 required substantial to maximal assist for bathing. Review of bathing documentation revealed Resident #26 received a shower and had hair washed on 02/01/24. Interview on 03/11/24 at 1:36 P.M. Regional Director of Clinical Services #103 verified there was no other documentation of Resident #26 being bathed or showered in February and March, 2024. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment to a resident with diagnosed mental disorders. This affected one (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, and dementia. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #1 was ordered Abilify (antipsychotic) 300 milligram (mg) intramuscularly (IM) on the 28th of each month. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #1 was administered Abilify 300 mg IM on 10/28/23. A medication note dated 11/28/23 at 4:27 P.M. revealed Abilify 300 mg was reordered and would be administered once the medication was delivered. Review of the MAR for November revealed Resident #1 was not administered Abilify 300 mg on 11/28/23 due to medication not being available. A medication administration note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate foot care. This affected one (Resident #71) out of three reviewed for foot care. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed former Resident #71 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/01/24 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), epilepsy, dementia, cachexia, and major depressive disorder. A care plan dated 12/25/23 revealed Resident #71 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to COPD, decreased mobility function, dementia, difficulty in walking, disorder of muscle, nicotine dependence, rheumatoid arthritis, symbolic dysfunction, history insomnia, polyneuropathy. Interventions include check Resident #71's nail length, trim, and clean on bath day and as necessary. Any changes were to be reported to the nurse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had mildly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of menus, review of food service invoices, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supply of food, post menu's timely, and failed to follow the menu. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/09/24 at 8:17 A.M., of the resident notification board revealed no evidence the meals for 02/09/24 were posted. The lunch and dinner meals were posted for yesterday 02/08/24. Interview on 02/09/24 at 8:27 A.M., with the Dietary Manager (DM) #58 confirmed he doesn't post breakfast menus and he hasn't posted the lunch and dinner menus yet but was getting ready to. Interview on 02/09/24 at 8:44 A.M., with Resident #10 revealed the kitchen staff don't post breakfast, lunch, or dinner menus on the board timely. The Resident reported she doesn't like meat and if she wanted an alternative, she would have to write her request on paper and place it in the box at the nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, fall investigation review, staff interview, and guardian interview, this facility failed to ensure a residents guardian was notified of a change in condition including a witnessed fall. This affected one (Resident #119) of the five residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #119 revealed an admission date of 07/10/20 and a discharge date of 11/02/23. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system. Resident #119 was noted to have a guardian who was not a friend or family member. Review of Resident #119's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15 indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #119 was noted to be independent with set up help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, fall investigation review, review of photo, staff interview, and guardian interview, this facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #119) of the five residents reviewed for incident investigations. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #119 revealed an admission date of 07/10/20 and a discharge date of 11/02/23. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system. Resident #119 was noted to have a guardian who was not a friend or family member. Review of Resident #119's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15 indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #119 was noted to be independent with set up help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, discharge planning report, equipment invoice review, staff interview, and case manager interview, this facility failed to ensure a resident discharging from the facility was sent home with a sufficient supply of insulin and needed shower chair. This affected one (Resident #115) of the four residents reviewed for proper and safe discharging. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 07/07/23 and a discharge date of 10/04/23. Diagnoses included COIVD-19, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, Diabetes Mellitus 2, COPD, major depressive disorder recurrent, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypothyroidism, insomnia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, nicotine dependence cigarettes, constipation. Resident #115 was noted to be her own responsible party. Review of Resident #115's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an odor free environment. This directly affected one (#48) resident with potential to affect the additional 48 (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #49, #50, #51, #53, #55 and #56) who resided on the first floor of the facility. The census was 56. Findings include: Observation during the initial tour of the facility on 10/11/23 at 7:18 A.M. revealed a strong urine odor was noted starting down the 100 hallway. Additional observation at 10:24 A.M., outside of Resident #48's room, revealed the urine odor was stronger. Observation and interview with Housekeeping Supervisor #98 on 10/11/23 at 10:24 A.M. confirmed there was a very strong odor of urine in the room that permeated out into the 100 hallway. Observation at this time revealed Resident #48 was not in the room, but the odor of urine remained strong. Further interview with Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with oral hygiene. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/28/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, morbid obesity, tracheotomy, anoxic brain damage, stroke, and major depression. Review of Resident #15's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and was assessed as dependent on staff for personal hygiene including oral care. Observation of Resident #15 revealed the resident received personal care on 10/11/23 at 9:24 A.M. and 11:53 A.M. Resident #15 received care from State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #96, STNA #99, STNA #100. Resident #15 was provided a bed bath including washing her face. Further observation revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of mechanical lift manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to safely operate a mechanical lift during a resident transfer. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included coronary artery disease (CAD), heart attack, gout, morbid obesity, and vascular disease. Review of Resident #13's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and was totally dependant on staff for transferring with two staff persons needed for assistance. Review of Resident #13's progress notes and physician orders dated 10/11/23 at 12:36 P.M. revealed the resident sustained a facial abrasion while being transferred in a mechanical (Hoyer) lift. Review of the notes revealed the facility nurse practitioner (NP) was in the facility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain intravenous (IV) access in a proper manner. This affected two (#22 and #33) of two residents reviewed for IV access. The census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included hepatic failure, severe septic shock, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #22's hospital discharge records revealed the resident was discharged to the facility with physician orders for IV antibiotics to be administered through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line every eight hours for 21 days. Review of Resident #22's progress notes dated 10/06/23 at 1:38 P.M. revealed a peripheral IV (PIV) line was inserted into the resident's right arm. Review of physician orders dated 10/06/23 revealed a PIV line may be inserted until a new PICC line can be placed. The physician order identified to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and discarded by expiration or use by date. This affected two residents (Resident #39 and Resident #49) out of five residents reviewed for pharmacy medication reviews and had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 07:28 A.M. revealed in the facility's main medication storage area had four unopened bottles of Aspirin 325 milligrams with the written date of 06/2023. Observation of the manufacturer's expiration date revealed date of 06/2023. Further observation in the facility's main medication storage area revealed two bottles of Docusate Sodium (stool softener) 100 milligrams with written date of 06/2023. Observation of the manufacturer's expiration date revealed date of 06/2023. Interview on [DATE] at 7:50 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the four bottles of expired Aspirin 325 milligrams and the two bottles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor and determine Resident #39's ability to safely self administer all acquired medications. This affected one (Resident #39) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/11/22. Diagnosis included multiple sclerosis, chronic pain syndrome, adult failure to thrive and cocaine abuse. Review of Resident #39's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #39 was noted to require extensive assistance from one staff member for eating and was noted to experience impairment to one upper and one lower extremity. Review of Resident #39's Medication Self-Administration Safety Screen dated 08/01/23 revealed medication that was being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident centered care plan for the use of a positioning splint device. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #45) out of one resident reviewed for a positioning splint device. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy, stroke, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type 2, depression, high blood pressure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Resident #45 was also frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #45's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/19/23 for the placement of a roll hand splint to the right hand for up to six hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise Resident #8's comprehensive care plan after a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #8) of 25 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings Include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were type I diabetes, difficulty walking, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, acquired absence of right foot, peripheral vascular disease, myasthenia gravis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, old myocardial infarction, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and anemia. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/13/23, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #8 progress notes, dated 08/10/23, revealed he returned to the facility after having surgery to perform a below the knee amputation. Review of Resident #8 care plan revealed no care plan regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene to Resident #1 who dependent on staff for care. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #1) out of two residents reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of Resident #1 medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, congestive heart failure, blindness, depression, anxiety, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly dated 08/18/23 revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene including fingernail trimming and care. Resident #1 was dependent on the staff for bathing and locomotion off the unit. Further review revealed Resident #1 was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 01/04/22 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders to notify the physician of an abnormal blood glucose level. These deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #21) out of two residents reviewed for blood glucose levels. Findings Include:Reviewed of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 06/22/22. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and chronic pancreatitis. Review of Resident #21 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #21 was noted to be 69 inches tall, weighted 133 pounds and was receiving insulin and diuretics daily. Review of Resident #21's plan of care, no date noted, revealed the resident has type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and diabetic neuropathy. Interventions include administering diabetic medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to verify placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prior to medication administration. These deficient practices affected one resident (Resident #5) out one resident reviewed for PEG tube. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5 medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive and gastrostomy status. Further review revealed Resident #5 received medications via the PEG tube. Review of Resident #5 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly dated 07/04/23 revealed Resident #5 requires extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and dependent assistance from staff for feeding and medication administration. Review of Resident #5 physician orders revealed Resident #5 receives Enteral Feed of Jevity 1.5 at 325 milliliters every four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate social services oversight and assistance to Resident #54 related to benefit(s)/continued placement in the facility. This affected one resident (#54) of one resident reviewed for insurance benefits. The census was 58. Findings Include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were encephalitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontoxic goiter, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, hypertension, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #54's progress notes, dated [DATE] and [DATE], revealed the resident told facility social services he had no apartment to go back to since he was in the nursing home. She documented they would continue a safe discharge process and appeal an insurance discontinuation. On [DATE], social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed provide evidence all pharmacy recommendations were addressed for Resident 349 in a timely and thorough manner. This affected one (Resident #49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 58. Findings Include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, morbid obesity, myopia, tracheostomy status, anoxic brain injury, hypertension, anemia, personal history of transient ischemic attack, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and opioid dependence. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/03/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #49 census documentation revealed she was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with an anticipation of return. Review of Resident #49 pharmacy recommendations signed 08/10/23 revealed the recommendation to clarify the diagnosis of Amantadine and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all staff protected and valued residents' private space when Laundry Manager #4 failed to knock or request permission to enter the shower room where Resident #25 was being assisted with a shower. This affected one resident (#25) of 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, hemiplegia, history of cocaine abuse, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the annual [NAME] Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/09/23 revealed the resident had intact cognition, required total assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) and bathing tasks and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 08/23/23 at 10:34 A.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #3 was observed assisting Resident #25 into the first-floor central shower room for a shower. Further observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer wound care for Resident #40 in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#40) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer care/treatment. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, dysphasia, and the presence of a pressure injury to the sacrum region. Review of Resident #40's physician's orders revealed an order for wound care, cleanse and pack sacral wound with silver alginate and cover with a dry, clean dressing daily and as needed. On 08/23/23 beginning at 9:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 were observed performing a sacral pressure ulcer dressing change. RN #1 placed a towel between Resident #40's buttocks and the bottom bed sheet as a barrier. During the procedure, RN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care for Resident #40 in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#40) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings Include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, dysphasia, and the presence of a pressure injury to the sacrum region. Review of Resident #40's physician's orders revealed an order for tracheostomy care twice daily and replacement of the tracheostomy inner cannula daily. On 08/23/23 beginning at 9:00 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 were observed performing tracheostomy care for Resident #40. While cleaning the inside of the external tracheal cannula, RN #1 placed the used cannula cleaning brush on the paper barrier located on Resident #40's chest. As RN #1 was completing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a menu with a variety of foods and failed to create substitution logs and notify residents when the planned menu was not being followed. This had the potential to affect 46 of 46 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#46 and #4) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 07/21/21 revealed residents had concerns with the variety of food being served. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 08/08/21 revealed residents had concerns with the types of food, portions and times of meals. The August 2021 meeting minutes revealed to review and make changes to the menus. On 11/21/21 at 10:18 A.M. interview with Resident #20 revealed she felt the facility served the same foods repeatedly. On 11/22/21 at 2:10 P.M. during a resident council meeting, four of nine residents present at the meeting revealed concerns related to food variety. The residents revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure meals/food items from the kitchen were palatable and served at the proper temperature. In addition, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were prepared properly to conserve appearance and palatability. This had the potential to affect 46 of 46 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#46 and #4) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. On 11/21/21 at 9:24 A.M. interview with Resident #20 revealed dietary concerns. The resident revealed he felt the food was served cold and was unappealing. On 11/21/21 at 9:55 A.M. interview with Resident #2 revealed dietary concerns. The resident revealed she felt the food was cold and did not taste good. On 11/21/21 at 1:15 P.M. interview with Resident #32 revealed dietary concerns. The resident voiced concerns food was served cold. On 11/22/21 observation of the lunch meal revealed the main meat entree was a pork cutlet. At 11/22/21 at 1:00 P.M. following the delivery of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to consider the views of residents and act promptly upon resident concerns regarding the variety of food. This affected nine residents (Residents #7, #18, #20, #24, #33, #35, #38, #40, #43) with the potential to affect all 46 residents that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Interviews on 11/22/21 at 2:10 P.M. with nine resident council members (Residents #7, #18, #20, #24, #33, #35, #38, #40, #43) during the resident council meeting revealed four of nine revealed concerns of food variety. The residents revealed these concerns come up frequently during resident council meetings. Review of resident council meeting minutes, dated 07/21/21, revealed concerns of the variety of food, specifically vegetables, with interventions to review substitutes for fall menu. Resident council minutes, dated 08/18/21, revealed concerns related to types of food, timing of meals, and seasonal menu, with interventions to review and make changes to the menus. Review of the spring summer menu for 2021 revealed a lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-01 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility resident personal needs accounts (PNA) and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a surety bond was in place to potentially cover any loss of residents PNA account funds. This affects 21 of 21 residents (Resident #2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #10, #13, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #28, #31, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40 and #41) whose personal funds were secured by the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility PNA accounts identified total balance of $31,499.58 as of 11/29/21 for the 21 residents. The facility surety bond was identified to cover a loss of up to $24,000 and had been in effect since 09/18/17. Interview with Business Office Manager #7 on 11/29/21 at 8:40 A.M. confirmed the facility current surety bond does not cover the total amount of funds in the account.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a privacy curtain that would allow full visual privacy. This affected 21 residents (Resident #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #27, #37, #43, #45, #46, #49, #201 and #452) of 21 residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: Observation on 11/21/21 at 11:16 A.M. of Resident #1's room revealed the privacy curtain was observed to be several feet too short to provide the resident full visual privacy. Observation on 11/22/21 at 7:47 A.M. of Resident #17's room revealed both beds in the room did not have privacy curtains that extend all the way around their bed to allow for full visual privacy. Interview on 11/22/21 at 10:42 A.M. with Administrator revealed the facility completed an audit and provided the listing of residents that do not have privacy curtains that provide residents full visual privacy. The interview revealed privacy curtains in the following residents rooms were not long enough to provide full visual privacy: Resident #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #14, #16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive plan of care for Resident #8, #14, #20, #26. This affected four residents (Resident's #8, #14, #20, and #26) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/27/20. Diagnoses included but were not limited to encephalotpathy, cerebral infarction with left sided hemiparesis, contracture of left hand, seizures, and Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, essential hypertension, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Resident #8's nursing admit/readmit screener, dated 04/27/20, revealed the resident had a contracture to his left arm and leg. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/09/21, revealed the resident had unclear speech, sometimes understood others, sometimes makes himself understood, and had a moderate cognitive impairment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all multi-use medications were dated when opened and failed to ensure medications were discarded once expired. This affected five residents (#12, #6, #450, #16 and #33) and had the potential to affect 26 residents who resided on the Eastside unit and 14 residents who resided on the Westside unit who received medication(s) from the observed medication carts. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:01 A.M. observation of the medication cart on the Westside unit with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #45 revealed a stock bottle of Aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 03/2021 and a stock Allergy Relief 10 mg with expiration date of 10/2020. On [DATE] at 11:01 A.M. observation of the medication cart on the Westside unit with LPN #45 revealed the medication cart contained resident medications that had not been dated when opened/first used. The cart contained Lantus insulin for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to follow a spreadsheet or diet guide for residents on a therapeutic diet and failed to ensure Resident #9 was provided a diet as ordered by the physician. This affected five residents (#3, #9, #23, #201 and #451) of 48 residents residing in the facility identified to receive a therapeutic diet. Findings include: 1. On 11/22/21 from 11:50 A.M. to 12:40 P.M. observation of the lunch meal service revealed residents were given pork cutlet, buttered noodles, mixed vegetables, corn bread and pears. Residents on a liberalized renal diet and cardiac diet were given the same meals as those on the regular meal. Review of the spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 11/22/21 revealed a description of what residents on regular, mechanical soft, puree, mechanical soft finger food, and finger food diets were to receive. There was no description of the food to be provided to residents on a liberalized renal diet or cardiac diet. Review of the menu for the lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during a pressure ulcer dressing change for Resident #28 and during blood glucose monitoring using a shared glucometer to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and five residents (#12, #34, #44, #17 and #450) of five residents observed for blood glucose monitoring. Findings include: 1. On 11/22/21 at 11:20 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #45 was observed performing blood glucose monitoring using a shared glucometer. LPN #45 obtained supplies from the east medication administration cart, applied a pair of disposable gloves and walked to Resident #12's room. LPN #45 placed a barrier on the resident's bedside table and placed the supplies on the barrier. She then cleansed the resident's left index finger and obtained the required blood using a single use lancet. LPN #45 then walked to the medication administration cart and cleansed her hands with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 advanced directives were accurate. This affected one resident (Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the Resident #10's physician order for 05/13/20 revealed the resident was DNRCC. Review of Resident #10's care plan, dated 05/14/21, revealed the resident had the Advanced Directive: Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Interventions included assess advance directive upon admission, quarterly, annually, and with significant change to ensure the resident wishes were maintained regarding advanced directive. Review of Resident #10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26's pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) was updated with current mental health diagnosis. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of the 24 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 08/05/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, COVID-19, Chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus type two, hallucinations, mood disorder, pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #26's PASARR, dated 12/14/20, revealed Resident #26 had mood disorder, panic or other severe anxiety disorder and bi-polar disorder checked under serious mental illness/ Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/21, revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #26's medical diagnoses history revealed the resident received diagnoses for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #8 and #19) who were dependent on staff for personal hygiene were shaved. This affected two residents (Resident #8 and #19) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/27/20. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, cerebral infarction with left sided hemiparesis, dysphagia, hypertension, contracture of left hand, seizures, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, dementia with behavioral disturbances, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and anemia. Review of Resident #8's nursing admit/readmit screener, dated 04/27/20, revealed the resident had no teeth but did have both full upper and lower dentures. The assessment indicated the resident had a contracture to his left arm and leg. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 had a pressure reducing mattress in place per physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 08/05/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, COVID-19, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus type two, hallucinations, mood disorder, pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/21, revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with two-person for bed mobility and transfers, and was total dependent for toileting and bathing. The assessment indicated she was at risk for pressure ulcers and had one stage four pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #26's physician order, dated 08/06/21, revealed orders for a pressure reducing mattress and a specialized air loss mattress. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8's left arm splint and foot positioning device was in place to prevent a decline in range of motion (ROM). This affected one resident (Resident #8) of one reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/27/20. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, cerebral infarction with left sided hemiparesis, dysphagia, hypertension, contracture of left hand, seizures, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, dementia with behavioral disturbances, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and anemia. Review of Resident #8's nursing admit/readmit screener, dated 04/27/20, revealed the resident had a contracture to his left arm and leg. Review of the Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident would wear a left arm splinting device for four hours on and four hours off. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's fall interventions were in place at all times and bed rails were safely installed and inspected to prevent risk of resident entrapment. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including fracture of the hip, asthma, dementia without behaviors, anxiety, dysphagia, difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy of right lower leg, osteoarthritis, repeated falls, seizures, encephalopathy, and heart disease. Resident #19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/21, revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Resident #19 required limited assistance of one-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #19 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #46 was provided oxygen therapy as ordered. This affected one resident (#46) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services/oxygen. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and chronic respiratory failure with tracheotomy (trach). Review of the current physician's orders revealed the resident had an order for oxygen at two liters via trach mask with humidification. On 11/22/21 at 7:27 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. Resident #46 was observed with humidification running, however there was no oxygen bled into the tracheotomy system at these times. The resident was not receiving any oxygen at the times of the observation. On 11/22/21 at 12:48 P.M. observation and interview with Respiratory Therapist (RT) #120 revealed the resident's humidification to his trach was not set up correctly. RT #120 verified the resident was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to comprehensively monitor and assess for weight changes to determine if the changes were a result of fluid loss/hemodialysis for Resident #14. This affected one resident (#14) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 09/21/21. Resident #14 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD), diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hyperlipidemia, anemia, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the care plan, dated 09/22/21 revealed the resident had potential for nutritional problems related to multiple medical diagnosis including ESRD on hemodialysis, asthma, diabetes mellitus type two and morbid obesity. The care plan revealed diuretic use and hemodialysis treatments may cause weight fluctuations. Supplements used for additional nutritional support. The plan was updated on 11/15/21 to reflect a significant weight loss times three weeks which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services to ensure medications for administration were not left unattended with Resident #40. This affected one resident (#40) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 11/21/21 at 7:40 A.M. Resident #40 was observed to have a full cup of medications on her bedside stand sitting in front of her. The observation revealed no staff were within viewing of the resident at that time. At the time of the observation, interview with Resident #40 revealed the nurse had left the medications with her this morning and indicated she would take them with her meal which would be served in about a half hour. Record review revealed no assessment of the resident's ability to self administer medications and no physician order for medications to be left at the resident's bedside for self-administration. On 11/21/21 at the time of the observation, interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #39 revealed she had taken medications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner for Resident #33 and Resident #19. This affected two residents (#19 and #33) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an original admission date of 10/12/14 with the latest readmission of 04/23/20. Resident #33 had diagnoses including end stage heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, severe morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, diverticulitis of large intestine, lymphedema, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, gout, anemia, pain, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, anxiety and kidney failure. Review of the pharmacy recommendation, dated 11/20/20 revealed the pharmacist recommended laboratory testing to obtain a complete metabolic panel (CMP), Digoxin level, HgbA1c, magnesium level,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #33 and Resident #19's medication regimens were free of unnecessary medications. The facility failed to obtain physician ordered daily weights to monitor the effectiveness of diuretic medication and failed to obtain laboratory testing (PT/INR) to monitor the effectiveness of anti-coagulant medication for Resident #33 and failed to ensure Resident #19 was not administered duplicate doses/excessive doses of anti-seizure medication. This affected two residents (#19 and #33) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an original admission date of 10/12/14 with the latest readmission of 04/23/20. Resident #33 had diagnoses including end stage heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, severe morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, diverticulitis of large intestine, lymphedema, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, gout, anemia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19, Resident #36 and Resident #51 were free from significant medication errors. This affected three residents (#19, #36 and #51) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/10/20. Resident #36 had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, frontotemporal dementia, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, psychotic disorder with delusions, schizophrenia and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 07/24/20 revealed the resident had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered by the physician, dietary consult for nutritional regimen and ongoing monitoring, fasting serum blood sugar as ordered by the physician, monitor/document/report as needed any signs/symptoms of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia and offer substitutes for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-01 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #53 was transported back to the facility timely following a scheduled physician's appointment. This affected one resident (#53) of one resident reviewed for outside services. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed and original admission date of 06/04/19 with the latest readmission of 07/08/20. Resident #53 had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, dysphagia and encephalopathy. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/15/20 revealed the resident had clear speech, understood others, made himself understood and had a moderate cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Review of a physician's order revealed an order for a scheduled vascular appointment on 08/13/21 at 1:00 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-09-14 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for all State Testing Nursing Assistants (STNAs) as required. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #363's personnel record revealed a hire date was 05/03/13 with previous annual evaluations completed from 05/03/14 to 05/03/19, but no annual performance evaluations completed since 05/03/2019. Review of STNA #377's personnel record revealed a hire date was 10/20/21, and no annual performance evaluations were completed for 10/20/22. Interview on 09/14/23 at 9:15 A.M. with Human Resource (HR) staff #424 confirmed the incomplete annual performance evaluations for STNA #363 and #377.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$140,849 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $140,849 — penalty dated 2024-05-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-29 for 54 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTHWOOD HEALTHCARE GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DREIFUS, ETHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 09/18/2017
LINK, MARSHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/18/2017
BRAUNSTEIN, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
FEUER, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
KATZ, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
LESHKOWITZ, ELIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/18/2017
NORTHWOOD HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/18/2017

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$157K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 2%Other / private 70%

This home reported $157K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,547per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$283per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365933. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next