Parkland Manor Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 34.6 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a level I PASRR assessment for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR assessments.The administrator identified 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #3 had a medical diagnosis report, dated 09/05/25, showed Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type and bipolar disorder.Resident #3's level I PASRR screen, dated 09/08/25, showed a primary diagnosis of chronic diastolic congestive heart failure and a secondary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. The level I PASRR screen showed the resident had no diagnosis of a serious mental illness.On 12/03/25 at 4:25 p.m., the administrator was shown the level I PASSR form and Resident #3's admission diagnoses. The administrator was asked if these diagnoses had been reported to the OHCA to see if a level II PASSR was required.On 12/03/25 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated the level I PASSR form was not completed correctly. They stated there was no documentation the OHCA had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing per the facility policy for 1 (#30) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified one resident with PRN oxygen therapy. Findings: On 12/02/25 at 11:05 a.m., Resident #30 was observed in their room. The resident was observed to have oxygen per nasal cannula. There was no date on the oxygen tubing to indicate when the tubing had been changed. A Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection policy, dated 11/2011, read in part, Change the oxygen cannulae [sic] and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed. Medical diagnoses form for Resident #30, dated 05/13/25, showed the resident has diagnoses which included COPD, asthma, and shortness of breath. A care plan for Resident #30, dated 05/26/25, showed the resident has altered respiratory status related to asthma, COPD, and nicotine dependence. The care plan showed the resident received oxygen therapy as ordered. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #30, dated 11/05/25, showed the resident has a BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was notified in a timely manner when a resident experienced a change in condition for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for change in condition. The DON identified 17 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, read in parts, Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, [their] attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status .Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: It is necessary to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center .Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Res #1 had diagnoses which included pneumonitis and dysphagia. Res #1's admission record, original admission date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. medications were administered as ordered for one (#2); b. an accurate account of controlled medications was maintained for two (#2 and #4); and c. a physician ordered medication was available to administer for one (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for pain. The BOM identified 17 residents with orders for pain medication resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Medication Handling Procedure policy, read in part, .The facility staff is responsible for reordering the medication when needed .The Refill Order Form serves as the system's basic form to facilitate the transfer of medication reorders . An undated Storage and Documentation of Controlled Medications policy, read in part, .All controlled medications shall be checked for accountability at each change of shift .In the event that a discrepancy is noted follow the policy with regard to pilferage . An undated Medication Discrepancies policy, read in part, .When a discrepancy is noted in controlled medication during shift count the off…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a level I PASARR assessment for three (#8, 10, and #13) of three residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The administrator identified 21 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #10 had a level I PASARR screen, dated 04/27/23, which documented a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and a secondary diagnosis of hemiparesis and hemiplegia. The level I PASARR screen documented the resident had no diagnoses of a serious mental illness. A medical diagnosis report, dated 05/01/23, documented Res #10 had admission diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type, delusional disorders, and brief psychotic disorders. On 05/29/24 at 2:00 p.m., the DON was shown the level I PASSAR form and Res #10's admission diagnoses. The DON was asked if these diagnoses had been reported to the OHCA to see if a level II PASSAR was required. On 05/29/24 at 2:15 p.m., the DON stated the level I PASSAR form was not completed correctly. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from accident hazards fro one (#8) for two residents sampled for accidents. The administrator reported 21 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/29/24 at 9:55 a.m., Res #8 reported one person uses lift to transfers her most times. A monthly summary, dated 4/2/24, documented mechanical lift with 2 person assist. On 05/29/24 at 1:07 p.m., CNA #1 was asked how the resident is transferred. CNA #1 reported with the mechanical lift. CNA #1 was asked how many people transfer resident and he reported usually 2 but I can do it by myself. CNA #1 was asked if he transferred the resident by himself yesterday morning and he reported yes. On 05/29/24 at 2:03 p.m., the DON reported the mechanical lift should be used by 2 staff members with all transfers.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered separately and PEG tube placement was verified prior to the administration of medications for one (#17) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings. The DON identified one resident who received medications via PEG tube. Findings: An Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube policy, revised November 2018, read in parts, .Verify placement of feeding tube: if you suspect improper tube positioning, do not administer feeding or medications. Notify the charge nurse or physician .Administer each medication separately and flush between medications .If administering more than one medication, flush with 15 mL warm water (or prescribed amount) between medications . Res #17 had diagnoses which included dementia, cerebral infarction, and gastrostomy. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/27/24, documented Res #17 was severely cognitively impaired, had no swallowing concerns, and received 25% or less proportion of total calories through parenteral or tube feeding. A care plan, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for two (#1 and #5) of six residents who were observed for medication administration. The administrator identified 21 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Administration policy, undated, read in parts, .Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: Right resident, Right drug, Right dosage, Right route, Right time, Right documentation .Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time . 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 10/02/23, documented Humalog insulin - inject 6 units subcutaneously before meals for type II diabetes mellitus. On 05/29/24 at 12:05 p.m., LPN #2 was observed to administer Novolog insulin 6 units subcutaneously per injection to Res #5. On 05/30/24 at 1:39 p.m., the DON was made aware of the medication administration observations with LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a. a PRN psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for two (#1 and #17); b. a GDR (gradual dose reduction) was attempted for one (#15); and c. routine/PRN psychotropic medications were not received unless for a specific diagnosis for two (#15 and #17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 21 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Tapering Medications and Gradual Dose Reduction policy, revised July 2022, read in parts, .Residents who use psychotropic medications shall receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs .Within the first year after a resident is admitted on a psychotropic medication or after the resident has been started on a psychotropic medication, the staff and practitioner shall attempt and GDR in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts) , 1. Res #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 31 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 6.45%. The administrator identified 21 residents who received medications in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 10/02/23, documented Humalog insulin - inject 6 units subcutaneously before meals for type II diabetes mellitus. 2. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic pain. A physician order, dated 03/11/24, documented hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 7.5/325 mg - give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. On 05/29/24 at 12:05 p.m., LPN #2 was observed to administer Novolog insulin 6 units subcutaneously per injection to Res #5. LPN #2 stated the resident received this insulin due to the before meals physician order. On 05/30/24 at 7:50 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg one tablet by mouth to Res #1. On 05/30/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELMBROOK MANAGEMENT COMPANY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK