Muncy Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 102.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from staff neglect by implementing interventions to prevent falls for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2) resulting in harm to include a fracture for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Abuse: Prevention, Investigation, and Reporting, last reviewed without changes on June 4, 2025, revealed that Resident abuse is defined as any act of omission or commission, which may cause or does cause actual physical, psychological, or emotional harm or injury to a resident. Neglect means the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect refers to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatments and care, including but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain the environment in a safe and sanitary condition in the facility's main kitchen and second floor kitchenette.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 6, Dietary Manager, on July 22, 2025, at 8:45 AM revealed the following: A walk-in cooler contained the following: A bag of lunch meat with no dates on it. A container of asiago cheese with a use by date of July 13, 2025. A container of provolone cheese with a use by date of July 5, 2025. A large bag of lettuce opened to the ambient air with a use by date of July 19, 2025. A container labeled, vegetable fresh prep, with a use by date of July 13, 2025.Cooked bacon with a use by date of July 13, 2025. A container of chicken salad with a use by date of July 19, 2025.Feta cheese with a use by date of July 19, 2025. A second walk-in cooler had a damaged single serve milk carton that was leaking onto the adjacent cartons and surrounding area. A hospitality cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident dignity during dining for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 94 and 100).Findings include: Observation on July 22, 2025, at 12:21 PM revealed Employee 1, nurse aide, feeding both Resident 94 and Resident 100 their lunch meals. Employee 1 stood between the two residents who were seated next to the dining table while she fed them. During this same time, Employee 1 would leave the table and grab other plates to serve other residents in an adjacent dining room. Observation on July 22, 2025, at 12:26 PM revealed that Employee 1 left Resident 94 and Resident 100, and Employee 2, nurse aide, arrived and finished feeding both Resident 94 and Resident 100. Employee 2 also stood between both Resident 94 and Resident 100 to finish feeding them. Observation on July 23, 2025, at 12:32 PM revealed that the facility served Resident 94 and Resident 100 their lunch meals. Employee 3, nurse aide, began feeding Resident 100 his meal standing up at 12:35 PM. Employee 3 continued feeing Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Resident 85). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 85 revealed an active physician's order dated July 8, 2025, for staff to administer the antianxiety medication, Alprazolam, 1 mg (milligram) as needed (PRN) every eight hours with a stop date of January 3, 2026, (180 days from the order date). Active physician orders for Resident 85 also included instructions for staff to administer 0.5 mg of Alprazolam three times daily (order date November 26, 2024).Per the medication resource Drugs.com, the usual maximum adult dose for anxiety is 4 mg per day. The lowest possible effective dose should be administered and the need for continued treatment reassessed frequently.If administered as often as the active physician orders permitted, Resident 85 could receive 4.5 mg of Alprazolam per day, which exceeds the usual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to anticoagulant use for one of five residents selected for medication regimen review (Resident 85). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 85 revealed an active physician's order dated January 2, 2025, for staff to administer the anticoagulant medication Eliquis (anticoagulants are a family of medications that stop your blood from clotting too easily; they can break down existing clots or prevent clots from forming in the first place) 2.5 mg (milligrams) two times daily. Review of an annual MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated February 2, 2025, assessed Resident 85 as taking an anticoagulant medication. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], assessed Resident 85 as taking an anticoagulant medication. Review of plans of care developed by the facility to identify and address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medication parameters for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a diagnosis list that included hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the current physician orders for Resident 1 revealed an order dated May 15, 2025, for Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication that is used to treat high blood pressure and/or heartrate) 25 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by gastrostomy tube (a medical tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to provide feeding, hydration, and/or medications) every eight hours. The order indicated a blood pressure and/or pulse hold: pulse less than 60; systolic blood pressure (SBP, the top number of a blood pressure reading where the heart contracts) less than 100. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from May, June, and July 2025, for Resident 1 revealed that the Metoprolol was marked as administered outside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician ordered interventions for a resident with limited range of motion for one of nine residents reviewed for range of motion concerns (Resident 85). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 85 revealed an active physician's order dated June 4, 2024, that instructed staff to ensure Resident 85 wore a left palm guard with digit separators (splint worn on the hand with cushioning to split the fingers and protect the palm) in the morning for four hours and in the evening for four hours with skin checks every two hours. Review of a plan of care developed by the facility for contracture prevention for Resident 85 revealed a goal that Resident 85 would wear the left palm guard/digit separator for four hours in the morning and four hours in the evening. Interventions included in the plan of care indicated that nursing staff would don (apply) and doff (remove) the splint as scheduled for further contracture prevention. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident who is fed by enteral means to prevent potential complications for one of three residents reviewed for tube feeding concerns (Resident 5). Findings include: The surveyor requested the facility policies and procedures related to bolus feeding (the administration of a limited volume of liquid nutrition formula over a brief period of time) via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications; also known as a PEG tube) during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Employee 4 (assistant director of nursing), and Employee 5 (assistant nursing home administrator), on July 25, 2025, at 12:00 PM; and again, during an interview with Employee 5 on July 25, 2025, at 1:00 PM. The facility was only able to provide a policy entitled,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement contact precautions for one of two residents reviewed for isolation concerns (Resident 4), and implement proper hand hygiene practices consistent with accepted standards of practice for two of 21 residents (Residents 5 and 9). Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Hand Hygiene, dated July 18, 2025, revealed that hand hygiene must be performed prior to donning gloves when gloves are being worn for interaction with a patient and/or patient zone. Hand hygiene must be performed after removing gloves when gloves are being worn for interaction with a patient and/or patient zone and patient surroundings. Remove gloves, clean hands, and don a fresh pair of gloves when caring for a patient that requires moving from a dirty site to a clean site. Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed nursing documentation dated July 21, 2025, at 2:11 PM that Resident 9 had increasing edema (swelling) in both her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion (ROM) for seven of eight residents reviewed (Residents 18, 42, 58, 59, 60, 71, and 88). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 18 revealed a current care plan for staff to provide a restorative nursing program (RNP) to prevent contracture(s) which included: AAROM (active assisted range of motion, movement of the body to maintain a resident's ability) to their BL (bilateral) arms at the shoulders, elbows, wrists, and fingers. Do a slow progressive stretch and monitor for discomfort for up to 30 repetitions by shift. PROM (passive range of motion) to their BLLE (lower legs at the hips, knees, and ankles for flexion, extension, abduction (moving away from the middle of the body), adduction (moving closer to the middle of the body), and ankle pumps, slowly and gently up to 20 repetitions by shift. Review of task documentation for Resident 18 revealed that staff did not document completion and/or document…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated July 1, 2024, that indicated the facility assessed him an having a urinary catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine). There was no documented evidence in Resident 8's clinical record to indicate that he was utilizing a urinary catheter. Interview with the Administrator on August 15, 2024, at 9:38 AM confirmed Resident 8 did not utilize a urinary catheter. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ix) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in PA