No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Canterbury Place

310 Fisk Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15201 · Non profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (412) 622-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4401 Penn Ave 3 · (412) 648-9670 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4101 Penn Ave · (412) 621-6471 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Main St Old Forge, PA 18518 · (570) 457-2021 · Call to confirm hours
Park
254 40th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.5%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.5%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.5%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.4%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.7%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.211.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.451.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
27.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 27.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.0%CMS range 32.1–64.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.0–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge27.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting79.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.2–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.20
RN hours/ resident / day
0.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.92
RN hoursweekends
41.6%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-16)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper supervision for a resident (Resident R1) resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) from the facility. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation (IJ) for sixteen residents identified as an elopement risk. The immediate jeopardy was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Wandering and Elopements dated 12/9/25, indicated the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of the facility policy Fire Safety In-Service dated 12/9/25, indicated that in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2026-02-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a fully functioning call bell system for one resident resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Answering the Call Light dated 1/2/26, indicated: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the residents requests and needs. General Guidelines - Be sure that the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times. Some residents may not be able to use their call light. Be sure you check these residents frequently. Review of admission Record indicated Resident R1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs), dated 1/24/26, indicated diagnosis of cancer( a disease of uncontrolled proliferation by transformed cells subject to evolution by natural selection), malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility submitted documents, facility documentation, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed (Closed Resident Record CR1) was free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a fracture of their right femur (thigh bone). Findings include: Review of facility policy Recognizing Sign and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, dated 12/9/25, indicated all types of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited. Neglect is defined as failure to provide goods and services as necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Sign of neglect: accidents among residents who need supervision. Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated 12/9/25, indicated residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician order for a Bipap device (a positive airway pressure machine when breathing in and breathing out) and failed to act on a malfunctioning Bipap in a timely manner for one of three residents (Resident R2) which resulted in actual harm of dyspnea (difficulty breathing), hypoxemia (a low level of oxygen in the blood), hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood stream), requiring an intensive care unit (ICU - specialized hospital department where critically ill patients receive intensive, round-the-clock care) admission for Bipap. Findings include: Review of the facility policy CPAP/Bipap Support dated 1/2/25, indicated Bipap delivers continuous positive airway pressure, but allows separate pressure settings for expiration (EPAP -breathing out) and inspiration (IPAP- breathing in). Document in the resident's medical record how the resident tolerated the procedure. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and the Pennsylvania Nursing Practice Act, clinical record review, incidents submitted to the local State field office, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of clinical practice for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Skin Care and Wound Management dated 12/9/25, indicated assigned/due treatments are assigned in the electronic medical record under the ETAR (Electronic Treatment Administration Record) tab. Review of the facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description indicated the LPN is to provide care to residents in accordance with physician orders, recognized standards of practice and established company policies and procedures. Responsibilities include sets up and administers prescribed medications and treatments. Review of the facility Registered Nurse (RN) job description indicated the RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and facility job descriptions, clinical record review, incidents submitted to the local State field office, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Skin Care and Wound Management dated 12/9/25, indicated all residents have head-to-toe skin inspection upon admission/readmission, then completed weekly, and as needed by nursing. It is documented in the electronic medical record NRSG: Weekly Skin. Assigned/due treatments are assigned in the electronic medical record under the ETAR (Electronic Treatment Administration Record) tab. Wound assessments/observation are required at a minimum weekly and when there is a change. Review of the facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description indicated the LPN is to provide care to residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility provided document, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility to maintain equipment in a sanitary condition for four of six meal delivery carts (Meal delivery cart 3, 4, 6, and 9)Findings include: Review of facility policy Cleaning and Sanitizing, dated 12/9/25, indicated team members maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Cleaning logs/scheduled are available for all small and large equipment. Review of facility provided document Trayline Cleaning List, indicated Task: Spray out carts; Frequency: Daily; Task: Spray out the carts; Frequency: Weekly. During multiple observations on 6/2/26, from 11:54 a.m., through 12:36 a.m., during lunch meal service, revealed the following: Meal delivery cart 3's exterior door panels and lower bumper panels were covered with old food debris and dark spots and splashes of a dark substance; top of cart had dried, old food debris, as delivered to the 3rd floor with lunch trays contained inside. Meal delivery cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) accurately reflected the resident's status for two of six residents (Residents R2 and R3).Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (periodic assessments of care needs), dated October 2025, indicated the following instructions:Section O0110. Special Treatments, Procedures, and ProgramsCheck all of the following treatments, procedures, and programs that were performed.K1. Hospice - mark if indicated while a resident. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), high blood pressure, and dementia (a general…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility by failing to ensure proper supervision for a resident (Resident R1) resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) from the facility on 4/22/26, which created an immediate jeopardy situation for all residents identified as an elopement risk.Findings include: The job description for the Nursing Home Administrator specified the duties and responsibilities of the Administrator-Skilled Nursing Facility include performing a variety of tasks associated with creating a fulfilling resident experience, including resident care coordination, teammate oversight, and regulatory reporting and compliance for the Skilled Nursing areas of the Community. Supervise all department heads to ensure the community is operating according to standards and in compliance with regulatory guidelines. The job description for the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) training to one of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7).Findings include: Review of LPN Employee E7's personnel file indicated a date of hire of 8/1/24. Review of LPN Employee E7's education training records on 6/3/26, failed to include education on QAPI during the past year of employment as required. Interview on 6/3/26, at 10:30 a.m. Infection Preventionist Employee E16 confirmed that the facility failed to provide QAPI training to one of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0946 — isolated
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Compliance and Ethics training to one of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7).Findings include: Review of LPN Employee E7's personnel file indicated a date of hire of 8/1/24. Review of LPN Employee E7's education training records failed to include education on Compliance and Ethics training during the past year of employment as required. Interview on 6/3/26, at 10:30 a.m. Infection Preventionist Employee E16 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Compliance and Ethics training to one of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Behavioral training to one of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7).Findings include: Review of LPN Employee E7's personnel file indicated a date of hire of 8/1/24. Review of LPN Employee E7's education training records failed to include education on Behavioral training during the past year of employment as required. Interview on 6/3/26, at 10:30 a.m. Infection Preventionist Employee E16 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Behavioral training to one of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility neglected to provide the necessary means and services for a resident to contact staff for help when the call system malfunctioned for one of two trach residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Prevention, Intervention Reporting and investigation dated 1/2/26, indicated: Residents are to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, emotional/mental abuse, self-abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion at all times. Definitions: Neglect is defined as failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm. Mental anguish or mental illness. Review of admission Record indicated Resident R1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs), dated 1/24/26, indicated diagnosis of cancer( a disease of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in Resident R2 being transferred to the hospital for a hematoma. This failure was determined to be past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of facility policy 1/23/26, Accidents and Incidents indicated: All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc. occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. The nature of the injury/illness (e.g. bruise, fall, nausea, etc.). The circumstances surrounding the accident or incident. Where the accident or incident took place; The name of witnesses and their accounts of the accident or incident; the injured person account of the accident or incident; the disposition of the injured (i.e. transferred to hospital, put to bed, sent home, returned to work, etc.) This facility is in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, facility and clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that the facility provide a fully functioning call bell system for one resident resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: The job description for the NHA specified that the job scope is to oversee the overall operations of the Community and is responsible for resident care, customer service, and the welfare and safety of residents. The job description for the DON specified that the job scope is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Nursing services department. Facilitates the coordination of nursing services and other departments to maintain quality of care for residents. Based on the findings of this report that identified that the facility failed to provide a fully functioning call bell system for on resident resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' care plans were updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of six residents (Resident R22, R29, and R31).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Goals and Objectives, Care Plans dated 12/9/25, indicated care plan goals and objectives are defined as the desired outcomes for a specific resident problem. Care plans will be modified accordingly. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pulmonary hypertension (type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart), glaucoma and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated 11/6/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an Assessment Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS- a widely used tool designed to measure the severity of tardive dyskinesia (TD- a disorder characterized by involuntary movements that can occur as a side effect of long term use of antipsychotic medication) assessment at least quarterly for three of five residents (Resident R30, R36, R102).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Assessment Involuntary Movement Scale last reviewed 12/9/25, indicated to ensure early identification, monitoring, and appropriate clinical response to involuntary movements particularly those associated with antipsychotic medication use, through consistent use of the AIMIS scale for residents receiving nursing services. AIMS must be completed prior to initiation of any antipsychotic medication, must be completed every three months (quarterly) for all residents receiving antipsychotic medications. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for five of seven residents (Resident R21, R30, R33, R36, and R50) and failed to have a current hospice agreement that included the vendors name.Findings include: Review of the facility Hospice Program last reviewed 12/9/25, indicated Hospice services are available to residents at the end of life. Our facility has an agreement in place with at least one Medicare-certified hospice to ensure that residents who wish to participate in a hospice program may do so. Hospice providers who contract with this facility must have a written agreement with the facility outlining the responsibilities of the facility and the hospice agency. It is the responsibility of the hospice to manage the residents' care as it relates to terminal illness and related conditions including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for one of five residents (Resident R64). Findings include:Review of facility policy Dignity dated 12/9/25, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R64's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/28/25, indicated diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- a common enlargement of the prostate gland in aging men that squeezes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that residents were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R48).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Advanced Directives dated 12/9/25, indicated prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of his/her family members and/or their legal representative, about the existence of any written advanced directives. If the resident indicates that they have not established an advanced directive the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advanced directives. Staff will document in the medical record the offer to assist and the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance.Review of the admission record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of five residents (Resident R41). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (nerve disease caused by damage to many nerves), edema and obesity. Review of Resident 's Medicare 5-day MDS assessment(minimum data assessment)- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/29/25, indicated the diagnosis remained current. Review of Resident R41's physician orders dated 12/29/25 Insulin Lispro (1 Unit Dial) Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 140 = 0 units; 141 - 180 = 1 unit; 181 - 220 = 2 units; 221 - 260 = 3 units; 261 - 300 = 4 units; 301 - 340 = 5 units; 341 - 1000 = 6 units Call provider if CBG >340, subcutaneously with meals for IDDM Review of blood sugar summary indicated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to display (for the residents and family members) the required information on the grievance process for the building.Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Grievance/Complaint Procedures dated? 12/9/25, indicated: Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at this facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. Review of facility policy Grievance Program (Concern and Comment) dated 12/9/25, indicated: Purpose: To help guide our communities in the Grievance Process and ensure that a thorough, complete, and accurate investigation has been completed to the best of our knowledge in accordance with F585 483.10 (j)(1)(2)(3) and (4).The facility will post in prominent locations throughout the facility The Right to File Grievances orally (meaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received proper treatment for pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/PI's - injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for two of four residents (Resident R11, and R93). Findings include: Review of the facility wound policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, dated 12/9/25, indicated In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following - a full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width, and depth presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. Review of Resident R11's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia with behavioral disturbance (brain diseases that mainly affect frontal and temporal lobes of the brain. These areas of the brain are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy, interview with staff and resident, it was determined the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents receiving oxygen (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Tracheostomy Care dated 12/9/25, indicated a replacement tracheostomy tube (a hollow tube inserted into a surgical opening in the neck (stoma) directly into the windpipe to provide long-term ventilation) must be available at the bedside at all times. Review of the admission record indicated R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/31/25, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that block airflow and make it hard to breathe), and Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of two residents (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Goals and Objectives, Care Plans last reviewed 12/9/25, indicated care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/23/25, indicated the diagnosis of heart failure (heart doesn't pump the way it should), hypertension and dementia. Review of Resident R36's physician progress notes dated 8/19/25, indicated past medical history that included but not inclusive to CAD, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, Post Traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications properly and securely in one of two medication rooms ( Renaissance unit), four of four medication carts (First Floor Carts A and B, and Renaissance Hall front and back), and failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in presence of the nurse.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 12/9/25, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. During an observation on 1/13/26, at 11:14 a.m. the Renaissance unit medication room refrigeration contained an ice pack. During an interview completed on 1/13/26, at 11:19 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E10 confirmed the ice pack was stored in the refrigerator and stated, the ice pack is used for the laboratory and should be stored in the laboratory refrigerator. During an observation on 1/13/26, at 1:24 p.m. the First Floor Cart A contained the undated medication of albuterol nebulizers (respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for two of four quarters (January 2025, through March 2025 and July 2025, through September 2025).Findings include: Review of facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program Guidelines last reviewed 12/9/25, indicated the facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility wide data driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement last reviewed 12/9/25, indicated the following individuals serve on the committee: Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Infection Preventionist, Pharmacy, Social Services, Activity Service, Environmental Services, Human Resources, Medical Records and Diagnostics. A review of the QAPI Committee meeting sign-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to manage airborne isolation for Covid positive infections in one of seven rooms (Resident R37). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) - Identification and Management of Ill Residents dated 12/9/25, indicated newly identified Covid-19 infection in resident; symptomatic residents regardless of vaccination status, are restricted to their rooms and cared for staff using a NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) approved N95 or equivalent or higher level respirator, eye protection (goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face), gloves, and a gown. Review of Resident R37's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 8/11/25. Review of Resident R37's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/14/25, indicated diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon review of clinical and hospital records, interviews with staff, and review of facility submitted documents and policies, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure physician orders were transcribed accurately on admission for two of three records reviewed (Closed Record Resident R1 and Resident R2).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication and Treatment orders, dated 1/2/25, indicated orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. Only authorized licensed practioners, or individuals authorized to take verbal orders from practioners, shall be allowed to write orders in the medical chart. Review of clinical record indicated that Closed Record (CR) Resident R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal glucose readings as per order for one out of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Diabetes - Clinical Protocol dated 1/2/25, indicated the physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record (MAR).Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/27/25, indicated the diagnoses of diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), and high blood pressure.Review of Resident R1's physician orders dated 5/25/25, indicated Insulin Lispro (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were free from mental abuse, including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology for one of five residents reviewed (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 1/2/25, indicated to establish and maintain a culture of compassion and caring for all residents and particularly those with behavioral, cognitive or emotional problems. Review of admission record indicated Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/11/25, indicated the diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), hypertension (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and peripheral vascular disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of four residents (Resident R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy Respiratory Therapy dated 1/2/25, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment. Change the oxygen nasal cannula (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to patients through two prongs inserted into the nostrils) every seven days, or as needed. Store the mask and plastic tubing from the nebulizer (small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) in a plastic bag, marked with date and resident ' s name, between uses. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/20/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, employee personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their written procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents by failing to perform criminal history background checks prior to the date of hire for five of six sampled records (Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E17, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E18, NA Employee E19, and RN Employee E20). Findings include: The Safety-01 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation general policy dated 5/1/22, last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that the facility will obtain criminal and FBI background checks. Prior to the employee's first day of employment, the facility will make reasonable efforts to obtain personal and professional reference information. Documentation will note conducted attempts. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2's was hired to the facility on 9/3/24. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2's personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician order for a urinary catheter (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine) included the size of the suprapubic catheter, balloon sizing, and the amount of fluid needed to insert for balloon inflation/securement (the balloon keeps catheter in the bladder) for three out of seven sampled residents (Residents R53, R58, and R316 ) and failed to ensure catheter bags were covered as required for two of seven sampled residents (Residents R58, and R316). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Suprapubic Catheter Replacement dated 1/3/24, indicated verify that there is a physician's order. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Supplies needed indicated catheter of proper size and composition (ordered by the physician). Review of the facility policy Dignity dated 1/3/24, indicated staff are expected to promote dignity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for four of five residents (Residents R14, R22, R58, and R314) and failed to maintain an accurate care plan for dialysis access site for two of five (Resident R22, and R314). Findings include: Review of the facility policy End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with dated 1/3/24, indicated communication between the dialysis provider and facility staff will occur, and staff will be knowledgeable of the care of grafts and fistulas. The resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to End Stage Renal Disease and dialysis care. Review of Resident R14's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/11/24, indicated diagnoses of cerebral infarction (necrotic tissue in the brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for three out of four nurse aide personnel records (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E10, NA Employee E11, and NA Employee E12). Findings include: Review of CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) §483.35(d)(7) Regular in-service education. The facility must complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews. In-service training must comply with the requirements of §483.95(g). Review of NA Employee E10's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 8/25/14. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 3/2/09. Review of NA Employee E12's personnel record indicated he was hired to the facility on [DATE]. Review of personnel records did not include an annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for NA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for one of three residents (Resident R77). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Neglect Exploitation General Policy dated 1/3/25, indicated Investigation - The facility is responsible for investigating and reporting cases of possible abuse, neglect including involuntary seclusion, exploitation, and misappropriation of property to external agencies in accordance with laws and regulations. Review of facility policy Abuse Investigation and Reporting, Protection and Response dated 1/??/25, indicated skilled nursing facilities are responsible for the investigation and reporting of allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of a resident's property. Review of Resident R77 clinical record was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R77 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 11/26/24, indicated diagnosis of renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan for two of seven residents (Residents R8 and R316) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident and care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 1/2/25, indicated the facility must develop a comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/23/24, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure, mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident R8's physician order dated 11/19/24, indicated FreeStyle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal glucose readings as per order for one out of three residents (Resident R108). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Diabetes - Clinical Protocol dated 1/2/25, indicated the physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of the admission record indicated Resident R108 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R108's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/16/24, indicated the diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- age related prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulties), obstructive uropathy (a structural or functional hindrance of normal urine flow), and diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received the necessary services to prevent/treat pressure ulcers/wounds for two of six residents (Residents R317 and Resident R51). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Prevention of Pressure Injuries dated 1/3/24, indicated review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. Use a standardized pressure injury screening tool to determine and document risk factors. Conduct a comprehensive skin assessment. Implement preventative skin care interventions. Select appropriate support surfaces based on the resident's risk factors. Review the interventions and strategies for effectiveness on an ongoing basis. Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 1/3/24, indicates the facility must develop a comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of three residents (Residents R14). Findings include: Review of facility policy Enteral Nutrition dated 1/2/25, indicated adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. The use of enteral nutrition is based on the results of the comprehensive nutritional assessment, and is consistent with current standards of practice, the resident's advance directives, treatment goals and facility policy. Review of Resident R14's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/11/24, indicated diagnoses of cerebral infarction (necrotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of three residents (Resident R59). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hospice Services dated 1/2/25, indicated that hospice services are available to residents at the end of life. The facility is responsible for collaborating with hospice representatives and coordinating facility staff participation in the hospice care planning process for residents receiving these services; obtaining the following information from the hospice: - the most recent hospice plan of care - hospice election form - physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness - names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care - instruction on how to access the hospice's 24-hour on-call system Coordinated care plan for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two of seven residents (Residents R22, and R315), failed to have proper interventions carried out by staff for one of two positive Covid residents (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Transmission Based Precautions dated 1/3/24, indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are in place for residents with an infection or colonization of a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO), wounds and/or indwelling medical devices, such as an indwelling catheter, trach/vent, central line, and feeding tube. Gowns and gloves are to be on and used when providing high contact care with a resident who is in EBP. Review of the facility policy Covid -19 Identification and Management of Ill Residents dated 1/3/24, indicated newly identified Covid-19 infection in a resident is evaluated as a potential outbreak. Symptomatic residents are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, employee personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation on the date of orientation for one out of five sampled records (Nurse aide Employee E3). Findings include: The Safety-01 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation general policy dated 5/1/22, last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that all employees and contracted staff will be educated upon orientation, annually, and as indicated on topics to include resident rights,privacy and confidentiality , and abuse prevention. Staff will be educated on recognizing the signs of abuse, neglect and exploitation. Review of Nurse aide (NA) Employee E3's personnel record indicated she was hired 10/2/24. Review of nurse deployment documents (form indicating the name and number of nursing staff working a specific date), indicated that Nurse aide (NA) Employee E3 first worked on the floor starting 10/7/24. After her orientation was completed, Nurse aide (NA) Employee E3 worked on 10/13/24 and continued to work at the facility. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of changes in condition for one of six sampled residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the Resident R1 admission record indicates she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1 quarterly MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set Assessment. Periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/5/2024, indicated that the resident current diagnoses were Alzheimers (progressive mental deterioration due to generation of the brain), rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and obesity. Review of Resident R1 medical records indicated that in 12/13/2023 a new guardian was appointed for the resident. Review of Resident R1 nurse progress dated 1/31/2024 indicated that a message was left with the POA regarding the physician recommendation. Review of Resident R1 nurse progress dated 2/4/2024 indicated that a message was left with the son regarding a fall the resident sustained. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility baseline care plan summary, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was completed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for four of eight residents (Residents R95, R105, R333, and R262). Findings include: The facility Baseline Care Plan Summary , last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that all residents will have a Baseline Care Plan Summary completed within 48 hours of admission. A baseline careplan should include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and PASARR recommendation, if applicable. Review of Resident R95's admission record indicated resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R95's MDS assessment ( Minimum Data Set Assessment: A periodic assessment of resident care needs ) dated 1/10/24, indicated he was admitted with the following diagnoses , Parkinson's disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs of one of five residents (Resident R69). Findings include: Review of facility policy 2.3 Call Lights dated 1/3/24, indicated all residents have a standard call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/23/23, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and osteoarthritis (degeneration of the joints causing pain and stiffness). During an observation on 1/22/24, at 9:29 a.m. Resident R69 was observed lying in bed with his soft touch call light placed on the left top corner of the mattress, completely out of the resident's visual sight and reach. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper Advanced Directives on one of five residents ( Resident R95). Findings include: The facility POLST (Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) policy, last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that all residents will have a POLST form completed or reviewed within 14 days of admission, if there is a change in the resident's status, and annually with the annual MDS schedule. In emergency life-saving treatment situations, consent is presumed for full treatment if a decision has not been made and minimum requirements for POLST are not completed. Review of Resident R95's admission record indicated resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R95's MDS assessment ( Minimum Data Set Assessment: A periodic assessment of resident care needs ) dated 1/10/24, indicated he was admitted with the following diagnoses Parkinson's disease (neuromuscular disorder causing tremors and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of three residents (Resident R69). Findings include: Review of facility policy 15.7 Oxygen Therapy Via Nasal Cannula reviewed 1/5/23, and 1/3/24, indicated oxygen therapy via nasal cannula (a lightweight tube placed in the nostrils to provide oxygen) will be administered as ordered by a physician and will include correct flow rate, concentration, mode of delivery, and frequency. Replace cannula every seven days, date, and store in plastic bag when note in use. Review of facility policy SRC-Quality of Care-15.12 Small Volume Nebulizer-Breathing Treatment reviewed 15/23, and 1/3/24, indicated to date connecting tubing, change PRN (as needed) and as indicated. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label open medications with a date in two of four medication carts (2nd Floor Cart A and 3rd Floor High Side). Findings include: Review of facility policy SRC-Pharmacy-12.21 Medication Storage-AB dated 1/3/24, indicated all medications are maintained under strict conditions according to accepted standards of practice. An observation on 1/24/24, at 9:30 a.m. of the 2nd Floor Cart A medication cart revealed the following medications not dated upon opening: - Resident R69's Humalog pen (prefilled pen to inject rapid acting insulin under the skin). - Resident R85's NovoLog pen (prefilled pen to inject rapid acting insulin under the skin). - Resident R85's Lantus pen (prefilled pen to inject long acting insulin under the skin). During an interview on 1/24/24, at 9:32 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 confirmed the findings noted above. An observation on 1/24/24, at 9:41 a.m. of the 3rd Floor High Side medication cart revealed the following medications not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members for two of four quarterly meeting (February 2023 thru December 2023). Findings Include: The facility Quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) policy dated 10/31/21 and last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that the facility utilizes a quality assurance and performance improvement program. to comprehensively address systems of care and management practices. The administrator and the Medical director of each facility is responsible for implementation of the QAPI program. At minimum, the standing members of this committee are the Administrator, Medical director, Director of Nursing and the clinical staff responsible for infection control. Review of Quality assurance and performance improvement sign in sheets and attendance records from February 13, 2023 through December 14, 2023 did not indicate that the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-31 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents, an audit conducted by the State Ombudsman Office and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman Office of resident transfers and discharges for 30 of 30 months (4/22, 5/22, 6/22, 7/22, 8/22, 9/22, 10/22, 11/22, 12/22, 1/23, 2/23, 3/23, 4/23, 5/23, 6/23, 7/23, 8/23, 9/23, 10/23, 11/23, 12/23, 1/24, 2/24, 3/24, 4/24, 5/24, 6/24, 7/24, 8/24, and 9/24) as required. Findings include: A request to review facility documents on 10/25/24, of the facility's compliance in notifying the State Ombudsman Office revealed the facility failed to provide documented evidence of notifying the State Ombudsman Office of residents transfers and discharged for the time period of 4/22, through 9/24, A review of an audit conducted 8/1/24, by the State Ombudsman Office revealed that the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman Office of resident transfers and discharges since 3/22, During an interview on 10/25/24, at 11:30 am the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to report resident transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/01/2007
UPMCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/01/2007
BECKWITH III, GEORGEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2023
BLUM, EVAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/12/2014
BORGO, ANGELAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/10/2020
CAPLAN, DEBRAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2020
CESTELLO, LOUISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/18/2023
CLAGETTE, VAUGHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2019
COVERT, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2019
DAVIS, LESLIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2021
DICK, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
GABEL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/17/2023
GHUBRIL, SALEEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/20/2023
HALEY, LISAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/20/2023
HUMPHREY, KATHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/20/2023
JEGASOTHY, MICHELEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/01/2004
LUCIDO, ELENIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2022
LYONS, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2019
MONTLER, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2013
NEIDICH, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/07/2019
PEPPERMAN, ANNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2016
RAIMY, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/22/2017
SCOTT, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
SHEKHAR, ANANTHAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2020
SHIPLEY, SUSANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2015
SOLOMON, JEFFREYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
STILLEY, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2021
SURMA, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2015
VERBANAC, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
WELLS, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2020
BRODINE, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
HAMILTON, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
JOY, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
NACE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
SIMMONS, EILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
WESLEY, BRYANTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
OAKDALE SENIORS ALLIANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2025
RHOADS, CHARLESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2016
BAKER TILLY US LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 39 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-53.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 2%Other / private 26%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$583per resident / day
operating cost
$17,718per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$379per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next