No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunset Manor Avera Health

129 E Clay St, Irene, SD 57037 · Non profit - Other · 58 certified beds · (605) 263-3318 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse4 actual-harm citations$40,596 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $40,596 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
512 Broadway St · (605) 563-2411 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 W Park Ave · (605) 326-5211 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
101 N Main St · (605) 766-5536 · Call to confirm hours
Park
East 29th Street & Ruth St · (605) 668-5231 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.3%21.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.7%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.5%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.1%5.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.2%19.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.0%17.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%25.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table74.0%24.6%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.741.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.721.751.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.85
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
70.4%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 49.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.44 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-31)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for one of one sampled resident (1) who was straddled and restrained in his bed by one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA)G while he provided incontinence (involuntary urine and bowel leakage) care to resident 1. Findings include:1. Review of the provider's SD DOH FRI report dated 3/23/26 revealed that resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 99, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. The report indicated that on 3/22/26 at 4:00 a.m., resident 1 became combative during incontinence care provided by CNA G. During the interaction, CNA G straddled resident 1 in his bed to manage the resident's combative behavior and applied pressure with his thumb to a pressure point behind the resident's ear to calm the resident. This action increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (2) with cognitive impairment who ingested an improperly stored and secured Santimine (sanitizing chemical) tablet. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 2/6/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 2 revealed: *His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 1 which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. *On 2/6/25 at 1:50 p.m. he was observed raising his hand to his mouth and a blue coloration was noted in his mouth. *A unnamed certified nursing assistant (CNA) asked him to spit it out which he. *Unnamed CNAs approached him and noted they were Santimine (sanitizer tablets). *He went to put another tablet in his mouth, and registered nurse RN C swatted it out of his hand causing it to fall to the floor. *Material safety data sheets (MSDS) were pulled. *Poison control was called. *Medical director (MD) J was notified. -Due to increased behaviors and agitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint review, record review, interview, video review, and policy review, the provider failed to protect six of eight sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8) from neglect by licensed practical nurse (E) who did not offer or provide repositioning or toileting assistance as directed in their plans of care. Findings include: 1. Review of the 9/12/24 SD DOH complaint revealed: *The complainant wanted to remain anonymous. *There was concern regarding neglect for all residents in the Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) unit. *From 9/7/24 at 10:00 p.m. to 9/8/24 at 6:00 a.m. -Resident 5 was left in the same clothes he was dressed in on 9/7/24. -He was curled up in a ball on the floor with no blanket. -He was cold to the touch. -He was covered in feces. -His bed was still made from the previous day. *Residents (1, 2, 3, 7, and 8) were identified as being incontinent of both bowel and bladder in the complaint. *Complainant requested a review of the video footage of the unit. 2. Review of resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint review, record review, interview, and video review, the provider failed to ensure eight of eight sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) who were dependent on staff for their care needs, received those cares as directed on their care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of the 9/12/24 SD DOH complaint revealed: *The complainant wanted to remain anonymous. *There was concern regarding neglect for all residents in the Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) unit. *From 9/7/24 at 10:00 p.m. to 9/8/24 at 6:00 a.m. -Resident 5 was left in the same clothes he was dressed in on 9/7/24. -He was curled up in a ball on the floor with no blanket. -He was cold to the touch. -He was covered in feces. -His bed was still made from the previous day. *Residents (1, 2, 3, 7, and 8) were identified as being incontinent of both bowel and bladder in the complaint. *Complainant requested a review of the video footage of the unit. 2. Review of resident 4's electronic medical record (EMR) and pocket care plan revealed: *His diagnoses included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), interview, observation, and policy review, the provider failed to report a physical abuse incident to the SD DOH within the required time frame for one of one sampled resident (1), who was straddled and restrained in his bed by one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) (G) while he provided incontinence (involuntary urine and bowel leakage) care to resident 1. Findings include: Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 3/23/26 SD DOH FRI (a required reporting of unexpected or adverse events) report revealed that on 3/22/26 at 4:00 a.m., resident 1 was combative during morning care rounds (changing of residents who were incontinent of stool or urine). CNA G had turned the resident so he was positioned on his side, lying in his bed. That increased the resident's combative behavior, so CNA G placed a leg over the resident to straddle him. CNA G then used his thumb and put pressure on a pressure point under the resident's ear (to lock the resident's jaw) to distract the resident. This increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility assessment review, the provider failed to post the required nursing staffing information in a location readily visible to residents, staff, and visitors that clearly reflected actual hours worked by the nursing staff from October 2025 through December 2025 daily:*For 46 of 92 days reviewed regarding the Traumatic Brain Injury unit (TBI).*For 24 of 92 days reviewed regarding the Challenging Behavior Unit (CBU).*For 13 of 92 days reviewed regarding the main area where residents resided (The Manor). Findings include:1. Observation on 12/29/25 at 2:34 p.m. of the provider's posted nurse staffing hours for The Manor and the CBU revealed:*The information was posted on a bulletin board near the nurses' station in the Manor.*It included the date of 12/26/25 and resident census for The Manor and the CBU.*There were no registered nurse (RN) hours documented on those postings.2. Observation on 12/29/25 at 3:45 p.m. in the TBI unit revealed there were no posted nurse staffing hours.3. Observation on 12/31/25 at 9:28 a.m. of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure six of six sampled residents' (2, 6, 9, 34, 39, and 40) with a severe mental health illness Minimum Data Set, a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs, (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for the area of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR).Findings include: 1. Review of resident 2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *He was admitted on [DATE]. *His diagnoses included bipolar (mental condition causing extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), and neurocognitive disorder (a group of conditions marked by the decline in mental function like memory, thinking, and reasoning) and psychotic disorder (a loss of contact with reality characterized by symptoms like delusions (false beliefs) and hallucinations (seeing, hearing, feeling things that are not true)). *He had a level I (1) PASRR completed on 9/5/25 for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the staff followed standard food safety practices regarding:*Monitoring the food and drink temperatures prepared and served were served to residents by cook M, P and Q and dietary assistant (DA) N on one of one evening meal services and one of one lunchtime meal services.*Handwashing and glove use by DA N and O and Cooks P and Q was followed during one of one evening meal service and one of one lunch time service in the kitchen. Findings include:1. Interview on 12/29/25 at 3:17 p.m. with resident 48 in her room revealed:*She stated the food was not prepared well.*At times the food is overcooked and at times it is cold.*She stated that there were multiple residents who did not eat their meals due to how the food was prepared and served.*She had reported her concerns to staff members but they were not the staff members who had the authority to do anything about her concerns.2. Observation on 12/29/25 at 5:23 p.m. from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure infection control practices were followed regarding: *Cleaning of mechanical lifts and slings by three of three certified nursing assistants (CNA) (W, Z, and AA) observed while transferring three of three sampled residents (9, 24, and 25).*Hand hygiene completed by five of five CNAs (W, X, Z, BB, and CC) observed when assisting three of three sampled resident (17, 24, and 50) with cares.*Hand hygiene completed by two of two CNAs (W and Y) observed assisting five of five sampled resident (1, 9, 16, 25, and 40) to eat. *Use of personal protective equipment by two of two CNAs (X and AA) while providing resident care to one of one sampled resident (24) who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/29/25 at 2:24 p.m. in the common area of the Challenging Behavior Unit (CBU) revealed: *There was a sling made of cloth material draped over the sit-to-stand mechanical lift (a mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incidents (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure staff followed a resident's documented do not resuscitate (DNR) code status wishes for one of one closed record sampled resident (52) when discovered with no pulse or respirations by staff and was then provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without first verifying the resident's code status. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's [DATE] SD DOH FRI revealed:*On [DATE] at 5:20 a.m. a nurse obtained resident 52's vitals which were stable, and her blood sugar was reading high both times it was checked and then assisted resident 52 (who had agreed to go to the hospital) to the restroom.*The nurse called the on-call provider to report on resident 52's condition and to receive orders to administer insulin and Zofran (medication for nausea).*A second nurse went to resident 52's room and found her slumped over on the toilet and heard a gurgling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD OH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by one of one sampled resident (3) who made unsolicited sexual advances towards one of one sampled resident (2). Resident 3 had a history of sexually inappropriate behavior and required close supervision while in common areas around peers. Findings include: 1. Review of the SD FRI report dated 6/9/25 revealed: *The incident occurred on 6/7/25. *Residents 2 and 3 ambulated via wheelchairs independently. *Residents 2 and 3 were in a hallway unmonitored by staff. *Resident 3 propelled himself in his wheelchair up to resident 2 and rubbed her right leg then rolled away from her. *Certified nursing assistant (CNA) J talked to residents 2 and 3 in the hallway but had not separated the residents. *Resident 3 put hand sanitizer on his hands, rolled over to resident 2 and put some of the sanitizer on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to complete a resident assessment for the physical and emotional well-being of one of one resident (2) who experienced unsolicited touching of her body by one of one resident (3) following alleged abuse for one of one sampled resident (2). Findings include: 1. Review of the SD FRI report dated 6/9/25 revealed: *The incident occurred on 6/7/25. *Residents 2 and 3 ambulated via wheelchairs independently. *Residents 2 and 3 were in a hallway unmonitored by staff. *Resident 3 propelled himself in his wheelchair up to resident 2 and rubbed her right leg then rolled away from her. *Certified nursing assistant (CNA) J talked to residents 2 and 3 in the hallway but had not separated the residents. *Resident 3 put hand sanitizer on his hands, rolled over to resident 2 and put some of the sanitizer on her hands, started to rub her lap, and touched her private…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), interviews, record review, and lift manufacturer's instructions, the provider failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (1) was free from accident hazards during a transfer using a sit-to-stand lift when the manufacturer's operator's instructions for the safe use of the lift had not been followed. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's FRI submitted to SD DOH on 4/16/25 at 3:42 p.m. revealed: *Resident 1 had a fall from the sit-to-stand lift (a mechanical lift used to assist from a seated to a standing position) on 4/9/25 at 5:00 a.m., when his right arm gave out and went above his head during the transfer while using the sit-to-stand and he was lowered to the floor. *The safety straps on the sit-to-stand were not used on his waist or legs during the transfer. *After the fall, he initially complained of feeling sore in both shoulders, which had been baseline for him, but no injury was visualized and he refused medical treatment. *After several days of soreness and refusal of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint, interview, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure dining assistance and nutritional needs were adequately care planned and implemented for one of one resident (1) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) when he refused to leave his room for meals or refused to eat. Findings include: 1. Review of the SD DOH complaint that was filed anonymously about resident 1 on 1/6/25 revealed: *Resident resided in the traumatic brain injury (TBI) unit. *He had behavioral problems, such as: refusing cares, refusing to take his medications, refusing to come out of his room for meals, refusing to eat. *When residents who required assistance would not come out of their rooms, they were not allowed to have a meal tray in their room. *Two to three weeks prior to filing the complaint, resident 1 had gone without his evening meal for three consecutive nights due to him not coming out of his room. *Resident 1 required assistance with eating. 2. Observation on 2/11/25 at 11:45 a.m. of resident 1 while eating his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SDDOH) complaint report review, record review, policy review and interview the provider failed to ensure 15 of 22 (2, 3, 7, 8, 14, 16, 20, 23, 25, 26, 29, 33, 35, 41, 43) Elopement risk evaluations were completed accurately to ensure resident safety. Findings include: 1. Review of SDDOH complaint report revealed: *Resident 43 had eloped from the building on 7/17/24 out a door that had an alarm. *The alarm did not sound and alert staff to a resident exiting the building. *Staff observed resident 43 walking with a walker across the front lawn of the building. *They assisted him back into the building. *Nurse completed vitals and assessed him to make sure he was okay. *Staff checked all other doors in the building, making sure all other alarms were working. 2. Review of resident 43's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *He was admitted on [DATE]. *He had diagnoses of: -Macular degeneration. -Dementia with other behavioral disturbances. *Brief interview for mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a facility-reported incident (FRI) review, observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (37) who was cognitively impaired received adequate care and monitoring to ensure she was free of physical restraints imposed for discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms that resulted in an incident of resident abuse by one of one agency staff member (H). Findings include: 1. Review of the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) event report for resident 37 on 6/28/24 revealed: *She returned from the hospital on 6/28/24 at 6:35 p.m., was restless, and had tried multiple times to stand up from her chair. -She was unsteady when walking. -She was redirected to sit in her wheelchair by agency certified nursing assistant (CNA) H. -For nearly an hour and half resident [resident 37] continues to try to stand up or get out of the wheelchair and resists against [first name of agency CNA H] but is physically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview the provider failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner for five of twenty-four sampled residents (3, 7, 19, 23, and 37). Findings include: 1. Review of the (MDS) schedule for the facility provided by MDS coordinator C on 7/12/23 revealed quarterly assessments for residents 3, 7, 19, 23, and 37 were to have been completed on 6/12/23. Review of the MDS transmission results summary report provided by MDS coordinator C on 7/12/2023 revealed no quarterly assessments had been submitted in June or July for residents 3, 7, 19, 23, and 37. Review of the providers 3/2022 LTC-Assessment (MDS Policy) revealed assessments would be .completed within 14 days of the resident's admission, quarterly, annually, and within any significant change in condition. Interview on 7/12/23 at 9:47 a.m. with MDS coordinator C regarding quarterly assessments for residents 3, 7, 19, 23, and 37 revealed: *Completed MDS assessments were transmitted via Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System at least weekly.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$40,596 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-02-12
  • $29,406 — penalty dated 2024-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVERA HEALTH — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DAVIS, BRITTANIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
GAERTNER, RACHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2024
JOHNKE, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/09/2013
LEARING, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2024
NIELSEN, TAMIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
KOLBECK, AUDREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/1991
STOCKLAND, ROBINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/04/2025
SACRED HEART HEALTH SERVICESOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1994
SUNSET MANOR INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/15/1994

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 2%Other / private 5%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$511per resident / day
operating cost
$15,547per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$441per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Dakota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in South Dakota
$9,444/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,190/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,900/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 435100. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next