Stonebridge Health Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 48.9 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 5 (Resident #195) residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to provide scheduled Morphine and Tramadol for Resident #195 from 02/07/2025-02/09/2025 which resulted in mental anguish and untreated pain. An IJ was identified on 02/11/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 04:56 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/14/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of 1 because all nursing staff had not been trained on pain assessments and the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for prolonged and unnecessary pain and suffering and a decreased quality of life. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #16 reviewed for pain.The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received pain management to the fullest extent possible, resulting in her experiencing pain on 04/22/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of uncontrolled pain. Findings included:Record review of the undated face sheet for Resident #16 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cancer of both lungs, brain cancer secondary to lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), generalized anxiety disorder, and pain.Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #16 dated 03/04/2026 reflected a BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to administer the correct dosage of medication to Resident #36 on 04/22/26. 2. The facility failed to administer the medication to Resident #36 at the time ordered by Physician 04/22/26. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date 12/07/2018. Resident #36 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease unspecified (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder causing dementia, with symptoms including memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), anxiety disorder (serious mental health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #22) observed for infection prevention. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA H was following the infection control procedures during peri-care when CNA H cleaned Resident #22's anal area first before cleaning his scrotum. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA H and CNA I were following the infection control procedures when the same wipe was folded multiple times and used for multiple strokes while providing peri-care to Resident #22. 3. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and PPE was used when CNA H and CNA I provided care for Resident #22. Thes failures could place incontinent residents at risk for infection, hospitalization, and decreased quality of life.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0774 — isolated
  Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident in making transportation arrangements to an outside provider for one (Resident #1) of seven residents interviewed for transportation services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received transportation to his scheduled medical appointment after being provided with adequate notice. This failure could lead to the worsening of acute or chronic health conditions and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], for rehabilitation services. Pertinent diagnoses include infection of internal joint prosthesis (infection of a joint replacement), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition in which the lungs are unable to exchange gases efficiently), and the presence of cardiac implants and grafts (including a pacemaker). Review of the MDS admission assessment dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The cook was not wearing hair restraints while in the kitchen. The cook did not practice appropriate hand washing prior to preparing and cooking food. The cook did not wash hands or wear gloves when moving from one operation to another. The DA did not wash hands or wear gloves when moving from one operation to another. Non-dietary staff, CNA entered the kitchen without hair restraint. Non-dietary staff did not wash hands. The DM improperly cleaned the thermometer while checking holding temperatures of foods prior to meal service. The DM did not have knowledge of cleaning and sanitization of the thermometer. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Finding included: Observation on 02/11/2025 at 9:29 a.m. revealed the following: The DA in the kitchen was preparing liquids by covering with plastic wrap prior to meal service.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage room and 2 of 3 medication carts. A) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies and medications were removed from the medication storage room. B) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies and medications were removed from the nurses' medication cart for 400 hall. C) The facility failed to ensure that the nurses medication cart for 100 hall was secured by a lock when it was left unattended by LVN A. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination causing illness, decreased effectiveness of medication, and risk of injury to other residents if medication left unsecured were consumed. Findings included: A. During an observation on 02/12/2025 at 02:24 PM of the medication storage room with the ADON revealed one bottle of Senna S that expired 01/2025, 16 alcohol wipes that expired 12/2024, 1 safety blood collection set that expired 11/2017, 57…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance in the facility's only kitchen. The DM prepared food 2 1/2 hours prior to meal service. The DM held food in a convection steamer and/or on a hot food table for more than 2 1/2 hours prior to meal service. Food service started 150 minutes after food was placed on the steam table. Food item not being pureed with adequate and appropriate liquids. Pureed foods were prepared with water. Liquids for pureed foods were not measured. Thickener for pureed foods was not measured. Pureed and mechanical soft foods did not follow policy/procedures of determining number of servings needed to determine the portion size method. Condiments and seasonings used on regular textured foods was not used on puree and mechanical soft foods. DM prepared foods without proper equipment: scale, measuring cups, and measuring spoons. Pureed test tray rendered a bland flavor. These failures could compromise and destroy nutritive value of food and prevent residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure RN G provided and continued to provide privacy during wound care for Resident #5, by ensuring the door and privacy curtain remained closed throughout the procedure. This failure could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and diminished quality of life. The finding included: Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 2/14/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Urinary tract infection, cystitis (inflammation of the bladder), pleural effusion (a collection of fluids around the lungs), chronic heart failure (the heart is unable to pump blood to meet the demands of the body), right above the knee amputation, hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 4 (Resident #22) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 received adequate physical assessment, including vital signs and lung sounds, prior to and after she received medications through a nebulizer and while on antibiotics for an upper respiratory infection. The failure could place resident at an increased risk for an adverse reaction to medication. Findings include: Record review of Resident #22's admission record, dated 2/14/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affect blood flow to the brain), vascular dementia (a condition affecting thought processes caused by impaired blood flow to the brain), muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), retention of urine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN G and CNA H followed enhanced barrier precautions when they provided wound care for Resident #5 on 02/13/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN G followed infection control precautions when she performed wound care on Resident #5. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 2/14/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Urinary tract infection, cystitis (inflammation of the bladder), pleural effusion (a collection of fluids around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (ICPC) that included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program. The facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policy for Resident #22 by not ensuring an infection surveillance was performed per facility policy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased multi drug resistant organisms. Findings include: Record review of Resident 22's admission record, dated 2/14/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affect blood flow to the brain), vascular dementia (a condition affecting thought processes caused by impaired blood flow to the brain),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,258 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $17,665 — penalty dated 2026-04-23
• $21,593 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-23 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARADAY HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX