Trinity Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 146.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure CNA A reported that she observed signs and symptoms of dizziness from Resident #1 before taking her to the shower room on [DATE]. CNA A did not report to anyone what she observed and continued to take Resident #1 to the shower room. While CNA A's back was turned in the shower room to grab something, Resident #1 got up from a shower bench unassisted, fell, and sustained a nondisplaced right inferior pubic ramus fracture and right parietal scalp hematoma with underlying acute traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Resident #1 was sent to the ER and placed on hospice for comfort care. On [DATE], Resident #1 passed away. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:56 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (CNA A) of 9 CNAs reviewed for competent nursing care. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was proficient in reporting residents' change in condition and resident shower safety. CNA A did not report that she observed Resident #1 having s/s of dizziness and did not have all shower supplies prepared before taking Resident #1 to the shower room. CNA A took Resident #1 to the shower room, turned her back to grab something, Resident #1 got up from the shower bench unassisted and fell in the shower room. Resident #1 was sent to the ER, found to have sustained a nondisplaced right inferior pubic ramus fracture and right parietal scalp hematoma with underlying acute traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (Resident #16, Resident #17, and Resident # 26) of 20 residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #16, Resident #17, and Resident #26's bedrooms had no scratches or holes on the walls next to their beds.The facility failed to ensure that the walls and carpets in 2 of 3 (200 hall, 400 hall) hallways were in good condition. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life. Findings included:During an observation on 01/20/2026 at 9:25 AM revealed tattered floors, walls and stains in the carpets of the hallways on 200 hall and 500 hall. The carpets had a foul urine odor to it in the hallways of 200 hall and 400 hall.1. Record review of Resident #26's admission Face sheet, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (structural and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of ten residents (Resident #32, Resident #100, and Resident #113) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #113's fingernails were trimmed and clean. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32's and Resident #100's facial hair was shaved. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care services, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #32's face sheet, dated 01/21/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], diagnoses included chronic venous hypertension (condition of sustained high blood pressure in leg veins caused by damaged valves or, less commonly, venous obstruction, leading to blood pooling), major depressive disorder (severe mental health condition marked by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order, and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 3 of 6 medication carts ( RN G's Medication Cart #1, RN H's medication cart #2, and RN I's Medication Cart #3) in the facility effecting 3 residents (Resident #5, Resident #55, and Resident #148) reviewed for pharmacy services.1. The facility failed to ensure RN G accurately reconciled Resident #5's narcotic medication log when she administered but did not sign for Resident #5's Lorazepam (controlled medication used for anxiety) 1 tablet and Acetaminophen/APAP (controlled medication used for pain) 1 tablets on 01/22/2026 at 8:48 a.m.2. The facility failed to ensure RN H accurately reconciled Resident #55's narcotic medication log on the medication cart 2 by omitting the count of Resident #55's morphine sulfate (controlled medication used for pain and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 15 errors in 43 opportunities resulting in a 34.88% error rate, which involved 3 of 5 residents (Resident #70, Resident #109, and Resident #114) and 2 of 3 staff (MA C and MA D) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication errors.MA D failed to administer Spironolactone 25 mg (treating high blood pressure) ordered by physician for Resident #70. MA C failed to administer Namenda 5 mg (treating moderate to severe dementia) as ordered by physician for Resident # 114.MA C administered Resident #109's 13 medications outside of the allotted time frame. These failures could place residents at risk of their medications not being administered according to Physician's orders, getting their medications late, or not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications.Findings included: During observation of the medication pass on 01/21/2026 at 7:44 a.m., MA D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1.The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices including cleaning the ice machine, cleaning the juice dispenser nozzle, cleaning the front of the convection oven, and cleaning the dish rack storage cart.2. The facility failed to label and date all food items in the kitchen.3. The facility failed to properly cover all food items to prevent contamination.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness.Findings Included: During an observation on 1/20/26 at 9:22 a.m., revealed a container of spaghetti meat sauce and a container of winter vegetable blend on stovetop griddle uncovered. This should be covered to prevent cross contamination from a physical contaminant. During an observation on 1/20/26 at 9:23 a.m. revealed a bag of corn chips undated, unlabeled, and not closed securely. Further observation revealed a bag of oatmeal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 9 of 15 residents (Resident #18 and 8 residents in the dining room near nursing station C) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA E did not change gloves between dirty and clean peri-care tasks and did not sanitize her hands between glove changes during peri-care for Resident #18.2. CNA F and RN G did not sanitize their hands between passing meal trays for 8 residents in the dining room near nursing station C. These failures could place the residents at risk of infection transmission, sepsis, and hospitalization.Findings included: An observation on 01/22/2026 at 12:18 p.m. of peri-care for Resident #18, revealed CNA E did not change her gloves after cleaning dirty peri-care area with bowel movement and front peri-care area. CNA E changed her gloves without conducting hand hygiene. CNA E touched bedside table,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has the right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for Privacy and Confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's clinical records were protected from being viewed by unauthorized persons when LVN J left Resident #87's personal information visible on the computer's screen on unattended medication cart. This failure could place residents' personal information at risk of being exposed to unauthorized individuals. Findings included:Observation on 1/21/2026 at 4:24 p.m., revealed the computer screen on LVN J's medication cart on side C was open and unlocked, with Resident #87's MAR information displayed and visible to unauthorized individuals, including visitors or other residents not observed at that time near that cart.During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 4:26 p.m., with LVN J, she stated she was in-serviced on HIPAA a few months ago via…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free of misappropriation of resident property and exploitation for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation.The facility did not prevent misappropriation when on 11/04/2025 CNA A accessed Resident #1's personal cell phone and used Resident # 1's mobile cash application to transfer amounts of $ 31.00 and $50.00 to herself. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of money, possessions, and feelings of loss.Record review of the facility provider investigation report written by the facility ADM, dated 11/05/2025, reflected: Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old woman who resided at the facility for Rehabilitation care services. Resident # 1 reached out to facility letting the facility know that Resident #1's cell phone cash application was used to make payments to CNA A on 11/04/2025 at 7:15 PM. The facility started an investigation of the incident and filed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 3 of 18 residents (Resident#1, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure catheter bag was covered and not visible Resident#1, Resident #3, and Resident #4. This failure placed residents at risk of embarrassment and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident#1's admission Record updated 7/9/25 revealed, Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnosis of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), acute respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after stroke).Record review of Resident#1's care plan updated 7/8/25 revealed, IN INTERVENTION: The resident requires SKIN inspection per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #17) of 18 residents reviewed for resident call system in that: The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Resident #1, Resident#2, and Resident #17.This failure could have placed residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed Findings included:Record review of Resident#1's admission Record updated 7/9/25 revealed, Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnosis of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), acute respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after stroke).Record review of Resident#1's care plan updated 7/8/25 revealed, Problem: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t CVA with hemiplegia of left side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,293 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,293 — penalty dated 2024-07-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARADAY HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX