Will-O-Bell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 73.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to immediately notify the physician of a significant change in the resident's physical status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for an unknown injury (Resident #2) LVN B and RN A failed to immediately notify Residents' Physician when a large bruise was discovered on his ankle, which was discovered to be a fracture. This failure may have resulted in Resident #2 experiencing pain from a fracture for 4-5 days. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #2's revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE], latest readmission on [DATE]. Resident #2 diagnoses include osteoporosis (fragile bones), repeated falls, cerebral palsy (impaired muscle coordination), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2's, dated 7/12/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not assessed due to Resident #2 being rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report to the administrator and/or designee, physician, and failed to investigate an injury of unknown source for 1 of 2 (Resident #2) reviewed for incident reporting. LVN B and RN A failed to reported an injury of unknown origins on Resident #2 to the Nurse Practitioner or Doctor, to receive orders of care. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in needed treatment. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #2's revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE], latest readmission on [DATE]. Resident #2 diagnoses include osteoporosis (fragile bones), repeated falls, cerebral palsy (impaired muscle coordination), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2's, dated 7/12/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not assessed due to Resident #2 being rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to immediately, or within 2 hours, report injuries of unknown source to the administrator and/or designee and to other officials for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origins (Resident #2) LVN B and RN A did not report an injury of unknown origins on Resident #2 to the Nurse Practitioner or Doctor, to receive orders of care. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in needed treatment. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #2's revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE], latest readmission on [DATE]. Resident #2 diagnoses include osteoporosis (fragile bones), repeated falls, cerebral palsy (impaired muscle coordination), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2's, dated 7/12/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not assessed due to Resident #2 being rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for Resident #39. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided.The findings include: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 05/14/26, documented a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), Alzheimer's disease (a neurodegenerative disease that usually starts slowly and progressively worsens), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #39) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39 had her gauze roll placed inside her left hand on 05/13/26 as directed by physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, pain, injury, infection, and hospitalization.Findings included: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 05/14/26, documented a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), Alzheimer's disease (a neurodegenerative disease that usually starts slowly and progressively worsens), major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control. Resident #3 had a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to the Left buttock and the facility failed to place him on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.This deficient practice could increase the risk of the spread of infection to other residents.Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with Encephalopathy, (any disease or damage that alters the brain's structure or function), Muscle wasting and atrophy (the shrinking and loss of muscle mass) and Polyosteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease characterized by the breakdown of cartilage and bone in five or more joints simultaneously. It causes chronic pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control.CNA A failed to properly dispose of Resident #1's soiled brief after incontinent are. CNA A failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene after handling soiled brief.This failure could place residents at risk for infection and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1’s, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia (a general term for a decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life) in other disease classified elsewhere, severe, with psychotic disturbance and agitation, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (is a mental health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological's were stored under proper temperature in the Front Medication Room and the Back Medication Room reviewed for medication storage. The facility's failures could place residents receiving medication at risk for lack of drug efficacy. Findings included: During an observation on 03/26/2025 at 09:55 AM of the back medication room revealed that the refrigerator temperature log for the medications was out of range 25 of 26 days of March 2025. The log reflected the temperatures ranged from 28 degrees Fahrenheit to 32 degrees Fahrenheit. On 03/26/2025 the temperature was observed in the fridge at 28 degrees when visually checked. At the time of the observation, the fridge contained insulin pens. During an observation on 03/26/2025 at 11:55 AM of the front medication room revealed that the refrigerator temperature log for the medications was out of range 24 of 24 days of March 2025. The log reflected the temperatures ranged from 28 degrees Fahrenheit to 31 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food following professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: - Food items were not labeled and/or dated. - Moldy and rotten food was present during inspection of the walk-in refrigerator. These failures could place all residents who received meals from the main kitchen at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 3/25/2025 at 9:15 am of the walk-in refrigerator reflected the following: - Potatoes that were dated 3-9-25 had green sprouts growing from the potato. - The lunch meat dated 3-8-25 was expired. - Diced chicken was dated 3-24-25 with no discard date. - 15 Sandwiches dated 3-25-25 had no discard date. - Ranch dressing was not in the original container, dated 3-8-25, with no discard date. - Grated cheese was not in the original container, dated 3-21-25, with no discard date. - Grated cheese was not in the original container, dated 3-21-2028, with no discard date. - Tomato soup was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a complete and accurate request for nursing facility specialized services in the LTC Online Portal within 20 business days after the date of the Interdisciplinary Team meeting for one of one resident reviewed. The facility failed to submit a NFSS form request by the specific deadline for Resident #2 for a pressure reducing mattress and a motorized wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving or benefiting from specialized equipment they may require. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Muscle weakness (generalized), Muscle wasting and Atrophy, and Unsteadiness on feet. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #2 was PASARR positive, and her Cognitive status was rated with a BIMS of 2. The MDS also revealed recommendation for the resident to be provided with a pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate PASARR for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #38) reviewed for PASARR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to notify the local authority of the PASARR I screen for Residents #38. This failure could affect residents with mental illness placing them at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: Record review of a Face Sheet dated 03/25/25 for Resident #38 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy); anoxic brain damage non else classified (a catastrophic and potentially fatal injury characterized by the brain's complete deprivation of oxygen. It distinguishes from hypoxic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to: - Ensure Resident #1 was not sitting in his bed with linens covered in feces and his pants saturated with urine. The staff failed to complete accurate skin assessments to be able to provide appropriate treatment to MASD on his buttocks. - Ensure Resident #2 was getting barrier cream applied to a rash on her buttocks and failed to complete accurate skin assessments. These failures placed residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new pressure injuries, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of resident #1's face sheet dated 08/01/24 reflected an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was discharged home without two of Resident #2's medications (Trazadone and Tegretol). This deficiency put residents at risk of consuming unprescribed medications, harm, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (cancer of the blood-forming cells of the bone marrow), acute pulmonary edema (buildup of fluid in the lungs), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/24/24, reflected a BIMS of 9,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,279 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,279 — penalty dated 2023-10-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX