Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 100.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (CR #1) of 4 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care.-LVN A failed to provide emergency tracheostomy (surgical hole in the windpipe to assist with breathing when the usual way is blocked) reinsertion for CR #1 after the resident accidentally removed their tracheostomy on 04/27/2025. LVN A did not use an obturator (an instrument used to guide the cannula (tubing that allows oxygen to go through the windpipe) back into a resident's opening (the surgical hole in the windpipe also called a stoma) during reinsertion) and did not know what it was or how to use an obturator. LVN A had to provide oxygen to CR #1 by placing the resident's cannula directly into the opening until emergency services arrived…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1medication cart (200 Hall Nurse Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services . LVN A failed to ensure the 200 Hall Medication Nursing Cart was locked when not under direct supervision of authorized staff ON 5/27/26 at 10:26 AM. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications and misappropriation of medications.Findings included: Observation on 05/27/26 at 10:26 AM revealed the 200 Hall medication cart was unlocked and unattended. In an interview on 5/27/26 at 10:30 with CMA A, it was revealed that the unattended medication care was assigned to LVN A. CMA A initially thought LVN A was giving care to a resident in the area. However, after looking in several rooms, LVN A was not located on the floor. CMA A stated carts should be locked when unsupervised to prevent unauthorized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-29 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for coordination of PASARR and assessments. -The facility failed to conduct the PASARR Level I assessment Form 1012-Mental Illness/Dementia Resident Review for Resident #8 until 7/24/25.-The facility failed to request, submit and coordinate the PASARR assessment and screening in the Simple LTC portal to ensure therapeutic services (physical, speech and occupational) were completed for Resident #8.This failure could place residents requiring PASARR services at risk of not having their special needs assessed and met by the facility. Record review of Resident #8's facility face sheet dated 7/28/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female with an admission date of 10/2/24. Her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices based on the resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #9) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. -Resident #9 was found with a skin tear on 07/24/2025 after surveyor intervention . LVN B, CNA G and CNA V cared for Resident #9 and did not document the skin tear prior to 07/24/2025.This failure could lead to residents not receiving timely wound interventions and could cause further wound deterioration, infection and decline in health. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 07/26/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE] . His medical diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including adminstering drugs and biologicals to meet the needs for each resident for 1 (Resident #105) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. LVN F did not correctly check Resident #105's g-tube placement before medication administration.LVN F did not stir the medications before administering it through the g-tube.LVN F left a substantial amount of medication residue in the medication cups after Allopurinol 100 mg give 0.5 tablet and Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate tablet 500-125 mg were administered through a g - tube to Resident #105.These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Record review of Resident #105's face sheet dated 07/22/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: gastrostomy status (a tube is surgically inserted into the stomach),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6%, based on 2 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 1 (Resident #105) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors. - LVN F left a substantial amount of medication residue in the medication cups after Allopurinol 100 mg give 0.5 tablet and Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate tablet 500-125 mg were administered through a g - tube to Resident #105.- LVN F did not stir the medications before administering it through the g-tube.These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #105's face sheet dated 07/22/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: gastrostomy status (a tube is surgically inserted into the stomach), dysphagia (difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for significant medication errors.- LVN S failed to administer medication as ordered to Resident # 25 when she injected insulin Lispro 5 units subcutaneously (below the top skin layer) and all the insulin was not administered to the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of hyperglycemia, and potential hospitalization.Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 07/24/25 revealed a 51year old male was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included: diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (persistently high blood sugar), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction due to chemical imbalance in the body).Record review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognition. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 (Freezer A) of 1 freezer observed for food storage.-There were 3 packets of onion soup base which had best used by dates of 07/11/2025 in Freezer A. This failure could put residents at risk of food contamination and illness due to being served food past the best used by date. Observation of Freezer A on 7/22/2025 at 8:25am, revealed there were 3 5.4 oz. packets of onion base soup powder dated best if used by 07/11/2025 and labelled 11-12 in black ink pen.During observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 7/22/2025 at 8:25am, the Dietary Manager said those packets should be thrown away and that everyone in the kitchen was responsible for checking for dates. The Dietary Manager was observed throwing all 3 packets into the trash can. The Dietary Manager said there was no harm or risks to residents if the food was expired and still on the shelves because the kitchen would not cook and serve those foods to residents. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Hall A) of 3 halls observed for infection control.-There was a trash bag with white and blue linen left outside Resident #12's room by the doorway on the floor.This failure could place residents at risk of contagious diseases and spread of illness when infection control protocols are not followed. Observation and interview in Hall A on 7/23/2025 at 3:40pm, revealed there was a trash bag on the floor outside Resident #12'sroom. The bag was tied up and contained white and blue linen. MA V saw the bag and took it and walked it down the hall to the trash room. MA V said that it did not belong there, and she did not know who put it there.In an interview with LVN B on 7/23/2025 at 3:41pm, he said the trash bag should not have been on the floor and he did not know who placed it on the floor. He said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for oxygen therapy for two of two residents (Resident # 29 and Resident #186) reviewed for respiratory care. -The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #29's oxygen administration. -The facility failed to provide tracheal care and suctioning according to professional standards for Resident #186. These deficient practices could result in the resident's not receiving the care and services ordered by the physician and a decline in health status and oxygen deprivation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's facility admission record dated 06/11/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, hyperosmolality (a serious complication of diabetes that causes very high blood sugar and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9% based on 3 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 3 of 9 residents (Resident #29, Resident #14 and Resident #6) reviewed for medication errors. 1. RN A did not administer Sodium Chloride (a prescription medicine used to replenish lost water and salt in your body due to certain conditions like low salt syndrome) to Resident #29 as ordered by the physician. 2. MA A did not administer Losartan Potassium ( a drug used to lower blood pressure) to Resident #14 as ordered by the Physician. 3. RN B did not administer Valproic Acid ( a drug works by lowering seizures) to Resident #6 as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of prescribed medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet revealed a female admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,431 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,431 — penalty dated 2025-07-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX