No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Clyde W Cosper Texas State Veterans Home

1300 Seven Oaks Rd, Bonham, TX 75418 · Government - State · 160 certified beds · (903) 640-8387 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Dec 20234 immediate-jeopardy citations$216,749 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Dec 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $216,749 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-07)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1201 East 9th Street
Pharmacy
1201 E 9th St · (903) 583-2111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2228 Island Bayou Rd
Park
1202 N Center St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.2%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.3%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.9%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.442.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 5.8–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
48.3%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 155.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-29)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatment and services, in accordance with comprehensive assessment and professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure injuries was provided for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #74) reviewed for pressure injuries. 1. The facility failed to provide care to prevent pressure ulcer or injury development for Resident #74. Resident #74 broke his right ankle and a soft splint was applied on 07/13/24. The facility failed to obtain a clarification order from the doctor related to Resident #74's splnt care. Resident #74 developed 4 unstageable deep tissue injuries to his right foot and possible osteomyelitis. An IJ was identified on 02/05/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:57 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/06/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provided supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #134) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #134 received adequate supervision to prevent exiting the facility without facility knowledge on 01/25/2025, when Resident #134 was found outside sitting on the curb of the facility's parking lot with her wheelchair tipped over. The facility failed to ensure adequate interventions were placed for Resident #134 after exit seeking attempts on 11/18/2024 and 01/25/2025. The facility failed to review Resident #134's exit incidents to determine triggers that increased her risk for elopement and develop person centered interventions to prevent elopement. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/04/2025 at 3:20 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:40 PM. While the IJ was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 10 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by CNA A on 5/14/2023.CNA A had a history of a physical abuse allegation in December 2022 towards Resident #2. The facility failed to implement measures to protect residents from further abuse. The facility failed to train staff on how to manage residents with behaviors that could lead to abusive behaviors. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/15/23 at 4:25 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/18/23, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for physical and verbal abuse, psychosocial harm, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 10 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to follow facility policy of each resident having the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion by not protecting Resident #1 from physical abuse by a staff member. The facility failed to implement their policy by providing training to manage residents with behaviors that could lead to abusive behaviors. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/15/23 at 4:25 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/18/23, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place the resident at risk for abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 2 of 2 shower rooms (A Hall and C Hall) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure the shower stalls in the C Hall shower room did not have black grime buildup. The facility failed to ensure the shower stalls in the A Hall shower room did not have yellowish-brownish and pink grime buildup. These failures could place the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment due to unsanitary conditions. Findings included: During a confidential group interview, the resident group said when they went to take their showers the shower rooms on A Hall and C hall were always dirty, and they did not like taking showers in a dirty shower room. During an observation and interview of the A Hall shower room with LVN D on 04/29/2026 at 1:52 PM, the A Hall shower room had 3 shower stalls. The 3 shower stalls had yellowish-brownish grime from the middle down to the lower part of the tile on the shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident and determined that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 7 medication carts (600 Hall Medication Aide Medication Cart) and 2 of 3 (A Hall Medication Storage Room and Memory Care Medication Storage Room) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #118's lorazepam gel with expiration date of 04/14/2026 and acetaminophen 650 mg suppositories with expiration date of 03/2026 were removed from the Memory Care Medication Storage Room. The facility failed to ensure acetaminophen 650 mg suppositories with expiration date of 01/2026 were removed from the A Hall Medication Storage Room refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure 30 tablets of famotidine 10 mg with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #20, and Resident #161), 2 of 7 medication carts (200 Hall Nurse Medication Cart and 600 Hall Medication Aide Medication Cart), ) medication storage rooms reviewed for drugs and biologicals. 1. The facility failed to ensure UTI-Stat and Pro-Stat on the 600 Hall Medication Aide Medication Cart were dated after opened. 2. The facility failed to ensure a package of budesonide ampules in the 200 Hall Nurse Medication cart was labeled properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #161's medication labels for his glipizide, finasteride, gabapentin, and metformin matched his physician orders. 4. The facility did not ensure Resident #20's Systane Eye Drops (eye drops) were not left on his nightstand These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure:The deep fryer was clean and free of food debris.One medium-sized skillet was free from black buildup on the inside and outside.One large-sized skillet with Teflon coating was free from peeling on the inside. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During an observation of the kitchen on 04/26/2026 starting at 10:30 AM, the fryer had crumbs around it, one medium-sized skillet had black carbon built up on the inside and outside and one Teflon coated large-sized skillet had the coating peeling off on the inside. During an observation of the kitchen on 04/27/2026 at 10:18 AM, the fryer had crumbs around it, and hanging off the rack with pots and pans there was one medium-sized skillet with black carbon built up on the inside and outside of it and one Teflon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z called Resident #76 by his preferred name while providing care on 04/28/26. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth.Findings included:Record review of Resident #76's face sheet dated 04/28/26 indicated he was [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (stress-related condition when individual copes with life changes) , and vascular dementia (progressive decline in thinking caused by conditions that reduce blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #76's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated usually made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. Resident #28's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], identified the resident was not receiving oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services to meet their needs. Findings include:Record review of Resident #28's face sheet, dated 04/28/26, reflected Resident #28 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/08/26, reflected Resident #28 made himself understood and understood others. Resident #28 had a BIMS score of 8, which reflected his cognition was moderately impaired. During the 7-day look-back period the assessment did not reflect Resident #28 was receiving oxygen. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the coordination and provision of services agreed upon during the IDT meeting for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for PASARR. 1. The facility failed to provide documentation of Resident #102's psychosocial rehabilitative services (group), psychosocial rehabilitative services (individual), and routine case management services as requested in the PCSP Form.2. The facility failed to refer Resident #86 for PASARR Level ll assessment when a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, was diagnosed after admission on [DATE]. These failures could cause residents with mental health disorders and psychiatric conditions to have a delay in services or not receive specialized services or equipment that may be needed.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #102's face sheet, dated 04/29/26, reflected Resident #102 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (severe psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs, for 1 of 35 (Resident #28) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility did not ensure Resident #28 had a floor mat on each side of the bed. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and falls with injuries. Findings include: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet, dated 04/28/26, reflected Resident #28 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included repeated falls. Record review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/08/26, reflected Resident #28 made himself understood and understood others. Resident #28 had a BIMS score of 8, which reflected his cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #28 was dependent with chair/bed-to-chair transfer, and the activity sit to stand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #56 and Resident #28) reviewed for respiratory care.1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #56's oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned.This failure could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections and exacerbation of respiratory disease.Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #56's face sheet dated 04/29/26 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease also known as COPD (a progressive, incurable lung disease—primarily caused by smoking—that obstructs airflow, causing chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for laboratory services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's Pre-Albumin (measures the level of a liver-produced protein in the blood to assess nutritional status and monitor for malnutrition) was drawn bi-weekly and Albumin (measures the level of albumin, a protein produced by the liver, in the blood or urine to assess liver/kidney function and nutritional status) was drawn monthly for Resident #12. 2. The facility failed to ensure Vitamin D and Lipid panel test were drawn every year for Resident #12. Vitamin D (measures the levels of vitamin D in your blood. Vitamin D helps your body absorb calcium to build healthy bones and teeth). Lipid panel (a blood test measuring cholesterol and triglycerides to evaluate cardiovascular risk) These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving lab services as ordered, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure menus met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established guidelines and ensure menus were followed for 1 of 2 meals (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] B used a #16 scoop to serve the pureed roll on 04/27/2026. The facility failed to ensure the Assistant Dietary Manager served one cup of the regular chicken cacciatore pasta on 04/27/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an observation and interview of the lunch meal in the kitchen on 04/27/2026 starting at 11:22 AM, [NAME] B said she served the lunch meal for the residents who ate lunch in the halls. [NAME] B used a #20 scoop to serve the pureed bread. A size #16 scoop was required. During an observation and interview of the lunch meal in the main dining room on 04/27/2026 at 11:43 AM, the Assistant Dietary Manager said she was using only 1/2 scoops to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were prescribed by the attending physician for 1 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for health shakes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received his health shake, as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not maintaining adequate nutritional status including unintentional weight loss. Findings include:Record review of Resident #2 face sheet revealed a male who was admitted to the facility 10/22/2024. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's (difficult movement due to decreased brain function; tremors) and dysphagia of the opharyngeal phase (difficult swallowing food from mouth to throat). Record review of Resident #2 comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident p#2 had a BIMS of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 was dependent on assistance with all eating. Resident #2 had weight loss of 5% or more in one month or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech therapy-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for mental illness and intellectual disability or services of a lesser intensity, as required in the resident's comprehensive plan of care for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. The facility did not ensure Resident #67 received physical therapy after a therapy screening on 03/11/26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline or decrease in their physical capabilities. Findings include: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet, dated 04/29/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #67 had a diagnosis which included repeated falls. Record review of Resident #67's significant change of status MDS assessment, dated 02/27/26, reflected Resident #67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #73 and Resident #86) reviewed for infection control.1.The facility failed to ensure LVN E wore PPE (gown and mask) while performing a blood sugar check on Resident #73 on 04/28/26, who was on droplet precautions (Droplet Precautions are intended to prevent transmission of pathogens spread through close respiratory or mucous membrane contact with respiratory secretions).2.The facility failed to ensure CNA CC and Nurse DD performed proper glove changes while providing incontinent care to Resident #86 on 4/27/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection.Finding include:1. Record review of Resident #73's face sheet, dated 04/29/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment accurately reflected the use of antidepressants. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/07/2026, revealed an admission date of 11/26/2024 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disorder that is the common cause of dementia (cognitive loss), anxiety (a group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), delusional disorder (a chronic condition characterized by the presence of one or more false beliefs), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of any lipid (fats) in the blood), and osteoarthritis (a joint disease caused by the breakdown of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair was properly secured in the facility transport van on 12/05/2025. Resident #1 sustained a contusion to his head when the wheelchair tipped over as the van turned a corner during transport. This failure could place residents transported via facility van at risk for accidents resulting in serious injury. The findings were:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/12/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included a cerebral infarction with hemiplegia (a stroke caused by reduced blood flow leading to brain tissue death that limits movement on one side of the body), Osteoarthritis (a joint disease where protective cartilage breaks down, causing bones to rub…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide liquids consistent with the residents' needs for 2 of 3 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for liquid inconsistency. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A checked the lunch tray appropriately for Resident #1, who required nectar-thick liquids on 11/10/25. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and Resident #2 did not have thin liquids at their bedside on 11/11/25. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for aspiration and not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1' face sheet dated 11/12/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's (a progressive brain disorder that affects movement, primarily caused by the death of brain cells that produce dopamine), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, where food or liquids cannot move easily from the mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 4 of 32 residents (Resident #402, Resident #401, Resident #22, and Resident #45) reviewed for trauma-informed care. 1.The facility did not ensure Resident #402 had a trauma screening completed upon admission that identified possible triggers when Resident #402 had a history of trauma and PTSD (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #401 had a trauma screening completed upon admission. 3. The facility did not ensure Residents #22 and #45 care plan identified possible triggers when Residents #22 and #45 had a history of trauma. These failures could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #103), 1 of 13 medication carts (600 hall Nurse Medication Cart), and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Secure Unit Medication Room) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure LVN M secured the 600 hall Nurse Medication Cart, when it was not in use on 02/03/2025. The facility failed to ensure a lock box in the Secure Unit Medication Room refrigerator with 4 bottles of Ativan (controlled medication for anxiety) was permanently affixed. The facility failed to ensure a lock box inside the cabinets in the Secure Unit Medication Room with 2 bottles of morphine (controlled pain medication) and 2 bottles of hydromorphone (controlled pain medication) was permanently affixed. The facility did not ensure Resident #103's Cold & Flu cough syrup and Aleve liquid gels (pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 3 of 7 residents (Resident #49, Resident #22, and Resident #103) reviewed for laboratory services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's T4 Free and a PSA lab test were drawn yearly. T4 Free (a test that measures the amount of free thyroxine (T4) in the blood. T4 is a hormone produced by the thyroid gland that plays a vital role in metabolism). Prostate-Specific Antigen also known as PSA test (blood test that measures the amount of (PSA) in your blood. It can help to diagnose prostate cancer. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's Vitamin D test was drawn every 6 months. (Vitamin D measures the levels of vitamin D in your blood. Vitamin D helps your body absorb calcium to build healthy bones and teeth). 3. The facility did not obtain a physician's ordered Free T4 (hormone test that measures the amount of active thyroid hormone (T4) in the bloodstream for Resident's #22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections reviewed for 3 of 32 residents (Resident #49, Resident #95, and Resident # 39) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA BB wore PPE while entering Resident #49's room while on contact isolation precautions on 02/04/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeper NNN wore PPE while cleaning Resident #49's room while he was on contact isolation precautions on 02/04/25. 3. The facility did not ensure LVN E performed hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident #95. 4. The facility did not ensure LVN E disinfected Resident #95's dresser prior to exiting the room. 5. The facility failed to ensure LVN XX performed hand hygiene between glove changes while providing catheter care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure CNA FFF treated Resident #2 with respect and dignity when Resident #2 asked CNA FFF to provide incontinent care before he ate his lunch and CNA FFF failed to comply with Resident #2's request during lunch on 02/03/25 and she told him I just changed you 5 minutes ago. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of bipolar disorder (disease characterized by periods of depression and elevated moods), anxiety disorder (feelings of dread over anticipated events), history of traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience and not required to treat medical symptoms for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for restraint use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was free of physical restraints when CNA ZZ held his wrist against the bed while providing care on 02/03/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, a decline in physical functioning and injury. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/05/2025 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a condition caused by lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrients to a part of the brain and can cause problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Screenings for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #55 and #61) reviewed for PASRR. The facility did not ensure the correct PASRR (a preliminary assessment completed for all individuals before admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to determine whether they might have a mental illness or intellectual disability) Level 1 Screening was submitted to the local authority for Residents #55 and #61 who had a diagnosis of mental illness upon admission. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 02/07/25, reflected Resident #61 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included PTSD (a disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 resident (#402) of 12 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to address Resident #402's PTSD diagnosis and triggers in his baseline care plan. This deficient practice could affect residents who are admitted to the facility with specialized needs and result in missed care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #402's face sheet dated 02/07/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis's alcohol abuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation), metabolic encephalopathy (condition where the brain does not function related to the an imbalance in the body's metabolism and causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of a face sheet dated 02/05/2025 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a condition caused by lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrients to a part of the brain and can cause problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory). Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated, Resident #59 was able to make himself understood and understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #59 had a BIMs score of 10, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #59 required partial to moderate assistance with toileting, showering/bathing self, personal hygiene, and dressing. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #59 did not exhibit rejection of care. Record review of Resident #59's care plan last reviewed 12/19/2024 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #105). The facility failed to ensure Resident #105's oxygen mask tubing was changed out and dated on 01/29/25. This failure could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections and exacerbation of respiratory disease. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #105's face sheet indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses PTSD (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation), heart failure (condition in which the heart does not pump as well as it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 32 residents (Resident # 93 and Resident # 114) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93's blood pressure met the parameters for the administration of an anti-hypertensive medication on 01/16/2025 and on 01/27/2025. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114's blood pressure met the parameters for the administration of an anti-hypertensive medication on 01/03/2025 and on 01/16/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of serious harm, not receiving their medications as ordered, illnesses, hospitalizations, exacerbation of their disease processes, coma, and death. Findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet dated 02/06/2025, indicated Resident # 93 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident's #30 and #299) reviewed for infection control practices related to droplet precautions and 4 of 11 facility staff members (MA C, LVN A, LVN F, and Speech Therapist D) reviewed for infection control practices related to medication pass and droplet precautions. The facility further failed to ensure facility personnel handled, stored, processed, and transported linens so as to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 5 staff members (CNA N) reviewed for transportation of linens. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A, MA C, Speech Therapist D wore the appropriate PPE when entering Resident #30's and Resident #299's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN F removed her PPE prior to exiting Resident #30's and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, and interview the facility failed to coordinate assessments with pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR ) program under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing effort which included referring all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment ensure a PASRR screening was completed for residents with mental disorders or an intellectual disability for 4 of 7 residents (Residents #129, #26, #57, and #121) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility failed to ensure the correct PASRR (a preliminary assessment completed for all individuals before admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to determine whether they might have a mental illness or intellectual disability) Level 1 Screening was submitted to the local authority for Residents #129, #26, #57,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accidents hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #92) and 2 of 7 halls (Halls 700 and 800) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure the bathroom for Resident #33 and Resident #92 was free of leaking water. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Residents on Hall 700 and Hall 800 were adequately supervised. These failures could put residents at risk of serious bodily harm, physical impairment, or death. Findings Include: 1.Record review of Resident #33's face sheet, dated 01/25/24, indicated Resident #33 was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included arthritis (causes joint pain, stiffness, and inflammation), leg cramps (painful, involuntary muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 1 of 9 residents with a nebulizer machine (Resident #57) and 4 of 11 residents who received oxygen (Resident's #130, #47, #57, and #81) that were reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 oxygen was placed on 2 LPM as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2L via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #57. 2a. The facility failed to properly store Resident #57's nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) mask while not in use. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #130's nasal cannula tubing was changed weekly. 3a. The facility failed to ensure Resident #130's nasal cannula tubing was changed weekly. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #81's oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for medications at their bedside and 1 of 6 (500 Hall) medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #48's Nystatin Powder was not unsecured in Resident #12's room. 2. The facility did not ensure LVN A kept the medication cart on 500 Hall locked or within her line of site, while administering medications. This failure could place residents at risk for misuse of medication and overdose, drug diversions, adverse reactions of medications, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #48's face sheet, dated 01/25/2025, indicated Resident #48 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #62, Resident #6, and Resident #127) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to follow the policy on smoking by not completing a smoking screen assessment quarterly on Resident #62, Resident #6, and Resident #127. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe smoking and injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 01/25/24 indicated Resident #62 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Involuntary movements (a group of uncontrolled movements that may manifest as a tremor), Blindness to left eye and diabetes (a condition that happens when your blood sugar (glucose) is too high). Record review of Resident #62's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/21/23, indicated Resident #62 was understood and understood by others . Resident #62's BIMs score was 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional for 1 of 30 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. The facility did not ensure Resident #57's admission MDS assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 01/25/2024, indicated Resident #57 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (moderately or severely loss of kidney function). Record review of Resident #57's comprehensive MDS assessment, with an ARD of 01/17/2024, indicated in Section A0310 it was an admission assessment (required by day 14). The MDS assessment for Resident #57 indicated in Section A1600 an entry date of 01/08/2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for care plans related to PTSD. (Resident #68) The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's care plan reflected his diagnosis of PTSD, that included triggers for potential re-traumatization. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and potential re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/25/24, revealed Resident #68 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD (mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations). Record review of the quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 30 (Residents #57 and #299) residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #57 was provided his scheduled bath/showers. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #299 received his shower as scheduled on 01/22/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 01/25/2024, indicated Resident #57 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (moderately or severely loss of kidney function). Record review of Resident #57's admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #57 understood others and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for medication administration. The facility did not ensure Resident #85's furosemide (diuretic), metoprolol tartrate (blood pressure medication), valproic acid (anticonvulsant), and lacosamide (anticonvulsant) labels from the pharmacy matched the orders placed in the electronic charting system. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for inaccurate drug administration and not receiving the care and services to meet their individual needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/25/2024, revealed Resident #85 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for insulin administration. (Resident #300) The facility did not ensure LVN A administered Resident #300's Novolog (insulin aspart) FlexPen (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This failure could place the resident at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/25/2024, revealed Resident #300 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). Record review of Resident #300's MDS assessment revealed it was not due to have been completed yet. Record review of the comprehensive care plan, initiated on 01/16/2024, revealed Resident #300 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 2 (Resident #124) residents reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #124 received dental services when he had jagged, black teeth and missing teeth. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed dental care, difficulty eating, toothaches, tooth infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 01/25/2024 indicated Resident #124 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (the heart's main pumping chamber, left ventricle, becomes stiff an unable to fill properly) and atrial fibrillation (irregular often rapid heartbeat). Record review of the Comprehensive MDS assessment indicated Resident #124 was able to make himself understood and understood others. The MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain annually an effective training program for existing staff, consistent with their expected roles for 1 of 21 employees (ADON) reviewed for required annual trainings. The facility failed to ensure the ADON received required restraint training annually in January 2023. The facility failed to ensure the ADON received required HIV training annually in January 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for inappropriate restraints and exposure to HIV. The Finding included: Record review of the Facility Personnel file undated indicated, ADON was hired 01/23/18 and the HIV training was last completed on 3/27/23. The facility did not complete ADON's HIV training in January of 2023. The HIV training for the ADON was 2 months late. Record review of the Facility Personnel file undated indicated, ADON was hired 01/23/18 and the restraints training was last completed on 3/27/23. The facility did not complete ADON's restraints training in January of 2023. The restraints training for the ADON was 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 7(Resident #3 and Resident #4) residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received only medication he was prescribed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received long-acting insulin instead of short-acting insulin. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 1/14/23 and ended on 5/30/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications or experiencing adverse reactions relating to receiving a medication that was not ordered for them. Finding Include: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 11/22/23 indicated Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a type of progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • No harm found · C2023-12-08 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review the governing body failed to appoint an administrator who is Licensed by the State, where licensing is required; responsible for management of the facility; and reports to and is accountable to the governing body. The facility failed to appoint a Licensed Administrator after the immediate resignation by the previous Administrator. This failure could result in the facility not being managed in a responsible manner, which could affect the health and safety of all residents. Findings Include: 1. Record review of the Notice of Termination dated 11/09/23 for the previous Administrator indicated the effective date of termination was 11/08/23. The Notice of Termination indicated the previous Administrator's termination reason was resignation. The Notice of Termination indicated the previous Administrator was not eligible for rehire. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 8:43 a.m. the DON said the facility did not currently have an Administrator. During an interview on 11/16/23 at 2:30 pm the DON said the previous Administrator had resigned last week (week…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$216,749 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $196,105 — penalty dated 2025-02-07
  • $20,644 — penalty dated 2023-12-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-08 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TEXVET — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BERKELY, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/23/2015
MCLEMORE, WILLIAMIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/16/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 2%Other / private 94%

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,798per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675873. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next