Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 57.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 154.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to put interventions in place to protect Resident #2 from abuse after a reported resident to resident physical altercation with Resident #1 on 02/07/26. On 02/08/26 a 2nd altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred which resulted in Resident #2 being found on the floor with bilateral skin tears to arms and right knee and stated Resident #1 had pulled him down to the floor on 02/08/26. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate jeopardy began on 02/07/26 and ended on 02/08/26. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish and, emotional distress. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/25/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from abuse after a reported resident to resident physical altercation with Resident #1 on 02/07/26. On 02/08/26 a 2nd altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred which resulted in Resident #2 being found on the floor with bilateral skin tears to arms and right knee and stated Resident #1 had pulled him down to the floor on 02/08/26. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate jeopardy began on 02/07/26 and ended on 02/08/26. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish and, emotional distress. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for four Residents (Resident #76, Resident #93 ) of eight residents whose records were reviewed for elopement and supervision. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #76, and Resident #93 received adequate supervision. Resident #76 eloped from the facility memory unit on 10/22/2022 & 12/19/22. Resident #93 eloped on 1/30/23. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 12/18/22 and ended on 2/13/23. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. These failures could place the residents with exit seeking behaviors at risk for injury or death and could place residents at risk for smoking-related injuries. Findings were: 1. Record review of R#76's Order Summary Report dated 7/14/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of ST Elevation Myocardial Infraction Involving (STEMI) other coronary artery of inferior wall (most severe type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident needs, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan reflected oral care issues.This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/20/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior, and is the most common cause of dementia), acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins (formation of a blood clot in blood vessels), chronic kidney disease (condition that affects the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, if the alleged violation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (which included to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for reporting alleged allegations of abuse.The facility did not report to HHSC within two hours, when Resident #1 hit Resident #2's hand with an empty water bottle on 03/13/26.This failure could place residents at risk for undetected abuse, neglect and/or decline in feelings of safety and well-being.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. 1.The facility failed to follow their skin and wound prevention and management policy and did not have a licensed nurse complete and document a skin assessment at least weekly for Resident #3. This failure could put residents at risk of having skin breakdowns that could go unidentified and untreated. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/24/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included EPILEPSY, UNSPECIFIED, NOT INTRACTABLE, WITH STATUS EPILEPTICUS (seizures that continue despite adequate trials of at least two appropriate anti-seizure medications ), DYSPHAGIA (difficulty swallowing) FOLLOWING NONTRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE (stroke), AGE-RELATED PHYSICAL DEBILITY…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1.The facility failed to have an adequate indication for the use of the medication Seroquel (an antipsychotic) for Resident #1 before administering the medication with a black box warning. This failure could put residents at risk of harm from adverse reactions or harmful side effects. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/25/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/15/26 with diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) in other diseased classified elsewhere, severe, with agitation, generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by chronic, excessive, and uncontrollable worry about everyday events, activities, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the alleged violation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (which included to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for reporting alleged allegation of abuse. The facility did not report to HHSC within 2 hours, when Resident #2 was found on the floor with bilateral skin tears to arms and stated Resident #1 had pulled him down to the floor on 02/08/26. This failure could place residents at risk for undetected abuse, neglect and/or decline in feelings of safety and well-being. The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preference for 1 (Resident #42) of 42 residents reviewed for call lights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #42 had the call light within reach while in bed in their room.This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and in the event of an emergency.The findings were:Record review of Resident #42's admission record dated 1/07/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly damages nerve cells, leading to symptoms like tremors (shaking), stiffness, and balance problems), Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (a chronic condition where the body has high blood sugar levels), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills).Record review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #96's contact precautions. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care, services or treatment needed in a timely manner.The findings included: Record review of Resident #96's face sheet dated 01/05/2026 reflected the resident was an 83 -year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 06/10/2021. Resident #96 had diagnosis of ESBL to arterial ulcer. Record review of Resident #96's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/10/2026, reflected that he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure a physician order was written for isolation precautions for Resident #96 on 12/23/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information records. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #96's face sheet dated 01/05/2026 reflected the resident was an 83 -year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 06/10/2021. Resident #96 had diagnosis of ESBL to arterial ulcer. Record review of Resident #96's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/10/2026, reflected that he scored a 4 on her BIMS which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 5 medication carts (400 Hall medication cart) reviewed for storage of drugs. The facility failed to ensure that there were no expired medications inside the 400-hall medication nurse cart for Resident #152 on 01/06/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the medication's full therapeutic benefits and possible side effects.Findings included: Record review of Resident #152's face sheet, dated 01/06/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #152's was diagnosed with Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), Cerebral Infraction (stroke), Chronic Kidney Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Unspecified Dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason), and Anxiety. Record review of Resident #152's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 (Resident #96) residents reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #96 had a Contact precaution sign on the door or PPE. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and the spread of infection.Findings include: Record review of Resident #96's face sheet dated 01/05/2026 reflected the resident was an 83 -year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 06/10/2021. Resident #96 had diagnoses which included the following: ESBL to arterial ulcer, Dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason), Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar levels), Acute Kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-02-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TEXVET — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX