No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Leaves Nursing And Rehab INC

321 Kilgore Drive, Henderson, TX 75652 · Government - Hospital district · 125 certified beds · (903) 657-1923 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 657-1923 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,901 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,901 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-24)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
105 Zeid Blvd · (903) 655-2315 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
220 Zeid Blvd · (903) 657-2588 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
702 W Main St · (903) 722-9112 · Call to confirm hours
Park
412 E Van Sickle St · (254) 922-0763 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
201 Millville Dr

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.872.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.012.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.4%CMS range 57.1–71.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.6–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.7–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
56.8%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 98.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.79 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free from accident hazards and the residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with adequate supervision and assistance on 3/25/25 when a mechanical lift (specialized device designed to safely transfer individuals with limited mobility) sling broke while CNA A was conducting a mechanical lift transfer without the required two (2) staff members, causing Resident #1 to fall from the mechanical lift sling and sustain a minor injury, a hematoma (collection of blood) on the back of her head. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to have begun on 3/25/2025 and ended on 3/27/25. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the survey. This failure could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for the facility's only discontinued narcotic drug storage reviewed for reconciliation. The facility failed to ensure they had a log of the discontinued narcotic drug storage on 05/05/26. This failure could place residents at risk for missing medications and medication errors.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 05/05/26 at 01:55PM, the Acting DON took this surveyor to observe the discontinued narcotic drug storage. She unlocked the door and opened it, then unlocked the cabinet and opened it. There were several narcotic medication cards inside. This surveyor picked out 3 cards at random and checked the count sheet attached to each one, and each one had accurate counts. The acting DON said however, that she did not have a log for the medications in that cabinet. She said the previous DON was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 5 of 13 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #41, Resident #84, Resident #09, Resident #98, and Resident # 108)The facility failed to include in the care plan services Resident # 41 was a 2-person transfer with a Mechanical lift.The facility failed to include in the care plan services refused by Resident # 84 (left hand splints and dietary recommendations).The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #9's care plan for upper and lower extremity limited ROM.The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #98's care plan for wandering.The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #108's care plan for falls.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and could result in a decline in physical well-being and care needs not being addressed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacies report of irregularities for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, #88 and #108) reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. 1.The facility failed to ensure a proper rationale was given for not following the pharmacy consultant's recommendation for a trial dose reduction for Resident #1's Oxcarbazepine (an anticonvulsant medication sometimes used off-label as a mood stabilizer), Trazodone (an antidepressant commonly used to treat major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, and insomnia), and Alprazolam (a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety disorders, panic disorders, and anxiety associated with depression). 2.The facility failed to ensure Residents #88 and #108 received gradual dose reduction attempts to determine whether the psychotropic medication could be decreased or discontinued. These failures could place residents at risk from maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, mental,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility failed to consistently serve a suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks to residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for snacks. (AR #1, AR #2, AR #3, AR #4 and AR #5) The facility failed to offer an evening nourishing snack routinely for residents on 4/5/2026 to 4/6/2026. This failure could put residents at risk of experiencing complications of diabetes such as low blood sugar, weight loss, or hunger during the night. During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, AR#1 stated that the staff left snacks at the nurse station and residents must get snacks. The anonymous resident stated that not all residents were able to get out of bed to get snacks in the evening and not every resident was offered evening snacks. During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, AR #2 on Hall 100 said the staff did not always ask if she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #108) The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #108 by using inappropriate techniques to check the resident for the need for incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased self-esteem, decreased privacy and decreased quality of life.The findings included: 1. Record review of an undated facesheet revealed Resident #108 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (an umbrella term for a decline in cognitive function-memory, thinking, and reasoning-severe enough to interfere with daily life), history of falls, and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #108 had a BIMS score of 03, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs (Resident #23, and Resident #108). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 did not have a PRN order for lorazepam 0.5 mg (a prescription medication used to treat anxiety disorders-feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) after 14 days without an evaluation by the physician for continued treatment with a rationale in the resident's medical record and a duration for the PRN order. 2. The facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not used unless necessary to treat a specific diagnosed condition by continuing an antipsychotic medication for a resident with dementia without adequate clinical justification, documented behavioral symptoms, non-pharmacological interventions, or evidence of the medication regimen was necessary to protect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of ROM (Range of Motion) for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107 had a contracture prevention device in place for treatment of her right-hand and left-hand contractures. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease in mobility and range of motion and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings include: Record review of Resident #107's undated face sheet indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted [DATE] with a readmit date of 7/13/22. She had diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis or weakness on her dominant side following a stroke, damage to the brain's left hemisphere affecting motor control, balance, and often causing speech/language deficits because the dominant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for adequate supervision.The facility failed to securely store hydrogen peroxide and Isopropyl Alcohol 50% for Resident #29.This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions.Findings included:Record review of the face sheet indicated Resident #29 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder-and the most common form of dementia-that destroys memory and thinking skills), Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive, treatable lung disease-primarily caused by smoking-that restricts airflow, making it hard to breathe), Hypothyroidism (an underactive thyroid condition where the gland fails to produce enough hormones, slowing the body's metabolism). Record review of a Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with bowel and urinary incontinence, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible 2 of 2 residents to reviewed for urinary and bowel incontinence (Resident #11 and Resident #41)The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had a catheter securement device in place on 05/07/26.The facility failed to ensure CNA N and CAN M performed proper incontinent care by ensuring Resident #41 was completely clean after bowel movement and before placing a new brief on 3/5/2026.These failures could place residents at an increased risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 04/05/26, reflected that he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that stops urine from flowing, causing it to back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of 1 of 13 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident #108) The facility failed to obtain the following labs for Resident #108 per physician's orders:BMP- basic metabolic panel (a common blood test that measures eight key substances to evaluate kidney function, fluid/electrolyte balance, and blood sugar levels)Lipid panel (a routine blood test that measures cholesterol and triglyceride levels to evaluate cardiovascular risk, including potential heart disease and stroke risk)Liver panel (a blood test that measures enzymes, proteins, and bilirubin to assess liver health, damage, or disease)These failures could place residents at risk of not having their medications at a therapeutic level, delays in treatment, and/or deterioration in condition.Findings include: 1. Record review of an undated facesheet revealed Resident #108 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 22 residents (Residents #13 and Resident #11) reviewed for infection control practices.1. The facility failed to properly store or dispose of a used feeding tube syringe for Resident #13.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's catheter bag was not lying on the floor on 05/04/26.These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.Findings include: 1. Record review of the face sheet indicated Resident #13 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Autistic Disorder (a neurodevelopmental condition affecting communication, social interaction, and behavior), Intermittent Asthma (a mild form of asthma characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate use of an antibiotic for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident #16 and Resident #68). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 did not have an order for Cephalexin (an antibiotic used to treat a variety of bacterial infections) for prophylactic antibiotic use. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68 did not have an order for Macrobid (an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) for prophylactic antibiotic use. These failures could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 05/06/26, reflected that she was an [AGE] year-old female,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Resident Rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with respect and dignity when CNAs spoke rudely and disrespectfully to him. This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm, self-isolation, and diminished quality of life.Findings included: 1.Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 dated 4/22/26 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of prostate cancer, secondary bone cancer, and brain cancer. Review of the significant change MDS assessment for Resident #1 dated 3/6/26 indicated he had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 7. He required substantial/maximal assistance with all ADLs. He was always incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was implemented on 1/7/2026 and 1/10/2026 by having two people provide incontinent care to Resident #1.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet individualized medical and nursing needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 1/15/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (her right side was weak and paralyzed), and contracture of the left hand (fingers and wrist stuck in a fixed position). Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #1 did not speak and required substantial assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards. CNA A and CNA B failed to lock Resident #1's bed wheels before they raised Resident #1's bed, before they performed peri-care (removal of soiled brief, the cleaning of the genital/ anal areas and placement of a clean brief which required turning Resident #1 side to side in the bed) and pulling Resident #1 up in the bed on 10/23/25. This failure could place residents at risk of significant injury.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/23/25, indicated she was 81- years- old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following stroke affecting the right dominant side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Dialysis. The facility failed to ensure the appropriate dialysis port care was provided to Resident #1 on 8/5/25, 8/7/25, 8/9/25, 8/16/25, 8/19/25, and 9/6/25 when the facility failed to remove the dialysis port (access point for dialysis) dressing as ordered by the dialysis center. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, hospitalization, and diminished quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 10/13/2025, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), type 2 diabetes, and schizophrenia (mental condition characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 19 (Resident #64, Resident #74 and Resident #76) residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach while Resident #64, Resident #74 and Resident #76 were in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident 64's face sheet dated 03/18/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body, affecting muscles and motor function), acquired absence of left leg above the knee, and depression. Record review of Resident #64's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 5 of 11 residents (Resident #42, Resident #246, Resident #16, Resident #9, and Resident #33) reviewed for respiratory care and services. The facility failed to properly store Resident #246's Nasal Cannula. The facility failed to change the dirty filters for Resident #16. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's oxygen concentrator was set at 2 LPM, as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's oxygen concentrator filter was without white fuzzy particles. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's oxygen concentrator filter was without white fuzzy particles. This failure could place residents at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #246's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 2 of 19 residents (Resident #50 and Resident #47) reviewed for medications storage and pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to remove expired over the counter medications from the Medication Storage room. 2. The facility failed to ensure narcotic counts were accurate for Resident # 50's Belsomra 10 mg (medication used for insomnia) for medication cart on Hall 100 at shift change on [DATE]. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 Midodrine (is used to treat low blood pressure (hypotension)) had hold blood pressure (is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 5 of 29 residents (Residents #29, #39, #42, #55, and #84) reviewed for storage of medication. 1. The facility failed to securely store Resident #29's Benadryl and Neosporin cream found at her bedside table on 3/17/2025. 2. The facility failed to securely store Resident # 39's Systane eye drops found at her bedside table on 3/17/2025. 3. The facility failed to securely store Resident #42's Oxymetazoline HCL 0.05% (nasal decongestant) and a powdery substance in a medication cup located on beside table on 3/17/2025. 4. The facility failed to securely store Resident # 84's Visine eye drops located on her bedside table on 3/17/2025. 5. The facility failed to securely store over the counter medications for Resident #55. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse reactions to medications or overdose. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which included but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safety, for 1 of 4 halls (Hall 200) reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Hall 200's armed exit door near the designated smoke area and laundry, was functioning correctly and not alarming on 3/17/25 and 3/18/25. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life in an environment that is not homelike. Findings included: During an observation on 3/17/25 at 11:11 a.m., the Hall 200 exit door was entered by a staff member. The Hall 200 exit door shut behind the staff member. The Hall 200 exit door started alarming. The staff member who entered the exit door was partially down the hall when the Hall 200 door alarmed. A housekeeping staff member securely shut the exit door previously entered by another staff member. The Hall 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #64) The facility did not assist Resident #64 out of bed as often has he preferred. This failure could place dependent residents at risk for feelings of depression, lack self-determination and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident 64's face sheet dated 03/18/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body, affecting muscles and motor function), acquired absence of left leg above the knee, and depression. Record review of Resident #64's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #64 was totally dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #48) The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's MDS dated [DATE], was coded for receiving an anticonvulsant medication (help treat and prevent seizures). The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's MDS dated [DATE], was coded for receiving a hypoglycemic medication (used to lower blood sugar levels in individuals with diabetes). These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 3/18/25 indicated Resident #48 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #48 had diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes (is a chronic condition in which the body does not use insulin properly or does not produce enough insulin) and multiple sclerosis (is a disease that causes breakdown of the protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #246 and Resident #18.) The facility did not change the adult brief for Resident #246 in a timely manner leaving her in a urine-soaked brief. The facility failed to shave Resident #18 facial hair. This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #246's Face sheet dated 3/17/2022 indicated the resident was a 74 year- old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that cause ongoing inflammation and damage to the airways and air sacs in the lungs, leading to breathing difficulties), Cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had a urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident #24) The facility failed to drain urine from Resident #24's urinary catheter bag. The facility failed to keep Resident #24's urinary catheter bag off the floor. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of urinary tract infections, making the residents high risk for pain, confusion and sepsis (infections that spread to the blood) from severe urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/18/25 revealed Resident #24 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord), flaccid neuropathic bladder (a condition where the bladder muscles do not contract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications was provided for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for feeding tube management. (Resident #47 and Resident #52) The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 and Resident #52 had a physician order for the volume, frequency, and type of flush to administer via the feeding tube. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 and Resident #52 had a physician order on the frequency of cleaning and the care of the site on the feeding tube. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 and Resident #52 had a physician order on the frequency of residual checks (assess the rate of gastric emptying) for the feeding tube. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 and Resident #52 had a physician order on the frequency of checking placement for the feeding tube. These failures placed residents at risk for clogged tubing, trapped air, vomiting, and aspiration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: In excessive doses (including duplicate therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 did not received Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal (is used to treat urinary tract infections (is a bacterial infection in the urinary system)) for prophylactic use. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections (happens when germs like bacteria and fungi develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them). Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 29 residents (Resident # 20) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN O applied enhanced barrier precautions while providing medication administration to Resident # 20 on 3/18/2025 at 1:18 PM. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections leading to illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #20's Face sheet dated 3/19/2025 indicated the resident was a 49-year- old male who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), Dysphagia (a term for difficulty swallowing), Aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate, usually after a stroke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate the use of an antibiotic for 1 of 2 residents reviewed antibiotic use. (Resident #47) The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 received the appropriate antibiotic to treat her urinary tract infection on 2/22/25. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 3/18/25 indicated Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #47 had diagnosis including urinary tract infection (is a bacterial infection in the urinary system), severe sepsis (is a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow residents to obtain a copy of the records or any portions thereof upon request and 2 working days advance notice to the family for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for the right to access copies of records. The facility failed to provide medical records for Resident #1 to her attorney within two working days of a request on 07/31/2024. This failure could place residents at risk by causing a negative health impact due to not having continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 9/16/2024 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired concentration, apathy, anxiety, and agitation), and asthma (cough, wheeze, shortness of breath and chest tightness). Record review of a the annual comprehensive MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who need respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences, for 3 of 11 residents (Residents #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2 and #3's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was changed and dated as ordered. These failures could place residents at risk for upper respiratory infections and worsening of their physical condition. The findings included: Resident #1's cannula tubing was not changed as ordered, the concentrator water bottle was dated 06/09/2024 and was empty. Resident #2's cannula tubing was not changed as ordered, the concentrator water bottle was dated 06/19/2024. Resident #3's canula tubing was not changed as ordered, the concentrator water bottle was dated 06/20/2024. Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 18 residents (Residents #3, #7, #58 and #65) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to care plan the use of oxygen therapy for Resident #3. The facility failed care plan the use of oxygen therapy for Resident #7. The facility failed to care plan the use of oxygen therapy for Resident #58. The facility failed to care plan the use of oxygen therapy for Resident #65. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and cause residents not to receive needed services. Findings included: 1. Record review of a facility face sheet indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicted Resident #3 had a BIMS of 05 indicating severe cognitive impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care are provided care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 10 of 13 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #3, #50, #62, #65, #43, #7, #25, #58, #66 and #21). 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's had an order for oxygen, the humidifier and tubing for the oxygen concentrator were dated and the filter was clean and free of dust buildup. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's oxygen concentrator had an external filter and was free of dust buildup. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #62's had an order for oxygen, the oxygen tubing was changed per the facility's policy and the concentrator filter was free of dust buildup. 4.The facility did not obtain orders for Resident #65's oxygen. 5.The facility did not clean the oxygen concentrator filter as ordered for Resident #43. 6. The facility failed to ensure the internal filter of Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #38) and 2 of 6 staff (CNA E and CNA L) reviewed for infection control. CNA E failed to perform proper hand hygiene during meal service on 1/29/2024. CNA L failed to perform proper hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #38 on 01/30/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/29/2024 between 12:33 pm and 12:43 pm revealed CNA E was passing the meal trays for the lunch meal. She was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] setting up the resident tray by opening containers and cutting up food, adjusting the resident in the bed and then returned to the hall. CNA E obtained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 58) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 58's urinary drainage bag had a dignity/privacy cover. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk for a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings: Record review of an admission Record dated 1/30/2024 for Resident #58 indicated she admitted to the facility on 3/17.2022 and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Chronic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body), Asthma (narrow airways that make it difficult to breathe), type 2 diabetes, COPD (group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe) and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (loss of control over the bladder). Record review of a Quarterly/Medicare 5 Day MDS assessment dated [DATE] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 17 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure the walls in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were free from holes. The facility failed to ensure the walls in room [ROOM NUMBER] were kept clean. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well- kept and clean environment. Findings: During initial rounds and observations on 01/29/24 at 9:40 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole in the sheet rock measuring approximately one foot by one foot on the wall next Resident #3's bed and had splatters of a thick brown and tan substance on the same wall. Resident #3 did not have anything to say about the wall. During initial rounds and observations on 01/29/24 at 10:52 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole in the sheetrock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not accurately document Resident #62's oxygen therapy on the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings: Record review of a facility face sheet indicated Resident #62 was an [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. During an observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 9:55 am Resident #62 had an oxygen concentrator next to her bed. She stated she used the oxygen every night when she was sleeping. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicted Resident #62 had a BIMS of 09 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS assessment did no capture oxygen therapy. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated of 11/10/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #8, Resident #16) reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's and Resident #16's nails were kept clean. This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings: 1. Record review of a facility face sheet indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of autistic disorder (a neurological and developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 had a BIMS of 00 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure and provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 ( Resident #70) residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: Resident #70's medications (Systane ultra pf lubricant eye drops, Pataday once daily relief eye allergy solution, and Systane lubricant eye drops and a bottle of ninety soft gel capsules of PreserVision eye supplements) were found on the bedside table with no attached labels for use. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications resulting in exacerbation of the resident's condition and disease process. Findings included: During a record review physician order summary dated January 2024 for Resident #70 indicated she was [AGE] years old with diagnosis of colostomy and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for 1 of 15 employees (CNA O) new and existing staff reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure CNA O was trained on fall prevention on hire. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. Findings include: Record review of CNA O's personnel file indicated she was hired at the facility on 9/6/2023 and there was no documented evidence the aide completed training on fall prevention on hire. During an interview on 1/31/2024 at 8:47 AM, HR said she had been employed at the facility for 2 years and was responsible for payroll, orientation of new employees and on boarding of new hires along with ensuring they had the required trainings. She said she ensured the trainings were completed and corporate sets up the curriculum with online training. She said all staff should be getting trainings annually and on hire and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 1 of 15 employees (LVN N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure required education was provided on the rights of the resident and responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was conducted by LVN N annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. Findings include: Record review of LVN N's personnel file revealed he was hired on 6/17/2020 and had not completed annual training on rights of the resident and responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. The last time he received training on resident rights was on 7/2/2022. During an interview on 1/31/2024 at 8:47 AM, HR said she had been employed at the facility for 2 years and was responsible for payroll, orientation of new employees and on boarding of new hires along with ensuring they had the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-06-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ML HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2022
ML REAL ESTATE-HENDERSON, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
LANGSDALE, TROYIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
MILLER, LAURAIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2022
ML-HENDERSON LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025
VOZZA, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
TURNER, VICTORIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 18%Other / private 23%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$247per resident / day
operating cost
$7,516per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676025. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next