The Lodge Of Saginaw Health And Wellness

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 159 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 115.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. 1. On 12/31/24, CNA F and CNA G failed to safely transfer Resident #1 during the use of the mechanical lift, which resulted in the resident sustaining a scalp hematoma and T12 compression fracture. 2. On 12/18/24 the Van Driver failed to properly restrain Resident #2's wheelchair in the facility transportation van to prevent the wheelchair from tipping over on its side on the way to dialysis. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/18/24 and ended on 01/20/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for severe injury or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life and death. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure facility staff documented bruising on Resident #1's Weekly Wound Progress Report during his admission from 04/04/26 - 06/23/26. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and monitoring.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/30/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation after a significant cerebral infarction. Resident #1 had relevant diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (interruption of blood flow to the brain,) acute cystitis (inflammation of bladder,) atherosclerotic heart disease (accumulation of cellular waste in arteries,) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (non-cancerous enlargement of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Residents #1and #2) of six residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Wound Nurse J performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves during Resident #1 and #2's wound care on 06/18/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves during Resident #1's incontinent care on 06/18/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/18/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed no BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #3) of six residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the resident on 06/18/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 04/23/26, revealed the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t decreased mobility, other lack of coordination with intervention to Encourage the resident to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to follow the facility's wound cleaning protocol for Resident #2's left above the knee amputation stump dressing change on 06/18/26. This failure put Resident #2 at risk of not receiving necessary treatment and a worsening of their wound.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/18/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below Knee, Acquired Absence Of Right Leg Below Knee. Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that the resident had a BIMS score of 15 (indicates no cognitive impairment). It revealed that the Resident has surgical wounds. Record Review of Resident #2's Physician Order dated 06/08/26 revealed Left leg/AKA stump: Cleanse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Tag: F689 /4027S/S= D Surveyor Name(s): [NAME] NnadiImmediate Supervisor: Verlair AsheBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and #6) reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's fall mat was placed alongside his bed while she was lying in the bed on 06/18/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's bed was in a low position for fall prevention per the care plan while he was lying in bed on 06/18/26. This failure could prevent the residents from having an environment that was free from hazards.Findings include: Record Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 04/23/26, revealed the resident has an ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was stored properly when not in use on 06/18/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) and BiPAP mask was stored properly when not in use on 06/18/26. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 06/18/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 Residents (Resident #63 and Resident #5) of 23 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 was not left in soiled briefs, or being double briefed.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had physician's order for an indwelling catheter (device used to drain urine from bladder). This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infections and improper treatment. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #63's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #63 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 32 residents (Residents #13 and #98) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer the morning medications on time resulting in Residents #13's hydrocodone scheduled for 2:00 PM not being administered and Resident #98's hydralazine not being administered at 2:00 PM on 12/15/25. This failure could cause residents to develop changes in their medical conditions. Findings included:Record review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic pain, rotator cuff pain, and Alzheimer's Disease. Her BIMS score was 11, indicating she had moderate cognitive impairment. Her Functional Ability assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food, subject to spoilage and removed from its original container, was kept sealed, labeled, and dated in 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure various foods stored in the kitchen freezer inside the walk-through fridge were sealed, dated and labeled and remove items opened past 7-day time frame. This failure could place all residents at risk for food contamination and food borne illness. Findings included: Observation and interview of the walk-through fridge on 12/15/25 at 9:00 AM with the Dietary Manger revealed a container of red sauce, corn, gravy, and green beans were not labeled identifying the contents and did not have a disposal date. The fridge also had open, exposed diced ham, and sliced turkey in their original packaging that was not sealed and open to air nor did it have a disposal date. The fridge also had link sausage in its original packaging that was open to air and did not have a disposal date. Observation of the freezer inside the walk-through fridge two clear bags of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide in-service training that was sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year and included dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training and care of the cognitively impaired for 2 (CNA G and CNA H) of 5 CNAs reviewed for annual training. The facility failed to provide CNA G and CNA H with 12 hours per year of annual training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff.Findings included:Review of CNA G's personnel record revealed a hired date of 10/24/23. The annual training in-service provided by the facility did not include evidence of 12 hours of annual training. Review of CNA H's personnel record revealed a hired date of 02/28/23. The annual training in-service provided by the facility did not include evidence of 12 hours of annual training. Interview on 12/17/25 at 4:27 PM with ADON G who stated inservices with the CNA's were provided by ADON's and DON collectively. ADON G said she was aware all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,944 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,944 — penalty dated 2025-01-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ML HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX