No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Park Manor Of Humble

19414 Mckay drive, Humble, TX 77338 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (281) 319-4060 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Feb 20253 immediate-jeopardy citations$181,138 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $181,138 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18980 N Memorial Dr, Ste 280 · (713) 486-8180 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19333 Highway 59 N Ste 150 · (281) 540-4441 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
33 W Main St · (281) 548-3359 · Call to confirm hours
Park
310 E Main St · (281) 446-3061 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.3%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.8%12.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.3%CMS range 44.1–67.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.9–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.1–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 96.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, that facility failed to extend to the resident representative ' s the right to make decisions on behalf of the resident for 1 of 10 residents (CR#1) reviewed for resident rights in that. 1. The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. 2. The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital when requested by RR for CR#1 when he expressed having trouble breathing on [DATE] and complained of abdominal pain with diarrhea. CR#1 was wheeled to a local hospital on [DATE] and expired while at the hospital on [DATE]. - An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:43pm. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician; and notify the resident representative for 1 of 10 residents (CR#1) reviewed for change of condition, in that, 1. LVN A failed to immediately notify the physician on [DATE] when CR#1 was observed with diarrhea, and LVN A failed to immediately notify the physician when CR#1 said he was having trouble breathing on [DATE]. CR#1 was admitted to a local hospital on [DATE] and died while in the hospital on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] 11:27am. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (CR #1) out of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care in that: 1-The facility failed to obtain physician orders on [DATE] prior to treating CR#1 with loperamide to treat diarrhea. 2-The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital when requested by RR for CR#1 when he expressed having trouble breathing on [DATE] and complained of abdominal pain with diarrhea. CR#1 was wheeled to a local hospital on [DATE] and expired while at the hospital on [DATE]. 3-The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:20 pm. While the IJ was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure nurses monitored Resident #1 after an unwitnessed fall on 5/1/26 according to the facility policy.The facility failed to document the monitoring of Resident #1's unwitnessed fall on 5/1/26 and 5/2/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care, injury, and hospitalization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 5/21/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (is bleeding that occurs between the dura mater and the arachnoid mater of the brain), Alzheimer's disease with late onset, bilateral osteoarthritis of hip (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily and systematically organized in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records.The facility failed to document the monitoring of Resident #1's unwitnessed fall on 5/1/26 and 5/2/26 in a timely manner. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care, injury, and hospitalization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 5/21/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (is bleeding that occurs between the dura mater and the arachnoid mater of the brain), Alzheimer's disease with late onset, bilateral osteoarthritis of hip (the protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time), contracture of right and left hip (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9%, based on 3 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #29 and #114) and 2 of 4 staff (MA C and MA L) reviewed for medication administration.MA C did not offer or apply Lidocaine patches to all areas indicated in the MD order and administered the wrong Iron supplement to Resident #114 on 4/8/26. MA L did not administer the correct dose of Clearlax (used for the relief of occasional constipation) to Resident #29 on 4/8/26.These failures could place residents at risk of ineffective therapeutic outcomes. Findings include:Record review of Resident #114's admission record dated 4/9/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included displaced fracture of fifth cervical vertebra, central cord syndrome (incomplete spinal cord injury, primarily affecting the upper limbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature control, and only permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #115 and Resident #48) reviewed for storage of medications.The facility failed to keep Resident #115's medication secured. Four plastic eye dropper bottles of Eyes Alive (Carboxymethylcellulose sodium 0.5%) were found on Resident #115's bedside tray table. Resident #115 did not have orders to self-administer.The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's Xiidra eye drops (used to treat the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease) were stored at the proper temperature according to the medication label.The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, drug diversion, or ingestion of unprescribed medications to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of 5 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for infection control.CNA A failed to cleanse the tip of the penis while performing incontinent care for Resident #67.CNA A failed to maintain a sanitary environment by placing packages of used supplies back onto a clean linen cart.Findings included:Record review of Resident #67's face sheet dated 04/08/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (a serious viral infection of the brain); other combined immunodeficiencies (a group of inherited disorders of the immune system, leading to increased susceptibility to infections), urinary tract infection; Hemiplegia (one sided paralysis or severe loss of strength on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #39 and #52) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. -The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse of Resident #39 and Resident #52 to the State Agency within the two-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings include: Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's clinical record dated 2/5/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practices, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices and based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for an abrasion that Resident #42 sustained on his left leg after an incident on 2/1/25. This failure could place residents at risk of infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's admission record dated 2/5/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, elevated white blood cell count, hemiplegia (a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis), acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas), and weakness. Record review of Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to remain free of pests and rodents for four of four residents and one of four halls. The facility failed to ensure the building is free of cockroaches. This failure could place residents at risk of, infection, skin irritation, allergies, which could result in unsanitary living conditions and decline in health and well-being. Finding included: In an interview with Resident #37 on 01/23/2025 at 10:42am, Resident #37 stated the facility did have roaches and it's because a few residents eat in their rooms. Resident #37 stated there were times when they would try to stomp on the roaches with their shoe and would miss. When addressing the issue to the facility staff, Resident #37 was told it was a delusion of seeing the roaches, but an exterminator was brought in shortly after speaking with facility staff. The exterminator did place pellets along the side of the walls to kill any sighting of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for pest control. -Resident #1 had one medium sized roach crawling on the wall behind her bed. -Resident #2 had several medium and small size roaches crawling on the floor and wall next to her bed. -Resident #3 had a small roach crawling on the wall in her room. This failure could place residents at risk of residing in an environment with pests. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety, bipolar disorder (mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), insomnia (difficulty either falling or staying asleep), cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-12 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 3 (Resident #1, #5, and #7) of 10 residents reviewed for residents' rights in that: -Resident #1 was found to have soiled (feces) wipes left in her brief until her scheduled shower time. -Residents #5 and #7 did not have their briefs changed in a timely manner according to the facility's policy and procedures. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for impaired dignity, loss of self-worth, and a decline in psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Lymphedema (define), Rheumatoid Arthritis (define), Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Observation and Interview on 5/11/2024 at 1:57 PM revealed Resident #1 alert and oriented to person, place, time, and event. Her daughter was at her bedside. Staff transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's physician orders for oxygen administration were being followed. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and ineffective treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 11/08/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident's diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of damaged skeletal muscle), malignant neoplasm (cancer) of connective and soft tissue of right lower limb including hip, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident call system. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was in working order. This failure could have placed residents at risk of not receiving assistance when needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 11/14/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed due to different diseases or toxins in the body), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #76 was assessed by a licensed nurse in a timely manner when she began to show signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). CNA K reported the hypoglycemic episode to RN A, who did not respond to the incident. CNA K provided Resident #76 with juice and sugar packets and the resident was not assessed until the following shift, approximately 1 hour later. This failure could place residents at risk of hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #76's face sheet dated 11/2/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypoglycemia, weakness, injury of the head, morbid obesity, heart failure, and acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for significant medication errors. -The facility failed to administer the correct dose of Xtandi (a cancer medication) to Resident #107 as ordered by the Physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effect of the medication. Findings include: Record review of Resident #107's face sheet dated 11/2/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included acute respiratory failure, pleural effusion, anemia, hypertension, heart failure, acute kidney failure, and weakness. Record review of Resident #107's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. He required extensive assistance with ADL care. Record review of Resident #107's physician orders revealed an order for Xtandi give 160 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it remains free of pests for 1 (Resident #53) of 24 residents and one area (The Conference Room) reviewed for pests. -The facility failed to ensure the building was free of cockroaches and fruit flies. These failures could put residents at risk of, infection, allergies, skin irritation, unsanitary living conditions and decline in health and well-being. Findings include: Resident #53 Record review of Resident #53's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. His diagnosis included diabetes, paralysis to left side of body following a stroke, malnutrition, memory deficit, narrowing of the arteries, bipolar disorder (a mental disorder), dementia, delusional disorders, age related cognitive decline, elevated blood pressure and progressive lung disease. Record review of Resident #53's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$181,138 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $181,138 — penalty dated 2024-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HMG HEALTHCARE — 31 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 30 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab CenterHumble, TX 1 of 5Park Manor of Cypress StationHouston, TX 1 of 5Silver SpringAbilene, TX 1 of 5Smoky Hill Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Tanglewood Nursing & RehabilitationTopeka, KS 1 of 5Treviso Transitional CareLongview, TX 2 of 5Accel at College StationCollege Station, TX 2 of 5Park Manor Of TomballTomball, TX 2 of 5Park Manor of Quail ValleyMissouri City, TX 2 of 5Park Manor of WestchaseHouston, TX 3 of 5Arbrook PlazaArlington, TX 3 of 5Cimarron Place Health & RehabilitationCorpus Christi, TX 3 of 5Forum Parkway Health & RehabilitationBedford, TX 3 of 5Green Oaks Nursing & RehabilitationArlington, TX 3 of 5Hewitt Nursing And RehabilitationHewitt, TX 3 of 5Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLCDesoto, TX 3 of 5Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation CenterRed Oak, TX 3 of 5Willowbrook Nursing CenterNacogdoches, TX 4 of 5Friendship Haven Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenFriendswood, TX 4 of 5Gulf Pointe PlazaRockport, TX 4 of 5Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMission, TX 4 of 5Park Manor Of South BeltHouston, TX 4 of 5Park Manor Of The WoodlandsThe Woodlands, TX 5 of 5Crowley Nursing And RehabilitationCrowley, TX 5 of 5Harbor Lakes Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGranbury, TX 5 of 5Holland Lake Rehabilitation And Wellness CenterWeatherford, TX 5 of 5Park Manor Of CyfairHouston, TX 5 of 5Pecan Bayou Nursing And RehabilitationBrownwood, TX 5 of 5Stallings Court Nursing and RehabilitationNacogdoches, TX 5 of 5Stonegate Nursing And RehabilitationFort Worth, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
ZIONS BANCORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
STRAMECKI, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
HMG PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE, L.L.C.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/31/2017
BALSAMO, KRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
CANNON, CRAIGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2021
CULP, ROLANDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
DASPIT, LAURENCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
DOHN, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
MURRELL, EDWARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
MYLES, ARDRILAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2023
PICO, ANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
PRINCE, DEREKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
REINARZ, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
ROGERS, DENISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2021
ROLLO, JEFFERYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
VRATIS, KACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
WAY, GEORGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
HEALTHMARK GROUP LTDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
HM GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
HMG HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
STANBRIDGE, NORMAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,587per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675991. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next