No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gulf Pointe Plaza

1008 Enterprise Blvd., Rockport, TX 78382 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (361) 727-1800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (361) 727-1800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1704 Jenkins St · (361) 790-9047 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1409 Highway 35 N · (361) 729-0530 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1409 HWY 35 NORTH BUSINESS
Park
Enterprise Blvd · (361) 727-2158 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.6%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.2%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.5%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.712.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.122.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.7%CMS range 54.7–73.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.7–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge86.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 3.4–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
38.7%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 73.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-10)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #18, Resident #57, and Resident #22) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's oxygen was administered at the correct setting on 03/08/2026 as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's oxygen was administered at the correct setting on 03/08/2026 as ordered by the physician. 3. The facility failed to post an oxygen sign outside of the room indicating Resident #57 received oxygen on 03/08/2026 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's oxygen was administered at the correct setting on 03/08/2026 as ordered by the physician. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's oxygen tubing was connected to humidification. These failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation.The facility failed to properly label and date open, shelf stable food.The facility failed to dispose of expired shelf stable and refrigerated food.The facility failed to ensure containers and bags of food were sealed appropriately. The facility failed to ensure behind the ice machine and under the sink were clean.The facility failed to ensure all dry and/or shelf stable foods were labeled with received by, opened, and use by dates.The facility failed to ensure pans were free from dents and dings, as well as from having the Teflon scraped off.The facility failed to ensure there were no chemicals stored in the kitchen or serving area.The facility failed to ensure no staff items were being stored in the kitchen refrigerators. These failures could have placed residents at risk of ingesting foreign objects as well as possible foodborne illnesses.The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be fully informed in advance about the risks or benefits of any proposed treatment that may affect the resident's well-being for 2 of 6 (Resident #7 and Resident #10) residents reviewed for psychotropic medication consents. 1. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent for Resident #7's Divalproex (a medication used to treat seizures, but could also be used to treat anxiety [intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations], depression [a mood disorder which caused a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest], schizophrenia [a severe mental disorder which affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often leading to hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking], and bipolar disorder [a mental health condition characterized by extreme mood swings which include emotional highs and lows]). 2. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #57) of 5 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's OOH-DNR was completed. The OOH-DNR form did not have the resident or RP signature. This failure could affect residents who have implemented Advance Directives and established their choice to not be resuscitated to a risk of receiving CPR and being resuscitated against their wishes. The findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #57's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disorder which is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes) and Picks Disease (a progressive and degenerative brain disease which usually affects people under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately for 1 of 4 medication carts (100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart) reviewed for storage.The facility failed to ensure the 100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart was locked and secured.This failure could have placed residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications which were not prescribed to them and could have caused them harm.The findings included:An observation on 01/20/2026 at 3:47 PM of the 100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart parked at the nurses' station revealed an unlocked medication cart. The lock on the cart was popped out, and all drawers except the narcotic drawer were able to be accessed. There was no staff observed at the cart, but there were multiple residents sitting out in the front lobby close to where the cart was parked. In an interview on 01/20/2026 at 3:48 PM LVN-A stated 100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart was hers, and she had not realized she had not locked the med-cart back after counting medications with the off-going nurse. LVN-A stated she knew she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN A's medication cart on hall 400 and MAR contained an accurate count and record for Resident #1's liquid Morphine (a narcotic used to treat pain). This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion and/or a delay in medication administration, as well as risk of not having allegations investigated or timely. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/19/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 04/19/25. Diagnoses included Warnicke's Encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a severe deficiency of thiamine (vitamin B1), Alzheimer's, Chronic Respiratory Failure (advanced lung disease which makes it progressively harder to breathe over time and can lead…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to revise orders for Resident #47's code status from full code to DNR after his return from the hospital to correctly reflect the resident's wishes. The resident had a signed DNR form from 2019, but also had an active order for full code. This deficient practice could affect residents who require care and monitoring and place them at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #47's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of [DATE] and a current admission date of [DATE]. Pertinent diagnosis included Vascular Dementia (general term describing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to your brain).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs, as well as describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for care plans in that: The Facility failed to ensure that Resident #7's care plan was revised, updated and individualized with interventions and goals to address Resident #7's urinary incontinence. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and not having personalized or individualized plans developed to address specific needs or concerns. Findings included: Record review face sheet, on 12/18/2024 at 3:17 PM, revealed Resident #7 was a [AGE] year-old-female with an original…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 1 central supply room reviewed for the environment. The facility failed to maintain and assure the central supply room was locked at all times. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe environment. The findings include: Observation of the central supply room door on 12/17/24 at 8:25 AM revealed the door was unlocked and easily opened. There was a key to the lock hanging on the wall just outside of the door. There was a sign on the door that read, Staff Only Do Not Enter. In the room were 12 closed boxes and one open box of disposable razors. There were 6 boxes of loose nail clippers, and 1 large box full of multiple individual bottles of liquid soap. The items were in cubby type shelves located from the floor to approximately waist high. Observation of the central supply room door on 12/18/24 at 9:18 AM revealed the door was unlocked and easily opened. There was one can of spray lubricant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles reviewed for medications stored in 1 of 7 medication carts (Overflow cart) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to keep the overflow cart locked when not in use. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of drug diversion or misuse of medications leading to harm. Findings included: During an observation at 7:15 AM on 12/17/24, this surveyor pulled the top drawer of the overflow medication cart and it opened. The overflow medication cart was unlocked with no employee nearby. During an interview with CMA C at 7:16 AM on 12/17/24, CMA C stated she was not aware the medication cart was unlocked until she saw the drawer open. CMA C stated she arrived at the facility this morning at around 5:45 AM. CMA C stated the cart that was left unlocked was the overflow cart where they store extra medications for residents. CMA C stated she had not used the overflow cart yet since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling Legionella through a program that identifies areas in the water system where Legionella can grow and spread for the facility reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to have a system in place for preventing and controlling Legionella through a program that identifies areas in the water system where Legionella can grow and spread. This deficient practice place the facility residents at risk for airborne infections. The findings included: An interview on 09/27/23 at 10:28 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed he did not know what Legionnaire's was. He stated he had been working at this facility for three and a half years. The Maintenance Director stated the facility water is on city water and that he visually inspects water. The Maintenance Director stated to his knowledge, there was no system to monitor effectiveness of control measures. He stated that he had no training upon hire. He was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments on 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for storage of drugs. Nurses' Medication Cart was left unattended, unlocked and medication cart keys left in medication cart lock by nurse's station area. This deficient practice could affect residents who have medications on the Nurses' Medication Cart and could result in lost medications, drug diversion, or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications. Findings included: Observation on 09/25/23 at 1:45 PM revealed a medication cart was left unlocked, unattended and medication cart keys left in medication cart lock by nurse's station. There was one resident about 5 to 10 feet away from cart and one nurse located at the nurses station out of view of the unlocked medication cart. This surveyor opened the top drawer recognizing the cart being unlocked. Multiple medications in bulk bottles and blister packs were easily assessable for removable. The DON walked by approximately 5 to 10 minutes later and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HMG HEALTHCARE — 31 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 30 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab CenterHumble, TX 1 of 5Park Manor of Cypress StationHouston, TX 1 of 5Silver SpringAbilene, TX 1 of 5Smoky Hill Rehabilitation CenterSalina, KS 1 of 5Tanglewood Nursing & RehabilitationTopeka, KS 1 of 5Treviso Transitional CareLongview, TX 2 of 5Accel at College StationCollege Station, TX 2 of 5Park Manor Of TomballTomball, TX 2 of 5Park Manor of Quail ValleyMissouri City, TX 2 of 5Park Manor of WestchaseHouston, TX 3 of 5Arbrook PlazaArlington, TX 3 of 5Cimarron Place Health & RehabilitationCorpus Christi, TX 3 of 5Forum Parkway Health & RehabilitationBedford, TX 3 of 5Green Oaks Nursing & RehabilitationArlington, TX 3 of 5Hewitt Nursing And RehabilitationHewitt, TX 3 of 5Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLCDesoto, TX 3 of 5Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation CenterRed Oak, TX 3 of 5Willowbrook Nursing CenterNacogdoches, TX 4 of 5Friendship Haven Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenFriendswood, TX 4 of 5Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMission, TX 4 of 5Park Manor Of HumbleHumble, TX 4 of 5Park Manor Of South BeltHouston, TX 4 of 5Park Manor Of The WoodlandsThe Woodlands, TX 5 of 5Crowley Nursing And RehabilitationCrowley, TX 5 of 5Harbor Lakes Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGranbury, TX 5 of 5Holland Lake Rehabilitation And Wellness CenterWeatherford, TX 5 of 5Park Manor Of CyfairHouston, TX 5 of 5Pecan Bayou Nursing And RehabilitationBrownwood, TX 5 of 5Stallings Court Nursing and RehabilitationNacogdoches, TX 5 of 5Stonegate Nursing And RehabilitationFort Worth, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2018
MURRELL, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
ROLLO, JEFFERYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
STRAMECKI, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
VRATIS, KACEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
WAY, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018
CULP, ROLANDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
DASPIT, LAURENCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
PRINCE, DEREKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
HMG PARTNERS I, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
HMG ROCKPORT SNF, LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
BALSAMO, KRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2021
DAVIS, RHONDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2020
DOHN, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
HIGGINS, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
REINARZ, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024
SOLIS, ADRIENNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/08/2011
ZIONS BANCORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
STANBRIDGE, NORMAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 6%Other / private 33%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$232per resident / day
operating cost
$7,039per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$241per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675892. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next