Lindan Park Care Center LP

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 37% occupied, or roughly 87 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse when CNA A force fed her on 03/03/25. The resident suffered psychosocial harm. On 03/20/25 at 1:00 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 03/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of choking, aspiration, serious injury, harm, and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative regarding changes in condition for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician and resident representative 08/09/23 when he initially developed a wound which deteriorated to a Stage 4 and on 08/20/23 it deteriorated where it was unstageable with wound odor and bloody drainage. Resident #1 was transferred to the ER because of possible infection and need for surgical debridement. Resident #1 was still in the hospital at the time of the investigation and with a diagnosis of sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection and a life-threatening medical emergency) according to the hospital representative. An IJ was identified on 08/24/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:36 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/25/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of actual harm that was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility failed to ensure LVN A, who identified Resident #1's wound on 08/09/23, followed-up to notify his physician, and the facility did not get orders for treatment until 08/11/23. LVN D on 08/20/23 documented Resident #1's wound had an odor, bloody drainage and was unstageable. LVN D on 08/20/23 did not notify Resident #1's physician, DON, or resident representative when she noticed his wound had deteriorated. The facility on 08/20/23 took no additional interventions to care for Resident #1's wound. Resident #1 initially developed a wound which deteriorated to a Stage 4 and on 08/20/23 it deteriorated where it was unstageable with wound odor and bloody drainage. Resident #1 was transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (medication cart #1) of 6 medication carts reviewed for storage of medications.The facility failed to ensure medication cart #1 was locked while unattended on 06/04/26.This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included:An observation on 06/04/26 at 8:10 PM revealed medication cart #1 was unlocked and unattended with no staff within eyesight of medication cart #1. All drawers could be opened, and medication and supplies (needles, gauze, ointments, etc.) could be easily accessed. In an observation and interview on 06/04/26 at 8:15 PM, with LVN B she stated medication cart #1 belonged to her. LVN B locked medication cart #1. LVN B said she had allowed MA A to get supplies out of medication cart #1, unaware it was not locked after the supplies were obtained. LVN B said by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential and personal medical records for 22 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #11, Resident #19, Resident # 24, Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #32, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #37, Resident #42, Resident #45, Resident #44, and Resident #47, Resident #49, and Resident #54) of 22 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality of records.The facility failed to ensure that the Thickened Liquid List was not accessible to visitors in the Dining Room on 05/04/26 and 05/05/26.The facility failed to ensure that the Red Napkin List was not accessible to visitors in the Dining room [ROOM NUMBER]/04/26 and 05/05/26.The facility failed to ensure that the Shower Log Binder on the counter at the Nurses Station was not accessible to visitors on 05/05/26.The facility failed to ensure that the EBP List for 14 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety.1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage area and refrigerator areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines.2. The facility failed to seal open items in plastic bags, containers, and boxes in the dry storage pantry, refrigerator, and freezer areas.3. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the dry storage area were removed.4. The facility failed to ensure that dented cans were removed in the dry pantry area and were separated from the other canned food.5. The facility failed to ensure that the A/C vents in the kitchen's food preparation area were cleaned.These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other food-borne illnesses.Findings Included:An Observation of the kitchen during the brief initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Level 2 evaluation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3), reviewed for resident assessment. Resident #3's PASRR Level 1 screening did not reflect mental illness, and the resident did not have a PASRR Level II evaluation. This could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary specialized services to meet their individual needs.The findings were: Record Review of Resident #3s Care Plan dated 05/28/2025, reflected: 03/08/2026: The resident will show decreased episodes of s/s of depression related to diagnosis of Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). 05/28/2025: The resident will maintain the ability to make own decisions independently and establish own goals related to diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a rare mental illness that affects how a person thinks,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify residents or their representatives on how to file a grievance in an anonymous manner for three (Residents #5, #11, #46, #37, #30, and #59) of three residents reviewed for knowledge of how to file a grievance. The facility failed to notify residents or their representatives either individually or through prominent postings throughout the facility on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner. These failures could affect 6 of 60 resident's ability to file a grievance without the fear of discrimination, reprisal, retribution, and their right to anonymously file their grievance. Observation on 03/05/25 at 2:45 PM Surveyor attempted to open the frame with many attempts were required. When the frame was opened the 1 grievance printed in small print on blue paper fell out of the frame where the grievances were kept. Interview on 03/04/2025 at 1:30PM with five residents during the confidential Resident Counsel revealed the residents were unaware where grievance forms were located. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, and refrigerator areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines. 2. The facility failed to seal open items in plastic bags in the dry storage pantry and the refrigerator areas. 3. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the dry storage pantry and the refrigerator areas were removed. 4. The facility failed to ensure that 1 dented can was removed from the shelf in the dry pantry area. These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings Included: Observation of the kitchen during the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 03/03/25 at 9:20 AM, revealed the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review for one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for PASARR services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was properly screened for PASARR services This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized PASARR services which would enhance their highest level of functioning and could contribute to residents decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/17/25, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic disorder. Resident #29's BIMs score of 3 indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Record review of Resident #29's PASARR Level I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included but was not limited to, (i) A recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but was not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results; (ii) A final summary of the resident's status; (iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter) for two (Resident #58, Resident #59) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning. 1. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary and a reconciliation of medications for Resident #58 for his planned discharge home on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary and a reconciliation of medications for Resident #59 for his planned discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk of a recapitulation of the stay being unavailable to help ensure continuity of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician consistent with his or her authority, when there was a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to promptly notify Resident #1's physician when a change in condition was discovered by RN A (Registered Nurse) on Resident #1 on 1/26/2025 at 5:16 AM. The physician was not notified of the change in condition by RN A (Registered Nurse). This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician informed when there was a change in condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 01/30/25, revealed that the resident was a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of lack of coordination, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, heart failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and responsible party consistent with his or her authority, when there was an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to promptly notify Resident #1's physician, and Resident #1's responsible party when an injury of unknown origin was discovered on Resident #1. The physician and responsible party were not made aware of the injury of unknown origin until Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital for unrelated treatment. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician or responsible party informed when there was a change in condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 01/03/25, revealed that the resident was a [AGE] year-old female. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$75,233 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,287 — penalty dated 2025-03-20
• $62,946 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX