Colonnades Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 279 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 20.1 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.99 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.55 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the residents' right to be free from mental abuse/verbal abuse/ and physical abuse by a staff member for four residents, (Resident #5 (R5), Resident #7 (R7) Resident #20 (R20) and Resident #177 (R177)) out of a survey sample of 20 residents, which resulted in psychosocial harm for R20. Immediate jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care in the area of abuse was identified. The findings included: 1. For R5 and R20, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse, mental abuse and verbal abuse. On 10/29/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R5's chart, which noted she had been discharged and was no longer a resident of the facility. Therefore, an interview could not be conducted with R5. On 10/29/24 at 9:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with R20. R20 said, [Certified nursing assistant #1 (CNA 1)'s name redacted] treated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards and failed to assess residents to determine who was at risk, having the potential to affect multiple residents on one of one nursing units. Two residents (Resident #105 and Resident #109) spilled coffee onto their lap, which resulted in R105 requiring first aide intervention, which constituted harm. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and substandard care was identified. Once IJ was abated, the scope and severity was lowered to a level three, isolated. The findings included: For all of the residents residing on the one nursing unit in the facility, the facility staff had not assessed the residents ability to manage hot liquids, when hot coffee was available and accessible to residents in the lobby, and the facility failed to maintain a consistent system in place to monitor temperatures of hot liquids being served in the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to effectively administer the facility for residents to maintain their highest practicable well-being, which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings included: For the resident's residing in the facility, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently administer the facility to ensure residents were free from and protected from abuse. The facility administrator, who was the abuse coordinator, failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure residents were protected, allegations were reported and investigated timely, and residents were free from abuse, which resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy and substandard quality of care. 1. On 10/29/24 at 9:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with resident #20 (R20). R20 said, [Certified nursing assistant #1 (CNA 1)'s name redacted] treated me like slapping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from a significant medication error for one resident (Resident #7-R7) in a survey sample of 20 residents. The findings included: For R7, the facility staff failed to administer an antibiotic resulting in a two-day delay in the order being carried out and then resulting in multiple missed doses. On 10/29 and 10/30/24 a clinical record review was conducted of R7's chart. This review revealed R7 had a visit to the hospital on [DATE], following a fall where she sustained a laceration to the back of her head which required medical attention. R7 returned to the facility on [DATE]. According to the hospital records within R7's paper chart, the ED [emergency department] After Visit Summary dated 10/25/24, noted Reason for Visit: Fall. Diagnoses: Fall, initial encounter, Hematoma of scalp, initial encounter, Cystitis, Traumatic tear of thoracic aorta, initial encounter. That same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were securely stored in 1 of 2 medication carts and for 1 resident (resident #128) in a survey sample of 20 residents. The facility staff also failed to ensure that expired medications were not available for use in 1 of 1 medication rooms. The findings included: 1. For R128, the facility staff permitted the resident to have eye drops at the bedside which were not secured. On 10/29/24 at 9:49 a.m., observations were conducted in R128's room and an interview conducted with the resident. On R128's over bed table the surveyor noted a bottle with a prescription label. When asked, R128 said it was eye drops and I use them when my eyes get dry or itchy. R128 reported that he had received them when he was in the hospital. R128 handed the surveyor the bottle and it was noted to be Carboxymethylcellulose Refresh 1% a 15 ml container of ophthalmic gel. The instructions read, 1 drop both eyes. It had a hospital pharmacy label with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. Four food bins containing rice, flour, sugar, and bread crumbs were labeled as expired and were accessible for distribution in the main kitchen. The findings included: On 10/29/24 at 8:40 a.m. during the initial tour of the main kitchen with dietary manager (other staff, OS #1) four large food bins containing rice, flour, sugar, and bread crumbs all with an expiration date of 9/21/24 were accessible for distribution. OS #1 also observed the food bins and verbalized that either a staff member had not relabeled the food bins when new food was added or the food is out of date, verbalizing the food will be removed and replaced along with new expiration dates. A policy titled Food Storage, Preparation and Service was obtained and read in part: General Food Handling [ .] d. All food items are labeled, dated and rotated to maintain a system of First In First Out. e. Expired food is discarded. On 10/3024 at 5:01 p.m. the administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the above finding. No other information was provided prior to exit conference on 11/1/24. Based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that the facility assessment involved the appropriate participants, which had the potential to affect all operations and residents within the facility. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the active involvement of direct care staff and solicit input from residents, resident representatives and family members in the development of the facility assessment. On 10/31/24, a review of the facility assessment was conducted. This review revealed no evidence of direct care staff, residents, resident representatives or family members being involved and/or their input being solicited for the development of and/or review of the resident assessment. The facility assessment was updated 5/23/24 and reviewed with the governing body on 5/16/24. According to the persons involved in completing assessment it included the administrator, director of nursing, governing body representative, medical director, social services coordinator, resident assessment coordinator and dietary services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For R12, who had multiple falls and sustained a significant head injury, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record to include the details of the fall and the facility's response. On 10/29/24 at 11:03 a.m., during an interview with R12 and his spouse, the spouse reported, He had several falls here, which resulted in a head injury. The first one they called me, he hit his head badly and was bleeding and had to have some surgery on his brain. On the evening of 10/30/24, during a clinical record review, the following was noted. R12 had a fall on 6/10/24. The Fall Progress Note read, Fall was unwitnessed in residents room [ROOM NUMBER]/10/2024 8:00 PM. Residents description of event and how they were feeling: Guest stated that he was going to bed. He stated that he was ok before he fell .No injury noted at time of fall. [R12's spouse's name redacted] Your husband fell. He is ok. was notified on 06/10/2024 11:00 PM [Doctor's name redacted], MD was notified on 06/10/2024 9:00 PM with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer COVID immunizations, to 4 of 5 residents (resident #7-R7, resident #17-R17, resident #76- R76 and Resident #20-R20) sampled for immunizations and failed to have evidence of having provided staff education regarding COVID immunizations for 3 (licensed practical nurse #1- LPN #1, certified nursing assistant #6- CNA #6, and other employee #5- OE#5) of 3 staff sampled. The findings included: On 10/30/24, a sample of five residents was selected for review of immunizations. Review of the clinical records for each resident revealed the following: 1. R7 had no information noted with regards to the status of her COVID immunizations. There was no indication that the facility had offered any education with regards to COVID immunizations. 2. For R17, the clinical record indicated that the resident was eligible for the spike vaccination of COVID-19. 3. R76's clinical record indicated no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0944 — pattern
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide as part of their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program mandatory training for five employees (certified nursing assistants- CNA #1, #4 and #5, licensed practical nurse LPN #4, and registered nurse RN #2) in a sample of five staff members reviewed for educational requirements. The findings included: On 10/31/24, a survey sample of five staff members was selected for review of their education and training. The sample included: CNA #1, CNA #4, CNA #5, LPN #4 and RN #2. The facility administration was given the names and asked to provide all evidence of education and training provided to those employees for the past two years. On 11/1/24, the general manager (GM) provided the survey team with transcript reports of education for each of the five sampled staff. The GM was asked if all the staff education is conducted as computer-based training and the GM stated that it was, and the facility used Relias for staff training. The GM also confirmed that they have a training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to respond timely to a clinical record request for 1 resident of 20 residents, resident #26 (R26). The findings included: For R26, whose power of attorney requested copies of the resident's clinical record, the facility staff failed to fulfil the request for over six weeks. On 11/1/24, a closed clinical record review was conducted of R26's chart. This review revealed no information with regards to a request for clinical records being made. On 11/1/24 at 9:49 a.m., an interview was conducted with the medical records employee. The medical records employee reported that the process when a person requests medical records is that they fill out a form, it is forwarded to the records management team and documents are uploaded for them to review. Once approval is received from the records management team, she releases the requested records. The medical records employee reported she had only been in the role about two months and therefore had no knowledge of a request for records involving R26. On 11/1/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to implement Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy for abuse and failed to implement abuse policy regarding an allegation of abuse and injury of unknown origin for one of 20 residents (Resident #7). The Findings Include: 1. The facility did not communicate or monitor feedback of allegations of abuse during QAPI meetings as directed in the QAPI policy. Review of facility reported incidents indicated that the facility reported an allegation of abuse between a staff member and two residents on 10/2/24. Review of the facility QAPI policy read in part 4. The SNA/designee [skilled nursing administrator] will maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program. Documentation may include. but is not limited to: b. Systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation,analysis, and prevention of adverse events. [ .] The community maintains procedures for feedback,data collection systems, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-07 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA