No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Premier Rehab and Healthcare at Berlin

98 Hospitality Drive, Barre, VT 05641 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (802) 229-0308 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$307,847 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $307,847 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 59% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Barre0.3 mi
654 Granger Rd, Suite 1
Pharmacy
800 U S 302 · (802) 476-6659 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Market 320.6 mi
168 Ames Dr · (802) 479-9078 · Call to confirm hours
Park
VisitVT0.2 mi
751 Granger Rd · (802) 223-3443 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2026-04 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.3%19.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.5%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.0%13.0%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%5.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%16.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%97.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%5.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.1%26.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%78.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%17.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.751.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.502.881.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 36.5–52.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.5%CMS range 5.7–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 2.9–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
72.9%
Total nursing turnover
69.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-04)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 7 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #1, #2, and #3) received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent or promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure injury. As a result, Resident #1 developed an unstageable pressure injury which became necrotic (death of tissue); requiring hospitalization, and resulted in death related to due to osteomyelitis and sepsis of the pressure injury. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to prevent and treat pressure injury resulting in infection and death of 1 resident. Findings include: 1. Per review of Resident #1's medical record, s/he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and a history of pelvic fracture on [DATE]. On [DATE], a nursing assessment revealed a 12 on the Braden scale for predicting pressure risk, identifying Resident #1 as a high risk for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) related to obtaining urinalyses (UA) and culture and sensitivity [C&S; a test to determine if there is an infection, what germ is causing the infection, and what medication will work best to treat the infection] as requested by medical providers in a timely manner. As a result, Resident #1 and #2 suffered symptoms of urinary tract infections (UTI), a disease that can be diagnosed with a urinalysis and C&S, and were both transferred to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis [a life-threatening complication of an infection] caused by a UTI. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty), morbid obesity, and type 2 diabetes. A 10/2/2023 hospital discharge summary indicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-01 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an EKG (electrocardiogram; a diagnostic test to evaluate heart function) to meet the needs of its residents for 1 applicable resident (Resident #2). As a result, Resident #2 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) and later to the ICU (intensive care unit) to manage the cardiac complications including atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate) with RVR (rapid ventricular response; abnormal rhythm originating in the lower chambers of the heart) and NSTEMI Type II (a heart attack due to mismatched oxygen supply and demand to the heart muscle), both cardiac conditions can potentially be diagnosed with an EKG. Findings include: Per record review Resident #2 has diagnoses that include schizophrenia, hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation. Resident #2's care plan, created on 9/15/2022, states that s/he is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs, antipsychotic, anti-manic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to Identify a resident-to-resident altercation as abuse (Resident #1 and Resident #2) and failed to immediately report the incident as required. Finding include: Per record review Resident #1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 0 which indicates significant cognitive impairment. Diagnoses for Resident #1 include major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, restlessness, agitation and history of traumatic brain injury.Per record review Resident #2 has a BIMS of 10 which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses for Resident #2 include cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder with anxiety, epilepsy and alcoholic polyneuropathy.Per review of the facility's 5/26/2026 incident report, on 5/23/2026 Resident #1 became angry when s/he thought Resident #2 was wearing a shirt that belonged to him/her. While a staff member was attempting to redirect Resident #1, Resident #1 turned around and willfully hit Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare in accordance with professional standards for food service safety per observation of stored dirty, greasy, and wet pots and of unclean kitchen equipment.Per observation on 2/2/26 at approximately 10:48 AM, observed numerous pots and pans that were wet on the inside and outside and not dried prior to stacking. Several other pans were noted to be greasy. Per observation on 2/2/26 at approximately 10:58 AM, the meat slicer was observed to have some dry particles on the back of the blade. Per interview on 2/2/26 at approximately 11:02 AM, the Kitchen Manager confirmed the above observations.Per observation on 2/2/26 at approximately 11:03 AM, the floor stand mixer was noted to have a dried, tacky white substance on the underside of the mixer arm, and on the backsplash under the mixer arm. There were some food particles/crumbs noted on the inside of the attached metal mixing bowl. Per interview on 2/2/26 at approximately 11:04 AM, the Kitchen Manager confirmed the above observation.Per observation on 2/2/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive choices were indicated in the electronic medical record for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident # 10 and Resident #29). Findings include:1.) Per record review of Resident # 10's COLST (Clinicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form dated [DATE] revealed the resident wishes to receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and desires full code status. Resident # 10's care plan initiated [DATE] stated Resident #10 is a full code indicating the resident wants CPR. A physician's order dated [DATE] read full code. The EMR (electronic medical record) care profile for Resident #10 has a section for code status that read DNR (do not resuscitate). Per interview with Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of B wing on [DATE] at 1:07 PM, she stated her and her staff use the resident care profile to identify a resident's code status. She confirmed Resident #10 is a DNR based on the care profile and that the COLST form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide palatable and appealing food for 10 of 19 sampled Residents (Resident #3, Resident #37, Resident #5, Resident #30, Resident #8, Resident #11, Resident #42, Resident #43, Resident #1, and Resident #27). Findings include:#1: Per interview with Resident #3 on 8/4/2025 at 11:01 AM, she/he reported that s/he has been struggling to eat the food and gags because it’s so bad. Resident #3 also reported that they will heat up his/her food and it will still be cold ninety percent of the time. #2: Per interview with Resident #37 on 8/04/2025 at 11:46 AM, s/he reported that sometimes the food is not hot. #3: Per interview with Resident #5 on 8/04/2025 at 11:56 AM, s/he reported the food is “too often” cold, about 75% of the time. #4: Per interview with Resident #30 on 8/4/2025 at 2:33 PM s/he stated that the food is not always good and not like s/he is used to. #5: Per interview with Resident #8 on 8/4/2025 at 3:14 PM, the Resident reported that s/he does not eat the food provided by the facility and that the food is not healthy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Per observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine whether it is clinically appropriate for residents to self-administer medications for one of one sampled resident (Resident #43). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous thee recertification surveys, dated 2/6/25, 8/19/24, and 3/01/24. Findings include:Per review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration reviewed on 3/2025, Medication are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. Observe resident consumption of medication.Per record review, Resident #43 has a medical condition called dysphagia, a condition that causes difficulty swallowing. Additionally, the physicians order page in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #43 does not have orders for self-administration of medications.Per observation on 8/4/2025 at approximately 10:40am, Resident #43 had a pill in a small medicine cup with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident from eloping from a facility for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #45). Findings include:Per record review of Resident #45's Care Plan, this resident was assessed as an elopement risk upon admission to this facility and has had a Wander Guard on his/her right ankle since admission. The Wander Guard was initiated on 3/7/25. The Care Plan does not indicate interventions related to wandering or for supervision for this resident. This resident has diagnoses of impaired cognitive function, restlessness and agitation and traumatic brain injury.Per review of an Incident Report, Resident #45's eloped on 4/7/25,. The document shows Resident #45 was unable to be located on the facility campus on 4/17/25 at 7:15PM. S/he was located at approximately 7:35PM on the property adjacent to the facility which is located down a hill from the facility. Per record review [SS1] of a 4/18/25 progress note, Resident #45 was transported by Emergency Medical Services from the adjacent property to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #43). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous three recertification surveys, dated 2/6/25, 8/19/24, and 3/01/24 Findings include: Per review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration reviewed on 3/2025, Medication are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. Observe resident consumption of medication.Per review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage reviewed on 3/2025, During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.Per record review, Resident #43 has a medical condition called dysphagia, a condition that causes difficulty swallowing. Additionally, the physicians order page in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform adequate hand hygiene during a dressing change for 1 of 22 sampled Residents (Resident #67). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey dated 2/6/25. Findings include:Record review on 8/5/25 revealed that Resident #67 had an unstageable pressure ulcer on their coccyx (The small bone at the bottom of the spine. It is made up of 3-5 fused bones. It is also called the tailbone) and had an order for daily dressing changes. Observation on 8/5/25 at approximately 2:30 PM, a Physician's Assistant (PA) donned gloves and provided a wound assessment via visual and tactile methods, and they provided wound debridement with a disposable scalpel for Resident #67. After performing the wound assessment and wound debridement, the PA removed the soiled gloves and without sanitizing her/his hands took the disposable scalpel used to debride the residents wound and with her/his bare hand, placed the disposable scalpel inside one of the gloves s/he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director assisted the facility with the implementation of resident care policies, specifically related to the total skin program at the facility, and failed to coordinate the medical care in the facility. As a result, one resident died of sepsis related to a pressure injury of the sacrum (Resident #1). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at risk for skin impairment and pressure injury residing in the facility. Findings include: Per review of Resident #1's admission assessment, s/he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and identified as a high risk for pressure injury with a score of 12. S/he did not have any skin integrity issues with his/her sacrum at the time of admission. Per review of Resident #1's care plan, initiated on [DATE], s/he was identified as at risk for a pressure injury with interventions that included weekly skin checks and nonspecific treatments for prevention of skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 3 residents out of 7 sampled (Resident #1, #2, and #3) related to skin, wounds, including pressure prevention interventions and care planning for actual pressure injury. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with this violation cited during a previous recertification survey dated 8/19/24. Findings include: 1. Per review of Resident #1's medical record, s/he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and a history of pelvic fracture on 1/27/25. On 1/27/25, a nursing assessment revealed a 12 on the Braden scale for predicting pressure risk, identifying Resident #1 as a high risk for pressure injury. On admission, Resident #1 was assessed to be frequently incontinent of urine and bowel, and dependent for care, including repositioning. Per Resident #1' admission minimum data set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) submitted on 2/10/25 by the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physicians and other providers (as delegated to per regulation) review the residents' total program of care, including skin, pressure injury risk and prevention and treatment plan at each visit as required for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Resident's #1, #3, and #4). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with this violation cited during a previous recertification survey dated 8/19/24. Findings include: 1) Per review of Resident #1's medical record, s/he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and a history of pelvic fracture on 1/27/25. On 1/27/25, a nursing assessment revealed a 12 on the Braden scale for predicting pressure risk, identifying Resident #1 as a high risk for pressure injury. Resident #1 had no pressure injuries at time of admission. A 3/14/25 Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) progress note dated 3/14/25 reveals that Resdeint #1 has a stage 2 pressure injury on their sacrum. Residnet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies necessary to care for residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and the plan of care for 4 of 5 sampled nurses. Findings include: Per review of 5 licensed nurses' employee education files, 4 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) did not have evidence that they had been assessed for skin or wound assessment competencies. Per facility policy titled Staff Competency Plan, last reviewed on 8/2024, reads, It is the policy of the facility to evaluate each employee to assure they meet appropriate competencies and skills for performing their job .The knowledge and skills required among staff to meet residents' needs are determined through the facility assessment process. Evaluating competency of staff is accomplished through the facility's training program. The Facility Assessment (an assessment that determines what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies), dated 1/31/25, section Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's power of attorney (POA) of a change in condition on 3/14/25, related to a new pressure ulcer identified on his/her sacrum for 1 resident in the sample of 7 (Resident #1). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during two previous recertification surveys, dated 2/6/25 and 3/1/24. Findings include: Per review of Resident #1's medical record, s/he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and a history of pelvic fracture on 1/27/25. A nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as a high risk for pressure injury with a Braden score of 12. Per the admission assessment dated [DATE], s/he was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel, and dependent for care, including repositioning. Per Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] there was no evidence of a pressure injury upon admission. According to the medical record, Resident #1 developed a stage 2 pressure injury to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This has the potential to impact all residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 08/19/24. Findings include: 1. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #25 stated that when they request as needed medications or personal care, the wait time is often over one hour, or the staff member forgets to return at all. Resident #25 said this sometimes leaves me laying in bed in pain waiting for medication, or just feeling forgotten about. Resident #25 also said that the wait time and staffing issues are noticeably worse on the weekends. Per observation and interview on 2/6/25 at approximately 11:00 AM, a Unit B's medication cart computer showed 8 residents highlighted in red. The LPN working this cart explained that the red indicates that an order is due and is over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and , it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen. Findings include: Per observation of the kitchen on 02/03/25 at 10:34 AM, there were food debris on the steam table. There were cobwebs on the coffee pot and carafe storage rack. There were food debris on the stainless-steel covers located on the steam table. An area on the inside of the microwave door appeared to have been burned off. There were food debris on the inside of the microwave and food debris under the microwave on the counter. Per observation there were water marks and food debris on all the stainless-steel counters. There were food debris under the stove burners and around the grill top. Food debris were on the clean plate holding device. The floor of the kitchen had visible remnants of food under all the stainless-steel working surfaces and in front of the stove and the grill. Per observation of the kitchen's dry storage area, the following items were found to be expired: There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: Per the Division of Licensing and Protection, the facility changed ownership on 12/16/2024. During the recertification entrance conference on 2/3/25 at 10:28 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide a copy of their Facility Assessment. Later, when the DON provided the facility assessment, it had not been documented as reviewed by anyone. The DON explained that it has not been reviewed by the leadership team yet. In an interview on 2/6/25 at 11:00 AM with the Regional Director of Clinical Operations [RDCO], The RDCO stated that the facility assessment was still a work in progress and had not been actually implemented yet. This surveyor questioned the RDCO about a document mentioned in the draft of the facility assessment that was provided to this surveyor titled staff development and training plan and the RDCO stated that the document had not been created yet. In an interview with the Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain facility-wide systems for the prevention, identification, and control of infection and communicable disease of residents, staff and visitors through surveillance, staff training and following established policies and procedures related to changing oxygen tubing, hand washing, cleaning and disinfection of reusable equipment, proper use and disposal of PPE (personal protective equipment), and facility cleanliness. Findings include: 1. Per observation on 2/3/25 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Unit Manager was observed in the general milieu without a mask in place. Review of facility policy and procedure titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, date implemented: 5/2022, date reviewed/revised: 07/2024, under subtitle, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, #11. Droplet Precautions and 12. Airborne Precaution, state,states, a. Intended to prevent transmission of pathogens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #27 and Resident #35) related to palliative care; and failed to implement care plan interventions related to supervision for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #363). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 08/19/24 and 03/01/24. Findings include: 1. Per record review, a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 9/16/24 for Resident #27 stated Currently receiving cyclobenzaprine [used to treat pain and stiffness due to muscle spasms] as a standing order. Long term use not recommended due to high risk of anticholinergic side effects including drowsiness, dizziness, and dry mouth. Please evaluate continued need and consider taper to PRN [as needed] for 1 week then discontinue, if appropriate. The Nurse Practitioner disagreed, writing Palliative care patient as the reason. Per record review, Resident #27's Care Plan does not include any focus or interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of group, individual, and independent activities to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident as evidenced by a lack of engaging activities both in and out of resident rooms for 6 of 20 sampled residents (Residents #2, #19, #26, #35, #53 and # 563). Findings include: 1. Per observation, no group activities were seen during the four days this survey was conducted, 02/03/25 through 02/06/25. Residents were, however, observed sitting and moving freely in hallways and public spaces. Observations on Unit A included two residents sitting side by side (not social distancing) in the hallway for the majority of the survey. Observation on 2/3/25 of Unit B revealed many residents sitting in the general milieu in wheelchairs, on the couch and in chairs. Some were conversing, others were visiting with family members, some had food and drink and others were sitting alone, There were no activities going on at this time. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 7 residents [Resident #363, Resident #463, Resident #57, Resident #52, Resident #312, Resident #8, and Resident #64] of 14 sampled residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Findings include: 1. Per interview with the Unit Manager on 2/5/25 at 10:09 AM, Resident #363 was identified as being on fifteen-minute checks. The Unit Manager discussed that the resident has past trauma. Per record review of Resident #364's care plan states, [Resident #363] is at risks for or is experiencing adjustment issues related to: Change in customary lifestyle and routineness and/or difficulty accepting placement in center, loss of status and/or freedom associated with transition .[Resident #363] reports past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside resource routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 20 sampled residents (Residents #19, #46, and #463). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification surveys dated 08/19/2024. Findings include: The Facility's Dental Services Policy revised 10/24, states It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. The Dental Policy includes the following definitions: Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing of broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g., taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Per observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine whether it is clinically appropriate for residents to self-administer medications for one sampled resident (Resident #364). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 08/19/24 and 03/01/24. Findings include: Per observation on 2/4/25 at 9:18 AM, Resident #364 was seen sitting in bed with three pills on his/her lap. S/he was asking for more water. Per interview with LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] #1 on 2/4/25 at 9:18 AM, it was confirmed that LPN #1 left the pills at the resident's bed side. Per record review, the medications left at the bedside were Docusate 100 mg tablet [a medication used for constipation], Metformin 500 milligram tablet [a medication used for Diabetes] and Bupropion ER 150 milligram tablet [a medication used to treat depression]. Per record review, Resident #364 did not have Docusate 100 milligram tablets on his/her MAR [Medication Administration Record]. Per the facility's Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident choices specific to aspects of their life that were important to them for 1 resident in a standard survey sample of 20 residents. (Resident #563). Findings include: Per interview on 2/5/25 at approximately 12:00 PM, Resident #563 stated she/he was recently admitted to this facility. She/he stated they came in on a Friday, 1/31/25, and spent the whole weekend in bed. Resident #563 stated they did ask staff to please get them up and was told by staff that until they (the resident) is assessed by PT (physical therapy) staff are not allowed to get them out of bed. The resident stated they had to use a bedpan because staff were not allowed to help the resident to the bathroom and she/he was upset about being there for rehab but not being able to get out of bed for 2 days. Per interview on 2/5/25 at approximately 12:40 PM, Resident #563's spouse met surveyor outside resident's room to discuss her/his concerns. They stated that their spouse was admitted on Friday, 1/31/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified of symptoms requiring an as needed medication whose prescription had expired for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #25). Findings include: In an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Resident #25 stated that they had not been given an PRN [as needed] dose of anxiety medication that they had requested on [DATE] in the AM. Resident #25 stated that they were told that the prescription had expired during the week and that the prescriber had gone home for the weekend and there was nothing the nurse on duty could do to remedy this issue. Resident #25 revealed that they had requested their PRN anxiety medication several times on both [DATE] and [DATE]. Resident #25 stated they were told by the nurse on duty [DATE] and by the nurse on duty [DATE] that Resident #25 would have to wait until Monday [DATE] for the prescriber to come back in to renew the prescription. Resident #25 said this caused them to have even more anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #25) was provided necessary assistance to carry out activities of daily living related to grooming and personal hygiene. Findings include: Per observation on 2/3/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #25's fingernails were approximately 1/2 inch long with a dirt like substance under each nail, except for the right pointer finger where the nail appeared to have broken off with small amounts of a red/brown blood like stain on the tip of the finger. Per interview with Resident #25 on 2/3/25 at 11:03 AM, Resident #25 stated that they are unable to cut their own fingernails and has asked the staff to help cut them. Resident #25 also stated it's very obvious that they need cutting, it was the first thing you noticed when you [surveyor] walked in here. Resident #25 revealed the last day or two they had caught their fingernail on their blanket and accidentally ripped the tip off causing a small amount of pain and bleeding. When asked if any staff provided care for this incident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #20) received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. Findings include: In an attempted interview with Resident #20 on 2/4/25 at 10:00 AM this surveyor was unable to communicate with the resident. Resident #20 was pointing at their ears and stated they could not hear. This surveyor approached very close to the resident and spoke in a very loud clear voice and Resident #20 stated they were still unable to hear. Resident #20 then stated their hearing aids were dead. Based on record review, Resident #20's has the following physician order apply hearing aids to both ears every AM. Resident #20's care plan reads, resident is hard of hearing and resident has hearing aids to assist with hearing. Resident #20's care plan also includes interventions that cannot be performed without the ability to hear and communicate such as maintain communication that is consistent, open, and respectful and listen to resident without judgment or guilt. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The total error rate for all observations was calculated at 43%. There were 30 medication administration opportunities observed resulting in 13 errors for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #12) due to the late administration of 12 medications, not following administration recommendations, and not administering an as needed (PRN) medication. Findings include: Per observation on 2/6/25 at 10:18 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began the process of administering medications to Resident #12. When the LPN opened the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #12 on their computer, the resident's medications were highlighted in red. Listed below are the Physician orders for the medications listed on the MAR and the time when they were observed administered. The following medications were administered to Resident #12 at 10:23 AM: Apixaban Oral Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for A-fib [Atrial fibrillation; heart rhythm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #364). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 08/19/24 and 03/01/24 Findings include: Per observation on 2/4/25 at 9:18 AM, Resident #364 was seen sitting in bed unsupervised with three pills on his/her lap. S/he was asking for more water. Per record review, the medications left at the bedside were Docusate 100 mg tablet [a medication used for constipation], Metformin 500 milligram tablet [a medication used for Diabetes] and Bupropion ER 150 milligram tablet [a medication used to treat depression]. Per record review, Resident #364 did not have Docusate 100 milligram tablets on his/her MAR [Medication Administration Record]. Per interview with LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] #1 on 2/4/25 at 9:18 AM it was confirmed that the LPN left the pills at the residents' bed side. The LPN confirmed on 2/4/24 at 9:24 AM that the medications were left on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #4). Findings include: In an interview on 2/3/25 at 2:38 PM Resident #4 stated that they do not eat any of the food that the facility provides. Resident #4 said The food here is garbage, it is inedible. Resident #4 explained that every 10 days they have a friend take them to the store and they purchase all their own food using personal funds. Resident #4 stated that they keep some of the food in their own room and items that require refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator on the unit in a locked room. Resident #4 said that they give food requiring refrigeration to the staff on unit and the staff puts the food in the refrigerator. Per interview on 2/4/25 1:00 PM Resident #4 stated that someone had thrown out all their food from the unit refrigerator without notifying them. Resident #4 stated that most of this food was in unopened packages and was not close to expiration date. Resident #4 was distressed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to appoint an administrator licensed by the state to be responsible for managing the facility. This has the potential to negatively impact all residents. Findings include: Per facility policy titled Governing Body, implemented on 5/2022, states The governing body will appoint an administrator who is: a. Licensed by the state where required b. Responsible for the management of the facility. c. Reports to and is accountable to the governing body. Per interview on 1/22/25 at approximately 11:00 AM with the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), s/he explained that the Interim Administrator left their role on 1/5/25 and a new Administrator resumed the position on 1/6/25 through 1/9/25. S/he revealed that the facility had been operating without a licensed administrator since the Administrator resigned on 1/9/2025. S/he explained that on 1/13/25, a new Director of Nursing was hired and they were had been designated to act as the interim administrator. Per the [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure residents have a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 open resident units. Findings include: 1. Per observation on 8/6/24 from approximately 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM, both nursing units (Units A and B) needed multiple functional and cosmetic repairs, and both unit's floors were generally messy in several resident rooms and common areas. a. Baseboard radiators were damaged in rooms A4, A7, A9, A17, A19, A22, B4, B7, B9, B14, B 15, B16, and the Unit A living room. Baseboard radiators were detaching from the wall in rooms A24 and B24. b. Wall had unrepaired holes or unpainted spackle in rooms A1, A5, A16, B4, B7, B9, B13, B15, B16, B18, B23, and the Unit B hallway near the nurses' station. c. Chair rails were damaged in rooms A24, B3, B4, and B24. d. Furniture, including dressers and side table, had peeled laminate exteriors and/or missing handles in rooms A10, A19, B8, B14, B15, and B25. e. Closets doors loose or missing handles and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide dignity and respect for 4 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #2, #6, #5, and #103) and residents on 1 of 2 units (Unit B). Findings include: 1. Per observation on 8/5/24 at 3:12 PM, Res. #103 was observed being transferred by a Licensed Nurse's Aide [LNA] by pulling their wheelchair backwards from the dining room down the hallway to the resident's room. The resident's feet were dragging and 'bumping' along the floor, and the resident's urine drainage bag and tubing from the suprapubic catheter were also dragging on the floor during the transport. Per interview with the LNA on 8/5/24 at 3:15 PM, The LNA confirmed s/he had pulled the resident backwards in the wheelchair and that the resident's feet and catheter bag were dragging on the floor. The LNA stated [Res.#103] don't pick up [h/her] feet. 2. During an interview with Resident #5 on 8/5/24 at approximately 3:15 PM, s/he stated that s/he is not taken to the bathroom by staff but is told use your pull up to pee or poop. When the Resident was asked how they feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents or resident representatives received written notification of the facility bed hold policy on residents' discharge to the hospital for 1 of 23 residents sampled. (Resident #5), Findings include: During an interview on 08/06/24 at approximately 8:26 AM Resident #5 stated they s/he had recently been to the hospital however s/he was not able to state the reason s/he was sent to the hospital or how long they s/he were there. Record review revealed that the resident had been sent to the ED [Emergency Department] on 8/1/24 for a potential UTI [urinary tract infection]. There was no evidence of a bed hold notice being sent to the POA [Power of Attorney] in the medical record. Per interview with the Clinical Market Advisor, on 8/7/24 at approximately 4:30 PM s/he could not find a bed hold notification for the resident's transfer to the ED on 8/1/24 but stated s/he would keep looking. On 8/7/24 at 4:45 PM the Clinical Market Advisor stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to catheter care and monitoring for 1 [Res.#103] and failed to identify and implement interventions for an actual urinary tract infection and the use of antibiotic therapy for (Resident #5) for 2 of 2 sampled residents. Findings include: Per record review, Res.#103 medical conditions include a suprapubic catheter. [A suprapubic catheter is a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder. It enters your body through a small incision in your abdomen.] (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/25028-suprapubic-catheter). Per observation on 8/5/24 at 3:12 PM, Res.#103 was observed being pulled backward in h/her wheelchair from the dining room to his/her room by a Licensed Nursing Aide [LNA]. The resident's urine drainage bag and tubing from the suprapubic catheter were dragging on the floor during the transport. Per interview, the LNA confirmed Res.#103's catheter bag and tubing were both touching the floor while the resident was being moved. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 23 residents sampled (Resident #16), related to significant medication error and symptomatic eye pain. Findings include: Per record review Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in November of 2023 with diagnoses that include, Pseudophakia OU (artificial lens in both eyes) mild retinopathy (bleeding in the small vessels in the eye), and dry eyes. During an interview with Resident #16 on 8/6/2024 at 2:00 PM s/he stated that s/he received drops for his/her ears to both of his/her eyes. Resident #16 stated It hurt like hell and burned. An emergency room Physician note written on 07/23/2024 states that Resident #16 was seen in the emergency department today for a recent chemical exposure to [his/her] eye . We flushed [his/her] eyes and have started [him/her] on some antibiotic eyedrops to prevent infection . If [she/he] experiences worsening symptoms, especially worsening pain, please return to the emergency room. Per the facility policy titled Person Centered Care Plan revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures related to catheter care for 1 resident [Res.#103] of 2 sampled residents. Findings include: Per record review, Res.#103 medical conditions include a suprapubic catheter. [A suprapubic catheter is a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder. It enters your body through a small incision in your abdomen.] (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/25028-suprapubic-catheter). Per observation on 8/5/24 at 3:12 PM, Res.#103 was observed being pulled backward in h/her wheelchair from the dining room to the resident's room by a Licensed Nursing Aide [LNA]. The resident's urine drainage bag and tubing from the suprapubic catheter were dragging on the floor during the transport. Per interview, the LNA confirmed Res.#103's catheter bag and tubing were both touching the floor while the resident was being moved. Per review of Res.#103's Care Plan, the resident is identified as requires suprapubic catheter- resident is high risk for Urinary Tract Infection. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to Identify a resident's past history of trauma, and/or triggers which may cause re-traumatization for 3 applicable residents (Residents #22, #31, and #28). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #22, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, anxiety, and depression. Per interview on 2/26/24 at 11:12 AM, Resident #22 said that s/he is very sad. S/He explained that his/her past was hard and at one point was held against his/her will and pressured into religion and became teary. Later in the interview Resident #22 expressed frustration and anger that the facility will not let him/her go outside and said it feels like they keep him/her in his/her room all the time. S/He stated, people here don't give a [explicative] about me. All I do is go to the bathroom, eat, and watch TV. Per review of Resident #22's transfer of care note, his/her active problem list, which was signed by a physician on 9/30/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that records are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized related to dental records for all residents and medication reviews for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #16, #32, and #31). Findings include: 1. Per interview on 2/26/24 at 10:39 AM, Resident #28, admitted to the facility on [DATE], explained that they had been seen at the facility by a dentist in regard to getting him/her bottom dentures. Per review of Resident #28's medical record, there were no dentist notes that documented that s/he had been seen by a dentist or that a plan was made to get him/her bottom dentures. On 2/28/24 at 3:22 PM, the Administrator showed this surveyor a large binder that contained notes for all the residents seen by the dentist. S/He explained that the Dentist had asked that notes all be kept in the same spot. The Administrator confirmed that all residents' dental records, including Resident #28, were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for 2 applicable residents (Resident #31 and #38). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic pain, epilepsy, depression, and anxiety. Resident #28's care plan states s/he has the potential to demonstrate verbal behaviors related to: History of verbal outbursts directed toward others (e.g., use of abusive language, pattern of challenging/confrontational verbal behavior), Ineffective coping skills, i.e., poor anger management, revised 2/11/24, with an intervention to monitor and report any of the following behaviors; verbal outbursts directed toward others (e.g., use of abusive language, pattern of challenging/confrontational verbal behavior), Ineffective coping skills, i.e., poor anger management, revised on 8/8/23. Per a 2/10/24 progress note, Resident #28 was having abnormal behaviors. 2/12/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations involving abuse are reported no later than 2 hours to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for 2 applicable residents (Resident #31 and #38). Findings include: Per interview on 3/1/24 at 10:38 PM, Licensed Nurse #1, explained that s/he witnessed Resident #28 masturbating in Resident #31 and #38's room around 3:00 AM on 2/13/23. See F600 for more information. S/He explained that s/he reported this event to the Unit Manager, the Nurse Educator, and Licensed Nurse #2 (Licensed Nurse #1's replacement at change of shift). Per interview on 3/1/24 at 9:10 AM, the Administrator explained that s/he became aware of Resident #28's sexually inappropriate behavior while investigating while investigating a separate resident to resident altercation involving Resident #28. This statement, taken by Licensed Nurse #2 on 2/13/23, states When I came in this morning to take report form the night nurse, I was told that [Resident #28] was found in another [gender omitted] resident's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and investigate an investigation of an alleged violation of sexual abuse for 2 applicable residents (Resident #31 and #38). Findings include: Per record review of a facility investigation of an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse, a statement taken on 2/13/23 from Licensed Nurse #2 states When I came in this morning to take report form the night nurse, I was told that [Resident #28] was found in another [gender omitted] resident's room masturbating on the floor between the bed and the window. That [gender omitted] patient did not appear to be aware that [s/he] was in the room according to the night nurse. Per interview on 3/1/24 at 10:38 PM, Licensed Nurse #1 confirmed that s/he found Resident #28 in Resident #31 and #38's room masturbating around 3:00 AM on 2/13/24. S/He explained that while s/he did not know how much Residents #31 or #38 saw of Resident #28's behavior or if Resident #28 had other inappropriate behaviors, s/he is sure that at least Resident #38 was upset and yelling get out, get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for 1 resident [Res.#11] of 34 sampled residents. Findings include: Per record review, Res.#11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include 'Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right dominant side' [complete paralysis and partial weakness after a stroke affecting the right side of the body]. Per review of Progress Notes for Res.#11, on 11/5/23, Res.#11 was evaluated for a blister after burn from coffee spillage on left inner thigh area. Blister is now broken, 2 by 2 centimeters and patient is in burning pain. Res.#11's Care Plan identified the resident as requires assistance/is dependent for Activities of Daily Living care related to: generalized weakness, impaired mobility. After the blistering burn from the coffee spill, the intervention Ensure resident is provided with coffee cup with secured lid was added to the Care Plan to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the faciliy failed to implement their policy regarding COVID-19 immunizations by failing to obtain vaccine supply and systematically provide education, obtain consents, and offer vaccines in a timely manner to all residents. Findings include: 1. On September 12, 2023, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) announced the release of the new 2023-24 COVID vaccine and indicated the vaccine would be available later that week. Per facility policy, titled COVID-19 Vaccination, the facility will provide the opportunity to receive COVID-19 vaccinations following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations subject to availability, to patients/residents .unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the individual has already been immunized. The policy states this will be done under the Medical Director's authorization, with patient consent. Per interview on 1/25/24 at 9:30 AM, the facility's designated Infection Preventionist (IP) stated that the first 2023-24 COVID vaccines were not ordered until the 3rd week of November,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mental health services and individualized care approaches that address the assessed needs of the resident for 1 applicable resident (Residents #1). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include depression and anxiety disorder. A 10/2/2023 hospital discharge summary indicates Resident #2 was being treated for his/her anxiety and depression during his/her hospital stay. The note explains that s/he was discharged on 75 mg sertraline daily and s/he May ultimately benefit from continued increased dose of 150 mg daily [of sertraline; anti-depressant] due to combined anxiety/depression. Resident #1's care plan, created on 10/3/2023, states that s/he 'is at risk for distresses/fluctuating mood symptoms related to depression, anxiety, PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder]. Per interview on 1/24/2024 at 11:19 AM, Resident #1's Representative explained that that s/he visited Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet each resident's needs and the facility failed to collaborate with the pharmacist to assure that effective policies and procedures were established and implemented for one applicable resident (Resident #2). Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #2 has diagnoses that include schizophrenia and physician order for clozapine [antipsychotic] tablet 100 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for schizophrenia, with a start date of 4/7/2023. Per Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Clozapine was last administered on 10/5/2023. Resident #2 did not receive pharmaceuticals to treat his/her schizophrenia until risperidone (an antipsychotic) was ordered and administered on 10/13/2023, 8 days after Resident #2 last received an antipsychotic for schizophrenia. The abrupt stop of Clozapine, with no immediate replacement, put Resident #2 at risk for medical complications and increased behaviors. See F760 for more information. Review of the manufacture's Clozapine safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for one applicable resident (Resident #2) related to the abrupt stop of a medication that should have been titrated down and the discontinuation of a medication due to the facility's inability to acquire the medication, putting Resident #2 at risk for medical complications and increased behaviors. Findings include: Per record review Resident #2 has diagnoses that include schizophrenia. Resident #2's care plan, created on 9/15/2022, states that s/he is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs, antipsychotic, anti-manic, anti-depressant. Record review reveals a physician order for clozapine [antipsychotic] tablet 100 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for schizophrenia, with a start date of 4/7/2023. Review of the manufacture's Clozapine safety information packet indicates that the medication is only available through a restricted program called the Clozapine Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program run by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 5 residents on A Wing (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) as evidenced by not providing access to call lights so that they may make their needs known. Findings include: Based on observation on 11/1/23 at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident #2 was eating breakfast in bed. Their juice had spilled all over their over-bed tray and their legs. When questioned about this, Resident #2 said that they hadn't been able to tell anyone about it because they didn't have their call light. They then pointed to the floor behind their bed where the call light string was laying out of reach. An LNA (licensed nursing assistant) was alerted to the issue and they confirmed the call light string was out of reach. Additional observations at that time revealed that Residents #3, #4, #5, and #6 also had call light strings laying on the floor behind their beds out of reach. Resident #6's call light string did not have a clip to secure the string to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from chemical restraints for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) as evidenced by administration of medications without proper indication for use and despite experiencing side effects. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Traumatic Brain Injury and Dementia. Progress notes and behavior monitoring flowsheets in the record document a steady increase in behavioral incidences throughout admission in which Resident #1 was physically aggressive with staff. Behaviors included punching, kicking, and grabbing at staff. A provider progress note on 10/5/2023 states, Due to continued agitation, [Resident #1]'s scheduled Ativan (an antianxiety medication) will be discontinued and [they] will be started on diazepam (a different antianxiety medication) 10 mg BID (twice a day). A new order for Diazepam Oral Tablet 10mg - Give 10 mg by mouth two times a day for behavioral issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality as evidenced by failing to follow physicians' orders for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications and an acquired absence of the right leg above the knee (amputation). On 8/24/23, Resident #1's attending physician ordered the following: Blood sugar checks AC (before meals) and HS (before bed) call if blood sugar less than 70 or greater than 400. Per interview on 10/17/23 at approximately 10:15 AM, Resident #1 stated that their blood sugar levels are not checked at the facility, but at home they have a device they use that constantly monitors their blood sugar levels. Per review of Resident #1's medical record, Resident #1's blood sugar was checked once since admission on [DATE]. There was no evidence that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all professional staff are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 or 4 sampled licensed nurses (RN #1). Findings include: Per record review, Registered Nurse #1 (RN #1) worked at the facility as a Nurse Educator from 7/10/2023 through 8/18/2023. RN #1's employee records revealed an unencumbered license in the state of New Hampshire. There was no evidence that RN #1 had a license to practice as a nurse in the state of [NAME]. According to [NAME] State Licensing and Operating Rules for Nursing Homes, professional staff must be licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable laws. According to the [NAME] Office of Professional Regulation, In order to practice in [NAME], a nurse must possess either an active [NAME] license or multistate license. Per interview on 10/17/2023, at approximately 1:00 PM, the Market Clinical Advisor confirmd that the facility failed to check RN #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 applicable residents (Resident #2) was free from abuse. Findings include: Per record review and confirmed via interview, a Registered Nurse (RN) physically abused Resident #2 on 08/14/23. Per review of the facility's own investigation and confirmed by witness statements, an RN removed Resident #2 from the dining room when the resident became agitated during lunch. The RN wheeled the resident in their wheelchair back to their room and RN was observed by staff to be holding the resident's arms down. A skin assessment later conducted on Resident #2, by the Nurse Practitioner found bruising consistent with fingerprints on both arms. Based on corrective actions completed prior to the onsite, this citation is designated as past non-compliance. The following actions were completed by the facility: 1. A report was made to The Agency as required on 08/15/23 and notification was made to Adult Protective Services (APS) on 08/15/23. 2. The Registered Nurse (RN) involved, was immediately suspended, and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-22 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity during personal care so as to not cause pain or discomfort for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 has a history of chronic right rotator cuff injury and requires assistance of 1-2 staff for mobility needs. Per the Nurse Practitioner's Acute Visit note from 8/9/2023, the note reads that Resident #1 described what happened and why [their] shoulder hurts. Reports last night after being repositioned by lifting [them] under the arms . request for shoulder X-ray. X-ray records show no new injury to the right shoulder. Per review of the facility reported incident investigation documentation, LNA 2 (licensed nursing assistant) notified the Administrator on 8/9/2023 that Resident #1 reported rough handling by LNA 1 during the 8/8/2023 night shift. Resident #1 confirmed, during interview with the Administrator, that the episode of personal care caused them pain in their shoulder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and a review of policies, the facility failed to maintain compliance with Professional Standards related to inaccurate documentation for two of three sampled residents [Residents #1 and #2] Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of spinal cord compression due to prostate cancer that has spread to her/his spine and other bones, and a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes. S/he was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of sepsis (sepsis is a life-threatening condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection; Sepsis can rapidly progress to septic shock, causing damage to the lungs, kidneys, liver, and other vital organs). A Nursing note dated 7/29/23 indicates the resident was pale in color and they could not obtain an Oxygen Saturation reading (measurement of Oxygen level in the blood) and indicates a foul odor and darkening of the tissue were observed during a dressing change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide weekly showers and assist with incontinence care as needed for 1 of 3 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #3). Findings include: Per interview with Resident #3 on 8/10/2023 at 2:00 PM the following was communicated: S/He had rung their call light at 11:30 this morning and requested assistance with changing her/his soiled pants. S/he gets up between 5:30 and 6:30 AM every day. S/he had been up since 6:30 AM this morning and has not received help as of 2:00 PM. The resident reports that s/he is incontinent of urine and 8 hours is a long time to be up without being changed. This is not new and happens just about every day. The resident stated that the staff come in, say they need to get someone to help them, shut off the call light, leave, and don't come back. Resident #3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair while s/he explained that staff use a Hoyer (mechanical lift) to put her/him back to bed to change her/him. During this interview, a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) entered the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-23 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold a current license from the State Agency to operate as a nursing home. This has the potential to negatively impact all residents. Findings include: Per interview on 1/22/25 at approximately 11:00 AM with the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), s/he explained that the Interim Administrator left their role on 1/5/25 and a new Administrator resumed the position on 1/6/25 through 1/9/25. S/he revealed that the facility had been operating without a Licensed Administrator since the Administrator resigned on 1/9/2025. S/he explained that on 1/13/25 a new Director of Nursing was hired. Per Vermont's Licensing and Operating Rules for Nursing Homes, last revised 6/1/18, section 2.5a reads, Each license shall be issued only for the licensee and premises names in the application and is not transferable or assignable. Section 17.2d reads, The facility must provide written notice to the state agency responsible for licensing the facility, at the time of any change, if a change occurs in . the facility's administrator or director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$307,847 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $80,698 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
  • $77,857 — penalty dated 2024-08-19
  • $149,292 — penalty dated 2024-02-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STELLAR HEALTH GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BERLIN MEMBER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
ERLICHMAN, ARIELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
HOLLERAND, RONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
RAINDEL, YEHUDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024
VAN DYCK, ALEXANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
WYNER, MOSHEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.3M
Related-party expense59% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 14%Other / private 14%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 59% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,790per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$363per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Vermont
$14,113/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,597/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475020. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next