Woodridge Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 184 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 140.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.30 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.42 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident, as a result, 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) suffered physical harm. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1's diagnoses include frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. Per review of Minimum Date Set (MDS; a standardized tool used to evaluate residents' needs and improve care planning) dated 8/4/25, Resident #1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 11, suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. Per record review, Resident #2's diagnoses include unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive function and awareness, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and restlessness and agitation. A review of the medical record reveals a BIMS of 14, suggesting Resident #2 is cognitively intact. A review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated 6/27/25 reveals Disturbed thought process related to degenerative brain changes as evidenced by confusion, memory loss, and disorientation. with agitation and anxiety.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents could freely file anonymous grievances. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: Per interview with five residents (Residents #114, #57,1#110, #107, and #133) at Resident Council on 9/9/25 at 1:30 PM, they stated they did not know how to file an anonymous grievance. Resident #110 stated, I often wonder who I could go to if there was a problem with staff. I don't want it getting back to me. Per record review Resident #110 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 15, indicating s/he has no cognitive impairment.Per observation of the second floor there were no blank grievance forms able to be located. The blank grievance forms were found behind the nurses station as shown by the Unit Manager.Per review of the facility's Grievances/Complaints-Filing, Investigating and Resolving policy [last reviewed 5/30/25], there is no mention to filing grievances anonymously.Per interview with the Unit Manager on 9/9/25 at 2:15 PM she stated, There's really no way for them [residents or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: 1. A kitchen tour was conducted with the Dietary Manager on 9/8/253 at 9:42 AM.Per observation of the kitchen prep area, the following items were found improperly stored:Harissa seasoning with no date,Expired black sesame dated 3/11/24,White sesame marked 6/18 (no year),Expired sesame seed dated 6/21/24,Marjoram dated11/30/23,Bay leaves dated 5/6/24,All spice dated 11/27/24,The Dietary Manager stated that spices should be discarded a year after opening and confirmed that the above spices were expired.Per observation of the walk in refrigerator, the following items were found improperly stored:A container of Jello with no labels or dates,A container of beef stew with no labels or dates,A container of cream cheese frosting with no use by date,A container of expired buttercream frosting marked good through 9/3/25,A container of expired cooked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that all residents were treated with dignity in regard to dining on 2 of 3 units. Findings include: 1. Per observation of lunch service on the Evergreen unit on 9/8/25 at 12:15 PM, 7 residents were in the side room for lunch sitting at one large table, and one small side table. Lunch was being served on trays, with warming dishes, to one resident at a time. As the trays were placed on the table, the warming lids were stacked in the middle of the table. Trash was also put in the middle of the table. At 12:19 PM, while other residents were eating, Resident #39 said that s/he is really hungry. S/he was not served lunch until 12:43 PM. Resident #86, who was sitting in the common area outside of the side room since the start of lunch service was not served lunch until 12:54 PM. Per interview with the Dietary Manager on 9/10/25 at 1:35 PM, he explained that they cannot get all meals to each unit at the same time because there isn't enough staff to bring each food cart up to the unit. Per interview with the DON on 9/10/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be informed in advanced by the physician or other practitioner or professional of the risk and benefits by proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for two of five residents in the sample. (Residents #4 and #12). Findings include: 1.) Per record review, Resident #4 has active orders for Lorazepam 1 mg [milligram] tab: Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Chronic Anxiety, and Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 mg [milligram]: Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for increased anxiety/restlessness/agitation for 30 Days inability to redirect, both ordered on 8/28/25. Resident #4 also had an order for Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligram): Give 0.5 mg by mouth one time a day for anxiety/agitation. This medication was originally ordered on 3/25/25 and discontinued on 5/22/25. Per record review, there is no evidence that residents were educated on the use and/or risk and benefits of the medications. Per record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all residents had a homelike environment for multiple areas of the facility, having the potential to impact many residents. Findings include:Per observation during a walkthrough of the facility on 9/8/25 at approximately 10:30 AM, two hallways of the Evergreen Unit had multiple wheelchairs, carts, lifts, medical machines, and bags lining one side of each hall. This was observed multiple times throughout the recertification survey on 9/8/25 through 9/10/25. Per interview on 9/10/25 at approximately 3:00 PM during a facility tour with the Director of Nursing, multiple hallways of the facility had multiple items in the hallway. She confirmed that the hallway should not be a place to store lifts and wheelchairs as there are spots tucked away in the halls for the equipment to be placed.During the tour, three large approximately 15 feet by 5 feet boards were observed across from the nursing stations by the resident common sitting areas. These boards contained multiple data points related to resident care and staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for five of five residents (Residents #86, #97, #94, #136, and #34). Findings include:1. Per record review, Resident #86 has diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A 7/18/25 admission note states that Resident #86 has the following active problem requiring attention Recent acute on chronic respiratory failure requires BiPAP [Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure; a non-invasive ventilation treatment] and 1 to 2 L [liters] of oxygen. [S/He] will continue with respiratory support with BiPAP machine we will continue oxygen 1 to 2L. Resident #86 had the following physician orders Standing Order Other: O2 (oxygen) @ 2LPM via NC [nasal canula] PRN [as needed] to maintain O2 sat of above 90% May administer oxygen prn via NC/mask to maintain SP02 [peripheral oxygen saturation] of >90%; If requiring more than 2L…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Resident's choice regarding his/her Advance Directives (wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment) was documented correctly, ordered, and care planned for 1 of 30 residents sampled (Resident #123). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #123's Electronic Health Record (EHR) has an Advanced Directive stating s/he wishes are do not resuscitate (DNR) and trial course of intubation (a tube to assist with breathing) and ventilation treatment for 5 days, signed 12/30/24 by the Resident. The Code Status in the EHR states DNR/DNI (Do Not Intubate), and the Care Plan (initiated on 2/28/25 and revised on 6/30/25) Focus states Advanced directive, [Resident #123] has established advanced directives-DNR/DNI, Date Initiated: 02/28/2025, Revision on: 03/25/2025), and there is an Order for DNR/DNI with a start date of 2/28/25. The Care Plan, Order, and Resident dashboard don't reflect the Resident's wishes of DNR/Trial of intubation for 5 days per her/his documented Advanced Directives.Per interview on 9/9/25 at 1:50…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident #4) were free from chemical restraints. Findings include:Per review of Resident #4's medical record, Resident #4 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 4, indicating the resident has cognitive impairment. Resident #4 has diagnoses of Type II Diabetes, CHF [Congestive Heart Failure], anxiety disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #4 needs substantial/maximal assistance with ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] and hygiene.Per record review, Resident #4 has an order for Lorazepam 0.5 mg [milligram]: Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for increased anxiety/restlessness/agitation for 30 Days inability to redirect. The order was placed on 8/28/25 and was to be discontinued on 9/27/25. Per record review of the Medication Administration Record, Resident #4 has received the prn [as needed] medication three times. Per record review of the facility's Pharmacy Services policy [last revised 11/18/24] states, e. Psychotropic Drugs. Based on a comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that their policies related to screening for abuse had been implemented for 1 of 5 Employees reviewed (Licensed Nursing Assistant #1). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey dated 11/6/24 and partial survey dated 7/24/25. Findings include: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that their policies related to screening for abuse had been implemented for 1 of 5 employees reviewed (Employee #1). The detailed findings are as follows:Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) #1, who was a contracted LNA, was hired on 9/3/2025. There was no evidence in the employee file that the Adult Registry review was conducted as required.The facility policy titled Prevention of Abuse Prohibition states that the facility will comply with and review the [NAME] Abuse and Child Protection Registry. Per interview on 9/10/2025 at 5:16 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were updated with pertinent information related to their care for two of 30 sampled residents (Residents #40 and #97). Findings include:1.) Per review of Resident #40's medical record, s/he has diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, hypertension, and muscle weakness. Resident #40 is dependent on staff for hygiene and needs substantial/maximal assistance with ADLs [Activities of Daily Living]. As of 6/16/25, Resident #40 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 0, indicating Resident #40 has cognitive impairment. Per record review of a post fall evaluation on 5/30/25 states, Date / Time of Fall: 05/30/2025 2:38 PM Fall was witnessed. Who witnessed fall: LNA [Licensed Nursing Assistant]. Fall occurred in the hallway. Activity at the time of fall: Being pushed down the hallway in w/c [wheelchair], put foot down on carpet while being pushed and fell out of w/c. Reason for the fall was evident.Did an injury occur as a result of the fall: Yes. Injury details: Hematoma (R)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,453 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $21,453 — penalty dated 2025-07-24
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-27 for 31 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HEALTH NETWORK — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT