Barron Care And Rehabilitation
660 E Birch Ave, Barron, WI 54812 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (715) 537-5643 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.8% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.1% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.1% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.4% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.8% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.1% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.93 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.9%CMS range 23.2–49.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 5.8–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 24.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.4–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 44.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards to prevent development of a pressure injury (PI) for two of three residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (R29 and R18.) R29 was admitted to the facility with no skin impairments and developed a stage 3 pressure injury to the coccyx area (tailbone) which remains unhealed, due to lack of comprehensive assessments, lack of timely care plan interventions, and lack of repositioning. This example is being cited at actual harm. Facility did not complete comprehensive assessment on admission of R18's present PIs and did not implement care plan interventions timely or follow the repositioning schedule to prevent a stage 2 pressure injury from occurring. Findings include: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, 2019, Reposition all individuals with or at risk of pressure injuries on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-07 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least every 12 months and provide 12 hours of regular in-service education based on the outcome of for 6 of 6 CNAs reviewed. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents.This is evidenced by:On 01/06/26, a sample of CNAs employed by the facility was selected for review for the completion of annual performance reviews. The facility provided the following information:CNA D has a hire date of 06/10/24. The annual performance review is dated 06/19/25. No documentation of in-service education based on performance review is noted.CNA K has a hire date of 04/24/24. The annual performance review is dated 08/12/25. No documentation of in-service education based on performance review is noted.CNA L has a hire date of 10/22/21. The annual performance review is dated 11/06/25. No documentation of in-service education based on performance review is noted.CNA M has a hire date of 04/15/24. The annual performance review is dated 08/12/25. No documentation of in-service education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete the required annual 12 hours of in-service training for nurse aides for 6 of 6 CNAs reviewed. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents.This is evidenced by:On 01/06/26, a sample of CNAs employed by the facility was selected for review for 12 hours of in-service training. The facility provided the following documentation:CNA D has a hire date of 06/10/24. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.CNA K has a hire date of 04/24/24. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.CNA L has a hire date of 10/22/21. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.CNA M has a hire date of 04/15/24. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.CNA N has a hire date of 04/12/23. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.CNA O has a hire date of 09/20/21. No documentation of required annual 12 hours of in-service training.On 01/06/26 at 3:12 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 4 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (R5, R7, R10, and R26), received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents.Findings: -The facility staff did not immediately respond to R7's wanderguard alarm, and R7 eloped from the facility. -The facility did not add a new intervention to R7 and R10's care plan after an accident. -The facility's documentation does not support R7 was 1:1 supervision.-The facility did not assess R26 for appropriate sling size based on manufacturer's recommendations.-The facility did not complete a thorough investigation after R5 had a fall with major injury to determine root cause and implement safety interventions.Example 1 The facility's policy titled, Elopement Prevention and Response, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.-The facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene during water pass for 4 of 4 residents observed (R35, R18, R46, & R16).-The facility did not ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned during wound care for 1 of 1 resident observed (R34).-The facility did not ensure appropriate PPE was donned while administering eye drops to 1 of 1 resident observed (R21).Findings include: Facility Policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Manual, dated 2023, reads in part: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required for contact precautions includes a gown and gloves when entering the room. The facility's nursing education sheet, dated 8/7/25, states in part, Infection Control- .Hand sanitizer is be used as entering, leaving (R's room) . On 1/5/26 at approximately 1:00 PM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N exit R35's room carrying an almost empty water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility must ensure each resident is free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by completing adequate drug monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (R5 and R7) reviewed for unnecessary medication reviews.-The facility is not accurately monitoring resident-specific targeted behaviors for R7's psychotropic medication use. -The facility is not accurately monitoring resident-specific targeted behaviors for R5's psychotropic medication use. The facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication, read in part, 4. Nursing will document daily on behaviors treated by antipsychotics/antianxiety/hypnotic. 8. PRN psychotropics and anti-anxiety medications will have behaviors to watch for and interventions to use prior to administration of medication. All behaviors and interventions used are to be documented. Example 1 R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, and anxiety. R7's Power of Attorney (POA) was activated to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed.-The facility staff did not immediately respond to R7's wanderguard alarm, and R7 eloped from the facility.-The facility did not report R7's elopement within two hours, as the allegation involved potential neglect.-The facility did not submit the misconduct incident report within five business days of discovery of the incident.The facility's policy titled, Elopement Prevention and Response, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of an injury for unknown origin for 1 of 1 resident (R)(R26) reviewed.On 12/06/25, R26 was noted to have an injury of unknown origin. Facility did not complete education for all staff on all potential causations of injury.This is evidenced by:R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of vascular dementia severe with anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, fibromyalgia, weakness, contracture of muscle right thigh, contracture of muscle left thigh, contracture of muscle left lower leg, and contracture of muscle right lower leg.R26's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/21/25 noted a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score not completed due to resident rarely/never understood. R26 has ROM impairment of upper extremity on one side and impairment of lower extremities on both sides. R26 is dependent assist with all ADLs.R26's care plan, dated 03/04/21, with a target date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan contained the minimum information to meet resident's immediate needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R51 and R6).-Baseline care plan did not include weightbearing status related to broken humerus (R51)-Baseline care plan did not include immobilizer instructions/care (R51)-Baseline care plan did not include skin monitoring related to immobilizer (R51)-Baseline care plan did not include pain monitoring and interventions (R6) Findings include: Facility Policy titled, Care Plan Process, last revised on 11/17/23, reads in part: It is the policy of [name of facility] to develop an initial baseline care plan addressing the major area of risk within 48 hours of admission. Example 1 Occupational therapy notes from hospital, dated 12/29/25, stated R51 was to be non-weight bearing to right upper extremity and to wear immobilizer to right upper extremity at all times. Physical therapy notes from hospital, dated 12/29/25, stated, Non-weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were revised to reflect residents' current needs and to provide the needed direction to staff in providing necessary care and services. The facility practice affected 1 of 13 resident care plans reviewed (R10).-R10's care plan was not revised after a fall. The facility policy titled, Care Plan Revision Upon Status Change, read in part, 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. D. The care plan will be updated with new or modified interventions.R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and history of falls. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/02/25, confirmed R10 scored 06/10 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognition. R10 uses a wheelchair for mobility and requires assistance from staff with all transfers. R10's care plan included: The resident is at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 2 residents reviewed (R7), received the necessary services to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). -The facility identified R7 had a decline in transfer status and did not follow up with the recommended therapy evaluation. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 12/08/25, confirmed R7 scored 04/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognition. R7's MDS assessment revealed R7 requires assistance with all transfers.R7's care plan included:-Resident has ADL Self Care deficit r/t alteration in functional abilities, altered cognition, dementia with behaviors, low back pain. Date Initiated: 08/27/2025 Revision on: 12/12/2025.-Resident will improve in ADL function. Date Initiated: 08/27/2025 Revision on: 12/11/2025.-Transfer: The resident is A2 with EZ stand. Date Initiated: 08/27/2025 Revision on: 12/11/2025R7's progress notes included: 12/11/25, IDT met to review change in res transfers. Staff have been using A2 with EZ stand. Will change res…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice that would meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs.-The facility did not obtain and enter orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R51).-The facility did not update provider related to new skin impairment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R10).-The facility did not implement interventions to assess skin under immobilizer to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R26). Findings include: Facility Policy titled, Provision of Physician Ordered Services, implemented in 2025, reads in part: The purpose of this policy is to provide a reliable process for the proper and consistent provision of physician ordered services according to professional standards of quality.Qualified nursing personnel will submit timely requests for physician ordered services (laboratory, radiology, consultations) to the appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards to prevent development of a pressure injury (PI) for one of one resident (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (R34).The facility did not provide, document, or evaluate interventions to prevent the development of multiple pressure injuries and/or promote healing of R34's pressure injuries.Facility did not have orders or documentation to perform daily skin assessments to assess R34's skin of R34's left foot, which had a post-operative shoe due to amputaion of left great toe. The facility's lack of skin assessments of R34's left foot lead to development of a stage 2 pressure injury on toip of R34's left foot because facility did not observe that there was no cushion between the skin on R34's left foot and the post-operative shoe.Wrong Hoyer sling used on R34, which caused stage 2 sacral ulcer. No new interventions provided to promote healing.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) with intermittent catheterization received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent complications or urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 1 resident (R)(R4) reviewed.R4 completed self-catheterization without facility assessment and indication of need. R4 developed a UTI on 12/02/25 and 12/31/25.This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Catheterization of a Male, with a date of 2025, states in part: Policy: Urinary catheterization will be performed in accordance with current standards of practice to minimize risk for bacterial contamination or urethral trauma.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that current standards of practice to prevent UTI and complications, intermittent catheterizations should be completed with clinical indications at regular intervals of 4-6 times daily and consider using a portable ultrasound device to assess urine volume in patients undergoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure pain management interventions were provided for 1 out of 2 residents (R) reviewed for pain management.The facility did not assess and provide non-pharmacologic interventions to R6 as ordered for pain management.This is evidenced by:The facility policy titled, Pain Assessment & Scale dated 4/12/2001, reads in part. 3. Consider alternative pain relief measures such as: distraction, massage, cold or warm packs, repositioning, or backrub.R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include fracture of upper end of left humerus. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/4/25 indicated R6 scored 14/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R6's care plan updated 12/16/25 indicated resident has acute pain related to humerus fracture, chronic pain related to kyphosis and history of spinal fractures. Goal, pain will be managed at a level of comfort. Interventions include, offer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident (R) who requires dialysis receives such service, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R3) reviewed for dialysis.The facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of R3's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments.Findings include:R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) and dependence on renal dialysis.R3 is transported to hemodialysis off site on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. R3's orders as of 10/21/25, indicate to take a full set of vitals and weight post dialysis treatment one time a day every Monday Wednesday, and Friday. Post vital signs were not taking on 11/28/25 and on 12/1/25 after R3's hemodialysis. R3's care plan states R3 requires dialysis related to renal failure with a goal to have no signs and symptoms of complications from dialysis. Interventions state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 3 residents observed (R21, R22).-Facility had a medication error rate of 11.54%.-R21 received the wrong dose for two medications (artificial tears and Citalopram).-R22 received the wrong medication. R22 received Calcium with Vitamin D 500mg tab and the physician order was for Calcium Carbonate 1250 (500 Ca) and to give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Medication Administration, last revised 11/25, states in part: Medications are administered to residents by qualified personnel in compliance with federal and state laws and standards of professional practice.to ensure the safe, appropriate, and accurate administration and handling of medications in a dignified manner.Licensed Nurses will . observe the seven rights of proper medication administration.right drug.right dose. On 01/06/26 at 7:22 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F administer medications to R21. LPN F administered 1 drop of artificial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not notify the resident/representative in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge for 5 of 6 residents reviewed who were discharged (R10, R14, R25, R8, R15). This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident [NAME] of Rights documented, in part: 14. Transfer and Discharge .Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must notify the resident and, if known, a family member or legal representative of the resident, of the transfer or discharge and the reasons, proposed date and location of transfer; record the reasons in the resident's clinical records; and include in the notice . Example 1 R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R10's medical record documented diagnoses in part, dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, UTI, sepsis, infectious gastroenteritis, dysphagia, and CVA. R10 was transferred to the emergency department on 04/26/24 for right lower quadrant pain and was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written bed hold notice required for facility-initiated transfers was given to the residents or resident representatives for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization (R10, R14, R25, R8, R15) This is evidence by: The facility's policy titled Bed Hold & Return to Facility with revised date of 05/03/24 documented, in part: It is the policy of this facility that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the State's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer. Example 1 R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R10's medical record documented diagnoses in part, dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, UTI, sepsis, infectious gastroenteritis, dysphagia, and CVA. R10 was transferred to the emergency department on 04/26/24 for right lower quadrant pain and was admitted to the hospital. Surveyor requested a copy of the bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) were treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner to enhance their quality of life. Facility staff used clothing protector to wipe resident's face while assisting to eat. This affected 3 of 3 residents observed. (R13, R18, and R17) This is evidenced by: Example 1 Facility's policy titled Resident [NAME] of Rights documented in part: Quality of Life, 19. Dignity, The facility must promote and care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. R13's medical record documented current diagnoses including in part, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, CKD stage 3A, dementia, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented R13 having severe impaired cognition and dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R18) of 15 sampled residents was reasonably accommodated with access to a call light. R18 was observed in R18's room without access to a call light or means to notify staff if assistance was needed. Findings include: R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis cerebral infarction, dysphagia, osteomyelitis left elbow, pressure ulcer stage 3 left elbow, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract infections. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/13/24, identified R18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. This indicated R18 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also identified R18 required total dependent assistance of two people for bed mobility, taking on and off footwear, rolling left to right, sit to lying, chair to bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop and initiate a comprehensive care plan with targeted interventions for a resident to maintain baseline Activities of Daily living (ADL)s. This occurred for 2 of 15 residents (R) reviewed for care planning, (R17 and R14) Findings include: Example 1 R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, and osteoarthritis of left knee. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/17/24, identified that R17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. This indicated R17 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also identified R17 required total dependent assistance of two people for bed mobility, taking on and off footwear, rolling left to right, sit to lying, chair to bed, toileting, and for transfers. On 10/07/24 at 9:08 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not review and revise comprehensive care plans for falls, incontinence, and activities of daily living for 2 of 15 residents (R)14 and R17). This is evidenced by: Example 1 R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R14's medical record documented diagnoses in part: fracture part of neck of right femur, dislocation of internal right hip prosthesis, muscle weakness, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of b-cell type not having achieved remission, peripheral venous insufficiency, dementia mild with behavioral disturbance, pain, repeated falls, dizziness and giddiness, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. This indicated R14 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R14 had impairment to one side of the lower extremities. R14 is dependent for transfers, toileting hygiene, showering, oral care, lower body dressing, bed mobility to roll side to side and sit to lying partial to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 10 residents (R14) who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services for toileting and to maintain good personal hygiene. This is evidenced by: R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R14's medical record documented diagnoses in part: fracture part of neck of right femur, dislocation of internal right hip prosthesis, muscle weakness, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of b-cell type not having achieved remission, peripheral venous insufficiency, dementia mild with behavioral disturbance, pain, repeated falls, dizziness and giddiness, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. This indicated R14 had severe cognitive impairment. R14 had inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS documented R14 had impairment to one side of the lower extremities. R14 is dependent for transfers, toileting hygiene, showering, oral care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to maintain or increase range of motion. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (R) R17, who were reviewed for range of motion services. R8 has a left arm and left leg weakness following a stroke effecting non-dominant side. The resident's range of motion program was never started. This is evidenced by: R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, and osteoarthritis of left knee. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/24, identified that R17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. This indicated R17 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also identified R17 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, rolling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with current accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 insulin pen medications reviewed during medication administration observation. This had the potential for harm to affect resident (R)2. This is evidenced by: Current Wisconsin State pharmacy labeling requirements effective December 2020 state all prescription medications must include in part: .patient name, date of birth , name and strength of medication, dosage, route . R2 was admitted to facility on 04/30/20 with a pertinent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus II. R2 has a prescription order for Admelog SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 140 - 179 = 4; 180 - 219 = 6; 220 - 259 = 8; 260 - 299 = 10; 300 - 339 = 12; 340 - 379 = 14; 380 - 399 = 15 greater than 399 call MD, subcutaneously two times a day for Diabetes my interchange lispro and aspart Hold if resident ref meal BS Parameters below 60 or above 400 call MD On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff did not perform hand hygiene with glove changes during morning cares and catheter cares for 2 of 4 residents (R). (R2 and for R29) Findings include: Facility policy and procedure entitled, Hand Hygiene, dated 02/02/24, states in part, .The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves . Example 1 R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, in part, type 2 diabetes, renal failure and neurogenic bladder. On 10/07/24 at 11:48 AM, Surveyor observed a sign on the outside of R2's room that stated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Record review identified R2 was on EBP due to an indwelling Foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents in the building. The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was not based on current standards of practice and did not: - Describe the building's water system using a flow diagram of the system to include an assessment of the facility's water system to identify all locations where Legionella could grow and spread. - Identify where control measures should be applied to prevent Legionella growth. - Include a process to confirm the WMP was being implemented and was effective. The facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene when providing care for Resident (R) 8 and R32. This was evidenced by: Example 1: The facility policy entitled, Care & Rehab Barron: Legionella Water Management Plan (WMP), states: .Potential risk areas for Legionella to grow at Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not prepare, store or distribute food under sanitary conditions. This can potentially affect 11 of 33 residents (R) (R19, R29, R5, R9, R12, R26, R18, R28, R3, R16, R6) who ate all meals in their rooms. Staff were distributing food and drinks to rooms without covering them, potentially exposing residents to contaminated food. Findings include: The facility Policy, entitled Food Service - Preparing and Cooking Foods, dated 04/16/20, states, A. Hot foods: . c. keep foods covered to retain heat and to keep contaminants from falling into food B. Cold Foods: . c. protect cold foods form contaminants with covers or food shields . On 10/23/23 at 12:05 PM, Surveyor observed that all desserts in rolling metal containers used to transport food to the residents' rooms were uncovered, and all other foods were covered on the trays. Surveyor observed that there is no barrier preventing exposure to other residents' foods when the cart door is open and when food is being delivered to any one individual resident. On 10/23/23 at 12:05 PM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for 3 of 12 sampled residents (R28, R19 and R136). The facility did not develop a care plan for precautions or monitoring related to use of anticoagulation medication, or for immobility related to an amputation for R28. The facility did not develop a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for R19 who has a foley catheter. The facility did not develop a care plan for R136 who was on an antipsychotic medication. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Care Plan Process revised 04/30//2020, states in part, It is the policy of Care and Rehab- Barron to develop an initial baseline care plan addressing the major area of risk with 48 hours of admission. Within seven days of the completion of initial MDS or within twenty-one days after admit, the complete comprehensive care plan will be finished . Example R28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include right below the knee amputation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plans for 1 of 12 sampled residents (R), R8. R8's care plan was not updated to identify the resident was experiencing severe weight loss. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Care Plan Process, dated May 5, 2010, stated: With every new MD order that changes the way a resident receives care or an incident that needs different interventions, or/and the onset of illness a temporary care plan will be put into place or the nurse must revise the care plan . If the problem will be longer than 21 days, add the problem to the main care plan in the chart and on the care plan in the resident room for the nurse aid. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. R8's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/19/23, indicated that R8 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment to prevent complications of enteral feeding in 2 of 2 residents (R32, R136) observed for cares with a gastric tube (g-tube). Surveyors observed enteral feedings to R32 and R136 and confirmation of placement was not checked prior to the administration. Findings include: The American Association of Critical Care Nurses, April 2016, Initial and Ongoing Verification of Feeding Tube Placement in Adults advises, .Checking Tube Location at Regular Intervals After Feedings Are Started, Unfortunately, feeding tubes can become dislocated during use. For this reason, it is necessary to monitor tube location at regular intervals while the tube is being used for feedings or medication administration. Observing for change in external tube length .Reviewing routine chest and abdominal radiography reports .Observing for changes in volume of feeding tube aspirates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that psychotropic drugs are not given unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed or specific behaviors in the clinical record. The facility did not implement targeted behavioral monitoring, assessment or implement alternate interventions, prior to initiating or increasing the dosage and frequency of a psychotropic medication for 1 of 8 residents (R) 29. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Behavior Observation and Monitoring revised 11/17/16, states: Resident's identified with targeted behavior will be monitored on a daily basis, will be recording identifying target behaviors, interventions, outcomes of interventions, and frequency of behaviors exhibited. R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], and most recent quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], noted R29 received antipsychotic medication daily, and had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from medication errors for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R32 and R136) getting medications through a G-tube. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Medication Administration via Enteral Tubes, revised 07/09/21, stated in part, .Medication Review: .4. Each medication will be administered separately to avoid risks for physical and chemical incompatibilities, tube obstruction, and altered therapeutic response; however, if provider has approved, medications may be crushed and comingled (given together) . Example R32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, functional intestinal disorder, epilepsy, disorders of bone density, gastrostomy (g-tube is a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). On 10/24/23 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor observed tube feeding care with R32 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C. After proper hand hygiene and glove use, LPN C gathered supplies needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident (R) is offered a pneumococcal immunization for 1 resident (R29) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R29's medical record did not contain documentation of R29 being screened and offered pneumococcal vaccine. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled: Nursing Home Guidelines for Pneumococcal Vaccination (PCV13 and PPSV23) of Residents, revised 09/26/23, states: .will offer the pneumococcal pneumonia vaccination (PPV) to all residents who meet immunization criteria and who cannot provide documentation of previous vaccination. Those who are unsure or do not know their vaccination status will be offered the vaccine. R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, chronic bronchitis (an inflammation of the airways that carry air to your lungs), immunodeficiency due to conditions classified elsewhere (deficiency of immune response or a disorder characterized by deficient immune response).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident (R) is offered a Covid-19 Immunization for 1 resident (R29) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R29's medical record did not contain documentation of R29 being screened and offered Covid-19 Immunization. The facility policy, entitled: Covid 19, revised 09/26/23, states: .all residents will be offered Covid 19 vaccine. Vaccinations will be required per CMS guidelines. R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, chronic bronchitis (an inflammation of the airways that carry air to your lungs), immunodeficiency due to conditions classified elsewhere (deficiency of immune response or a disorder characterized by deficient immune response). Review of R29's medical record did not document an assessment upon admission for eligibility to receive Covid-19 vaccination and was not offered the vaccine. On 10/24/23 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B, who stated R29 was from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-07 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARE & REHAB — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 4.0 | -3.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THAYER, GRANT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 10/01/2007 |
| BECHTEL, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/10/2025 |
| FAST, FERRIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2007 |
| MOEN, TERRI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2024 |
| SADOWSKA, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/10/2025 |
| SAMPSON, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| 660 EAST BIRCH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $249K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525648. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.